20 Search Results for "Ligett, Katrina"

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 192

2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)

FORC 2021, June 9-11, 2021, Virtual Conference

Editors: Katrina Ligett and Swati Gupta

Document
APPROX
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.2
Covering Simple Orthogonal Polygons with Rectangles

Authors: Aniket Basu Roy

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
We study the problem of Covering Orthogonal Polygons with Rectangles, focusing on three variants: covering the interior, the boundary, and the corners. While previous work provided constant-factor approximation algorithms for these problems, significant improvements had not been achieved for over two decades. The main contribution of this work is the development of a Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (PTAS) for both the Boundary Cover and Corner Cover problems on simple polygons, using a local search algorithm. Our work advances the state of the art, improving upon the previous best-known 4-approximation for the Boundary Cover and 2-approximation for the Corner Cover problems. The technical core of our work lies in proving the existence of planar support graphs for certain geometric hypergraphs defined by the polygon and its containment-maximal rectangles. This structural insight enables the application of the local search framework to achieve the PTAS results. We also demonstrate the limitations of this approach by constructing instances where local search fails for the Interior Cover and certain dual problems, such as the Maximum Antirectangle and Hitting Set problems. Additionally, the methods yield a PTAS for a special case of the Discrete Independent Set problem for rectangles. These results not only settle longstanding open questions but also introduce new techniques that may be of independent interest within computational geometry.
Cite as

Aniket Basu Roy. Covering Simple Orthogonal Polygons with Rectangles. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 2:1-2:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{basuroy:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.2,
  author =	{Basu Roy, Aniket},
  title =	{{Covering Simple Orthogonal Polygons with Rectangles}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243686},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Polygon Covering, Approximation Algorithms, Orthogonal Polygons, Rectangles, Local Search, Planar Supports}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.77
Minimizing Recourse in an Adaptive Balls and Bins Game

Authors: Adi Fine, Haim Kaplan, and Uri Stemmer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We consider a simple load-balancing game between an algorithm and an adaptive adversary. In a simplified version of this game, the adversary observes the assignment of jobs to machines and selects a machine to kill. The algorithm must then restart the jobs from the failed machine on other machines. The adversary repeats this process, observing the new assignment and eliminating another machine, and so on. The adversary aims to force the algorithm to perform many restarts, while we seek a robust algorithm that minimizes restarts regardless of the adversary’s strategy. This game was recently introduced by Bhattacharya et al. for designing a 3-spanner with low recourse against an adaptive adversary. We prove that a simple algorithm, which assigns each job to a randomly chosen live bin, incurs O(n log n) recourse against an adaptive adversary. This enables us to construct a much simpler 3-spanner with a recourse that is smaller by a factor of O(log² n) compared to the previous construction, without increasing the update time or the size of the spanner. This motivates a careful examination of the range of attacks an adaptive adversary can deploy against simple algorithms before resorting to more complex ones. As our case study demonstrates, this attack space may not be as large as it initially appears, enabling the development of robust algorithms that are both simpler and easier to analyze.
Cite as

Adi Fine, Haim Kaplan, and Uri Stemmer. Minimizing Recourse in an Adaptive Balls and Bins Game. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 77:1-77:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fine_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.77,
  author =	{Fine, Adi and Kaplan, Haim and Stemmer, Uri},
  title =	{{Minimizing Recourse in an Adaptive Balls and Bins Game}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{77:1--77:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.77},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234544},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.77},
  annote =	{Keywords: Adaptive adversary, load-balancing game, balls-and-bins, randomized algorithms, dynamic 3-spanner, dynamic graph algorithms, adversarial robustness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.3
Private Estimation When Data and Privacy Demands Are Correlated

Authors: Syomantak Chaudhuri and Thomas A. Courtade

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)

Abstract
Differential Privacy (DP) is the current gold-standard for ensuring privacy for statistical queries. Estimation problems under DP constraints appearing in the literature have largely focused on providing equal privacy to all users. We consider the problems of empirical mean estimation for univariate data and frequency estimation for categorical data, both subject to heterogeneous privacy constraints. Each user, contributing a sample to the dataset, is allowed to have a different privacy demand. The dataset itself is assumed to be worst-case and we study both problems under two different formulations - first, where privacy demands and data may be correlated, and second, where correlations are weakened by random permutation of the dataset. We establish theoretical performance guarantees for our proposed algorithms, under both PAC error and mean-squared error. These performance guarantees translate to minimax optimality in several instances, and experiments confirm superior performance of our algorithms over other baseline techniques.
Cite as

Syomantak Chaudhuri and Thomas A. Courtade. Private Estimation When Data and Privacy Demands Are Correlated. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 3:1-3:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chaudhuri_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.3,
  author =	{Chaudhuri, Syomantak and Courtade, Thomas A.},
  title =	{{Private Estimation When Data and Privacy Demands Are Correlated}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231305},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential Privacy, Personalized Privacy, Heterogeneous Privacy, Correlations in Privacy}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.8
Differential Privacy Under Multiple Selections

Authors: Ashish Goel, Zhihao Jiang, Aleksandra Korolova, Kamesh Munagala, and Sahasrajit Sarmasarkar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)

Abstract
We consider the setting where a user with sensitive features wishes to obtain a recommendation from a server in a differentially private fashion. We propose a "multi-selection" architecture where the server can send back multiple recommendations and the user chooses one from these that matches best with their private features. When the user feature is one-dimensional - on an infinite line - and the accuracy measure is defined w.r.t some increasing function 𝔥(.) of the distance on the line, we precisely characterize the optimal mechanism that satisfies differential privacy. The specification of the optimal mechanism includes both the distribution of the noise that the user adds to its private value, and the algorithm used by the server to determine the set of results to send back as a response. We show that Laplace is an optimal noise distribution in this setting. Furthermore, we show that this optimal mechanism results in an error that is inversely proportional to the number of results returned when the function 𝔥(.) is the identity function.
Cite as

Ashish Goel, Zhihao Jiang, Aleksandra Korolova, Kamesh Munagala, and Sahasrajit Sarmasarkar. Differential Privacy Under Multiple Selections. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 8:1-8:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{goel_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.8,
  author =	{Goel, Ashish and Jiang, Zhihao and Korolova, Aleksandra and Munagala, Kamesh and Sarmasarkar, Sahasrajit},
  title =	{{Differential Privacy Under Multiple Selections}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231353},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential Privacy, Mechanism Design and Multi-Selection}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.1
Privacy-Computation Trade-Offs in Private Repetition and Metaselection

Authors: Kunal Talwar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)

Abstract
A Private Repetition algorithm takes as input a differentially private algorithm with constant success probability and boosts it to one that succeeds with high probability. These algorithms are closely related to private metaselection algorithms that compete with the best of many private algorithms, and private hyperparameter tuning algorithms that compete with the best hyperparameter settings for a private learning algorithm. Existing algorithms for these tasks pay either a large overhead in privacy cost, or a large overhead in computational cost. In this work, we show strong lower bounds for problems of this kind, showing in particular that for any algorithm that preserves the privacy cost up to a constant factor, the failure probability can only fall polynomially in the computational overhead. This is in stark contrast with the non-private setting, where the failure probability falls exponentially in the computational overhead. By carefully combining existing algorithms for metaselection, we prove computation-privacy tradeoffs that nearly match our lower bounds.
Cite as

Kunal Talwar. Privacy-Computation Trade-Offs in Private Repetition and Metaselection. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 1:1-1:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{talwar:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.1,
  author =	{Talwar, Kunal},
  title =	{{Privacy-Computation Trade-Offs in Private Repetition and Metaselection}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231282},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential Privacy, Hyperparameter Tuning, Metaselection}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.19
Mapping the Tradeoffs and Limitations of Algorithmic Fairness

Authors: Etam Benger and Katrina Ligett

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 329, 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)

Abstract
Sufficiency and separation are two fundamental criteria in classification fairness. For binary classifiers, these concepts correspond to subgroup calibration and equalized odds, respectively, and are known to be incompatible except in trivial cases. In this work, we explore a relaxation of these criteria based on f-divergences between distributions - essentially the same relaxation studied in the literature on approximate multicalibration - analyze their relationships, and derive implications for fair representations and downstream uses (post-processing) of representations. We show that when a protected attribute is determinable from features present in the data, the (relaxed) criteria of sufficiency and separation exhibit a tradeoff, forming a convex Pareto frontier. Moreover, we prove that when a protected attribute is not fully encoded in the data, achieving full sufficiency may be impossible. This finding not only strengthens the case against "fairness through unawareness" but also highlights an important caveat for work on (multi-)calibration.
Cite as

Etam Benger and Katrina Ligett. Mapping the Tradeoffs and Limitations of Algorithmic Fairness. In 6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 329, pp. 19:1-19:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{benger_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2025.19,
  author =	{Benger, Etam and Ligett, Katrina},
  title =	{{Mapping the Tradeoffs and Limitations of Algorithmic Fairness}},
  booktitle =	{6th Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-367-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{329},
  editor =	{Bun, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231465},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algorithmic fairness, information theory, sufficiency-separation tradeoff}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.49
Cycle Counting Under Local Differential Privacy for Degeneracy-Bounded Graphs

Authors: Quentin Hillebrand, Vorapong Suppakitpaisarn, and Tetsuo Shibuya

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
We propose an algorithm for counting the number of cycles under local differential privacy for degeneracy-bounded input graphs. Numerous studies have focused on counting the number of triangles under the privacy notion, demonstrating that the expected 𝓁₂-error of these algorithms is Ω(n^{1.5}), where n is the number of nodes in the graph. When parameterized by the number of cycles of length four (C₄), the best existing triangle counting algorithm has an error of O(n^{1.5} + √C₄) = O(n²). In this paper, we introduce an algorithm with an expected 𝓁₂-error of O(δ^1.5 n^0.5 + δ^0.5 d_max^0.5 n^0.5), where δ is the degeneracy and d_{max} is the maximum degree of the graph. For degeneracy-bounded graphs (δ ∈ Θ(1)) commonly found in practical social networks, our algorithm achieves an expected 𝓁₂-error of O(d_{max}^{0.5} n^{0.5}) = O(n). Our algorithm’s core idea is a precise count of triangles following a preprocessing step that approximately sorts the degree of all nodes. This approach can be extended to approximate the number of cycles of length k, maintaining a similar 𝓁₂-error, namely O(δ^{(k-2)/2} d_max^0.5 n^{(k-2)/2} + δ^{k/2} n^{(k-2)/2}) or O(d_max^0.5 n^{(k-2)/2}) = O(n^{(k-1)/2}) for degeneracy-bounded graphs.
Cite as

Quentin Hillebrand, Vorapong Suppakitpaisarn, and Tetsuo Shibuya. Cycle Counting Under Local Differential Privacy for Degeneracy-Bounded Graphs. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 49:1-49:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hillebrand_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.49,
  author =	{Hillebrand, Quentin and Suppakitpaisarn, Vorapong and Shibuya, Tetsuo},
  title =	{{Cycle Counting Under Local Differential Privacy for Degeneracy-Bounded Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{49:1--49:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.49},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228748},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.49},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential privacy, triangle counting, degeneracy, arboricity, graph theory, parameterized accuracy}
}
Document
Complete Volume
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021
LIPIcs, Volume 192, FORC 2021, Complete Volume

Authors: Katrina Ligett and Swati Gupta

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 192, 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)

Abstract
LIPIcs, Volume 192, FORC 2021, Complete Volume
Cite as

2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 192, pp. 1-152, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Proceedings{ligett_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2021,
  title =	{{LIPIcs, Volume 192, FORC 2021, Complete Volume}},
  booktitle =	{2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)},
  pages =	{1--152},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-187-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{192},
  editor =	{Ligett, Katrina and Gupta, Swati},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-138675},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021},
  annote =	{Keywords: LIPIcs, Volume 192, FORC 2021, Complete Volume}
}
Document
Front Matter
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.0
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Authors: Katrina Ligett and Swati Gupta

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 192, 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)

Abstract
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization
Cite as

2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 192, pp. 0:i-0:viii, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ligett_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2021.0,
  author =	{Ligett, Katrina and Gupta, Swati},
  title =	{{Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}},
  booktitle =	{2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)},
  pages =	{0:i--0:viii},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-187-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{192},
  editor =	{Ligett, Katrina and Gupta, Swati},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.0},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-138680},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.0},
  annote =	{Keywords: Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.1
Privately Answering Counting Queries with Generalized Gaussian Mechanisms

Authors: Arun Ganesh and Jiazheng Zhao

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 192, 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)

Abstract
We give the first closed-form privacy guarantees for the Generalized Gaussian mechanism (the mechanism that adds noise x to a vector with probability proportional to exp(-(||x||_p/σ)^p) for some σ, p), in the setting of answering k counting (i.e. sensitivity-1) queries about a database with (ε, δ)-differential privacy (in particular, with low 𝓁_∞-error). Just using Generalized Gaussian noise, we obtain a mechanism such that if the true answers to the queries are the vector d, the mechanism outputs answers d̃ with the 𝓁_∞-error guarantee: 𝔼[||d̃ - d||_∞] = O(√{k log log k log(1/δ)}/ε). This matches the error bound of [Steinke and Ullman, 2017], but using a much simpler mechanism. By composing this mechanism with the sparse vector mechanism (generalizing a technique of [Steinke and Ullman, 2017]), we obtain a mechanism improving the √{k log log k} dependence on k to √{k log log log k}, Our main technical contribution is showing that certain powers of Generalized Gaussians, which follow a Generalized Gamma distribution, are sub-gamma. In subsequent work, the optimal 𝓁_∞-error bound of O(√{k log (1/δ)}/ε) has been achieved by [Yuval Dagan and Gil Kur, 2020] and [Badih Ghazi et al., 2020] independently. However, the Generalized Gaussian mechanism has some qualitative advantages over the mechanisms used in these papers which may make it of interest to both practitioners and theoreticians, both in the setting of answering counting queries and more generally.
Cite as

Arun Ganesh and Jiazheng Zhao. Privately Answering Counting Queries with Generalized Gaussian Mechanisms. In 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 192, pp. 1:1-1:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ganesh_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2021.1,
  author =	{Ganesh, Arun and Zhao, Jiazheng},
  title =	{{Privately Answering Counting Queries with Generalized Gaussian Mechanisms}},
  booktitle =	{2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-187-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{192},
  editor =	{Ligett, Katrina and Gupta, Swati},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-138698},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Differential privacy, counting queries, Generalized Gaussians}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.2
An Algorithmic Framework for Fairness Elicitation

Authors: Christopher Jung, Michael Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, Logan Stapleton, and Zhiwei Steven Wu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 192, 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)

Abstract
We consider settings in which the right notion of fairness is not captured by simple mathematical definitions (such as equality of error rates across groups), but might be more complex and nuanced and thus require elicitation from individual or collective stakeholders. We introduce a framework in which pairs of individuals can be identified as requiring (approximately) equal treatment under a learned model, or requiring ordered treatment such as "applicant Alice should be at least as likely to receive a loan as applicant Bob". We provide a provably convergent and oracle efficient algorithm for learning the most accurate model subject to the elicited fairness constraints, and prove generalization bounds for both accuracy and fairness. This algorithm can also combine the elicited constraints with traditional statistical fairness notions, thus "correcting" or modifying the latter by the former. We report preliminary findings of a behavioral study of our framework using human-subject fairness constraints elicited on the COMPAS criminal recidivism dataset.
Cite as

Christopher Jung, Michael Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, Logan Stapleton, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. An Algorithmic Framework for Fairness Elicitation. In 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 192, pp. 2:1-2:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jung_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2021.2,
  author =	{Jung, Christopher and Kearns, Michael and Neel, Seth and Roth, Aaron and Stapleton, Logan and Wu, Zhiwei Steven},
  title =	{{An Algorithmic Framework for Fairness Elicitation}},
  booktitle =	{2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-187-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{192},
  editor =	{Ligett, Katrina and Gupta, Swati},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-138701},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fairness, Fairness Elicitation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.3
On the Computational Tractability of a Geographic Clustering Problem Arising in Redistricting

Authors: Vincent Cohen-Addad, Philip N. Klein, Dániel Marx, Archer Wheeler, and Christopher Wolfram

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 192, 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)

Abstract
Redistricting is the problem of dividing up a state into a given number k of regions (called districts) where the voters in each district are to elect a representative. The three primary criteria are: that each district be connected, that the populations of the districts be equal (or nearly equal), and that the districts are "compact". There are multiple competing definitions of compactness, usually minimizing some quantity. One measure that has been recently been used is number of cut edges. In this formulation of redistricting, one is given atomic regions out of which each district must be built (e.g., in the U.S., census blocks). The populations of the atomic regions are given. Consider the graph with one vertex per atomic region and an edge between atomic regions with a shared boundary of positive length. Define the weight of a vertex to be the population of the corresponding region. A districting plan is a partition of vertices into k pieces so that the parts have nearly equal weights and each part is connected. The districts are considered compact to the extent that the plan minimizes the number of edges crossing between different parts. There are two natural computational problems: find the most compact districting plan, and sample districting plans (possibly under a compactness constraint) uniformly at random. Both problems are NP-hard so we consider restricting the input graph to have branchwidth at most w. (A planar graph’s branchwidth is bounded, for example, by its diameter.) If both k and w are bounded by constants, the problems are solvable in polynomial time. In this paper, we give lower and upper bounds that characterize the complexity of these problems in terms of parameters k and w. For simplicity of notation, assume that each vertex has unit weight. We would ideally like algorithms whose running times are of the form O(f(k,w) n^c) for some constant c independent of k and w (in which case the problems are said to be fixed-parameter tractable with respect to those parameters). We show that, under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions, no such algorithms exist. However, the problems are fixed-parameter tractable with respect to each of these parameters individually: there exist algorithms with running times of the form O(f(k) n^{O(w)}) and O(f(w) n^{k+1}). The first result was previously known. The new one, however, is more relevant to the application to redistricting, at least for coarse instances. Indeed, we have implemented a version of the algorithm and have used to successfully find optimally compact solutions to all redistricting instances for France (except Paris, which operates under different rules) under various population-balance constraints. For these instances, the values for w are modest and the values for k are very small.
Cite as

Vincent Cohen-Addad, Philip N. Klein, Dániel Marx, Archer Wheeler, and Christopher Wolfram. On the Computational Tractability of a Geographic Clustering Problem Arising in Redistricting. In 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 192, pp. 3:1-3:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cohenaddad_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2021.3,
  author =	{Cohen-Addad, Vincent and Klein, Philip N. and Marx, D\'{a}niel and Wheeler, Archer and Wolfram, Christopher},
  title =	{{On the Computational Tractability of a Geographic Clustering Problem Arising in Redistricting}},
  booktitle =	{2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-187-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{192},
  editor =	{Ligett, Katrina and Gupta, Swati},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-138718},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: redistricting, algorithms, planar graphs, lower bounds}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.4
A Possibility in Algorithmic Fairness: Can Calibration and Equal Error Rates Be Reconciled?

Authors: Claire Lazar Reich and Suhas Vijaykumar

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 192, 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)

Abstract
Decision makers increasingly rely on algorithmic risk scores to determine access to binary treatments including bail, loans, and medical interventions. In these settings, we reconcile two fairness criteria that were previously shown to be in conflict: calibration and error rate equality. In particular, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of calibrated scores that yield classifications achieving equal error rates at any given group-blind threshold. We then present an algorithm that searches for the most accurate score subject to both calibration and minimal error rate disparity. Applied to the COMPAS criminal risk assessment tool, we show that our method can eliminate error disparities while maintaining calibration. In a separate application to credit lending, we compare our procedure to the omission of sensitive features and show that it raises both profit and the probability that creditworthy individuals receive loans.
Cite as

Claire Lazar Reich and Suhas Vijaykumar. A Possibility in Algorithmic Fairness: Can Calibration and Equal Error Rates Be Reconciled?. In 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 192, pp. 4:1-4:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lazarreich_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2021.4,
  author =	{Lazar Reich, Claire and Vijaykumar, Suhas},
  title =	{{A Possibility in Algorithmic Fairness: Can Calibration and Equal Error Rates Be Reconciled?}},
  booktitle =	{2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-187-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{192},
  editor =	{Ligett, Katrina and Gupta, Swati},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-138727},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: fair prediction, impossibility results, screening decisions, classification, calibration, equalized odds, optimal transport, risk scores}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.5
Census TopDown: The Impacts of Differential Privacy on Redistricting

Authors: Aloni Cohen, Moon Duchin, JN Matthews, and Bhushan Suwal

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 192, 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)

Abstract
The 2020 Decennial Census will be released with a new disclosure avoidance system in place, putting differential privacy in the spotlight for a wide range of data users. We consider several key applications of Census data in redistricting, developing tools and demonstrations for practitioners who are concerned about the impacts of this new noising algorithm called TopDown. Based on a close look at reconstructed Texas data, we find reassuring evidence that TopDown will not threaten the ability to produce districts with tolerable population balance or to detect signals of racial polarization for Voting Rights Act enforcement.
Cite as

Aloni Cohen, Moon Duchin, JN Matthews, and Bhushan Suwal. Census TopDown: The Impacts of Differential Privacy on Redistricting. In 2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 192, pp. 5:1-5:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cohen_et_al:LIPIcs.FORC.2021.5,
  author =	{Cohen, Aloni and Duchin, Moon and Matthews, JN and Suwal, Bhushan},
  title =	{{Census TopDown: The Impacts of Differential Privacy on Redistricting}},
  booktitle =	{2nd Symposium on Foundations of Responsible Computing (FORC 2021)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-187-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{192},
  editor =	{Ligett, Katrina and Gupta, Swati},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-138736},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FORC.2021.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Census, TopDown, differential privacy, redistricting, Voting Rights Act}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 19 Document/PDF
  • 7 Document/HTML
  • 1 Volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 7 2025
  • 10 2021
  • 2 2020
  • 1 2010

  • Refine by Author
  • 6 Ligett, Katrina
  • 4 Roth, Aaron
  • 2 Gupta, Swati
  • 2 Jung, Christopher
  • 2 Kearns, Michael
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 18 LIPIcs
  • 1 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Security and privacy
  • 4 Security and privacy → Privacy-preserving protocols
  • 4 Social and professional topics → Computing / technology policy
  • 4 Theory of computation → Machine learning theory
  • 3 Applied computing → Law
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 5 Differential Privacy
  • 2 Approximation Algorithms
  • 2 Differential privacy
  • 2 differential privacy
  • 2 redistricting
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact