11 Search Results for "Stewart, Alistair"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.39
Planting and MCMC Sampling from the Potts Model

Authors: Andreas Galanis, Leslie Ann Goldberg, and Paulina Smolarova

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
We consider the problem of sampling from the ferromagnetic q-state Potts model on the random d-regular graph with parameter β > 0. A key difficulty that arises in sampling from the model is the existence of a "metastability" window β ∈ (β_u,β_u'), where roughly the distribution has two competing modes, the so-called disordered and ordered phases. This causes classical Markov-chain algorithms to be slow mixing from worst-case initialisations. Nevertheless, Helmuth, Jenssen and Perkins (SODA '19) designed a sampling algorithm that works for all β, when d ≥ 5 and q = d^{Ω(d)}, using polymers and cluster expansion methods; more recently, their analysis technique has been adapted to show that a Markov chain (random-cluster dynamics) mixes fast when initialised appropriately, in the same regime of q,d,β. Despite these positive algorithmic results, a well-known bottleneck behind cluster-expansion arguments is that they inherently only work for large q, whereas it is widely conjectured that sampling on the random d-regular graph is possible for all q,d ≥ 3. The only result so far that applies to general q,d ≥ 3 is by Blanca and Gheissari who showed that the random-cluster dynamics mixes fast in the "uniqueness" regime β < β_u where roughly only the disordered mode exists. For β ≥ β_u however, a second subdominant mode emerges creating bottlenecks and giving rise to correlations which have been hard to handle, especially for small values of q and d. Our main contribution is to perform a delicate analysis of the Potts distribution and the random-cluster dynamics that goes beyond the threshold β_u. We use planting as the main tool, a technique used in the analysis of random CSPs to capture how the space of solutions is correlated with the structure of the random instance. While planting arguments provide only weak sampling guarantees generically, here we instead combine planting with the analysis of random-cluster dynamics to obtain significantly stronger guarantees. We are thus able to show that the random-cluster dynamics initialised from all-out mixes fast for all integers q,d ≥ 3 beyond the uniqueness threshold β_u, all the way to the optimal threshold β_c ∈ (β_u,β_u') where the dominant mode switches from disordered to ordered. A more involved analysis also applies to the ordered regime β > β_c where we obtain an algorithm for all d ≥ 3 and q ≥ (5d)⁵, improving significantly upon the previous range of q,d by Carlson, Davies, Fraiman, Kolla, Potukuchi, and Yap (FOCS'22).
Cite as

Andreas Galanis, Leslie Ann Goldberg, and Paulina Smolarova. Planting and MCMC Sampling from the Potts Model. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 39:1-39:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{galanis_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.39,
  author =	{Galanis, Andreas and Goldberg, Leslie Ann and Smolarova, Paulina},
  title =	{{Planting and MCMC Sampling from the Potts Model}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255280},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: approximate sampling, Glauber dynamics, Potts model, random cluster model}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.33
Uniformity Testing Under User-Level Local Privacy

Authors: Clément L. Canonne, Abigail Gentle, and Vikrant Singhal

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
We initiate the study of distribution testing under user-level local differential privacy, where each of n users contributes m samples from the unknown underlying distribution. This setting, albeit very natural, is significantly more challenging than the usual locally private setting, as for the same parameter ε the privacy guarantee must now apply to a full batch of m data points. While some recent work considers distribution learning in this user-level setting, nothing was known for even the most fundamental testing task, uniformity testing (and its generalization, identity testing). We address this gap, by providing (nearly) sample-optimal user-level LDP algorithms for uniformity and identity testing. Motivated by practical considerations, our main focus is on the private-coin, symmetric setting, which does not require users to share a common random seed nor to have been assigned a globally unique identifier.
Cite as

Clément L. Canonne, Abigail Gentle, and Vikrant Singhal. Uniformity Testing Under User-Level Local Privacy. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 33:1-33:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{canonne_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.33,
  author =	{Canonne, Cl\'{e}ment L. and Gentle, Abigail and Singhal, Vikrant},
  title =	{{Uniformity Testing Under User-Level Local Privacy}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253201},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential Privacy, Local Differential Privacy, Uniformity Testing, Identity Testing, Hypothesis Testing, User-Level Differential Privacy, Person-Level Differential Privacy}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.18
Interactive Proofs for Distribution Testing with Conditional Oracles

Authors: Ari Biswas, Mark Bun, Clément L. Canonne, and Satchit Sivakumar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
We revisit the framework of interactive proofs for distribution testing, first introduced by Chiesa and Gur (ITCS 2018), which has recently experienced a surge in interest, accompanied by notable progress (e.g., Herman and Rothblum, STOC 2022, FOCS 2023; Herman, RANDOM 2024). In this model, a data-poor verifier determines whether a probability distribution has a property of interest by interacting with an all-powerful, data-rich but untrusted prover bent on convincing them that it has the property. While prior work gave sample-, time-, and communication-efficient protocols for testing and estimating a range of distribution properties, they all suffer from an inherent issue: for most interesting properties of distributions over a domain of size N, the verifier must draw at least Ω(√N) samples of its own. While sublinear in N, this is still prohibitive for large domains encountered in practice. In this work, we circumvent this limitation by augmenting the verifier with the ability to perform an exponentially smaller number of more powerful (but reasonable) pairwise conditional queries, effectively enabling them to perform "local comparison checks" of the prover’s claims. We systematically investigate the landscape of interactive proofs in this new setting, giving poly-logarithmic query and sample protocols for (tolerantly) testing all label-invariant properties, thus demonstrating exponential savings without compromising on communication, for this large and fundamental class of testing tasks.
Cite as

Ari Biswas, Mark Bun, Clément L. Canonne, and Satchit Sivakumar. Interactive Proofs for Distribution Testing with Conditional Oracles. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 18:1-18:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{biswas_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.18,
  author =	{Biswas, Ari and Bun, Mark and Canonne, Cl\'{e}ment L. and Sivakumar, Satchit},
  title =	{{Interactive Proofs for Distribution Testing with Conditional Oracles}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253059},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distribution Testing, Interactive Proofs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.22
Single-Token vs Two-Token Blockchain Tokenomics

Authors: Aggelos Kiayias, Philip Lazos, and Paolo Penna

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)

Abstract
We study long-term equilibria that arise in the token monetary policy, or tokenomics, design of proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain systems that engage utility maximizing users and validators. Validators are system maintainers who get rewarded with tokens for performing the work necessary for the system to function properly, while users compete and pay with such tokens for getting a desired portion of the system service. We study how the system service provision and suitable rewards schemes together can lead to equilibria with the following desirable characteristics (1) viability: the system keeps parties engaged, (2) decentralization and skin-in-the-game: multiple sufficiently invested validators are participating, (3) stability: the price path of the underlying token used to transact with the system does not change widely over time, and (4) feasibility: the mechanism is easy to implement as a smart contract, e.g., it does not require a fiat reserve on-chain to perform token buybacks or to perform bookkeeping of exponentially growing token holdings. Our analysis enables us to put forward a novel generic mechanism for blockchain monetary policy that we call quantitative rewarding (QR). We investigate how to implement QR in single-token and two-token proof of stake (PoS) blockchain systems. The latter are systems that utilize one token for the users to pay the transaction fees and a different token for the validators to participate in the PoS protocol and get rewarded. Our approach demonstrates a concrete advantage of the two-token setting in terms of the ability of the QR mechanism to be realized effectively and provide good equilibria. Our analysis also reveals an inherent limitation of the single token setting in terms of implementing an effective blockchain monetary policy - a distinction that is, to the best of our knowledge, highlighted for the first time.
Cite as

Aggelos Kiayias, Philip Lazos, and Paolo Penna. Single-Token vs Two-Token Blockchain Tokenomics. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 22:1-22:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kiayias_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.22,
  author =	{Kiayias, Aggelos and Lazos, Philip and Penna, Paolo},
  title =	{{Single-Token vs Two-Token Blockchain Tokenomics}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247412},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Blockchain, tokenomics, buyback, equilibria, price path, stable price, discounted game, dual-token, proof-of-stake, validator}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.31
Trustless Bridges via Random Sampling Light Clients

Authors: Bhargav Nagaraja Bhatt, Fatemeh Shirazi, and Alistair Stewart

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)

Abstract
The increasing number of blockchain projects introduced annually has led to a pressing need for secure and efficient interoperability solutions. Currently, the lack of such solutions forces end-users to rely on centralized intermediaries, contradicting the core principle of decentralization and trust minimization in blockchain technology. We propose a decentralized and efficient interoperability solution (aka Bridge Protocol) that operates without additional trust assumptions, relying solely on the Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) properties of the two chains being connected. In particular, relayers (actors that exchange messages between networks) are permissionless and decentralized, hence eliminating any single point of failure. We introduce Random Sampling, a novel technique for on-chain light clients to efficiently follow the history of PoS blockchains by reducing the signature verifications required. Here, the randomness is drawn on-chain, for example, using Ethereum’s RANDAO. We analyze the security of the bridge from a crypto- economic perspective and provide a framework to derive the security parameters. This includes handling subtle concurrency issues and randomness bias in strawman designs. While the protocol is applicable to various PoS chains, we demonstrate the protocol’s practical feasibility by showcasing an instantiated bridge between Polkadot and Ethereum (currently deployed), and discuss some practical security challenges. Furthermore, we evaluate the efficiency of our on-chain light client verifier (implemented as an Ethereum smart contract) against SNARK-based approaches, demonstrating significantly lower gas costs for signature verification - even for validator sets up to 10⁶.
Cite as

Bhargav Nagaraja Bhatt, Fatemeh Shirazi, and Alistair Stewart. Trustless Bridges via Random Sampling Light Clients. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 31:1-31:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bhatt_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.31,
  author =	{Bhatt, Bhargav Nagaraja and Shirazi, Fatemeh and Stewart, Alistair},
  title =	{{Trustless Bridges via Random Sampling Light Clients}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247503},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: PoS Blockchains, Trustless Bridges, Light Clients, Decentralised Relayers, RANDAO Bias}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.83
Low-Temperature Sampling on Sparse Random Graphs

Authors: Andreas Galanis, Leslie Ann Goldberg, and Paulina Smolarova

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We consider sampling in the so-called low-temperature regime, which is typically characterised by non-local behaviour and strong global correlations. Canonical examples include sampling independent sets on bipartite graphs and sampling from the ferromagnetic q-state Potts model. Low-temperature sampling is computationally intractable for general graphs, but recent advances based on the polymer method have made significant progress for graph families that exhibit certain expansion properties that reinforce the correlations, including for example expanders, lattices and dense graphs. One of the most natural graph classes that has so far escaped this algorithmic framework is the class of sparse Erdős-Rényi random graphs whose expansion only manifests for sufficiently large subsets of vertices; small sets of vertices on the other hand have vanishing expansion which makes them behave independently from the bulk of the graph and therefore weakens the correlations. At a more technical level, the expansion of small sets is crucial for establishing the Kotecky-Priess condition which underpins the applicability of the framework. Our main contribution is to develop the polymer method in the low-temperature regime for sparse random graphs. As our running example, we use the Potts and random-cluster models on G(n,d/n) for d = Θ(1), where we show a polynomial-time sampling algorithm for all sufficiently large q and d, at all temperatures. Our approach applies more generally for models that are monotone. Key to our result is a simple polymer definition that blends easily with the connectivity properties of the graph and allows us to show that polymers have size at most O(log n).
Cite as

Andreas Galanis, Leslie Ann Goldberg, and Paulina Smolarova. Low-Temperature Sampling on Sparse Random Graphs. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 83:1-83:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{galanis_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.83,
  author =	{Galanis, Andreas and Goldberg, Leslie Ann and Smolarova, Paulina},
  title =	{{Low-Temperature Sampling on Sparse Random Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{83:1--83:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.83},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234606},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.83},
  annote =	{Keywords: approximate counting, Glauber dynamics, random cluster model, approximate sampling, Erd\H{o}s-R\'{e}nyi Graphs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.9
Optimal Rates for Robust Stochastic Convex Optimization

Authors: Changyu Gao, Andrew Lowy, Xingyu Zhou, and Stephen J. Wright

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)

Abstract
Machine learning algorithms in high-dimensional settings are highly susceptible to the influence of even a small fraction of structured outliers, making robust optimization techniques essential. In particular, within the ε-contamination model, where an adversary can inspect and replace up to an ε-fraction of the samples, a fundamental open problem is determining the optimal rates for robust stochastic convex optimization (SCO) under such contamination. We develop novel algorithms that achieve minimax-optimal excess risk (up to logarithmic factors) under the ε-contamination model. Our approach improves over existing algorithms, which are not only suboptimal but also require stringent assumptions, including Lipschitz continuity and smoothness of individual sample functions. By contrast, our optimal algorithms do not require these stringent assumptions, assuming only population-level smoothness of the loss. Moreover, our algorithms can be adapted to handle the case in which the covariance parameter is unknown, and can be extended to nonsmooth population risks via convolutional smoothing. We complement our algorithmic developments with a tight information-theoretic lower bound for robust SCO.
Cite as

Changyu Gao, Andrew Lowy, Xingyu Zhou, and Stephen J. Wright. Optimal Rates for Robust Stochastic Convex Optimization. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 9:1-9:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gao_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.9,
  author =	{Gao, Changyu and Lowy, Andrew and Zhou, Xingyu and Wright, Stephen J.},
  title =	{{Optimal Rates for Robust Stochastic Convex Optimization}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231369},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Adversarial Robustness, Machine Learning, Optimization Algorithms, Robust Optimization, Stochastic Convex Optimization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.26
Settling the Complexity of Testing Grainedness of Distributions, and Application to Uniformity Testing in the Huge Object Model

Authors: Clément L. Canonne, Sayantan Sen, and Joy Qiping Yang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
In this work, we study the problem of testing m-grainedness of probability distributions over an n-element universe 𝒰, or, equivalently, of whether a probability distribution is induced by a multiset S ⊆ 𝒰 of size |S| = m. Recently, Goldreich and Ron (Computational Complexity, 2023) proved that Ω(n^c) samples are necessary for testing this property, for any c < 1 and m = Θ(n). They also conjectured that Ω(m/(log m)) samples are necessary for testing this property when m = Θ(n). In this work, we positively settle this conjecture. Using a known connection to the Distribution over Huge objects (DoHo) model introduced by Goldreich and Ron (TheoretiCS, 2023), we leverage our results to provide improved bounds for uniformity testing in the DoHo model.
Cite as

Clément L. Canonne, Sayantan Sen, and Joy Qiping Yang. Settling the Complexity of Testing Grainedness of Distributions, and Application to Uniformity Testing in the Huge Object Model. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 26:1-26:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{canonne_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.26,
  author =	{Canonne, Cl\'{e}ment L. and Sen, Sayantan and Yang, Joy Qiping},
  title =	{{Settling the Complexity of Testing Grainedness of Distributions, and Application to Uniformity Testing in the Huge Object Model}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226543},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distribution testing, Uniformity testing, Huge Object Model, Lower bounds}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.8
Optimal Multilevel Slashing for Blockchains

Authors: Kenan Wood, Hammurabi Mendes, and Jonad Pulaj

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
We present the notion of multilevel slashing, where proof-of-stake blockchain validators can obtain gradual levels of assurance that a certain block is bound to be finalized in a global consensus procedure, unless an increasing and optimally large number of Byzantine processes have their staked assets slashed - that is, deducted - due to provably incorrect behavior. Our construction is a highly parameterized generalization of combinatorial intersection systems based on finite projective spaces, with asymptotic high availability and optimal slashing properties. Even under weak conditions, we show that our construction has asymptotically optimal slashing properties with respect to message complexity and validator load; this result also illustrates a fundamental trade off between message complexity, load, and slashing. In addition, we show that any intersection system whose ground elements are disjoint subsets of nodes (e.g. "committees" in committee-based consensus protocols) has asymptotic high availability under similarly weak conditions. Finally, our multilevel construction gives the flexibility to blockchain validators to decide how many "levels" of finalization assurance they wish to obtain. This functionality can be seen either as (i) a form of an early, slashing-based block finalization; or (ii) a service to support reorg tolerance.
Cite as

Kenan Wood, Hammurabi Mendes, and Jonad Pulaj. Optimal Multilevel Slashing for Blockchains. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 8:1-8:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{wood_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.8,
  author =	{Wood, Kenan and Mendes, Hammurabi and Pulaj, Jonad},
  title =	{{Optimal Multilevel Slashing for Blockchains}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225445},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Blockchains, Finality, Slashablility, Committees, Availability}
}
Document
Track B: Automata, Logic, Semantics, and Theory of Programming
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.115
Reachability for Branching Concurrent Stochastic Games (Track B: Automata, Logic, Semantics, and Theory of Programming)

Authors: Kousha Etessami, Emanuel Martinov, Alistair Stewart, and Mihalis Yannakakis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 132, 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)

Abstract
We give polynomial time algorithms for deciding almost-sure and limit-sure reachability in Branching Concurrent Stochastic Games (BCSGs). These are a class of infinite-state imperfect-information stochastic games that generalize both finite-state concurrent stochastic reachability games ([L. de Alfaro et al., 2007]) and branching simple stochastic reachability games ([K. Etessami et al., 2018]).
Cite as

Kousha Etessami, Emanuel Martinov, Alistair Stewart, and Mihalis Yannakakis. Reachability for Branching Concurrent Stochastic Games (Track B: Automata, Logic, Semantics, and Theory of Programming). In 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 132, pp. 115:1-115:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{etessami_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.115,
  author =	{Etessami, Kousha and Martinov, Emanuel and Stewart, Alistair and Yannakakis, Mihalis},
  title =	{{Reachability for Branching Concurrent Stochastic Games}},
  booktitle =	{46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)},
  pages =	{115:1--115:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-109-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{132},
  editor =	{Baier, Christel and Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Flocchini, Paola and Leonardi, Stefano},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.115},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-106917},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.115},
  annote =	{Keywords: stochastic games, multi-type branching processes, concurrent games, minimax-polynomial equations, reachability, almost-sure, limit-sure}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2013.1
The complexity of analyzing infinite-state Markov chains, Markov decision processes, and stochastic games (Invited Talk)

Authors: Kousha Etessami

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 20, 30th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2013)

Abstract
In recent years, a considerable amount of research has been devoted to understanding the computational complexity of basic analysis problems, and model checking problems, for finitely-presented countable infinite-state probabilistic systems. In particular, we have studied recursive Markov chains (RMCs), recursive Markov decision processes (RMDPs) and recursive stochastic games (RSGs). These arise by adding a natural recursion feature to finite-state Markov chains, MDPs, and stochastic games. RMCs and RMDPs provide natural abstract models of probabilistic procedural programs with recursion, and they are expressively equivalent to probabilistic and MDP extensions of pushdown automata. Moreover, a number of well-studied stochastic processes, including multi-type branching processes, (discrete-time) quasi-birth-death processes, and stochastic context-free grammars, can be suitably captured by subclasses of RMCs. A central computational problem for analyzing various classes of recursive probabilistic systems is the computation of their (optimal) termination probabilities. These form a key ingredient for many other analyses, including model checking. For RMCs, and for important subclasses of RMDPs and RSGs, computing their termination values is equivalent to computing the least fixed point (LFP) solution of a corresponding monotone system of polynomial (min/max) equations. The complexity of computing the LFP solution for such equation systems is a intriguing problem, with connections to several areas of research. The LFP solution may in general be irrational. So, one possible aim is to compute it to within a desired additive error epsilon > 0. For general RMCs, approximating their termination probability within any non-trivial constant additive error < 1/2, is at least as hard as long-standing open problems in the complexity of numerical computation which are not even known to be in NP. For several key subclasses of RMCs and RMDPs, computing their termination values turns out to be much more tractable. In this talk I will survey algorithms for, and discuss the computational complexity of, key analysis problems for classes of infinite-state recursive MCs, MDPs, and stochastic games. In particular, I will discuss recent joint work with Alistair Stewart and Mihalis Yannakakis (in papers that appeared at STOC'12 and ICALP'12), in which we have obtained polynomial time algorithms for computing, to within arbitrary desired precision, the LFP solution of probabilistic polynomial (min/max) systems of equations. Using this, we obtained the first P-time algorithms for computing (within desired precision) the extinction probabilities of multi-type branching processes, the probability that an arbitrary given stochastic context-free grammar generates a given string, and the optimum (maximum or minimum) extinction probabilities for branching MDPs and context-free MDPs. For branching MDPs, their corresponding equations amount to Bellman optimality equations for minimizing/maximizing their termination probabilities. Our algorithms combine variations and generalizations of Newton's method with other techniques, including linear programming. The algorithms are fairly easy to implement, but analyzing their worst-case running time is mathematically quite involved.
Cite as

Kousha Etessami. The complexity of analyzing infinite-state Markov chains, Markov decision processes, and stochastic games (Invited Talk). In 30th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2013). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 20, pp. 1-2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{etessami:LIPIcs.STACS.2013.1,
  author =	{Etessami, Kousha},
  title =	{{The complexity of analyzing infinite-state Markov chains, Markov decision processes, and stochastic games}},
  booktitle =	{30th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2013)},
  pages =	{1--2},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-50-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2013},
  volume =	{20},
  editor =	{Portier, Natacha and Wilke, Thomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2013.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-39143},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2013.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: recursive Markov chains, Markov decision processes, stochastic games, monotone systems of nonlinear equations, least fixed points, Newton's method, co}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 11 Document/PDF
  • 9 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2026
  • 6 2025
  • 1 2019
  • 1 2013

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Canonne, Clément L.
  • 2 Etessami, Kousha
  • 2 Galanis, Andreas
  • 2 Goldberg, Leslie Ann
  • 2 Smolarova, Paulina
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 11 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Gibbs sampling
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Markov-chain Monte Carlo methods
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Random graphs
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Discrete mathematics
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Hypothesis testing and confidence interval computation
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Glauber dynamics
  • 2 approximate sampling
  • 2 random cluster model
  • 2 stochastic games
  • 1 Adversarial Robustness
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact