17 Search Results for "Pradel, Michael"


Issue

DARTS, Volume 3, Issue 2

Special Issue of the 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)

Editors: Philipp Haller, Michael Pradel, and Tijs van der Storm

Document
On the Effectiveness of Interpreter-Guided Compiler Testing

Authors: Federico Lochbaum and Guillermo Polito

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 134, Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)


Abstract
Guaranteeing that a compiler behaves correctly is a complex task often approached through test generation and fuzzing. Compiler test generation must not only ensure that a compiler generates code that does not break, but also that it implements the programming language semantics. Recently, interpreter-guided test generation has been proposed to test JIT compilers: Concolic-execution on the interpreter yields test cases for the language semantics which are then validated between differential testing of the interpreter and compiler. In previous work, this solution has been shown to find interpreter/compiler differences. However, little has been said about the effectiveness and the solution limits. In this paper we study the behavior of this technique, to shed light on future improvements and research. We experiment with this technique on the JIT compiler for the Pharo programming language, on two different backends: ARMv7 and x86. We explore how effective the solution is in terms of compiler coverage and its limitations, and we discuss how future research can overcome them. Moreover, we investigate how this technique combined with random constraint mutations increases backend compiler coverage.

Cite as

Federico Lochbaum and Guillermo Polito. On the Effectiveness of Interpreter-Guided Compiler Testing. In Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 134, pp. 20:1-20:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lochbaum_et_al:OASIcs.Programming.2025.20,
  author =	{Lochbaum, Federico and Polito, Guillermo},
  title =	{{On the Effectiveness of Interpreter-Guided Compiler Testing}},
  booktitle =	{Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-382-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Edwards, Jonathan and Perera, Roly and Petricek, Tomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243040},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Virtual Machines, Concolic Testing, JIT compilers, interpreters, Differential Testing, Constraint Mutations, Compiler Coverage}
}
Document
Fuzzing as Editor Feedback

Authors: Marcel Garus, Jens Lincke, and Robert Hirschfeld

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 134, Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)


Abstract
Live programming requires concrete examples, but coming up with examples takes effort. However, there are ways to execute code without specifying examples, such as fuzzing. Fuzzing is a technique that synthesizes program inputs to find bugs in security-critical software. While fuzzing focuses on finding crashes, it also produces valid inputs as a byproduct. Our approach is to make use of this to show examples, including edge cases, directly in the editor. To provide examples for individual pieces of code, we implement fuzzing at the granularity of functions. We integrate it into the compiler pipeline and language tooling of Martinaise, a custom programming language with a limited feature set. Initially, our examples are random and then mutate based on coverage feedback to reach interesting code locations and become smaller. We evaluate our tool in small case studies, showing generated examples for numbers, strings, and composite objects. Our fuzzed examples still feel synthetic, but since they are grounded in the dynamic behavior of code, they can cover the entire execution and show edge cases.

Cite as

Marcel Garus, Jens Lincke, and Robert Hirschfeld. Fuzzing as Editor Feedback. In Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 134, pp. 8:1-8:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{garus_et_al:OASIcs.Programming.2025.8,
  author =	{Garus, Marcel and Lincke, Jens and Hirschfeld, Robert},
  title =	{{Fuzzing as Editor Feedback}},
  booktitle =	{Companion Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming (Programming 2025)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-382-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{134},
  editor =	{Edwards, Jonathan and Perera, Roly and Petricek, Tomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242926},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Programming.2025.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fuzzing, Example-based Programming, Babylonian Programming, Dynamic Analysis, Code Coverage, Randomized Testing, Function-Level Fuzzing}
}
Document
Combining Generalization Algorithms in Regular Collapse-Free Theories

Authors: Mauricio Ayala-Rincón, David M. Cerna, Temur Kutsia, and Christophe Ringeissen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)


Abstract
We look at the generalization problem modulo some equational theories. This problem is dual to the unification problem: given two input terms, we want to find a common term whose respective two instances are equivalent to the original terms modulo the theory. There exist algorithms for finding generalizations over various equational theories. We focus on modular construction of equational generalization algorithms for the union of signature-disjoint theories. Specifically, we consider the class of regular and collapse-free theories, showing how to combine existing generalization algorithms to produce specific solutions in these cases. Additionally, we identify a class of theories that admit a generalization algorithm based on the application of axioms to resolve the problem. To define this class, we rely on the notion of syntactic theories, a concept originally introduced to develop unification procedures similar to the one known for syntactic unification. We demonstrate that syntactic theories are also helpful in developing generalization procedures similar to those used for syntactic generalization.

Cite as

Mauricio Ayala-Rincón, David M. Cerna, Temur Kutsia, and Christophe Ringeissen. Combining Generalization Algorithms in Regular Collapse-Free Theories. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 7:1-7:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ayalarincon_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7,
  author =	{Ayala-Rinc\'{o}n, Mauricio and Cerna, David M. and Kutsia, Temur and Ringeissen, Christophe},
  title =	{{Combining Generalization Algorithms in Regular Collapse-Free Theories}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236228},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Generalization, Anti-unification, Equational theories, Combination}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Bin Packing

Authors: Debajyoti Kar, Arindam Khan, and Malin Rau

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)


Abstract
We study three fundamental three-dimensional (3D) geometric packing problems: 3D (Geometric) Bin Packing (3D-BP), 3D Strip Packing (3D-SP), and Minimum Volume Bounding Box (3D-MVBB), where given a set of 3D (rectangular) cuboids, the goal is to find an axis-aligned nonoverlapping packing of all cuboids. In 3D-BP, we need to pack the given cuboids into the minimum number of unit cube bins. In 3D-SP, we need to pack them into a 3D cuboid with a unit square base and minimum height. Finally, in 3D-MVBB, the goal is to pack into a cuboid box of minimum volume. It is NP-hard to even decide whether a set of rectangles can be packed into a unit square bin - giving an (absolute) approximation hardness of 2 for 3D-BP and 3D-SP. The previous best (absolute) approximation for all three problems is by Li and Cheng (SICOMP, 1990), who gave algorithms with approximation ratios of 13, 46/7, and 46/7+ε, respectively, for 3D-BP, 3D-SP, and 3D-MVBB. We provide improved approximation ratios of 6, 6, and 3+ε, respectively, for the three problems, for any constant ε > 0. For 3D-BP, in the asymptotic regime, Bansal, Correa, Kenyon, and Sviridenko (Math. Oper. Res., 2006) showed that there is no asymptotic polynomial-time approximation scheme (APTAS) even when all items have the same height. Caprara (Math. Oper. Res., 2008) gave an asymptotic approximation ratio of T_{∞}² + ε ≈ 2.86, where T_{∞} is the well-known Harmonic constant in Bin Packing. We provide an algorithm with an improved asymptotic approximation ratio of 3 T_{∞}/2 + ε ≈ 2.54. Further, we show that unlike 3D-BP (and 3D-SP), 3D-MVBB admits an APTAS.

Cite as

Debajyoti Kar, Arindam Khan, and Malin Rau. Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Bin Packing. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 104:1-104:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kar_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.104,
  author =	{Kar, Debajyoti and Khan, Arindam and Rau, Malin},
  title =	{{Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Bin Packing}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{104:1--104:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.104},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234814},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.104},
  annote =	{Keywords: Approximation Algorithms, Geometric Packing, Multidimensional Packing}
}
Document
FuzzFlesh: Randomised Testing of Decompilers via Control Flow Graph-Based Program Generation

Authors: Amber Gorzynski and Alastair F. Donaldson

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)


Abstract
Decompilation is the process of translating compiled code into high-level code. Control flow recovery is a challenging part of the process. "Misdecompilations" can occur, whereby the decompiled code does not accurately represent the semantics of the compiled code, despite it being syntactically valid. This is problematic because it can mislead users who are trying to reason about the program. We present CFG-based program generation: a novel approach to randomised testing that aims to improve the control flow recovery of decompilers. CFG-based program generation involves randomly generating control flow graphs (CFGs) and paths through each graph. Inspired by prior work in the domain of GPU computing, (CFG, path) pairs are "fleshed" into test programs. Each program is decompiled and recompiled. The test oracle verifies whether the actual runtime path through the graph matches the expected path. Any difference in the execution paths after recompilation indicates a possible misdecompilation. A key benefit of this approach is that it is largely independent of the source and target languages in question because it is focused on control flow. The approach is therefore applicable to numerous decompilation settings. The trade-off resulting from the focus on control flow is that misdecompilation bugs that do not relate to control flow (e.g. bugs that involve specific arithmetic operations) are out of scope. We have implemented this approach in FuzzFlesh, an open-source randomised testing tool. FuzzFlesh can be easily configured to target a variety of low-level languages and decompiler toolchains because most of the CFG and path generation process is language-independent. At present, FuzzFlesh supports testing decompilation of Java bytecode, .NET assembly and x86 machine code. In addition to program generation, FuzzFlesh also includes an automated test-case reducer that operates on the CFG rather than the low-level program, which means that it can be applied to any of the target languages. We present a large experimental campaign applying FuzzFlesh to a variety of decompilers, leading to the discovery of 12 previously-unknown bugs across two language formats, six of which have been fixed. We present experiments comparing our generic FuzzFlesh tool to two state-of-the-art decompiler testing tools targeted at specific languages. As expected, the coverage our generic FuzzFlesh tool achieves on a given decompiler is lower than the coverage achieved by a tool specifically designed for the input format of that decompiler. However, due to its focus on control flow, FuzzFlesh is able to cover sections of control flow recovery code that the targeted tools cannot reach, and identify control flow related bugs that the targeted tools miss.

Cite as

Amber Gorzynski and Alastair F. Donaldson. FuzzFlesh: Randomised Testing of Decompilers via Control Flow Graph-Based Program Generation. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 13:1-13:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gorzynski_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.13,
  author =	{Gorzynski, Amber and Donaldson, Alastair F.},
  title =	{{FuzzFlesh: Randomised Testing of Decompilers via Control Flow Graph-Based Program Generation}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233062},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Decompiler, Reverse Engineering, Control Flow, Software Testing, Fuzzing}
}
Document
Contract Usage and Evolution in Android Mobile Applications

Authors: David R. Ferreira, Alexandra Mendes, João F. Ferreira, and Carolina Carreira

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)


Abstract
Contracts and assertions are effective methods to enhance software quality by enforcing preconditions, postconditions, and invariants. Previous research has demonstrated the value of contracts in traditional software development. However, the adoption and impact of contracts in the context of mobile app development, particularly of Android apps, remain unexplored. To address this, we present the first large-scale empirical study on the use of contracts in Android apps, written in Java or Kotlin. We consider contract elements divided into five categories: conditional runtime exceptions, APIs, annotations, assertions, and other. We analyzed 2,390 Android apps from the F-Droid repository and processed 52,977 KLOC to determine 1) how and to what extent contracts are used, 2) which language features are used to denote contracts, 3) how contract usage evolves from the first to the last version, and 4) whether contracts are used safely in the context of program evolution and inheritance. Our findings include: 1) although most apps do not specify contracts, annotation-based approaches are the most popular; 2) apps that use contracts continue to use them in later versions, but the number of methods increases at a higher rate than the number of contracts; and 3) there are potentially unsafe specification changes when apps evolve and in subtyping relationships, which indicates a lack of specification stability. Finally, we present a qualitative study that gathers challenges faced by practitioners when using contracts and that validates our recommendations.

Cite as

David R. Ferreira, Alexandra Mendes, João F. Ferreira, and Carolina Carreira. Contract Usage and Evolution in Android Mobile Applications. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 11:1-11:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ferreira_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.11,
  author =	{Ferreira, David R. and Mendes, Alexandra and Ferreira, Jo\~{a}o F. and Carreira, Carolina},
  title =	{{Contract Usage and Evolution in Android Mobile Applications}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:30},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233041},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Contracts, Design by Contract, DbC, Android, Java, Kotlin}
}
Document
Event Race Detection for Node.js Using Delay Injections

Authors: Andre Takeshi Endo and Anders Møller

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)


Abstract
Node.js is a widely used platform for building JavaScript server-side web applications, desktop applications, and software engineering tools. Its asynchronous execution model is essential for performance, but also gives rise to event races, which cause many subtle bugs that can be hard to detect and reproduce. Current solutions to expose such races are based on modifications of the source code of the Node.js system or on guided executions using complex happens-before modeling. This paper presents a simpler and more effective approach called NACD that works by dynamically instrumenting core asynchronous operations in the Node.js runtime system to inject delays and thereby reveal event race bugs. It consists of a small, robust runtime instrumentation module implemented in JavaScript that is configured by a flexible JSON model of the essential parts of the Node.js API. Experimental results show that NACD can reproduce event race bugs with higher probability and fewer runs than state-of-the-art tools.

Cite as

Andre Takeshi Endo and Anders Møller. Event Race Detection for Node.js Using Delay Injections. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 9:1-9:28, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{endo_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.9,
  author =	{Endo, Andre Takeshi and M{\o}ller, Anders},
  title =	{{Event Race Detection for Node.js  Using Delay Injections}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:28},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233026},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: JavaScript, race conditions, flaky tests, event races, callback interleaving}
}
Document
Wastrumentation: Portable WebAssembly Dynamic Analysis with Support for Intercession

Authors: Aäron Munsters, Angel Luis Scull Pupo, and Elisa Gonzalez Boix

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)


Abstract
Dynamic program analyses help in understanding a program’s runtime behavior and detect issues related to security, program comprehension, or profiling. Instrumentation platforms aid analysis developers by offering a high-level API to write the analysis, and inserting the analysis into the target program. However, current instrumentation platforms for WebAssembly (Wasm) restrict analysis portability because they require concrete runtime environments. Moreover, their analysis API only allows the development of analyses that observe the target program but cannot modify it. As a result, many popular dynamic analyses present for other languages, such as runtime hardening, virtual patching or runtime optimization, cannot currently be implemented for Wasm atop a dynamic analysis platform. Instead, they need to be built manually, which requires knowledge of low-level details of the Wasm’s semantics and instruction set, and how to safely manipulate it. This paper introduces Wastrumentation, the first dynamic analysis platform for WebAssembly that supports intercession. Our solution, based on source code instrumentation, weaves the analysis code directly into the target program code. Inlining the analysis into the target’s source code avoids dependencies on the runtime environment, making analyses portable across Wasm VMs. Moreover, it enables the implementation of analyses in any Wasm-compatible language. We evaluate our solution in two ways. First, we compare it against a state-of-the-art source code instrumentation platform using the WasmR3 benchmarks. The results show improved memory consumption and competitive performance overhead. Second, we develop an extensive portfolio of dynamic analyses, including novel analyses previously unattainable with source code instrumentation platforms, such as memoization, safe heap access, and the removal of NaN non-determinism.

Cite as

Aäron Munsters, Angel Luis Scull Pupo, and Elisa Gonzalez Boix. Wastrumentation: Portable WebAssembly Dynamic Analysis with Support for Intercession. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 23:1-23:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{munsters_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.23,
  author =	{Munsters, A\"{a}ron and Scull Pupo, Angel Luis and Gonzalez Boix, Elisa},
  title =	{{Wastrumentation: Portable WebAssembly Dynamic Analysis with Support for Intercession}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233153},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: WebAssembly, dynamic analysis, instrumentation platform, intercession}
}
Document
Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Knapsack

Authors: Klaus Jansen, Debajyoti Kar, Arindam Khan, K. V. N. Sreenivas, and Malte Tutas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 332, 41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025)


Abstract
We study the three-dimensional Knapsack (3DK) problem, in which we are given a set of axis-aligned cuboids with associated profits and an axis-aligned cube knapsack. The objective is to find a non-overlapping axis-aligned packing (by translation) of the maximum profit subset of cuboids into the cube. The previous best approximation algorithm is due to Diedrich, Harren, Jansen, Thöle, and Thomas (2008), who gave a (7+ε)-approximation algorithm for 3DK and a (5+ε)-approximation algorithm for the variant when the items can be rotated by 90 degrees around any axis, for any constant ε > 0. Chlebík and Chlebíková (2009) showed that the problem does not admit an asymptotic polynomial-time approximation scheme. We provide an improved polynomial-time (139/29+ε) ≈ 4.794-approximation algorithm for 3DK and (30/7+ε) ≈ 4.286-approximation when rotations by 90 degrees are allowed. We also provide improved approximation algorithms for several variants such as the cardinality case (when all items have the same profit) and uniform profit-density case (when the profit of an item is equal to its volume). Our key technical contribution is container packing - a structured packing in 3D such that all items are assigned into a constant number of containers, and each container is packed using a specific strategy based on its type. We first show the existence of highly profitable container packings. Thereafter, we show that one can find near-optimal container packing efficiently using a variant of the Generalized Assignment Problem (GAP).

Cite as

Klaus Jansen, Debajyoti Kar, Arindam Khan, K. V. N. Sreenivas, and Malte Tutas. Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Knapsack. In 41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 332, pp. 60:1-60:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jansen_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.60,
  author =	{Jansen, Klaus and Kar, Debajyoti and Khan, Arindam and Sreenivas, K. V. N. and Tutas, Malte},
  title =	{{Improved Approximation Algorithms for Three-Dimensional Knapsack}},
  booktitle =	{41st International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2025)},
  pages =	{60:1--60:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-370-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{332},
  editor =	{Aichholzer, Oswin and Wang, Haitao},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.60},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-232126},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2025.60},
  annote =	{Keywords: Approximation Algorithms, Hyperrectangle Packing, Multidimensional Knapsack, Three-dimensional Packing}
}
Document
Automated Programming and Program Repair (Dagstuhl Seminar 24431)

Authors: Claire Le Goues, Michael Pradel, Abhik Roychoudhury, and Shin Hwei Tan

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 14, Issue 10 (2025)


Abstract
The Dagstuhl Seminar 24431 on "Automated Programming and Program Repair" brought together 33 researchers from academia and industry to explore the intersection of automated code generation and program repair. Over five days (October 21–25, 2024), participants discussed advances in large language models (LLMs) for code generation, the role of automated program repair in improving generated code, and challenges in deploying these technologies in real-world software development. The seminar featured over 20 talks and three panel discussions on topics such as benchmarks for LLM-generated code, trust in automated programming, and the broader applications of LLMs beyond coding assistance. Key outcomes included identifying critical challenges in benchmarking, evaluation criteria, and developer adoption of automated repair techniques, fostering future collaborations and actionable research directions in the field.

Cite as

Claire Le Goues, Michael Pradel, Abhik Roychoudhury, and Shin Hwei Tan. Automated Programming and Program Repair (Dagstuhl Seminar 24431). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 14, Issue 10, pp. 39-57, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{legoues_et_al:DagRep.14.10.39,
  author =	{Le Goues, Claire and Pradel, Michael and Roychoudhury, Abhik and Tan, Shin Hwei},
  title =	{{Automated Programming and Program Repair (Dagstuhl Seminar 24431)}},
  pages =	{39--57},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{14},
  number =	{10},
  editor =	{Le Goues, Claire and Pradel, Michael and Roychoudhury, Abhik and Tan, Shin Hwei},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.14.10.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-230235},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.14.10.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: Auto-coding, Large Language Models, Automated Program Repair, Program Synthesis, Trustworthy Software}
}
Document
Query Repairs

Authors: Balder ten Cate, Phokion G. Kolaitis, and Carsten Lutz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 328, 28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025)


Abstract
We formalize and study the problem of repairing database queries based on user feedback in the form of a collection of labeled examples. We propose a framework based on the notion of a proximity pre-order, and we investigate and compare query repairs for conjunctive queries (CQs) using different such pre-orders. The proximity pre-orders we consider are based on query containment and on distance metrics for CQs.

Cite as

Balder ten Cate, Phokion G. Kolaitis, and Carsten Lutz. Query Repairs. In 28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 328, pp. 15:1-15:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{tencate_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.15,
  author =	{ten Cate, Balder and Kolaitis, Phokion G. and Lutz, Carsten},
  title =	{{Query Repairs}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2025)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-364-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{328},
  editor =	{Roy, Sudeepa and Kara, Ahmet},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-229566},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2025.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: Query Repairs, Databases, Conjunctive Queries, Data Examples, Fitting}
}
Document
Code Search (Dagstuhl Seminar 24172)

Authors: Satish Chandra, Michael Pradel, and Kathryn T. Stolee

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 14, Issue 4 (2024)


Abstract
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar "Code Search" (24172). The seminar brought together researchers and practitioners working on techniques that enable software developers to find code and artifacts related to code. The participants discussed the state of the art in code search, identified open problems, and discussed future directions for research and practice. The seminar was structured with keynote talks, short talks, and breakout groups. Breakout groups identified how researchers can situate their code search research in terms of the targeted user groups, the access point for the developer, and the stage of software development that is most relevant to the code search tasks. Synergies between generative AI and Code Search were discussed, concluding that for some users and some tasks, generative AI can work with Code Search to enhance the developer experience and effectiveness. For other tasks, code search without generative AI would be more effective because of concerns regarding data provenance, update frequency, privacy, and the need for correctness.

Cite as

Satish Chandra, Michael Pradel, and Kathryn T. Stolee. Code Search (Dagstuhl Seminar 24172). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp. 108-123, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{chandra_et_al:DagRep.14.4.108,
  author =	{Chandra, Satish and Pradel, Michael and Stolee, Kathryn T.},
  title =	{{Code Search (Dagstuhl Seminar 24172)}},
  pages =	{108--123},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{14},
  number =	{4},
  editor =	{Chandra, Satish and Pradel, Michael and Stolee, Kathryn T.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.14.4.108},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-213505},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.14.4.108},
  annote =	{Keywords: code reuse, code search}
}
Document
Programming Language Processing (Dagstuhl Seminar 23062)

Authors: Michael Pradel, Baishakhi Ray, Charles Sutton, and Eran Yahav

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 13, Issue 2 (2023)


Abstract
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 23062 "Programming Language Processing" (PLP). The seminar brought together researchers and practitioners from three communities-software engineering, programming languages, and natural language processing- providing a unique opportunity for cross-fertilization and inter-disciplinary progress. We discussed machine learning models of code, integrating learning-based and traditional program analysis, and learning from natural language information associated with software. The seminar lead to a better understanding of the commonalities and differences between natural and programming languages, and an understanding of the challenges and opportunities in industry adoption of PLP.

Cite as

Michael Pradel, Baishakhi Ray, Charles Sutton, and Eran Yahav. Programming Language Processing (Dagstuhl Seminar 23062). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp. 20-32, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{pradel_et_al:DagRep.13.2.20,
  author =	{Pradel, Michael and Ray, Baishakhi and Sutton, Charles and Yahav, Eran},
  title =	{{Programming Language Processing (Dagstuhl Seminar 23062)}},
  pages =	{20--32},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{13},
  number =	{2},
  editor =	{Pradel, Michael and Ray, Baishakhi and Sutton, Charles and Yahav, Eran},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.13.2.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-191799},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.13.2.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: ML4PL, ML4SE, Neural Software Analysis}
}
Document
Front Matter - ECOOP 2017 Artifacts, Table of Contents, Preface, Artifact Evaluation Committee

Authors: Philipp Haller, Michael Pradel, and Tijs van der Storm

Published in: DARTS, Volume 3, Issue 2, Special Issue of the 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017)


Abstract
Front Matter - ECOOP 2017 Artifacts, Table of Contents, Preface, Artifact Evaluation Committee

Cite as

Special Issue of the 31st European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2017). Dagstuhl Artifacts Series (DARTS), Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 0:i-0:xii, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{haller_et_al:DARTS.3.2.0,
  author =	{Haller, Philipp and Pradel, Michael and van der Storm, Tijs},
  title =	{{ Front Matter - ECOOP 2017 Artifacts, Table of Contents, Preface, Artifact Evaluation Committee}},
  pages =	{0:i--0:xii},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Artifacts Series},
  ISSN =	{2509-8195},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{2},
  editor =	{Haller, Philipp and Pradel, Michael and van der Storm, Tijs},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DARTS.3.2.0},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-72813},
  doi =		{10.4230/DARTS.3.2.0},
  annote =	{Keywords: Front Matter - ECOOP 2017 Artifacts, Table of Contents, Preface, Artifact Evaluation Committee}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 16 Document/PDF
  • 13 Document/HTML
  • 1 Issue

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 11 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2023
  • 3 2017
  • 1 2015

  • Refine by Author
  • 6 Pradel, Michael
  • 2 Kar, Debajyoti
  • 2 Khan, Arindam
  • 2 Le Goues, Claire
  • 2 Roychoudhury, Abhik
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 9 LIPIcs
  • 2 OASIcs
  • 1 DARTS
  • 4 DagRep

  • Refine by Classification
  • 4 Software and its engineering → Software testing and debugging
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Compilers
  • 2 Theory of computation → Packing and covering problems
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Artificial intelligence
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Machine learning
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Approximation Algorithms
  • 2 Fuzzing
  • 2 JavaScript
  • 1 Android
  • 1 Anti-unification
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail