28 Search Results for "Getoor, Lise"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.26
Engineering Algorithms for Dynamic Greedy Set Cover

Authors: Amitai Uzrad

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 371, 24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026)

Abstract
In the dynamic set cover problem, the input is a dynamic universe of elements and a fixed collection of sets. As elements are inserted or deleted, the goal is to efficiently maintain an approximate minimum set cover. While the past decade has seen significant theoretical breakthroughs for this problem, a notable gap remains between theoretical design and practical performance, as no comprehensive experimental study currently exists to validate these results. In this paper, we bridge this gap by implementing and evaluating four greedy-based dynamic algorithms across a diverse range of real-world instances. We derive our implementations from state-of-the-art frameworks - such as [GKKP(STOC'17); SU(STOC'23); SUZ(FOCS'24)] - which we simplify by identifying and modifying intricate subroutines that optimize asymptotic bounds but hinder practical performance. We evaluate these algorithms based on solution quality (set cover size) and efficiency, which comprises update time - the time required to update the solution following each insertion/deletion - and recourse - the number of changes made to the solution per update. Each algorithm uses a parameter β to balance quality against efficiency; we investigate the influence of this tradeoff parameter on each algorithm and then perform a comparative analysis to evaluate the algorithms against each other. Our results provide the first practical insights into which algorithmic strategies provide the most value in realistic scenarios.
Cite as

Amitai Uzrad. Engineering Algorithms for Dynamic Greedy Set Cover. In 24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 371, pp. 26:1-26:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{uzrad:LIPIcs.SEA.2026.26,
  author =	{Uzrad, Amitai},
  title =	{{Engineering Algorithms for Dynamic Greedy Set Cover}},
  booktitle =	{24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-422-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{371},
  editor =	{Aum\"{u}ller, Martin and Finocchi, Irene},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-260308},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dynamic graphs, set cover, recourse}
}
Document
Research
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.4.1.1
On the Computational Cost of Knowledge Graph Embeddings

Authors: Victor Charpenay, Mansour Zoubeirou A Mayaki, and Antoine Zimmermann

Published in: TGDK, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2026). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 4, Issue 1

Abstract
Over a decade, numerous Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) models have been designed and evaluated on reference datasets, always with increasing performance. In this paper, we re-evaluate these models with respect to their computational efficiency during training, by estimating the computational cost of the procedure expressed in floating-point operations. We design a cost model based on analytical expressions and apply it on a collection of 20 KGE models, representative of the state-of-the-art. We show that dimensionality or parameter efficiency, used in the literature to compare models with each other, are not suitable to evaluate the true cost of models. Through fixed-budget experiments, a novel approach to evaluate KGE models based on cost estimates, we re-assess the relative performance of model families compared to the state-of-the-art. Bilinear models such as ComplEx underperform with a low computational budget while hyperbolic linear models appear to offer no particular benefit compared to simpler Euclidian models, especially the MuRE model. Neural models, such as ConvE or CompGCN, achieve reasonable performance in the literature but their high computational cost appears unnecessary when compared with other models. The trade-off between efficiency and expressivity of both linear and neural models is to be further explored.
Cite as

Victor Charpenay, Mansour Zoubeirou A Mayaki, and Antoine Zimmermann. On the Computational Cost of Knowledge Graph Embeddings. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 1:1-1:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{charpenay_et_al:TGDK.4.1.1,
  author =	{Charpenay, Victor and Zoubeirou A Mayaki, Mansour and Zimmermann, Antoine},
  title =	{{On the Computational Cost of Knowledge Graph Embeddings}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{1:1--1:30},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{4},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.4.1.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-256863},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.4.1.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge Graph Embedding, Parameter Efficiency, Computational Budget, Green AI}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.7
Bridging Weighted First Order Model Counting and Graph Polynomials

Authors: Qipeng Kuang, Ondřej Kuželka, Yuanhong Wang, and Yuyi Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
The Weighted First-Order Model Counting Problem (WFOMC) asks to compute the weighted sum of models of a given first-order logic sentence over a given domain. It can be solved in time polynomial in the domain size for sentences from the two-variable fragment with counting quantifiers, known as C^2. This polynomial-time complexity is known to be retained when extending C^2 by one of the following axioms: linear order axiom, tree axiom, forest axiom, directed acyclic graph axiom or connectedness axiom. An interesting question remains as to which other axioms can be added to the first-order sentences in this way. We provide a new perspective on this problem by associating WFOMC with graph polynomials. Using WFOMC, we define Weak Connectedness Polynomial and Strong Connectedness Polynomials for first-order logic sentences. It turns out that these polynomials have the following interesting properties. First, they can be computed in polynomial time in the domain size for sentences from C^2. Second, we can use them to solve WFOMC with all of the existing axioms known to be tractable as well as with new ones such as bipartiteness, strong connectedness, having k connected components, etc. Third, the well-known Tutte polynomial can be recovered as a special case of the Weak Connectedness Polynomial, and the Strict and Non-Strict Directed Chromatic Polynomials can be recovered from the Strong Connectedness Polynomials.
Cite as

Qipeng Kuang, Ondřej Kuželka, Yuanhong Wang, and Yuyi Wang. Bridging Weighted First Order Model Counting and Graph Polynomials. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 7:1-7:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kuang_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.7,
  author =	{Kuang, Qipeng and Ku\v{z}elka, Ond\v{r}ej and Wang, Yuanhong and Wang, Yuyi},
  title =	{{Bridging Weighted First Order Model Counting and Graph Polynomials}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254316},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Weighted First-Order Model Counting, Axiom, Enumerative Combinatorics, Tutte Polynomial}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.74
Sublinear Metric Steiner Tree via Improved Bounds for Set Cover

Authors: Sepideh Mahabadi, Mohammad Roghani, Jakub Tarnawski, and Ali Vakilian

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We study the metric Steiner tree problem in the sublinear query model. In this problem, for a set of n points V in a metric space given to us by means of query access to an n× n matrix w, and a set of terminals T ⊆ V, the goal is to find the minimum-weight subset of the edges that connects all the terminal vertices. Recently, Chen, Khanna and Tan [SODA'23] gave an algorithm that uses Õ(n^{13/7}) queries and outputs a (2-η)-estimate of the metric Steiner tree weight, where η > 0 is a universal constant. A key component in their algorithm is a sublinear algorithm for a particular set cover problem where, given a set system (𝒰, ℱ), the goal is to provide a multiplicative-additive estimate for |𝒰|-SC(𝒰, ℱ). Here 𝒰 is the set of elements, ℱ is the collection of sets, and SC(𝒰, ℱ) denotes the optimal set cover size of (𝒰, ℱ). In particular, their algorithm returns a (1/4, ε⋅|𝒰|)-multiplicative-additive estimate for this set cover problem using Õ(|ℱ|^{7/4}) membership oracle queries (querying whether a set S ∈ 𝒮 contains an element e ∈ 𝒰), where ε is a fixed constant. In this work, we improve the query complexity of (2-η)-estimating the metric Steiner tree weight to Õ(n^{5/3}) by showing a (1/2, ε⋅|𝒰|)-estimate for the above set cover problem using Õ(|ℱ|^{5/3}) membership queries. To design our set cover algorithm, we estimate the size of a random greedy maximal matching for an auxiliary multigraph that the algorithm constructs implicitly, without access to its adjacency list or matrix. Previous analyses of random greedy maximal matching have focused on simple graphs, assuming access to their adjacency list or matrix. To address this, we extend the analysis of Behnezhad [FOCS'21] of random greedy maximal matching on simple graphs to multigraphs, and prove additional properties that may be of independent interest.
Cite as

Sepideh Mahabadi, Mohammad Roghani, Jakub Tarnawski, and Ali Vakilian. Sublinear Metric Steiner Tree via Improved Bounds for Set Cover. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 74:1-74:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mahabadi_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.74,
  author =	{Mahabadi, Sepideh and Roghani, Mohammad and Tarnawski, Jakub and Vakilian, Ali},
  title =	{{Sublinear Metric Steiner Tree via Improved Bounds for Set Cover}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{74:1--74:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.74},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227029},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.74},
  annote =	{Keywords: Sublinear Algorithms, Steiner Tree, Set Cover, Maximum Matching, Approximation Algorithm}
}
Document
Survey
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.1.1.7
Rule Learning over Knowledge Graphs: A Review

Authors: Hong Wu, Zhe Wang, Kewen Wang, Pouya Ghiasnezhad Omran, and Jiangmeng Li

Published in: TGDK, Volume 1, Issue 1 (2023): Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 1, Issue 1

Abstract
Compared to black-box neural networks, logic rules express explicit knowledge, can provide human-understandable explanations for reasoning processes, and have found their wide application in knowledge graphs and other downstream tasks. As extracting rules manually from large knowledge graphs is labour-intensive and often infeasible, automated rule learning has recently attracted significant interest, and a number of approaches to rule learning for knowledge graphs have been proposed. This survey aims to provide a review of approaches and a classification of state-of-the-art systems for learning first-order logic rules over knowledge graphs. A comparative analysis of various approaches to rule learning is conducted based on rule language biases, underlying methods, and evaluation metrics. The approaches we consider include inductive logic programming (ILP)-based, statistical path generalisation, and neuro-symbolic methods. Moreover, we highlight important and promising application scenarios of rule learning, such as rule-based knowledge graph completion, fact checking, and applications in other research areas.
Cite as

Hong Wu, Zhe Wang, Kewen Wang, Pouya Ghiasnezhad Omran, and Jiangmeng Li. Rule Learning over Knowledge Graphs: A Review. In Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 7:1-7:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{wu_et_al:TGDK.1.1.7,
  author =	{Wu, Hong and Wang, Zhe and Wang, Kewen and Omran, Pouya Ghiasnezhad and Li, Jiangmeng},
  title =	{{Rule Learning over Knowledge Graphs: A Review}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{7:1--7:23},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{1},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.1.1.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-194813},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.1.1.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Rule learning, Knowledge graphs, Link prediction}
}
Document
Vision
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.1.1.8
Machine Learning and Knowledge Graphs: Existing Gaps and Future Research Challenges

Authors: Claudia d'Amato, Louis Mahon, Pierre Monnin, and Giorgos Stamou

Published in: TGDK, Volume 1, Issue 1 (2023): Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 1, Issue 1

Abstract
The graph model is nowadays largely adopted to model a wide range of knowledge and data, spanning from social networks to knowledge graphs (KGs), representing a successful paradigm of how symbolic and transparent AI can scale on the World Wide Web. However, due to their unprecedented volume, they are generally tackled by Machine Learning (ML) and mostly numeric based methods such as graph embedding models (KGE) and deep neural networks (DNNs). The latter methods have been proved lately very efficient, leading the current AI spring. In this vision paper, we introduce some of the main existing methods for combining KGs and ML, divided into two categories: those using ML to improve KGs, and those using KGs to improve results on ML tasks. From this introduction, we highlight research gaps and perspectives that we deem promising and currently under-explored for the involved research communities, spanning from KG support for LLM prompting, integration of KG semantics in ML models to symbol-based methods, interpretability of ML models, and the need for improved benchmark datasets. In our opinion, such perspectives are stepping stones in an ultimate view of KGs as central assets for neuro-symbolic and explainable AI.
Cite as

Claudia d'Amato, Louis Mahon, Pierre Monnin, and Giorgos Stamou. Machine Learning and Knowledge Graphs: Existing Gaps and Future Research Challenges. In Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 8:1-8:35, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{damato_et_al:TGDK.1.1.8,
  author =	{d'Amato, Claudia and Mahon, Louis and Monnin, Pierre and Stamou, Giorgos},
  title =	{{Machine Learning and Knowledge Graphs: Existing Gaps and Future Research Challenges}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{8:1--8:35},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{1},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.1.1.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-194824},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.1.1.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph-based Learning, Knowledge Graph Embeddings, Large Language Models, Explainable AI, Knowledge Graph Completion \& Curation}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2019.2
The Power of Relational Learning (Invited Talk)

Authors: Lise Getoor

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 127, 22nd International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2019)

Abstract
We live in a richly interconnected world and, not surprisingly, we generate richly interconnected data. From smart cities to social media to financial networks to biological networks, data is relational. While database theory is built on strong relational foundations, the same is not true for machine learning. The majority of machine learning methods flatten data into a single table before performing any processing. Further, database theory is also built on a bedrock of declarative representations. The same is not true for machine learning, in particular deep learning, which results in black-box, uninterpretable and unexplainable models. In this talk, I will introduce the field of statistical relational learning, an alternative machine learning approach based on declarative relational representations paired with probabilistic models. I’ll describe our work on probabilistic soft logic, a probabilistic programming language that is ideally suited to richly connected, noisy data. Our recent results show that by building on state-of-the-art optimization methods in a distributed implementation, we can solve very large relational learning problems orders of magnitude faster than existing approaches.
Cite as

Lise Getoor. The Power of Relational Learning (Invited Talk). In 22nd International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 127, p. 2:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{getoor:LIPIcs.ICDT.2019.2,
  author =	{Getoor, Lise},
  title =	{{The Power of Relational Learning}},
  booktitle =	{22nd International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2019)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-101-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{127},
  editor =	{Barcelo, Pablo and Calautti, Marco},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2019.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-103048},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2019.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Machine learning, Probabilistic soft logic, Relational model}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.1
07161 Abstracts Collection – Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis

Authors: Luc De Raedt, Thomas Dietterich, Lise Getoor, Kristian Kersting, and Stephen H. Muggleton

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis (2008)

Abstract
From April 14 – 20, 2007, the Dagstuhl Seminar 07161 ``Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis'' was held in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available.
Cite as

Luc De Raedt, Thomas Dietterich, Lise Getoor, Kristian Kersting, and Stephen H. Muggleton. 07161 Abstracts Collection – Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis. In Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, pp. 1-21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deraedt_et_al:DagSemProc.07161.1,
  author =	{De Raedt, Luc and Dietterich, Thomas and Getoor, Lise and Kersting, Kristian and Muggleton, Stephen H.},
  title =	{{07161 Abstracts Collection – Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis}},
  booktitle =	{Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis},
  pages =	{1--21},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{7161},
  editor =	{Luc de Raedt and Thomas Dietterich and Lise Getoor and Kristian Kersting and Stephen H. Muggleton},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13885},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Uncertainty in AI, Probabilistic Reasoning, Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, Relational Learning, Inductive Logic Programming, Graphical Models, Statistical Relational Learning, First-Order Logical and Relational Probabilistic Languages}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.2
A general framework for unsupervised preocessing of structured data

Authors: Barbara Hammer, Alessio Micheli, and Alessandro Sperduti

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis (2008)

Abstract
We propose a general framework for unsupervised recurrent and recursive networks. This proposal covers various popular approaches like standard self organizing maps (SOM), temporal Kohonen maps, resursive SOM, and SOM for structured data. We define Hebbian learning within this general framework. We show how approaches based on an energy function, like neural gas, can be transferred to this abstract framework so that proposals for new learning algorithms emerge.
Cite as

Barbara Hammer, Alessio Micheli, and Alessandro Sperduti. A general framework for unsupervised preocessing of structured data. In Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, pp. 1-6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hammer_et_al:DagSemProc.07161.2,
  author =	{Hammer, Barbara and Micheli, Alessio and Sperduti, Alessandro},
  title =	{{A general framework for unsupervised preocessing of structured data}},
  booktitle =	{Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis},
  pages =	{1--6},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{7161},
  editor =	{Luc de Raedt and Thomas Dietterich and Lise Getoor and Kristian Kersting and Stephen H. Muggleton},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13837},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Relational clustering, median clustering, recursive SOM models, kernel SOM}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.3
Exploiting prior knowledge in Intelligent Assistants - Combining relational models with hierarchies

Authors: Sriraam Natarajan, Prasad Tadepalli, and Alan Fern

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis (2008)

Abstract
Statitsical relational models have been successfully used to model static probabilistic relationships between the entities of the domain. In this talk, we illustrate their use in a dynamic decison-theoretic setting where the task is to assist a user by inferring his intentional structure and taking appropriate assistive actions. We show that the statistical relational models can be used to succintly express the system's prior knowledge about the user's goal-subgoal structure and tune it with experience. As the system is better able to predict the user's goals, it improves the effectiveness of its assistance. We show through experiments that both the hierarchical structure of the goals and the parameter sharing facilitated by relational models significantly improve the learning speed.
Cite as

Sriraam Natarajan, Prasad Tadepalli, and Alan Fern. Exploiting prior knowledge in Intelligent Assistants - Combining relational models with hierarchies. In Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, pp. 1-2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{natarajan_et_al:DagSemProc.07161.3,
  author =	{Natarajan, Sriraam and Tadepalli, Prasad and Fern, Alan},
  title =	{{Exploiting prior knowledge in Intelligent Assistants - Combining relational models with hierarchies}},
  booktitle =	{Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis},
  pages =	{1--2},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{7161},
  editor =	{Luc de Raedt and Thomas Dietterich and Lise Getoor and Kristian Kersting and Stephen H. Muggleton},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13856},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Statistical Relational Learning, Intelligent Assistants}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.4
Learning Probabilistic Relational Dynamics for Multiple Tasks

Authors: Ashwin Deshpande, Brian Milch, Luke S. Zettlemoyer, and Leslie Pack Kaelbling

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis (2008)

Abstract
The ways in which an agent's actions affect the world can often be modeled compactly using a set of relational probabilistic planning rules. This extended abstract addresses the problem of learning such rule sets for multiple related tasks. We take a hierarchical Bayesian approach, in which the system learns a prior distribution over rule sets. We present a class of prior distributions parameterized by a rule set prototype that is stochastically modified to produce a task-specific rule set. We also describe a coordinate ascent algorithm that iteratively optimizes the task-specific rule sets and the prior distribution. Experiments using this algorithm show that transferring information from related tasks significantly reduces the amount of training data required to predict action effects in blocks-world domains.
Cite as

Ashwin Deshpande, Brian Milch, Luke S. Zettlemoyer, and Leslie Pack Kaelbling. Learning Probabilistic Relational Dynamics for Multiple Tasks. In Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, pp. 1-10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deshpande_et_al:DagSemProc.07161.4,
  author =	{Deshpande, Ashwin and Milch, Brian and Zettlemoyer, Luke S. and Kaelbling, Leslie Pack},
  title =	{{Learning Probabilistic Relational Dynamics for Multiple Tasks}},
  booktitle =	{Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis},
  pages =	{1--10},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{7161},
  editor =	{Luc de Raedt and Thomas Dietterich and Lise Getoor and Kristian Kersting and Stephen H. Muggleton},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13846},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hierarchical Bayesian models, transfer learning, multi-task learning, probabilistic planning rules}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.5
Logical Particle Filtering

Authors: Luke S. Zettlemoyer, Hanna M. Pasula, and Leslie Pack Kaelbling

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis (2008)

Abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of filtering in relational hidden Markov models. We present a compact representation for such models and an associated logical particle filtering algorithm. Each particle contains a logical formula that describes a set of states. The algorithm updates the formulae as new observations are received. Since a single particle tracks many states, this filter can be more accurate than a traditional particle filter in high dimensional state spaces, as we demonstrate in experiments.
Cite as

Luke S. Zettlemoyer, Hanna M. Pasula, and Leslie Pack Kaelbling. Logical Particle Filtering. In Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, pp. 1-14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zettlemoyer_et_al:DagSemProc.07161.5,
  author =	{Zettlemoyer, Luke S. and Pasula, Hanna M. and Pack Kaelbling, Leslie},
  title =	{{Logical Particle Filtering}},
  booktitle =	{Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis},
  pages =	{1--14},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{7161},
  editor =	{Luc de Raedt and Thomas Dietterich and Lise Getoor and Kristian Kersting and Stephen H. Muggleton},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13792},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Particle filter, logical hidden Markov model}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.6
Markov Logic in Infinite Domains

Authors: Pedro Domingos and Parag Singla

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis (2008)

Abstract
Markov logic combines logic and probability by attaching weights to first-order formulas, and viewing them as templates for features of Markov networks. Unfortunately, in its original formulation it does not have the full power of first-order logic, because it applies only to finite domains. Recently, we have extended Markov logic to infinite domains, by casting it in the framework of Gibbs measures. In this talk I will summarize our main results to date, including sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of a Gibbs measure consistent with an infinite MLN, and properties of the set of consistent measures in the non-unique case. (Many important phenomena, like phase transitions, are modeled by non-unique MLNs.) Under the conditions for existence, we have extended to infinite domains the result in Richardson and Domingos (2006) that first-order logic is the limiting case of Markov logic when all weights tend to infinity. I will also discuss some fundamental limitations of Herbrand interpretations (and representations based on them) for probabilistic modeling of infinite domains, and how to get around them. Finally, I will discuss some of the surprising insights for learning and inference in large finite domains that result from considering the infinite limit.
Cite as

Pedro Domingos and Parag Singla. Markov Logic in Infinite Domains. In Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, pp. 1-16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{domingos_et_al:DagSemProc.07161.6,
  author =	{Domingos, Pedro and Singla, Parag},
  title =	{{Markov Logic in Infinite Domains}},
  booktitle =	{Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis},
  pages =	{1--16},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{7161},
  editor =	{Luc de Raedt and Thomas Dietterich and Lise Getoor and Kristian Kersting and Stephen H. Muggleton},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13811},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Markov logic networks, Gibbs measures, first-order logic, infinite probabilistic models, Markov networks}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.7
Model equivalence of PRISM programs

Authors: James Cussens

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis (2008)

Abstract
The problem of deciding the probability model equivalence of two PRISM programs is addressed. In the finite case this problem can be solved (albeit slowly) using techniques from emph{algebraic statistics}, specifically the computation of elimination ideals and Gr"{o}bner bases. A very brief introduction to algebraic statistics is given. Consideration is given to cases where shortcuts to proving/disproving model equivalence are available.
Cite as

James Cussens. Model equivalence of PRISM programs. In Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, pp. 1-21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cussens:DagSemProc.07161.7,
  author =	{Cussens, James},
  title =	{{Model equivalence of PRISM programs}},
  booktitle =	{Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis},
  pages =	{1--21},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{7161},
  editor =	{Luc de Raedt and Thomas Dietterich and Lise Getoor and Kristian Kersting and Stephen H. Muggleton},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13808},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: PRISM programs, model equivalence, model inclusion, algebraic statistics, algebraic geometry, ideals, varieties, Gr"\{o\}bner bases, polynomials}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.8
On classification, ranking, and probability estimation

Authors: Peter Flach and Edson Matsubara

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis (2008)

Abstract
Given a binary classification task, a ranker is an algorithm that can sort a set of instances from highest to lowest expectation that the instance is positive. In contrast to a classifier, a ranker does not output class predictions – although it can be turned into a classifier with help of an additional procedure to split the ranked list into two. A straightforward way to compute rankings is to train a scoring classifier to assign numerical scores to instances, for example the predicted odds that an instance is positive. However, rankings can be computed without scores, as we demonstrate in this paper. We propose a lexicographic ranker, LexRank , whose rankings are derived not from scores, but from a simple ranking of attribute values obtained from the training data. Although various metrics can be used, we show that by using the odds ratio to rank the attribute values we obtain a ranker that is conceptually close to the naive Bayes classifier, in the sense that for every instance of LexRank there exists an instance of naive Bayes that achieves the same ranking. However, the reverse is not true, which means that LexRank is more biased than naive Bayes. We systematically develop the relationships and differences between classification, ranking, and probability estimation, which leads to a novel connection between the Brier score and ROC curves. Combining LexRank with isotonic regression, which derives probability estimates from the ROC convex hull, results in the lexicographic probability estimator LexProb.
Cite as

Peter Flach and Edson Matsubara. On classification, ranking, and probability estimation. In Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7161, pp. 1-10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{flach_et_al:DagSemProc.07161.8,
  author =	{Flach, Peter and Matsubara, Edson},
  title =	{{On classification, ranking, and probability estimation}},
  booktitle =	{Probabilistic, Logical and Relational Learning - A Further Synthesis},
  pages =	{1--10},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{7161},
  editor =	{Luc de Raedt and Thomas Dietterich and Lise Getoor and Kristian Kersting and Stephen H. Muggleton},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13828},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.07161.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Ranking, probability estimation, ROC analysis, calibration}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 28 Document/PDF
  • 5 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2026
  • 1 2025
  • 2 2023
  • 1 2019
  • 10 2008
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 4 De Raedt, Luc
  • 4 Getoor, Lise
  • 3 Muggleton, Stephen H.
  • 2 Cussens, James
  • 2 Dietterich, Tom
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 4 LIPIcs
  • 3 TGDK
  • 21 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Artificial intelligence
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Knowledge representation and reasoning
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Machine learning
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Semantic networks
  • 1 Hardware → Impact on the environment
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Statistical Relational Learning
  • 2 Statistical relational learning
  • 2 first-order logic
  • 1 Active Relational Learning
  • 1 Approximation Algorithm
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact