78 Search Results for "Herlihy, Maurice"

Volume

OASIcs, Volume 71

International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols (Tokenomics 2019)

Tokenomics 2019, May 6-7, 2019, Paris, France

Editors: Vincent Danos, Maurice Herlihy, Maria Potop-Butucaru, Julien Prat, and Sara Tucci-Piergiovanni

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.23
Exploiting Multi-Core Parallelism in Blockchain Validation and Construction

Authors: Arivarasan Karmegam, Lucianna Kiffer, and Antonio Fernández Anta

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 371, 24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026)

Abstract
Blockchain validators can reduce block processing time by exploiting multi-core CPUs, but deterministic execution must preserve a given total order while respecting transaction conflicts and per-block runtime limits. This paper systematically examines how validators can exploit multi-core parallelism during both block construction and execution without violating blockchain semantics. We formalize two validator-side optimization problems: (i) executing an already ordered block on p cores to minimize makespan while ensuring equivalence to sequential execution; and (ii) selecting and scheduling a subset of mempool transactions under a runtime limit B to maximize validator reward. For both, we develop exact Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) formulations that capture conflict, order, and capacity constraints, and propose fast deterministic heuristics that scale to realistic workloads. Using Ethereum mainnet traces and including a Solana-inspired declared-access baseline (Sol) for ordered-block scheduling and a simple reward-greedy baseline (RG) for block construction, we empirically quantify the trade-offs between optimality and runtime. MILPs quickly become intractable as heterogeneity or core count increases, whereas our heuristics run in milliseconds and achieve near-optimal quality. For ordered-block execution, heuristic makespans are typically within a few percent of the MILP solutions (and can even surpass the MILP incumbent when the solver times out), yielding up to 1.5 speedup with p = 2 and 2.3 speedup with p = 8 over sequential execution, despite tight ordering constraints. For block construction, the heuristic achieves 99-100% of the MILP optimum reward on homogeneous workloads, and 74-100% of an LP-relaxation upper bound on heterogeneous workloads, where exact optimization often times out. The resulting block-construction throughput scales close to linearly with p, reaching up to 7.9 speedup with p = 8 in our experiments. These results demonstrate that lightweight, conflict-aware scheduling and selection can unlock substantial parallelism in blockchain validation, bridging the gap between sequential execution and the true potential of multi-core hardware.
Cite as

Arivarasan Karmegam, Lucianna Kiffer, and Antonio Fernández Anta. Exploiting Multi-Core Parallelism in Blockchain Validation and Construction. In 24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 371, pp. 23:1-23:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{karmegam_et_al:LIPIcs.SEA.2026.23,
  author =	{Karmegam, Arivarasan and Kiffer, Lucianna and Fern\'{a}ndez Anta, Antonio},
  title =	{{Exploiting Multi-Core Parallelism in Blockchain Validation and Construction}},
  booktitle =	{24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-422-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{371},
  editor =	{Aum\"{u}ller, Martin and Finocchi, Irene},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-260271},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Block construction, Block execution, Deterministic parallelism, Conflict-aware scheduling}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.26
Finding a Fair Scoring Function for Top-k Selection: From Hardness to Practice

Authors: Guangya Cai

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)

Abstract
We study the problem of finding a fair linear scoring function over (numerical) attributes for top-k selection, ensuring fairness through a proportional representation constraint on the protected group. Existing algorithms do not scale efficiently, particularly in higher dimensions. Our hardness analysis shows that in more than two dimensions, no algorithm is likely to scale efficiently with respect to dataset size, and the computational complexity is likely to grow rapidly with dimensionality. However, the hardness results also provide key insights guiding algorithm design, leading to our two-pronged solution: (1) For small k, our analysis reveals a gap in the hardness barrier. By addressing various engineering challenges, including achieving efficient parallelism, we turn this potential of efficiency into an optimized geometry-based algorithm delivering substantial performance gains. (2) For large k, where the hardness is robust, we employ a practically efficient optimization-based algorithm which, despite being theoretically worse, achieves superior real-world performance. Experimental evaluations on real-world datasets then explore scenarios where worst-case behavior does not manifest, identifying areas critical to practical performance. Our solution achieves speedups of up to several orders of magnitude compared to the state of the art, an efficiency made possible through a tight integration of hardness analysis, algorithm design, practical engineering, and empirical evaluation.
Cite as

Guangya Cai. Finding a Fair Scoring Function for Top-k Selection: From Hardness to Practice. In 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 367, pp. 26:1-26:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cai:LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.26,
  author =	{Cai, Guangya},
  title =	{{Finding a Fair Scoring Function for Top-k Selection: From Hardness to Practice}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-418-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{367},
  editor =	{Ahn, Hee-Kap and Hoffmann, Michael and Nayyeri, Amir},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258320},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fairness, Top-k, Integration}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.33
Resolving Conflicts with Grace: Dynamically Concurrent Universality

Authors: Petr Kuznetsov and Nathan Josia Schrodt

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
Synchronization is the major obstacle to scalability in distributed computing. Concurrent operations on the shared data engage in synchronization when they encounter a conflict, i.e., their effects depend on the order in which they are applied. Ideally, one would like to detect conflicts in a dynamic manner, i.e., adjusting to the current system state. Indeed, it is very common that two concurrent operations conflict only in some rarely occurring states. In this paper, we define the notion of dynamic concurrency: an operation employs strong synchronization primitives only if it has to arbitrate with concurrent operations, given the current system state. We then present a dynamically concurrent universal construction.
Cite as

Petr Kuznetsov and Nathan Josia Schrodt. Resolving Conflicts with Grace: Dynamically Concurrent Universality. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 33:1-33:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kuznetsov_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.33,
  author =	{Kuznetsov, Petr and Schrodt, Nathan Josia},
  title =	{{Resolving Conflicts with Grace: Dynamically Concurrent Universality}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252068},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Universal Construction, Consensus, Dynamic Concurrency}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.3
Computing with Content-Oblivious Messages (Invited Talk)

Authors: Giuseppe Antonio Di Luna

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
One of the core aspects of distributed computing is the design of algorithms that tolerate failures [Cachin et al., 2011; Raynal, 2018]. Failures may involve processes (in which case we may encounter crash-stop, memory corruption, or Byzantine failures) or the communication among processes. When processes communicate through message passing, failures may include message loss, message addition (either duplication or fabrication), and message corruption [Santoro and Widmayer, 1989]. Tight bounds are known for agreement in the synchronous setting under these types of failures [Santoro and Widmayer, 1989], and numerous works have investigated message loss in the synchronous setting and asynchronous setting for many other problems [Herlihy et al., 2013; Raynal, 2018; Santoro and Widmayer, 1990; Schmid et al., 2009]. In this talk, we focus on what can be computed when the system is asynchronous and messages may be corrupted; that is, a sent message can be arbitrarily modified by an adversary, but it cannot be deleted or duplicated. We specifically consider the bleak scenario in which all messages sent by processes are corrupted. Alternatively, one can view this as a setting where all messages have zero size, consisting only of simple pulses. This content-oblivious model is reminiscent of the beeping model [A. Casteigts et al., 2019], but in the beeping model, synchrony allows silence to be used as a means of communication. Surprisingly, contrary to what one might expect at first glance, [Censor-Hillel et al., 2023] has recently shown that, in the content-oblivious setting, when a predetermined leader is present and the network topology is 2-connected, it is possible to simulate an environment that is completely fault-free. While [Censor-Hillel et al., 2023] has shown that 2-connectivity is necessary, it also conjectured that the presence of a leader was a required assumption. [Frei et al., 2024] disproved this conjecture for the special case of oriented ring graphs by presenting a composable leader election algorithm. This result was later extended in [Chalopin et al., 2025] to the case of unoriented graphs, and, under the mild assumption of an upper bound on the network size, for any 2-edge-connected network. Thus, for the special case of ring topologies, we have a computational equivalence between content-oblivious and classic asynchronous message passing. Always in oriented in rings [Chalopin et al., 2025] has shown a non-uniform leader election algorithm with an optimal dependency on process IDs. The talk will discuss these results, focusing on the open problems and the current state of computation in systems where messages carry no content.
Cite as

Giuseppe Antonio Di Luna. Computing with Content-Oblivious Messages (Invited Talk). In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 3:1-3:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{diluna:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.3,
  author =	{Di Luna, Giuseppe Antonio},
  title =	{{Computing with Content-Oblivious Messages}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:2},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251766},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fault-Tolerance, Message Failures, Simulation, Leader Election, Uniform Algorithms, Non-Uniform Algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4
A Hierarchy of Unrestricted Deterministic Objects with Consensus Number 1

Authors: Warren Zhu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
The consensus number of a shared object is the maximum number of processes that can solve consensus in a wait-free manner using copies of the object and registers. In 2016, to prove that an object is not fully characterized by its consensus number, Afek, Ellen and Gafni showed that for all integers n ≥ 2, there exists an infinite sequence of deterministic objects of consensus number n with strictly increasing computational power. In 2018, Daian, Losa, Afek, and Gafni constructed an infinite sequence of deterministic objects of consensus number 1 with strictly decreasing computational power, but the single operation that each of these objects supports is restricted in how it can be used during an execution. As restrictions can have an effect on an object’s consensus number, it was left as an open question whether the same result holds without this restriction. In this paper, we construct an infinite sequence of unrestricted deterministic objects with strictly decreasing computational power. All objects in this sequence have consensus number 1.
Cite as

Warren Zhu. A Hierarchy of Unrestricted Deterministic Objects with Consensus Number 1. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 4:1-4:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zhu:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4,
  author =	{Zhu, Warren},
  title =	{{A Hierarchy of Unrestricted Deterministic Objects with Consensus Number 1}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251778},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Shared Memory, Wait-free, Set Agreement, Consensus Hierarchy}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5
Tight Conditions for Binary-Output Tasks Under Crashes

Authors: Timothé Albouy, Antonio Fernández Anta, Chryssis Georgiou, Nicolas Nicolaou, and Junlang Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
This paper explores necessary and sufficient system conditions to solve distributed tasks with binary outputs (i.e., tasks with output values in {0,1}). We focus on the distinct output sets of values a task can produce (intentionally disregarding validity and value multiplicity), considering that some processes may output no value. In a distributed system with n processes, of which up to t ≤ n can crash, we provide a complete characterization of the tight conditions on n and t under which every class of tasks with binary outputs is solvable, for both synchronous and asynchronous systems. This output-set approach yields highly general results: it unifies multiple distributed computing problems, such as binary consensus and symmetry breaking, and it produces impossibility proofs that hold for stronger task formulations, including those that consider validity, account for value multiplicity, or move beyond binary outputs.
Cite as

Timothé Albouy, Antonio Fernández Anta, Chryssis Georgiou, Nicolas Nicolaou, and Junlang Wang. Tight Conditions for Binary-Output Tasks Under Crashes. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 5:1-5:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{albouy_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5,
  author =	{Albouy, Timoth\'{e} and Fern\'{a}ndez Anta, Antonio and Georgiou, Chryssis and Nicolaou, Nicolas and Wang, Junlang},
  title =	{{Tight Conditions for Binary-Output Tasks Under Crashes}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251786},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed solvability, Asynchrony, Synchrony, Impossibility proofs, Binary-output tasks, Crash tolerance, Disagreement}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7
Mobile Byzantine Agreement in a Trusted World

Authors: Bo Pan and Maria Potop-Butucaru

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
In this paper, we address the Byzantine Agreement problem in synchronous systems where Byzantine agents can move from process to process, corrupting their host. We focus on two representative models: Garay’s and Buhrman’s models. In Garay’s model, when a process has been left by the Byzantine agent, it enters a cured state, is aware of its condition, and can remain silent for a round to prevent the dissemination of incorrect information. In Buhrman’s model, a Byzantine agent moves together with the message. It has been shown that solving Byzantine Agreement requires at least 4t + 1 processes in Garay’s model, and at least 3t + 1 in Buhrman’s model. In this paper, we aim to increase the tolerance to mobile Byzantine agents by integrating a trusted counter abstraction into both models. This abstraction prevents nodes from equivocating. In the new models, we prove that at least 3t+1, respectively 2t+1 processors are needed to tolerate t mobile Byzantine agents. Furthermore, we propose novel Mobile Byzantine Agreement algorithms that match these new lower bounds for both Garay’s and Buhrman’s models, achieving agreement in 𝒪(n) synchronous rounds.
Cite as

Bo Pan and Maria Potop-Butucaru. Mobile Byzantine Agreement in a Trusted World. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 7:1-7:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pan_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7,
  author =	{Pan, Bo and Potop-Butucaru, Maria},
  title =	{{Mobile Byzantine Agreement in a Trusted World}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251809},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Byzantine Agreement, Mobile Faults, Trusted Abstractions}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.21
Solving Tasks with Fewer Registers Than Processes

Authors: Eli Gafni, Giuliano Losa, Michel Raynal, and Gadi Taubenfeld

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
This paper studies distributed-computing tasks through the lens of space complexity in the read/write wait-free model, defined as the number of multi-reader-multi-writer atomic read/write registers needed to solve a task using a wait-free algorithm. Surprisingly, even though the read/write wait-free model is at the foundation of distributed computing, previous work on space complexity has focused on synchronization primitives stronger than read/write registers or on weaker progress conditions. The paper reveals that the read/write wait-free model offers a rich space-complexity landscape: (1) assuming non-anonymous processes, it shows that there is an infinite hierarchy of tasks of increasing space complexity; (2) it shows that space complexity separates anonymous from non-anonymous memory; (3) regardless of process or register anonymity, it exhibits a task of space complexity two, which is the minimal non-trivial space complexity; (4) finally, it shows that subcases of the adopt-commit task have different space complexity in non-anonymous memory under bounded wait-freedom.
Cite as

Eli Gafni, Giuliano Losa, Michel Raynal, and Gadi Taubenfeld. Solving Tasks with Fewer Registers Than Processes. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 21:1-21:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gafni_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.21,
  author =	{Gafni, Eli and Losa, Giuliano and Raynal, Michel and Taubenfeld, Gadi},
  title =	{{Solving Tasks with Fewer Registers Than Processes}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251947},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Asynchrony, Read/write registers, Wait-freedom, Tasks, Covering argument, Lower bound, Space complexity, Anonymous Processes, Anonymous Memory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.17
Recoverable Lock-Free Locks

Authors: Hagit Attiya, Panagiota Fatourou, Eleftherios Kosmas, and Yuanhao Wei

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
This paper presents the first transformation that introduces both lock-freedom and recoverability. Our transformation starts with a lock-based implementation, and provides a recoverable, lock-free substitution to lock acquire and lock release operations. The transformation supports nested locks for generality and ensures recoverability without jeopardising the correctness of the lock-based implementation it is applied on.
Cite as

Hagit Attiya, Panagiota Fatourou, Eleftherios Kosmas, and Yuanhao Wei. Recoverable Lock-Free Locks. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 17:1-17:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{attiya_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.17,
  author =	{Attiya, Hagit and Fatourou, Panagiota and Kosmas, Eleftherios and Wei, Yuanhao},
  title =	{{Recoverable Lock-Free Locks}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251905},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: recoverable computing, NVM, lock, lock-freedom}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.16
Asynchronous Approximate Agreement with Quadratic Communication

Authors: Mose Mizrahi Erbes and Roger Wattenhofer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
We study approximate agreement in an asynchronous network of n parties, up to t of which are byzantine. This an agreement task where the parties obtain approximately equal inputs in the convex hull of their inputs. In an asynchronous network, it can be solved with the optimal resilience t < n/3 by forcing the parties to reliably broadcast their messages and thus preventing inconsistent byzantine behavior. This costs Θ(n²) messages per reliable broadcast, or Θ(n³) messages per protocol iteration. In this work, we forgo reliable broadcast to achieve asynchronous approximate agreement against t < n/3 faults with quadratic communication. In a tree with the maximum degree Δ and the centroid decomposition height h, we achieve edge agreement (agreement on two adjacent vertices) in at most 6h + 1 rounds with 𝒪(n²) messages of size 𝒪(log Δ + log h) per round. We do this by designing a 6-round multivalued 2-graded consensus protocol and using it to construct a recursive edge agreement protocol. Then, we achieve edge agreement in the infinite path ℤ, again by using 2-graded consensus. Finally, we show that our edge agreement protocol enables approximate agreement in ℝ (with outputs that are at most some small parameter ε > 0 apart) in 6log₂M/(ε) + 𝒪(log log M/(ε)) rounds with 𝒪(n²) messages of size 𝒪(log log M/(ε)) per round, where M is the maximum non-byzantine input magnitude.
Cite as

Mose Mizrahi Erbes and Roger Wattenhofer. Asynchronous Approximate Agreement with Quadratic Communication. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 16:1-16:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mizrahierbes_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.16,
  author =	{Mizrahi Erbes, Mose and Wattenhofer, Roger},
  title =	{{Asynchronous Approximate Agreement with Quadratic Communication}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251890},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Approximate agreement, byzantine fault tolerance, communication complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.13
A General Input-Dependent Colorless Computability Theorem and Applications to Core-Dependent Adversaries

Authors: Yannis Coutouly and Emmanuel Godard

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
Distributed computing tasks can be presented with a triple (ℐ,𝒪,Δ). The solvability of a colorless task on the Iterated Immediate Snapshot model (IIS) has been characterized by the Colorless Computability Theorem [Maurice Herlihy et al., 2013]. A recent paper [Yannis Coutouly and Emmanuel Godard, 2024] generalizes this theorem for any message adversaries ℳ ⊆ IIS by geometric methods. In 2001, Mostéfaoui, Rajsbaum, Raynal, and Roy [Achour Mostéfaoui et al., 2002] introduced condition-based adversaries. This setting considers a particular adversary that will be applied only to a subset of input configurations. In this setting, they studied the k-set agreement task with condition-based t-resilient adversaries and obtained a sufficient condition on the conditions that make k-Set Agreement solvable. In this paper we have three contributions: 1) We generalize the characterization of [Yannis Coutouly and Emmanuel Godard, 2024] to input-dependent adversaries, which means that the adversaries can change depending on the input configuration. 2) We show that core-resilient adversaries of IIS_n have the same computability power as the core-resilient adversaries of IIS_n where crashes only happen at the start. 3) Using the two previous contributions, we provide a necessary and sufficient characterization of the condition-based, core-dependent adversaries that can solve k-Set Agreement. We also distinguish four settings that may appear when presenting a distributed task as (ℐ,𝒪,Δ). Finally, in a later section, we present structural properties on the carrier map Δ. Such properties allow simpler proof, without changing the computability power of the task. Most of the proofs in this article leverage the topological framework used in distributed computing by using simple geometric constructions.
Cite as

Yannis Coutouly and Emmanuel Godard. A General Input-Dependent Colorless Computability Theorem and Applications to Core-Dependent Adversaries. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 13:1-13:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{coutouly_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.13,
  author =	{Coutouly, Yannis and Godard, Emmanuel},
  title =	{{A General Input-Dependent Colorless Computability Theorem and Applications to Core-Dependent Adversaries}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251862},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: colorless task, topological methods, geometric simplicial complex, k-set-agreement, t-resilient model, condition-based computability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29
How Exhaustive Does an Extension-Based Proof Need to Be?

Authors: Faith Ellen, Shihao Liu, Leqi Zhu, Eli Gafni, and Rati Gelashvili

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
The class of extension-based proofs encompasses traditional valency arguments. It has been shown that they are insufficient to establish the impossibility of (n-1)-set agreement among n ≥ 3 processes in an asynchronous system with crash failures. We generalize this definition to k-exhaustive extension-based proofs, in which a prover can learn the maximum length of all executions involving a set of at most k processes from a specified configuration (which may be infinite). An upper bound on the length of these executions enables the prover to determine the outputs of all these executions. When k = n, this enables the prover to perform an exhaustive search of all reachable configurations, so it knows everything about the protocol. On the other hand, extension based proofs are as powerful as 1-exhaustive extension-based proofs. For any task with no deterministic, wait-free solution among n ≥ 2 processes, we show that there is an (n-1)-exhaustive extension-based proof of its impossibility. This is done using a new characterization of such tasks. In contrast, we prove that for 1 ≤ k ≤ n-2, there is no k-exhaustive extension-based proof of the impossibility of (n-1)-set agreement.
Cite as

Faith Ellen, Shihao Liu, Leqi Zhu, Eli Gafni, and Rati Gelashvili. How Exhaustive Does an Extension-Based Proof Need to Be?. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 29:1-29:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ellen_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29,
  author =	{Ellen, Faith and Liu, Shihao and Zhu, Leqi and Gafni, Eli and Gelashvili, Rati},
  title =	{{How Exhaustive Does an Extension-Based Proof Need to Be?}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252020},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Extension-based proof, set agreement, valency argument, zero-one exclusion}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.20
Flavors of Quantifiers in Hyperlogics

Authors: Marek Chalupa, Thomas A. Henzinger, and Ana Oliveira da Costa

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 360, 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)

Abstract
Hypertrace logic is a sorted first-order logic with separate sorts for time and execution traces. Its formulas specify hyperproperties, which are properties relating multiple traces. In this work, we extend hypertrace logic by introducing trace quantifiers that range over the set of all possible traces. In this extended logic, formulas can quantify over two kinds of trace variables: constrained trace variables, which range over a fixed set of traces defined by the model, and unconstrained trace variables, which can be assigned to any trace. In comparison, hyperlogics such as HyperLTL have only constrained trace quantifiers. We use hypertrace logic to study how different quantifier patterns affect the decidability of the satisfiability problem. We prove that hypertrace logic without constrained trace quantifiers is equivalent to monadic second-order logic of one successor (S1S), and therefore satisfiable, and that the trace-prefixed fragment (all trace quantifiers precede all time quantifiers) is equivalent to HyperQPTL. Moreover, we show that all hypertrace formulas where the only alternation between constrained trace quantifiers is from an existential to a universal quantifier are equisatisfiable to formulas without constraints on their trace variables and, therefore, decidable as well. Our framework allows us to study also time-prefixed hyperlogics, for which we provide new decidability and undecidability results.
Cite as

Marek Chalupa, Thomas A. Henzinger, and Ana Oliveira da Costa. Flavors of Quantifiers in Hyperlogics. In 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 360, pp. 20:1-20:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chalupa_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.20,
  author =	{Chalupa, Marek and Henzinger, Thomas A. and Oliveira da Costa, Ana},
  title =	{{Flavors of Quantifiers in Hyperlogics}},
  booktitle =	{45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-406-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{360},
  editor =	{Aiswarya, C. and Mehta, Ruta and Roy, Subhajit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251016},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hyperproperties, Satisfiability, First-order Logic, S1S}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.2
On the Efficiency of Dynamic Transaction Scheduling in Blockchain Sharding

Authors: Ramesh Adhikari, Costas Busch, and Miroslav Popovic

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
Sharding is a technique to speed up transaction processing in blockchains, where the n processing nodes in the blockchain are divided into s disjoint groups (shards) that can process transactions in parallel. We study dynamic scheduling problems on a shard graph G_s where transactions arrive online over time and are not known in advance. Each transaction may access at most k shards, and we denote by d the worst distance between a transaction and its accessing (destination) shards (the parameter d is unknown to the shards). To handle different values of d, we assume a locality sensitive decomposition of G_s into clusters of shards, where every cluster has a leader shard that schedules transactions for the cluster. We first examine the simpler case of the stateless model, where leaders are not aware of the current state of the transaction accounts, and we prove a O(d log² s ⋅ min{k, √s}) competitive ratio for latency. We then consider the stateful model, where leader shards gather the current state of accounts, and we prove a O(log s⋅ min{k, √s}+log² s) competitive ratio for latency. Each leader calculates the schedule in polynomial time for each transaction that it processes. We show that for any ε > 0, approximating the optimal schedule within a (min{k, √s})^{1 -ε} factor is NP-hard. Hence, our bound for the stateful model is within a poly-log factor from the best possibly achievable. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to establish provably efficient dynamic scheduling algorithms for blockchain sharding systems.
Cite as

Ramesh Adhikari, Costas Busch, and Miroslav Popovic. On the Efficiency of Dynamic Transaction Scheduling in Blockchain Sharding. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 2:1-2:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{adhikari_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.2,
  author =	{Adhikari, Ramesh and Busch, Costas and Popovic, Miroslav},
  title =	{{On the Efficiency of Dynamic Transaction Scheduling in Blockchain Sharding}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248191},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Blockchain, Blockchain Sharding, Dynamic Transaction Scheduling}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 77 Document/PDF
  • 51 Document/HTML
  • 1 Volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 12 2026
  • 39 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2021
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 13 Herlihy, Maurice
  • 5 Wattenhofer, Roger
  • 4 Fernández Anta, Antonio
  • 4 Petrank, Erez
  • 3 Ellen, Faith
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 56 LIPIcs
  • 17 OASIcs
  • 2 DagRep
  • 2 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 25 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
  • 7 Theory of computation → Distributed computing models
  • 6 Theory of computation → Concurrent algorithms
  • 5 Computing methodologies → Distributed algorithms
  • 5 Security and privacy → Distributed systems security
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 5 Ethereum
  • 5 blockchain
  • 4 concurrency
  • 3 Approximate agreement
  • 3 Blockchains
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact