18 Search Results for "Schmidt, Renate A."

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.18
A Modular Framework for Proof-Search via Formalised Modal Completeness in HOL Light

Authors: Antonella Bilotta, Marco Maggesi, and Cosimo Perini Brogi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
We extend the existing HOL Light Library for Modal Systems (HOLMS) to support a modular implementation of modal reasoning within the HOL Light proof assistant. We deeply embed axiomatic calculi and relational semantics for seven normal modal logics (K, T, B, K4, S4, S5, GL) and formalise modal adequacy theorems for these systems. We then leverage those formalisations to implement a mechanism for automated reasoning via proof-search in the associated labelled sequent calculi, which we shallowly embed in HOL Light’s goal-stack mechanism. This way, we equip the general-purpose proof assistant with (semi)decision procedures for these logics that, in case of failure to construct a proof for the input formula, return a certified countermodel within the appropriate class for the logic under consideration. On the methodological side, we propose a precise measure of the modularity of our approach by systematically adopting Christopher Strachey’s distinction between ad hoc and parametric polymorphism throughout the library.
Cite as

Antonella Bilotta, Marco Maggesi, and Cosimo Perini Brogi. A Modular Framework for Proof-Search via Formalised Modal Completeness in HOL Light. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 18:1-18:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bilotta_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.18,
  author =	{Bilotta, Antonella and Maggesi, Marco and Perini Brogi, Cosimo},
  title =	{{A Modular Framework for Proof-Search via Formalised Modal Completeness in HOL Light}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254427},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Modal logic, HOL Light, Labelled sequent calculi, Logical verification, Interactive theorem proving, Automated proof-search}
}
Document
Research
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.3.3.1
A Logic Programming Approach to Repairing SHACL Constraint Violations

Authors: Shqiponja Ahmetaj, Robert David, Axel Polleres, and Mantas Šimkus

Published in: TGDK, Volume 3, Issue 3 (2025). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 3, Issue 3

Abstract
The Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) is a recent standard, a W3C recommendation, for validating RDF graphs against shape constraints to be checked on target nodes of a data graph. The standard also describes the notion of validation reports, which detail the results of the validation process. In case of violation of constraints, the validation report should explain the reasons for non-validation, offering guidance on how to identify or fix violations in the data graph. Since the specification left it open to SHACL processors to define such explanations, a recent work proposed the use of explanations in the style of database repairs, where a repair is a set of additions to or deletions from the data graph so that the resulting graph validates against the constraints. In this paper, we study such repairs for non-recursive SHACL, the largest fragment of SHACL that is fully defined in the specification. We propose an algorithm to compute repairs by encoding the explanation problem - using Answer Set Programming (ASP) - into a logic program, where the answer sets contain (minimal) repairs. We then study a scenario where it is not possible to simultaneously repair all the targets, which may be the case due to overall unsatisfiability or conflicting constraints. We introduce a relaxed notion of validation, which allows to validate a (maximal) subset of the targets and adapt the ASP translation to take into account this relaxation. Finally, we add support for repairing constraints which use property paths and equality of paths. Our implementation in clingo is - to the best of our knowledge - the first implementation of a repair program for SHACL.
Cite as

Shqiponja Ahmetaj, Robert David, Axel Polleres, and Mantas Šimkus. A Logic Programming Approach to Repairing SHACL Constraint Violations. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 3, pp. 1:1-1:36, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{ahmetaj_et_al:TGDK.3.3.1,
  author =	{Ahmetaj, Shqiponja and David, Robert and Polleres, Axel and \v{S}imkus, Mantas},
  title =	{{A Logic Programming Approach to Repairing SHACL Constraint Violations}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{1:1--1:36},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{3},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.3.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252124},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.3.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: SHACL, Shapes Constraint Language, Database Repairs, Knowledge Graphs, Semantic Web, Answer Set Programming}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6
Explaining Reasoning Results for Description Logic Ontologies (Invited Paper)

Authors: Patrick Koopmann

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
The Web Ontology Language (OWL), grounded in description logics, enables reasoning systems to infer implicit knowledge in a transparent manner. However, the expressivity of description logics and the complexity of large ontologies often results in reasoning outcomes that are hard to understand without additional tool support. Explanations of these outcomes are essential for users to understand ontology content, communicate its structure and behavior effectively, and debug undesired or missing inferences. This chapter provides an overview of the central explanation techniques that have been developed for explaining reasoning with description logic ontologies. Here, we consider both explanations for positive entailments (explaining why something can be deduced), as well as negative entailments (why something cannot be deduced). More specifically, we discuss justifications, proofs and interpolation as a means to explain positive entailments, and abduction for explaining negative entailments, where we also have a closer look at practical algorithms as well as practical and theoretical challenges.
Cite as

Patrick Koopmann. Explaining Reasoning Results for Description Logic Ontologies (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 6:1-6:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{koopmann:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6,
  author =	{Koopmann, Patrick},
  title =	{{Explaining Reasoning Results for Description Logic Ontologies}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:29},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250514},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Explanations, Justifications, Proofs, Craig Interpolation, Contrastive Explanations}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.35
Verifying an Efficient Algorithm for Computing Bernoulli Numbers

Authors: Manuel Eberl and Peter Lammich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
The Bernoulli numbers B_k are a sequence of rational numbers that is ubiquitous in mathematics, but difficult to compute efficiently (compared to e.g. approximating π). In 2008, Harvey gave the currently fastest known practical way for computing them: his algorithm computes B_k mod p in time O(p log^{1 + o(1)} p). By doing this for O(k) many small primes p in parallel and then combining the results with the Chinese Remainder Theorem, one recovers the value of B_k as a rational number in O(k² log^{2 + o(1)} k) time. One advantage of this approach is that the expensive part of the algorithm is highly parallelisable and has very low memory requirements. This algorithm still holds the world record with its computation of B_{10⁸}. We give a verified efficient LLVM implementation of this algorithm. This was achieved by formalising the necessary mathematical background theory in Isabelle/HOL, proving an abstract version of the algorithm correct, and refining this abstract version down to LLVM using Lammich’s Isabelle-LLVM framework, including many low-level optimisations. The performance of the resulting LLVM code is comparable with Harvey’s original unverified and hand-optimised C++ implementation.
Cite as

Manuel Eberl and Peter Lammich. Verifying an Efficient Algorithm for Computing Bernoulli Numbers. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 35:1-35:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{eberl_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.35,
  author =	{Eberl, Manuel and Lammich, Peter},
  title =	{{Verifying an Efficient Algorithm for Computing Bernoulli Numbers}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{35:1--35:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.35},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246331},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.35},
  annote =	{Keywords: Bernoulli numbers, LLVM, verification, Isabelle, Chinese remainder theorem, modular arithmetic, Montgomery arithmetic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.26
Improving the SMT Proof Reconstruction Pipeline in Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Hanna Lachnitt, Mathias Fleury, Haniel Barbosa, Jibiana Jakpor, Bruno Andreotti, Andrew Reynolds, Hans-Jörg Schurr, Clark Barrett, and Cesare Tinelli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Sledgehammer is a tool that increases the level of automation in the Isabelle/HOL proof assistant by asking external automatic theorem provers (ATPs), including SMT solvers, to prove the current goal. When the external ATP succeeds it must provide enough evidence that the goal holds for Isabelle to be able to reprove it internally based on that evidence. In particular, Isabelle can do this by replaying fine-grained proof certificates from proof-producing SMT solvers as long as they are expressed in the Alethe format, which until now was supported only by the veriT SMT solver. We report on our experience adding proof reconstruction support for the cvc5 SMT solver in Isabelle by extending cvc5 to produce proofs in the Alethe format and then adapting Isabelle to reconstruct those proofs. We discuss several difficulties and pitfalls we encountered and describe a set of tools and techniques we developed to improve the process. A notable outcome of this effort is that Isabelle can now be used as an independent proof checker for SMT problems written in the SMT-LIB standard. We evaluate cvc5’s integration on a set of SMT-LIB benchmarks originating from Isabelle as well as on a set of Isabelle proofs. Our results confirm that this integration complements and improves Sledgehammer’s capabilities.
Cite as

Hanna Lachnitt, Mathias Fleury, Haniel Barbosa, Jibiana Jakpor, Bruno Andreotti, Andrew Reynolds, Hans-Jörg Schurr, Clark Barrett, and Cesare Tinelli. Improving the SMT Proof Reconstruction Pipeline in Isabelle/HOL. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 26:1-26:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lachnitt_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.26,
  author =	{Lachnitt, Hanna and Fleury, Mathias and Barbosa, Haniel and Jakpor, Jibiana and Andreotti, Bruno and Reynolds, Andrew and Schurr, Hans-J\"{o}rg and Barrett, Clark and Tinelli, Cesare},
  title =	{{Improving the SMT Proof Reconstruction Pipeline in Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246243},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: interactive theorem proving, proof assistants, Isabelle/HOL, SMT, certification, proof certificates, proof reconstruction, proof automation}
}
Document
Short Paper
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.38
Sledgehammering Without ATPs (Short Paper)

Authors: Martin Desharnais and Jasmin Blanchette

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
We describe an alternative architecture for "hammers," inspired by Magnushammer, in which proofs are found by the proof assistant’s built-in automation instead of by external automatic theorem provers (ATPs). We implemented this approach in Isabelle’s Sledgehammer and evaluated it. The new ATP-free approach nicely complements the traditional Sledgehammer. The two approaches in combination solve more goals than the traditional ATP-based approach alone.
Cite as

Martin Desharnais and Jasmin Blanchette. Sledgehammering Without ATPs (Short Paper). In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 38:1-38:8, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{desharnais_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.38,
  author =	{Desharnais, Martin and Blanchette, Jasmin},
  title =	{{Sledgehammering Without ATPs}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{38:1--38:8},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.38},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246366},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.38},
  annote =	{Keywords: Interactive theorem proving, proof assistants, proof automation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.38
Reducing Quantum Circuit Synthesis to #SAT

Authors: Dekel Zak, Jingyi Mei, Jean-Marie Lagniez, and Alfons Laarman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Quantum circuit synthesis is the task of decomposing a given quantum operator into a sequence of elementary quantum gates. Since the finite target gate set cannot exactly implement any given operator, approximation is often necessary. Model counting, or #SAT, has recently been demonstrated as a promising new approach for tackling core problems in quantum circuit analysis. In this work, we show for the first time that the universal quantum circuit synthesis problem can be reduced to maximum model counting. We formulate a #SAT encoding for exact and approximate depth-optimal quantum circuit synthesis into the Clifford+T gate set. We evaluate our method with an open-source implementation that uses the maximum model counter d4Max as a backend. For this purpose, we extended d4Max with support for complex and negative weights to represent amplitudes. Experimental results show that existing classical tools have potential for the quantum circuit synthesis problem.
Cite as

Dekel Zak, Jingyi Mei, Jean-Marie Lagniez, and Alfons Laarman. Reducing Quantum Circuit Synthesis to #SAT. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 38:1-38:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zak_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.38,
  author =	{Zak, Dekel and Mei, Jingyi and Lagniez, Jean-Marie and Laarman, Alfons},
  title =	{{Reducing Quantum Circuit Synthesis to #SAT}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{38:1--38:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.38},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238997},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.38},
  annote =	{Keywords: Maximum weighted model counting, quantum circuit synthesis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.11
Better Extension Variables in DQBF via Independence

Authors: Leroy Chew and Tomáš Peitl

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
We show that extension variables in (D)QBF can be generalised by conditioning on universal assignments. The benefit of this is that the dependency sets of such conditioned extension variables can be made smaller to allow easier refutations. This simple modification instantly solves many challenges in p-simulating the QBF expansion rule, which cannot be p-simulated in proof systems that have strategy extraction [Leroy Chew and Judith Clymo, 2020]. Simulating expansion is even more crucial in DQBF, where other methods are incomplete. In this paper we provide an overview of the strength of this new independent extension rule. We find that a new version of Extended Frege called IndExtFrege + ∀red can p-simulate a multitude of difficult QBF and DQBF techniques, even techniques that are difficult to approach with eFrege + ∀red. We show five p-simulations, that IndExtFrege + ∀red p-simulates QRAT, DQBF-IR-calc, IR(𝒟^rrs)-calc, Fork-Resolution and DQRAT which together underpin most DQBF solving and preprocessing techniques. The p-simulations work despite these systems using complicated rules and our new extension rule being relatively simple. Moreover, unlike recent p-simulations by eFrege + ∀red we can simulate the proof rules line by line, which allows us to mix QBF rules more easily with other inference steps.
Cite as

Leroy Chew and Tomáš Peitl. Better Extension Variables in DQBF via Independence. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 11:1-11:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chew_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.11,
  author =	{Chew, Leroy and Peitl, Tom\'{a}\v{s}},
  title =	{{Better Extension Variables in DQBF via Independence}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237453},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: DQBF, QBF, Proof Systems, Dependency Schemes, RAT, Extended Frege, Skolem functions}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7
Combining Generalization Algorithms in Regular Collapse-Free Theories

Authors: Mauricio Ayala-Rincón, David M. Cerna, Temur Kutsia, and Christophe Ringeissen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
We look at the generalization problem modulo some equational theories. This problem is dual to the unification problem: given two input terms, we want to find a common term whose respective two instances are equivalent to the original terms modulo the theory. There exist algorithms for finding generalizations over various equational theories. We focus on modular construction of equational generalization algorithms for the union of signature-disjoint theories. Specifically, we consider the class of regular and collapse-free theories, showing how to combine existing generalization algorithms to produce specific solutions in these cases. Additionally, we identify a class of theories that admit a generalization algorithm based on the application of axioms to resolve the problem. To define this class, we rely on the notion of syntactic theories, a concept originally introduced to develop unification procedures similar to the one known for syntactic unification. We demonstrate that syntactic theories are also helpful in developing generalization procedures similar to those used for syntactic generalization.
Cite as

Mauricio Ayala-Rincón, David M. Cerna, Temur Kutsia, and Christophe Ringeissen. Combining Generalization Algorithms in Regular Collapse-Free Theories. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 7:1-7:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ayalarincon_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7,
  author =	{Ayala-Rinc\'{o}n, Mauricio and Cerna, David M. and Kutsia, Temur and Ringeissen, Christophe},
  title =	{{Combining Generalization Algorithms in Regular Collapse-Free Theories}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236228},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Generalization, Anti-unification, Equational theories, Combination}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.21
An Expressive Trace Logic for Recursive Programs

Authors: Dilian Gurov and Reiner Hähnle

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
We present an expressive logic over trace formulas, based on binary state predicates, chop, and least fixed points, for precise specification of programs with recursive procedures. Both programs and trace formulas are equipped with a direct-style, fully compositional, denotational semantics that on programs coincides with the standard SOS of recursive programs. We design a compositional proof calculus for proving finite-trace program properties, and prove soundness as well as (relative) completeness. We show that each program can be mapped to a semantics-preserving trace formula and, vice versa, each trace formula can be mapped to a canonical program over slightly extended programs, resulting in a Galois connection between programs and formulas. Our results shed light on the correspondence between programming constructs and logical connectives.
Cite as

Dilian Gurov and Reiner Hähnle. An Expressive Trace Logic for Recursive Programs. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 21:1-21:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gurov_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.21,
  author =	{Gurov, Dilian and H\"{a}hnle, Reiner},
  title =	{{An Expressive Trace Logic for Recursive Programs}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236360},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Denotational semantics, compositional semantics, program specification, compositional verification, fixed point logic, trace logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.19
The Complexity of Learning LTL, CTL and ATL Formulas

Authors: Benjamin Bordais, Daniel Neider, and Rajarshi Roy

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
We consider the problem of learning temporal logic formulas from examples of system behavior. Learning temporal properties has crystallized as an effective means to explain complex temporal behaviors. Several efficient algorithms have been designed for learning temporal formulas. However, the theoretical understanding of the complexity of the learning decision problems remains largely unexplored. To address this, we study the complexity of the passive learning problems of three prominent temporal logics, Linear Temporal Logic (LTL), Computation Tree Logic (CTL) and Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL) and several of their fragments. We show that learning formulas with unbounded occurrences of binary operators is NP-complete for all of these logics. On the other hand, when investigating the complexity of learning formulas with bounded occurrences of binary operators, we exhibit discrepancies between the complexity of learning LTL, CTL and ATL formulas (with a varying number of agents).
Cite as

Benjamin Bordais, Daniel Neider, and Rajarshi Roy. The Complexity of Learning LTL, CTL and ATL Formulas. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 19:1-19:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bordais_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.19,
  author =	{Bordais, Benjamin and Neider, Daniel and Roy, Rajarshi},
  title =	{{The Complexity of Learning LTL, CTL and ATL Formulas}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228441},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Temporal logic, passive learning, complexity}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.3
Algebras for Automata: Reasoning with Regularity (Invited Talk)

Authors: Anupam Das

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
In the second half of the 20th century various theories of regular expressions were proposed, eventually leading to the notion of a Kleene Algebra (KA). Kozen and Krob independently proved the completeness of KA for the model of regular languages, a now celebrated result that has been refined and generalised over the years. In recent years proof theoretic approaches to regular languages have been studied, providing alternative routes to metalogical results like completeness and decidability. In this talk I will present a new approach from a different starting point: finite state automata. A notation for non-deterministic finite automata is readily obtained via expressions with least fixed points, leading to a theory of right-linear algebras (RLA). RLA is strictly more general than KA, e.g. admitting ω-regular languages as a model too, and enjoys a simpler proof theory than KA. This allows us to recover (more general) metalogical results in a robust way, combining techniques from automata, games, and cyclic proofs. Finally I will discuss extensions of RLA by greatest fixed points, comprising a notation for parity automata, to reason about ω-regular languages too. This talk is based on joint works with Abhishek De [Anupam Das and Abhishek De, 2024a and 2024b].
Cite as

Anupam Das. Algebras for Automata: Reasoning with Regularity (Invited Talk). In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, p. 3:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{das:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.3,
  author =	{Das, Anupam},
  title =	{{Algebras for Automata: Reasoning with Regularity}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228281},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Regular languages, Linear grammars, Proof theory, Cyclic proofs, Automata theory, Fixed points, Games}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.9
On Homogeneous Models of Fluted Languages

Authors: Daumantas Kojelis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
We study the fluted fragment of first-order logic which is often viewed as a multi-variable non-guarded extension to various systems of description logics lacking role-inverses. In this paper we show that satisfiable fluted sentences (even under reasonable extensions) admit special kinds of "nice" models which we call globally/locally homogeneous. Homogeneous models allow us to simplify methods for analysing fluted logics with counting quantifiers and establish a novel result for the decidability of the (finite) satisfiability problem for the fluted fragment with periodic counting. More specifically, we will show that the (finite) satisfiability problem for the language is Tower-complete. If only two variable are used, computational complexity drops to NExpTime-completeness. We supplement our findings by showing that generalisations of fluted logics, such as the adjacent fragment, have finite and general satisfiability problems which are, respectively, Σ⁰₁- and Π⁰₁-complete. Additionally, satisfiability becomes Σ¹₁-complete if periodic counting quantifiers are permitted.
Cite as

Daumantas Kojelis. On Homogeneous Models of Fluted Languages. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 9:1-9:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kojelis:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.9,
  author =	{Kojelis, Daumantas},
  title =	{{On Homogeneous Models of Fluted Languages}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227669},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fluted Fragment, Fluted Logic, Fluted Fragment with Periodic Counting, Adjacent Fragment, Adjacent Fragment with Counting, Adjacent Fragment with Periodic Counting, Counting Quantifiers, Periodic Counting Quantifiers, Decidable Fragments of First-Order Logic}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.41
Taking Bi-Intuitionistic Logic First-Order: A Proof-Theoretic Investigation via Polytree Sequents

Authors: Tim S. Lyon, Ian Shillito, and Alwen Tiu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
It is well-known that extending the Hilbert axiomatic system for first-order intuitionistic logic with an exclusion operator, that is dual to implication, collapses the domains of models into a constant domain. This makes it an interesting problem to find a sound and complete proof system for first-order bi-intuitionistic logic with non-constant domains that is also conservative over first-order intuitionistic logic. We solve this problem by presenting the first sound and complete proof system for first-order bi-intuitionistic logic with increasing domains. We formalize our proof system as a polytree sequent calculus (a notational variant of nested sequents), and prove that it enjoys cut-elimination and is conservative over first-order intuitionistic logic. A key feature of our calculus is an explicit eigenvariable context, which allows us to control precisely the scope of free variables in a polytree structure. Semantically this context can be seen as encoding a notion of Scott’s existence predicate for intuitionistic logic. This turns out to be crucial to avoid the collapse of domains and to prove the completeness of our proof system. The explicit consideration of the variable context in a formula sheds light on a previously overlooked dependency between the residuation principle and the existence predicate in the first-order setting, which may help to explain the difficulty in designing a sound and complete proof system for first-order bi-intuitionistic logic.
Cite as

Tim S. Lyon, Ian Shillito, and Alwen Tiu. Taking Bi-Intuitionistic Logic First-Order: A Proof-Theoretic Investigation via Polytree Sequents. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 41:1-41:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lyon_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.41,
  author =	{Lyon, Tim S. and Shillito, Ian and Tiu, Alwen},
  title =	{{Taking Bi-Intuitionistic Logic First-Order: A Proof-Theoretic Investigation via Polytree Sequents}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{41:1--41:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.41},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227987},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.41},
  annote =	{Keywords: Bi-intuitionistic, Cut-elimination, Conservativity, Domain, First-order, Polytree, Proof theory, Reachability, Sequent}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.2.3.2
Strong Faithfulness for ELH Ontology Embeddings

Authors: Victor Lacerda, Ana Ozaki, and Ricardo Guimarães

Published in: TGDK, Volume 2, Issue 3 (2024). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 2, Issue 3

Abstract
Ontology embedding methods are powerful approaches to represent and reason over structured knowledge in various domains. One advantage of ontology embeddings over knowledge graph embeddings is their ability to capture and impose an underlying schema to which the model must conform. Despite advances, most current approaches do not guarantee that the resulting embedding respects the axioms the ontology entails. In this work, we formally prove that normalized ELH has the strong faithfulness property on convex geometric models, which means that there is an embedding that precisely captures the original ontology. We present a region-based geometric model for embedding normalized ELH ontologies into a continuous vector space. To prove strong faithfulness, our construction takes advantage of the fact that normalized ELH has a finite canonical model. We first prove the statement assuming (possibly) non-convex regions, allowing us to keep the required dimensions low. Then, we impose convexity on the regions and show the property still holds. Finally, we consider reasoning tasks on geometric models and analyze the complexity in the class of convex geometric models used for proving strong faithfulness.
Cite as

Victor Lacerda, Ana Ozaki, and Ricardo Guimarães. Strong Faithfulness for ELH Ontology Embeddings. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 2, Issue 3, pp. 2:1-2:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{lacerda_et_al:TGDK.2.3.2,
  author =	{Lacerda, Victor and Ozaki, Ana and Guimar\~{a}es, Ricardo},
  title =	{{Strong Faithfulness for ELH Ontology Embeddings}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{2:1--2:29},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{2},
  number =	{3},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.2.3.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225965},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.2.3.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge Graph Embeddings, Ontologies, Description Logic}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 18 Document/PDF
  • 15 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 13 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 2 2022
  • 1 2020

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Hähnle, Reiner
  • 2 Rümmer, Philipp
  • 2 Tinelli, Cesare
  • 1 Ahmetaj, Shqiponja
  • 1 Andreotti, Bruno
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 12 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs
  • 1 LITES
  • 2 TGDK
  • 2 DagRep

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Automated reasoning
  • 5 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Modal and temporal logics
  • 3 Theory of computation → Proof theory
  • 2 Theory of computation → Constraint and logic programming
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Interactive theorem proving
  • 2 Proof theory
  • 2 proof assistants
  • 2 proof automation
  • 1 Active Objects
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact