14 Search Results for "Martins, Ruben"

Document
PACE Solver Description
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.37
PACE Solver Description: Minimum Hitting Set Computation via Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving

Authors: André Schidler

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
This paper describes our hybrid MaxSAT and mixed integer programming approach for finding minimum hitting sets as submitted to the 2025 PACE challenge. We also discuss hitting set specific challenges, lower bounds, preprocessing and design choices.
Cite as

André Schidler. PACE Solver Description: Minimum Hitting Set Computation via Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 37:1-37:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{schidler:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.37,
  author =	{Schidler, Andr\'{e}},
  title =	{{PACE Solver Description: Minimum Hitting Set Computation via Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:4},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251692},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: hitting set, maxsat, core-guided}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.DX.2025.2
Are Diagnostic Concepts Within the Reach of LLMs?

Authors: Anna Sztyber-Betley, Elodie Chanthery, Louise Travé-Massuyès, Silke Merkelbach, Karol Kukla, Maxence Glotin, Alexander Diedrich, and Oliver Niggemann

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 136, 36th International Conference on Principles of Diagnosis and Resilient Systems (DX 2025)

Abstract
Model-based diagnosis is a cornerstone of system health monitoring, allowing for the identification of faulty components based on observed behavior and a formal system model. However, obtaining a useful and reliable model is often an expensive and manual task. While the generation of a formal model was the aim of previous work, in this paper, we propose a methodology to use large language models to generate Minimal Structurally Overdetermined sets (MSOs). MSOs are specific subsets of the model equations from which diagnosis tests can be obtained. We investigate two different directions: (i) the large-language-models' ability to generate MSO sets for hybrid systems, similar to those generated by the well-known Fault Diagnosis Toolbox (FDT) (ii) the automated generation of MSOs for Boolean circuits, as well as the computation of the diagnoses. We thus show how both dynamic and static systems can be analysed by large-language models and how their output can be used for effective fault diagnosis. We evaluate our approach on a set of arithmetic and logic circuits, using OpenAI’s LLMs 4o-mini, o1, and o3-mini.
Cite as

Anna Sztyber-Betley, Elodie Chanthery, Louise Travé-Massuyès, Silke Merkelbach, Karol Kukla, Maxence Glotin, Alexander Diedrich, and Oliver Niggemann. Are Diagnostic Concepts Within the Reach of LLMs?. In 36th International Conference on Principles of Diagnosis and Resilient Systems (DX 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 136, pp. 2:1-2:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sztyberbetley_et_al:OASIcs.DX.2025.2,
  author =	{Sztyber-Betley, Anna and Chanthery, Elodie and Trav\'{e}-Massuy\`{e}s, Louise and Merkelbach, Silke and Kukla, Karol and Glotin, Maxence and Diedrich, Alexander and Niggemann, Oliver},
  title =	{{Are Diagnostic Concepts Within the Reach of LLMs?}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Conference on Principles of Diagnosis and Resilient Systems (DX 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:20},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-394-2},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{136},
  editor =	{Quinones-Grueiro, Marcos and Biswas, Gautam and Pill, Ingo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.DX.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247913},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.DX.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fault Diagnosis, Large Language Models, LLMs, Model Based Diagnosis, MSO, Redundancy Relations, Conflicts, Diagnoses}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.28
SLS-Enhanced Core-Boosted Linear Search for Anytime Maximum Satisfiability

Authors: Ole Lübke and Jeremias Berg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT), the constraint paradigm of minimizing a linear expression over Boolean (0-1) variables subject to a set of propositional clauses, is today used for solving NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems in various domains. Especially anytime MaxSAT solvers that compute low-cost solutions within a limited available computational time have significantly improved in recent years. Such solvers can be divided into SAT-based methods that use sophisticated reasoning, and stochastic local search (SLS) methods that heuristically explore the search space. The two are complementary; roughly speaking, SLS struggles with finding feasible solutions, and SAT-based methods with minimizing cost. Consequently, most state-of-the-art anytime MaxSAT solvers run SLS before a SAT-based algorithm with minimal communication between the two. In this paper, we aim to harness the complementary strengths of SAT-based, and SLS approaches in the context of anytime MaxSAT. More precisely, we describe several ways to enhance the performance of the so-called core-boosted linear search algorithm for anytime MaxSAT with SLS techniques. Core-boosted linear search is a three-phase algorithm where each phase uses different types of reasoning. Beyond MaxSAT, core-boosted search has also been successful in the related paradigms of pseudo-boolean optimization and constraint programming. We describe how an SLS approach to MaxSAT can be tightly integrated with all three phases of the algorithm, resulting in non-trivial information exchange in both directions between the SLS algorithm and the reasoning methods. We evaluate our techniques on standard benchmarks from the latest MaxSAT Evaluation and demonstrate that our techniques can noticeably improve on implementations of core-boosted search and SLS.
Cite as

Ole Lübke and Jeremias Berg. SLS-Enhanced Core-Boosted Linear Search for Anytime Maximum Satisfiability. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 28:1-28:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lubke_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.28,
  author =	{L\"{u}bke, Ole and Berg, Jeremias},
  title =	{{SLS-Enhanced Core-Boosted Linear Search for Anytime Maximum Satisfiability}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238897},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: Maximum Satisfiability, MaxSAT, SAT, SLS, Anytime Optimization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.15
RustSAT: A Library for SAT Solving in Rust

Authors: Christoph Jabs

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
State-of-the-art Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers constitute a practical and competitive approach for solving various real-world problems. To encourage their widespread adoption, the relatively high barrier of entry following from the low level syntax of SAT and the expert knowledge required to achieve tight integration with SAT solvers should be further reduced. We present RustSAT, a library with the aim of making SAT solving technology readily available in the Rust programming language. RustSAT provides functionality for helping with generating (Max)SAT instances, writing them to, or reading them from files. Furthermore, RustSAT includes interfaces to various state-of-the-art SAT solvers available with a unified Rust API. Lastly, RustSAT implements several encodings for higher level constraints (at-most-one, cardinality, and pseudo-Boolean), which are also available via a C and Python API.
Cite as

Christoph Jabs. RustSAT: A Library for SAT Solving in Rust. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 15:1-15:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jabs:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.15,
  author =	{Jabs, Christoph},
  title =	{{RustSAT: A Library for SAT Solving in Rust}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237498},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: Rust, library, SAT solvers, constraint encodings}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3
Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes

Authors: Zachary Battleman, Joseph E. Reeves, and Marijn J. H. Heule

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Satisfiability solvers have been instrumental in tackling hard problems, including mathematical challenges that require years of computation. A key obstacle in efficiently solving such problems lies in effectively partitioning them into many, frequently millions of subproblems. Existing automated partitioning techniques, primarily based on lookahead methods, perform well on some instances but fail to generate effective partitions for many others. This paper introduces a powerful partitioning approach that leverages prefixes of proofs derived from conflict-driven clause-learning solvers. This method enables non-experts to harness the power of massively parallel SAT solving for their problems. We also propose a semantically-driven partitioning technique tailored for problems with large cardinality constraints, which frequently arise in optimization tasks. We evaluate our methods on diverse benchmarks, including combinatorial problems and formulas from SAT and MaxSAT competitions. Our results demonstrate that these techniques outperform existing partitioning strategies in many cases, offering improved scalability and efficiency.
Cite as

Zachary Battleman, Joseph E. Reeves, and Marijn J. H. Heule. Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 3:1-3:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{battleman_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3,
  author =	{Battleman, Zachary and Reeves, Joseph E. and Heule, Marijn J. H.},
  title =	{{Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237378},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Satisfiability solving, parallel computing, problem partitioning}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.7
Redundancy Rules for MaxSAT

Authors: Ilario Bonacina, Maria Luisa Bonet, Sam Buss, and Massimo Lauria

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
The concept of redundancy in SAT leads to more expressive and powerful proof search techniques, e.g., able to express various inprocessing techniques, and originates interesting hierarchies of proof systems [Heule et.al'20, Buss-Thapen'19]. Redundancy has also been integrated in MaxSAT [Ihalainen et.al'22, Berg et.al'23, Bonacina et.al'24]. In this paper, we define a structured hierarchy of redundancy proof systems for MaxSAT, with the goal of studying its proof complexity. We obtain MaxSAT variants of proof systems such as SPR, PR, SR, and others, previously defined for SAT. All our rules are polynomially checkable, unlike [Ihalainen et.al'22]. Moreover, they are simpler and weaker than [Berg et.al'23], and possibly amenable to lower bounds. This work also complements the approach of [Bonacina et.al'24]. Their proof systems use different rule sets for soft and hard clauses, while here we propose a system using only hard clauses and blocking variables. This is easier to integrate with current solvers and proof checkers. We discuss the strength of the systems introduced, we show some limitations of them, and we give a short cost-SR proof that any assignment for the weak pigeonhole principle PHP^m_n falsifies at least m-n clauses.
Cite as

Ilario Bonacina, Maria Luisa Bonet, Sam Buss, and Massimo Lauria. Redundancy Rules for MaxSAT. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 7:1-7:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bonacina_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.7,
  author =	{Bonacina, Ilario and Bonet, Maria Luisa and Buss, Sam and Lauria, Massimo},
  title =	{{Redundancy Rules for MaxSAT}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237411},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: MaxSAT, Redundancy Rules, Pigeonhole Principle}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.26
Analyzing Reformulation Performance in Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving

Authors: André Schidler and Stefan Szeider

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Core-guided algorithms like OLL are among the best methods for solving the Maximum Satisfiability problem (MaxSAT). Although some performance characteristics of OLL have been studied, a comprehensive experimental analysis of its reformulation behavior is still missing. In this paper, we present a large-scale study on how different reformulations of a MaxSAT instance produced by OLL affect solver performance. By representing these reformulations as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), we isolate the impact of structural features - such as the size and interconnectivity of unsatisfiable cores - on solver runtime. Our extensive experimental evaluation of over 600k solver runs reveals clear correlations between DAG properties and performance outcomes. These results suggest a new avenue for designing heuristics that steer the solver toward more tractable reformulations. All OLL DAGs and performance data from our experiments are publicly available to foster further research.
Cite as

André Schidler and Stefan Szeider. Analyzing Reformulation Performance in Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 26:1-26:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{schidler_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.26,
  author =	{Schidler, Andr\'{e} and Szeider, Stefan},
  title =	{{Analyzing Reformulation Performance in Core-Guided MaxSAT Solving}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237605},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: maximum satisfiability, OLL, core-guided}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23
Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization

Authors: Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell, and Rui Zhao

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
In the the last two decades, a lot of effort has been devoted to the development of satisfiability-checking tools for a variety of SAT-related problems. However, most of these tools lack optimization capabilities. That is, instead of finding any solution, one is sometimes interested in a solution that is best according to some criterion. Pseudo-Boolean solvers can be used to deal with optimization by successively solving a series of problems that contain an additional pseudo-Boolean constraint expressing that a better solution is required. A key point for the success of this simple approach is that lemmas that are learned for one problem can be reused for subsequent ones. In this paper we go one step further and show how, by using a simple symbolic conflict analysis procedure, not only can lemmas be reused between problems but also strengthened, thus further pruning the search space traversal. In addition, we show how this technique automatically allows one to infer upper bounds in maximization problems, thus giving an estimation of how far the solver is from finding an optimal solution. Experimental results with our PB solver reveal that (i) this technique is indeed effective in practice, providing important speedups in problems where several solutions are found and (ii) on problems with very few solutions, where the impact of our technique is limited, its overhead is negligible.
Cite as

Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell, and Rui Zhao. Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 23:1-23:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nieuwenhuis_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23,
  author =	{Nieuwenhuis, Robert and Oliveras, Albert and Rodr{\'\i}guez-Carbonell, Enric and Zhao, Rui},
  title =	{{Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237579},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: SAT, Pseudo-Boolean Optimization, Conflict Analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.29
Reencoding Unique Literal Clauses

Authors: Aeacus Sheng, Joseph E. Reeves, and Marijn J. H. Heule

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
We present a lightweight reencoding technique that augments propositional formulas containing implicit or explicit exactly-one constraints with auxiliary variables derived from the order encoding. Our approach is based on the observation that many formulas contain clauses where each literal appears only in that clause, and that these unique literal clauses can be replaced by the corresponding sequential counter encoding of exactly-one constraints, which introduces the same variables as the order encoding. We implemented the reencoding in the state-of-the-art SAT solver CaDiCaL with support for proof logging and solution reconstruction. Experiments on SAT Competition benchmarks demonstrate that our technique enables solving dozens of additional formulas. We found that shuffling a formula before reencoding harms performance. To mitigate this issue, we introduce a method that sorts literals within clauses based on the formula structure before applying our reencoding. The same technique also predicts whether reencoding is likely to yield improvements.
Cite as

Aeacus Sheng, Joseph E. Reeves, and Marijn J. H. Heule. Reencoding Unique Literal Clauses. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 29:1-29:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sheng_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.29,
  author =	{Sheng, Aeacus and Reeves, Joseph E. and Heule, Marijn J. H.},
  title =	{{Reencoding Unique Literal Clauses}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237635},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Satisfiability solving, auxiliary variables, graph coloring}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.2
A DSL for Swarm Intelligence Algorithms

Authors: Kevin Martins and Rui Mendes

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 135, 14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025)

Abstract
We propose a domain-specific language to simplify the expression of Swarm Intelligence algorithms. These algorithms are typically introduced through metaphors, requiring practitioners to manually translate them into low-level implementations.This process can obscure intent and hinder reproducibility. The proposed DSL bridges this gap by capturing algorithmic behavior at a higher level of abstraction. We demonstrate its expressiveness in a few lines of code and evaluate its feasibility through a reference implementation. A discussion is presented that includes empirical comparisons with traditional implementations and future directions of the proposed DSL.
Cite as

Kevin Martins and Rui Mendes. A DSL for Swarm Intelligence Algorithms. In 14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 135, pp. 2:1-2:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{martins_et_al:OASIcs.SLATE.2025.2,
  author =	{Martins, Kevin and Mendes, Rui},
  title =	{{A DSL for Swarm Intelligence Algorithms}},
  booktitle =	{14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:17},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-387-4},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{135},
  editor =	{Baptista, Jorge and Barateiro, Jos\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236826},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Domain Specific Languages, Swarm Intelligence, Global Optimization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.10
Bottom-Up Synthesis of Memory Mutations with Separation Logic

Authors: Kasra Ferdowsi and Hila Peleg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
Programming-by-Example (PBE) is the paradigm of program synthesis specified via input-output pairs. It is commonly used because examples are easy to provide and collect from the environment. A popular optimization for enumerative synthesis with examples is Observational Equivalence (OE), which groups programs into equivalence classes according to their evaluation on example inputs. Current formulations of OE, however, are severely limited by the assumption that the synthesizer’s target language contains only pure components with no side-effects, either enforcing this in their target language, or ignoring it, leading to an incorrect enumeration. This limits their ability to use realistic component sets. We address this limitation by borrowing from Separation Logic, which can compositionally reason about heap mutations. We reformulate PBE using a restricted Separation Logic: Concrete Heap Separation Logic (CHSL), transforming the search for programs into a proof search in CHSL. This lets us perform bottom-up enumerative synthesis without the need for expert-provided annotations or domain-specific inferences, but with three key advantages: we (i) preserve correctness in the presence of memory-mutating operations, (ii) compact the search space by representing many concrete programs as one under CHSL, and (iii) perform a provably correct OE-reduction. We present SObEq (Side-effects in OBservational EQuivalence), a bottom-up enumerative algorithm that, given a PBE task, searches for its CHSL derivation. The SObEq algorithm is proved correct with no purity assumptions: we show it is guaranteed to lose no solutions. We also evaluate our implementation of SObEq on benchmarks from the literature and online sources, and show that it produces high-quality results quickly.
Cite as

Kasra Ferdowsi and Hila Peleg. Bottom-Up Synthesis of Memory Mutations with Separation Logic. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 10:1-10:32, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ferdowsi_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.10,
  author =	{Ferdowsi, Kasra and Peleg, Hila},
  title =	{{Bottom-Up Synthesis of Memory Mutations with Separation Logic}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:32},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233036},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Program synthesis, observational equivalence}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2023.19
UpMax: User Partitioning for MaxSAT

Authors: Pedro Orvalho, Vasco Manquinho, and Ruben Martins

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 271, 26th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2023)

Abstract
It has been shown that Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) problem instances can be effectively solved by partitioning the set of soft clauses into several disjoint sets. The partitioning methods can be based on clause weights (e.g., stratification) or based on graph representations of the formula. Afterwards, a merge procedure is applied to guarantee that an optimal solution is found. This paper proposes a new framework called UpMax that decouples the partitioning procedure from the MaxSAT solving algorithms. As a result, new partitioning procedures can be defined independently of the MaxSAT algorithm to be used. Moreover, this decoupling also allows users that build new MaxSAT formulas to propose partition schemes based on knowledge of the problem to be solved. We illustrate this approach using several problems and show that partitioning has a large impact on the performance of unsatisfiability-based MaxSAT algorithms.
Cite as

Pedro Orvalho, Vasco Manquinho, and Ruben Martins. UpMax: User Partitioning for MaxSAT. In 26th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 271, pp. 19:1-19:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{orvalho_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2023.19,
  author =	{Orvalho, Pedro and Manquinho, Vasco and Martins, Ruben},
  title =	{{UpMax: User Partitioning for MaxSAT}},
  booktitle =	{26th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2023)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-286-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{271},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Slivovsky, Friedrich},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2023.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-184819},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2023.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Maximum Satisfiability, Formula partitioning, Graph-based methods}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2022.14
Incremental Maximum Satisfiability

Authors: Andreas Niskanen, Jeremias Berg, and Matti Järvisalo

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 236, 25th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2022)

Abstract
Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers allow for incremental computations, which is key to efficient employment of SAT solvers iteratively for developing complex decision and optimization procedures, including maximum satisfiability (MaxSAT) solvers. However, enabling incremental computations on the level of constraint optimization remains a noticeable challenge. While incremental computations have been identified to have great potential in speeding up MaxSAT-based approaches for solving various real-world optimization problems, enabling incremental computations in MaxSAT remains to most extent unexplored. In this work, we contribute towards making incremental MaxSAT solving a reality. Firstly, building on the IPASIR interface for incremental SAT solving, we propose the IPAMIR interface for implementing incremental MaxSAT solvers and for developing applications making use of incremental MaxSAT. Secondly, we expand our recent adaptation of the implicit hitting set based MaxHS MaxSAT solver to a fully-fledged incremental MaxSAT solver in terms of implementing the IPAMIR specification in full, and detail in particular how, in addition to weight changes, assumptions are enabled without losing incrementality. Thirdly, we provide further empirical evidence on the benefits of incremental MaxSAT solving under assumptions.
Cite as

Andreas Niskanen, Jeremias Berg, and Matti Järvisalo. Incremental Maximum Satisfiability. In 25th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 236, pp. 14:1-14:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{niskanen_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2022.14,
  author =	{Niskanen, Andreas and Berg, Jeremias and J\"{a}rvisalo, Matti},
  title =	{{Incremental Maximum Satisfiability}},
  booktitle =	{25th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2022)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-242-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{236},
  editor =	{Meel, Kuldeep S. and Strichman, Ofer},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2022.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-166885},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2022.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: maximum satisfiability, MaxSAT, incremental optimization, API, implicit hitting set approach}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2022.16
Certified CNF Translations for Pseudo-Boolean Solving

Authors: Stephan Gocht, Ruben Martins, Jakob Nordström, and Andy Oertel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 236, 25th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2022)

Abstract
The dramatic improvements in Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solving since the turn of the millennium have made it possible to leverage state-of-the-art conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solvers for many combinatorial problems in academia and industry, and the use of proof logging has played a crucial role in increasing the confidence that the results these solvers produce are correct. However, the fact that SAT proof logging is performed in conjunctive normal form (CNF) clausal format means that it has not been possible to extend guarantees of correctness to the use of SAT solvers for more expressive combinatorial paradigms, where the first step is an unverified translation of the input to CNF. In this work, we show how cutting-planes-based reasoning can provide proof logging for solvers that translate pseudo-Boolean (a.k.a. 0-1 integer linear) decision problems to CNF and then run CDCL. To support a wide range of encodings, we provide a uniform and easily extensible framework for proof logging of CNF translations. We are hopeful that this is just a first step towards providing a unified proof logging approach that will also extend to maximum satisfiability (MaxSAT) solving and pseudo-Boolean optimization in general.
Cite as

Stephan Gocht, Ruben Martins, Jakob Nordström, and Andy Oertel. Certified CNF Translations for Pseudo-Boolean Solving. In 25th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 236, pp. 16:1-16:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gocht_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2022.16,
  author =	{Gocht, Stephan and Martins, Ruben and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob and Oertel, Andy},
  title =	{{Certified CNF Translations for Pseudo-Boolean Solving}},
  booktitle =	{25th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2022)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-242-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{236},
  editor =	{Meel, Kuldeep S. and Strichman, Ofer},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2022.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-166901},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2022.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: pseudo-Boolean solving, 0-1 integer linear program, proof logging, certifying algorithms, certified translation, CNF encoding, cutting planes}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 14 Document/PDF
  • 11 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 11 2025
  • 1 2023
  • 2 2022

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Berg, Jeremias
  • 2 Heule, Marijn J. H.
  • 2 Martins, Ruben
  • 2 Reeves, Joseph E.
  • 2 Schidler, André
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 12 LIPIcs
  • 2 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Constraint and logic programming
  • 3 Theory of computation → Automated reasoning
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Combinatorial optimization
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Knowledge representation and reasoning
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Optimization algorithms
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 MaxSAT
  • 2 Maximum Satisfiability
  • 2 SAT
  • 2 Satisfiability solving
  • 2 core-guided
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact