Search Results

Documents authored by Saha, Chandan

Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.16
NP-Hardness of Testing Equivalence to Sparse Polynomials and to Constant-Support Polynomials

Authors: Omkar Baraskar, Agrim Dewan, Chandan Saha, and Pulkit Sinha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 297, 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)

Abstract
An s-sparse polynomial has at most s monomials with nonzero coefficients. The Equivalence Testing problem for sparse polynomials (ETsparse) asks to decide if a given polynomial f is equivalent to (i.e., in the orbit of) some s-sparse polynomial. In other words, given f ∈ 𝔽[𝐱] and s ∈ ℕ, ETsparse asks to check if there exist A ∈ GL(|𝐱|, 𝔽) and 𝐛 ∈ 𝔽^|𝐱| such that f(A𝐱 + 𝐛) is s-sparse. We show that ETsparse is NP-hard over any field 𝔽, if f is given in the sparse representation, i.e., as a list of nonzero coefficients and exponent vectors. This answers a question posed by Gupta, Saha and Thankey (SODA 2023) and also, more explicitly, by Baraskar, Dewan and Saha (STACS 2024). The result implies that the Minimum Circuit Size Problem (MCSP) is NP-hard for a dense subclass of depth-3 arithmetic circuits if the input is given in sparse representation. We also show that approximating the smallest s₀ such that a given s-sparse polynomial f is in the orbit of some s₀-sparse polynomial to within a factor of s^{1/3 - ε} is NP-hard for any ε > 0; observe that s-factor approximation is trivial as the input is s-sparse. Finally, we show that for any constant σ ≥ 6, checking if a polynomial (given in sparse representation) is in the orbit of some support-σ polynomial is NP-hard. Support of a polynomial f is the maximum number of variables present in any monomial of f. These results are obtained via direct reductions from the 3-SAT problem.
Cite as

Omkar Baraskar, Agrim Dewan, Chandan Saha, and Pulkit Sinha. NP-Hardness of Testing Equivalence to Sparse Polynomials and to Constant-Support Polynomials. In 51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 297, pp. 16:1-16:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{baraskar_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.16,
  author =	{Baraskar, Omkar and Dewan, Agrim and Saha, Chandan and Sinha, Pulkit},
  title =	{{NP-Hardness of Testing Equivalence to Sparse Polynomials and to Constant-Support Polynomials}},
  booktitle =	{51st International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2024)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-322-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{297},
  editor =	{Bringmann, Karl and Grohe, Martin and Puppis, Gabriele and Svensson, Ola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-201598},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2024.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Equivalence testing, MCSP, sparse polynomials, 3SAT}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2024.9
Testing Equivalence to Design Polynomials

Authors: Omkar Baraskar, Agrim Dewan, and Chandan Saha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 289, 41st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2024)

Abstract
An n-variate polynomial g of degree d is a (n,d,t) design polynomial if the degree of the gcd of every pair of monomials of g is at most t-1. The power symmetric polynomial PSym_{n,d} : = ∑_{i = 1}ⁿ x^d_i and the sum-product polynomial SP_{s,d} : = ∑_{i = 1}^{s}∏_{j = 1}^{d} x_{i,j} are instances of design polynomials for t = 1. Another example is the Nisan-Wigderson design polynomial NW, which has been used extensively to prove various arithmetic circuit lower bounds. Given black-box access to an n-variate, degree-d polynomial f(𝐱) ∈ 𝔽[𝐱], how fast can we check if there exist an A ∈ GL(n, 𝔽) and a 𝐛 ∈ 𝔽ⁿ such that f(A𝐱+𝐛) is a (n,d,t) design polynomial? We call this problem "testing equivalence to design polynomials", or alternatively, "equivalence testing for design polynomials". In this work, we present a randomized algorithm that finds (A, 𝐛) such that f(A𝐱+𝐛) is a (n,d,t) design polynomial, if such A and 𝐛 exist, provided t ≤ d/3. The algorithm runs in (nd)^O(t) time and works over any sufficiently large 𝔽 of characteristic 0 or > d. As applications of this test, we show two results - one is structural and the other is algorithmic. The structural result establishes a polynomial-time equivalence between the graph isomorphism problem and the polynomial equivalence problem for design polynomials. The algorithmic result implies that Patarin’s scheme (EUROCRYPT 1996) can be broken in quasi-polynomial time if a random sparse polynomial is used in the key generation phase. We also give an efficient learning algorithm for n-variate random affine projections of multilinear degree-d design polynomials, provided n ≥ d⁴. If one obtains an analogous result under the weaker assumption "n ≥ d^ε, for any ε > 0", then the NW family is not VNP-complete unless there is a VNP-complete family whose random affine projections are learnable. It is not known if random affine projections of the permanent are learnable. The above algorithms are obtained by using the vector space decomposition framework, introduced by Kayal and Saha (STOC 2019) and Garg, Kayal and Saha (FOCS 2020), for learning non-degenerate arithmetic circuits. A key technical difference between the analysis in the papers by Garg, Kayal and Saha (FOCS 2020) and Bhargava, Garg, Kayal and Saha (RANDOM 2022) and the analysis here is that a certain adjoint algebra, which turned out to be trivial (i.e., diagonalizable) in prior works, is non-trivial in our case. However, we show that the adjoint arising here is triangularizable which then helps in carrying out the vector space decomposition step.
Cite as

Omkar Baraskar, Agrim Dewan, and Chandan Saha. Testing Equivalence to Design Polynomials. In 41st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 289, pp. 9:1-9:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{baraskar_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2024.9,
  author =	{Baraskar, Omkar and Dewan, Agrim and Saha, Chandan},
  title =	{{Testing Equivalence to Design Polynomials}},
  booktitle =	{41st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2024)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-311-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{289},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Kant\'{e}, Mamadou Moustapha and Kupferman, Orna and Lokshtanov, Daniel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2024.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-197193},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2024.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Polynomial equivalence, design polynomials, graph isomorphism, vector space decomposition}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.12
Low-Depth Arithmetic Circuit Lower Bounds: Bypassing Set-Multilinearization

Authors: Prashanth Amireddy, Ankit Garg, Neeraj Kayal, Chandan Saha, and Bhargav Thankey

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 261, 50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023)

Abstract
A recent breakthrough work of Limaye, Srinivasan and Tavenas [Nutan Limaye et al., 2021] proved superpolynomial lower bounds for low-depth arithmetic circuits via a "hardness escalation" approach: they proved lower bounds for low-depth set-multilinear circuits and then lifted the bounds to low-depth general circuits. In this work, we prove superpolynomial lower bounds for low-depth circuits by bypassing the hardness escalation, i.e., the set-multilinearization, step. As set-multilinearization comes with an exponential blow-up in circuit size, our direct proof opens up the possibility of proving an exponential lower bound for low-depth homogeneous circuits by evading a crucial bottleneck. Our bounds hold for the iterated matrix multiplication and the Nisan-Wigderson design polynomials. We also define a subclass of unrestricted depth homogeneous formulas which we call unique parse tree (UPT) formulas, and prove superpolynomial lower bounds for these. This significantly generalizes the superpolynomial lower bounds for regular formulas [Neeraj Kayal et al., 2014; Hervé Fournier et al., 2015].
Cite as

Prashanth Amireddy, Ankit Garg, Neeraj Kayal, Chandan Saha, and Bhargav Thankey. Low-Depth Arithmetic Circuit Lower Bounds: Bypassing Set-Multilinearization. In 50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 261, pp. 12:1-12:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{amireddy_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.12,
  author =	{Amireddy, Prashanth and Garg, Ankit and Kayal, Neeraj and Saha, Chandan and Thankey, Bhargav},
  title =	{{Low-Depth Arithmetic Circuit Lower Bounds: Bypassing Set-Multilinearization}},
  booktitle =	{50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-278-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{261},
  editor =	{Etessami, Kousha and Feige, Uriel and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-180642},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2023.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: arithmetic circuits, low-depth circuits, lower bounds, shifted partials}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.21
Learning Generalized Depth Three Arithmetic Circuits in the Non-Degenerate Case

Authors: Vishwas Bhargava, Ankit Garg, Neeraj Kayal, and Chandan Saha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 245, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2022)

Abstract
Consider a homogeneous degree d polynomial f = T₁ + ⋯ + T_s, T_i = g_i(𝓁_{i,1}, …, 𝓁_{i, m}) where g_i’s are homogeneous m-variate degree d polynomials and 𝓁_{i,j}’s are linear polynomials in n variables. We design a (randomized) learning algorithm that given black-box access to f, computes black-boxes for the T_i’s. The running time of the algorithm is poly(n, m, d, s) and the algorithm works under some non-degeneracy conditions on the linear forms and the g_i’s, and some additional technical assumptions n ≥ (md)², s ≤ n^{d/4}. The non-degeneracy conditions on 𝓁_{i,j}’s constitute non-membership in a variety, and hence are satisfied when the coefficients of 𝓁_{i,j}’s are chosen uniformly and randomly from a large enough set. The conditions on g_i’s are satisfied for random polynomials and also for natural polynomials common in the study of arithmetic complexity like determinant, permanent, elementary symmetric polynomial, iterated matrix multiplication. A particularly appealing algorithmic corollary is the following: Given black-box access to an f = Det_r(L^(1)) + … + Det_r(L^(s)), where L^(k) = (𝓁_{i,j}^(k))_{i,j} with 𝓁_{i,j}^(k)’s being linear forms in n variables chosen randomly, there is an algorithm which in time poly(n, r) outputs matrices (M^(k))_k of linear forms s.t. there exists a permutation π: [s] → [s] with Det_r(M^(k)) = Det_r(L^(π(k))). Our work follows the works [Neeraj Kayal and Chandan Saha, 2019; Garg et al., 2020] which use lower bound methods in arithmetic complexity to design average case learning algorithms. It also vastly generalizes the result in [Neeraj Kayal and Chandan Saha, 2019] about learning depth three circuits, which is a special case where each g_i is just a monomial. At the core of our algorithm is the partial derivative method which can be used to prove lower bounds for generalized depth three circuits. To apply the general framework in [Neeraj Kayal and Chandan Saha, 2019; Garg et al., 2020], we need to establish that the non-degeneracy conditions arising out of applying the framework with the partial derivative method are satisfied in the random case. We develop simple but general and powerful tools to establish this, which might be useful in designing average case learning algorithms for other arithmetic circuit models.
Cite as

Vishwas Bhargava, Ankit Garg, Neeraj Kayal, and Chandan Saha. Learning Generalized Depth Three Arithmetic Circuits in the Non-Degenerate Case. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 245, pp. 21:1-21:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bhargava_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.21,
  author =	{Bhargava, Vishwas and Garg, Ankit and Kayal, Neeraj and Saha, Chandan},
  title =	{{Learning Generalized Depth Three Arithmetic Circuits in the Non-Degenerate Case}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2022)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-249-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{245},
  editor =	{Chakrabarti, Amit and Swamy, Chaitanya},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-171430},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2022.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Arithemtic Circuits, Average-case Learning, Depth 3 Arithmetic Circuits, Learning Algorithms, Learning Circuits, Circuit Reconstruction}
}
Document
RANDOM
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.50
Hitting Sets for Orbits of Circuit Classes and Polynomial Families

Authors: Chandan Saha and Bhargav Thankey

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 207, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2021)

Abstract
The orbit of an n-variate polynomial f(𝐱) over a field 𝔽 is the set {f(A𝐱+𝐛) : A ∈ GL(n,𝔽) and 𝐛 ∈ 𝔽ⁿ}. In this paper, we initiate the study of explicit hitting sets for the orbits of polynomials computable by several natural and well-studied circuit classes and polynomial families. In particular, we give quasi-polynomial time hitting sets for the orbits of: 1) Low-individual-degree polynomials computable by commutative ROABPs. This implies quasi-polynomial time hitting sets for the orbits of the elementary symmetric polynomials. 2) Multilinear polynomials computable by constant-width ROABPs. This implies a quasi-polynomial time hitting set for the orbits of the family {IMM_{3,d}}_{d ∈ ℕ}, which is complete for arithmetic formulas. 3) Polynomials computable by constant-depth, constant-occur formulas. This implies quasi-polynomial time hitting sets for the orbits of multilinear depth-4 circuits with constant top fan-in, and also polynomial-time hitting sets for the orbits of the power symmetric and the sum-product polynomials. 4) Polynomials computable by occur-once formulas.
Cite as

Chandan Saha and Bhargav Thankey. Hitting Sets for Orbits of Circuit Classes and Polynomial Families. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 207, pp. 50:1-50:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{saha_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.50,
  author =	{Saha, Chandan and Thankey, Bhargav},
  title =	{{Hitting Sets for Orbits of Circuit Classes and Polynomial Families}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2021)},
  pages =	{50:1--50:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-207-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{207},
  editor =	{Wootters, Mary and Sanit\`{a}, Laura},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.50},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-147433},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2021.50},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hitting Sets, Orbits, ROABPs, Rank Concentration}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.72
Randomized Polynomial-Time Equivalence Between Determinant and Trace-IMM Equivalence Tests

Authors: Janaky Murthy, Vineet Nair, and Chandan Saha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 170, 45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2020)

Abstract
Equivalence testing for a polynomial family {g_m}_{m ∈ ℕ} over a field 𝔽 is the following problem: Given black-box access to an n-variate polynomial f({𝐱}), where n is the number of variables in g_m for some m ∈ ℕ, check if there exists an A ∈ GL(n,𝔽) such that f({𝐱}) = g_m(A{𝐱}). If yes, then output such an A. The complexity of equivalence testing has been studied for a number of important polynomial families, including the determinant (Det) and the family of iterated matrix multiplication polynomials. Two popular variants of the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial are: IMM_{w,d} (the (1,1) entry of the product of d many w× w symbolic matrices) and Tr-IMM_{w,d} (the trace of the product of d many w× w symbolic matrices). The families - Det, IMM and Tr-IMM - are VBP-complete under p-projections, and so, in this sense, they have the same complexity. But, do they have the same equivalence testing complexity? We show that the answer is "yes" for Det and Tr-IMM (modulo the use of randomness). The above result may appear a bit surprising as the complexity of equivalence testing for IMM and that for Det are quite different over ℚ: a randomized poly-time equivalence testing for IMM over ℚ is known [Neeraj Kayal et al., 2019], whereas [Ankit Garg et al., 2019] showed that equivalence testing for Det over ℚ is integer factoring hard (under randomized reductions and assuming GRH). To our knowledge, the complexity of equivalence testing for Tr-IMM was not known before this work. We show that, despite the syntactic similarity between IMM and Tr-IMM, equivalence testing for Tr-IMM and that for Det are randomized poly-time Turing reducible to each other over any field of characteristic zero or sufficiently large. The result is obtained by connecting the two problems via another well-studied problem in computer algebra, namely the full matrix algebra isomorphism problem (FMAI). In particular, we prove the following: 1) Testing equivalence of polynomials to Tr-IMM_{w,d}, for d ≥ 3 and w ≥ 2, is randomized polynomial-time Turing reducible to testing equivalence of polynomials to Det_w, the determinant of the w × w matrix of formal variables. (Here, d need not be a constant.) 2) FMAI is randomized polynomial-time Turing reducible to equivalence testing (in fact, to tensor isomorphism testing) for the family of matrix multiplication tensors {Tr-IMM_{w,3}}_{w ∈ ℕ}. These results, in conjunction with the randomized poly-time reduction (shown in [Ankit Garg et al., 2019]) from determinant equivalence testing to FMAI, imply that the four problems - FMAI, equivalence testing for Tr-IMM and for Det, and the 3-tensor isomorphism problem for the family of matrix multiplication tensors - are randomized poly-time equivalent under Turing reductions.
Cite as

Janaky Murthy, Vineet Nair, and Chandan Saha. Randomized Polynomial-Time Equivalence Between Determinant and Trace-IMM Equivalence Tests. In 45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 170, pp. 72:1-72:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{murthy_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.72,
  author =	{Murthy, Janaky and Nair, Vineet and Saha, Chandan},
  title =	{{Randomized Polynomial-Time Equivalence Between Determinant and Trace-IMM Equivalence Tests}},
  booktitle =	{45th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2020)},
  pages =	{72:1--72:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-159-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{170},
  editor =	{Esparza, Javier and Kr\'{a}l', Daniel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.72},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-127419},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.72},
  annote =	{Keywords: equivalence testing, determinant, trace of the matrix product, full-matrix algebra isomorphism}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.23
A Super-Quadratic Lower Bound for Depth Four Arithmetic Circuits

Authors: Nikhil Gupta, Chandan Saha, and Bhargav Thankey

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 169, 35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020)

Abstract
We show an Ω̃(n^2.5) lower bound for general depth four arithmetic circuits computing an explicit n-variate degree-Θ(n) multilinear polynomial over any field of characteristic zero. To our knowledge, and as stated in the survey [Amir Shpilka and Amir Yehudayoff, 2010], no super-quadratic lower bound was known for depth four circuits over fields of characteristic ≠ 2 before this work. The previous best lower bound is Ω̃(n^1.5) [Abhijat Sharma, 2017], which is a slight quantitative improvement over the roughly Ω(n^1.33) bound obtained by invoking the super-linear lower bound for constant depth circuits in [Ran Raz, 2010; Victor Shoup and Roman Smolensky, 1997]. Our lower bound proof follows the approach of the almost cubic lower bound for depth three circuits in [Neeraj Kayal et al., 2016] by replacing the shifted partials measure with a suitable variant of the projected shifted partials measure, but it differs from [Neeraj Kayal et al., 2016]’s proof at a crucial step - namely, the way "heavy" product gates are handled. Loosely speaking, a heavy product gate has a relatively high fan-in. Product gates of a depth three circuit compute products of affine forms, and so, it is easy to prune Θ(n) many heavy product gates by projecting the circuit to a low-dimensional affine subspace [Neeraj Kayal et al., 2016; Amir Shpilka and Avi Wigderson, 2001]. However, in a depth four circuit, the second (from the top) layer of product gates compute products of polynomials having arbitrary degree, and hence it was not clear how to prune such heavy product gates from the circuit. We show that heavy product gates can also be eliminated from a depth four circuit by projecting the circuit to a low-dimensional affine subspace, unless the heavy gates together account for Ω̃(n^2.5) size. This part of our argument is inspired by a well-known greedy approximation algorithm for the weighted set-cover problem.
Cite as

Nikhil Gupta, Chandan Saha, and Bhargav Thankey. A Super-Quadratic Lower Bound for Depth Four Arithmetic Circuits. In 35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 169, pp. 23:1-23:31, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gupta_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2020.23,
  author =	{Gupta, Nikhil and Saha, Chandan and Thankey, Bhargav},
  title =	{{A Super-Quadratic Lower Bound for Depth Four Arithmetic Circuits}},
  booktitle =	{35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:31},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-156-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{169},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-125757},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2020.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: depth four arithmetic circuits, Projected Shifted Partials, super-quadratic lower bound}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2019.53
On the Symmetries of and Equivalence Test for Design Polynomials

Authors: Nikhil Gupta and Chandan Saha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 138, 44th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2019)

Abstract
In a Nisan-Wigderson design polynomial (in short, a design polynomial), every pair of monomials share a few common variables. A useful example of such a polynomial, introduced in [Neeraj Kayal et al., 2014], is the following: NW_{d,k}({x}) = sum_{h in F_d[z], deg(h) <= k}{ prod_{i=0}^{d-1}{x_{i, h(i)}}}, where d is a prime, F_d is the finite field with d elements, and k << d. The degree of the gcd of every pair of monomials in NW_{d,k} is at most k. For concreteness, we fix k = ceil[sqrt{d}]. The family of polynomials NW := {NW_{d,k} : d is a prime} and close variants of it have been used as hard explicit polynomial families in several recent arithmetic circuit lower bound proofs. But, unlike the permanent, very little is known about the various structural and algorithmic/complexity aspects of NW beyond the fact that NW in VNP. Is NW_{d,k} characterized by its symmetries? Is it circuit-testable, i.e., given a circuit C can we check efficiently if C computes NW_{d,k}? What is the complexity of equivalence test for NW, i.e., given black-box access to a f in F[{x}], can we check efficiently if there exists an invertible linear transformation A such that f = NW_{d,k}(A * {x})? Characterization of polynomials by their symmetries plays a central role in the geometric complexity theory program. Here, we answer the first two questions and partially answer the third. We show that NW_{d,k} is characterized by its group of symmetries over C, but not over R. We also show that NW_{d,k} is characterized by circuit identities which implies that NW_{d,k} is circuit-testable in randomized polynomial time. As another application of this characterization, we obtain the "flip theorem" for NW. We give an efficient equivalence test for NW in the case where the transformation A is a block-diagonal permutation-scaling matrix. The design of this algorithm is facilitated by an almost complete understanding of the group of symmetries of NW_{d,k}: We show that if A is in the group of symmetries of NW_{d,k} then A = D * P, where D and P are diagonal and permutation matrices respectively. This is proved by completely characterizing the Lie algebra of NW_{d,k}, and using an interplay between the Hessian of NW_{d,k} and the evaluation dimension.
Cite as

Nikhil Gupta and Chandan Saha. On the Symmetries of and Equivalence Test for Design Polynomials. In 44th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 138, pp. 53:1-53:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gupta_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2019.53,
  author =	{Gupta, Nikhil and Saha, Chandan},
  title =	{{On the Symmetries of and Equivalence Test for Design Polynomials}},
  booktitle =	{44th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2019)},
  pages =	{53:1--53:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-117-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Rossmanith, Peter and Heggernes, Pinar and Katoen, Joost-Pieter},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2019.53},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-109979},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2019.53},
  annote =	{Keywords: Nisan-Wigderson design polynomial, characterization by symmetries, Lie algebra, group of symmetries, circuit testability, flip theorem, equivalence test}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.62
Determinant Equivalence Test over Finite Fields and over Q

Authors: Ankit Garg, Nikhil Gupta, Neeraj Kayal, and Chandan Saha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 132, 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)

Abstract
The determinant polynomial Det_n(x) of degree n is the determinant of a n x n matrix of formal variables. A polynomial f is equivalent to Det_n(x) over a field F if there exists a A in GL(n^2,F) such that f = Det_n(A * x). Determinant equivalence test over F is the following algorithmic task: Given black-box access to a f in F[x], check if f is equivalent to Det_n(x) over F, and if so then output a transformation matrix A in GL(n^2,F). In (Kayal, STOC 2012), a randomized polynomial time determinant equivalence test was given over F = C. But, to our knowledge, the complexity of the problem over finite fields and over Q was not well understood. In this work, we give a randomized poly(n,log |F|) time determinant equivalence test over finite fields F (under mild restrictions on the characteristic and size of F). Over Q, we give an efficient randomized reduction from factoring square-free integers to determinant equivalence test for quadratic forms (i.e. the n=2 case), assuming GRH. This shows that designing a polynomial-time determinant equivalence test over Q is a challenging task. Nevertheless, we show that determinant equivalence test over Q is decidable: For bounded n, there is a randomized polynomial-time determinant equivalence test over Q with access to an oracle for integer factoring. Moreover, for any n, there is a randomized polynomial-time algorithm that takes input black-box access to a f in Q[x] and if f is equivalent to Det_n over Q then it returns a A in GL(n^2,L) such that f = Det_n(A * x), where L is an extension field of Q and [L : Q] <= n. The above algorithms over finite fields and over Q are obtained by giving a polynomial-time randomized reduction from determinant equivalence test to another problem, namely the full matrix algebra isomorphism problem. We also show a reduction in the converse direction which is efficient if n is bounded. These reductions, which hold over any F (under mild restrictions on the characteristic and size of F), establish a close connection between the complexity of the two problems. This then leads to our results via applications of known results on the full algebra isomorphism problem over finite fields (Rónyai, STOC 1987 and Rónyai, J. Symb. Comput. 1990) and over Q (Ivanyos {et al}., Journal of Algebra 2012 and Babai {et al}., Mathematics of Computation 1990).
Cite as

Ankit Garg, Nikhil Gupta, Neeraj Kayal, and Chandan Saha. Determinant Equivalence Test over Finite Fields and over Q. In 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 132, pp. 62:1-62:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{garg_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.62,
  author =	{Garg, Ankit and Gupta, Nikhil and Kayal, Neeraj and Saha, Chandan},
  title =	{{Determinant Equivalence Test over Finite Fields and over Q}},
  booktitle =	{46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2019)},
  pages =	{62:1--62:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-109-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{132},
  editor =	{Baier, Christel and Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Flocchini, Paola and Leonardi, Stefano},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.62},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-106382},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.62},
  annote =	{Keywords: Determinant equivalence test, full matrix algebra isomorphism, Lie algebra}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2017.21
Reconstruction of Full Rank Algebraic Branching Programs

Authors: Neeraj Kayal, Vineet Nair, Chandan Saha, and Sébastien Tavenas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 79, 32nd Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2017)

Abstract
An algebraic branching program (ABP) A can be modelled as a product expression X_1 X_2 ... X_d, where X_1 and X_d are 1 x w and w x 1 matrices respectively, and every other X_k is a w x w matrix; the entries of these matrices are linear forms in m variables over a field F (which we assume to be either Q or a field of characteristic poly(m)). The polynomial computed by A is the entry of the 1 x 1 matrix obtained from the product X_1 X_2 ... X_d. We say A is a full rank ABP if the w^2(d-2) + 2w linear forms occurring in the matrices X_1, X_2, ... , X_d are F-linearly independent. Our main result is a randomized reconstruction algorithm for full rank ABPs: Given blackbox access to an m-variate polynomial f of degree at most m, the algorithm outputs a full rank ABP computing f if such an ABP exists, or outputs 'no full rank ABP exists' (with high probability). The running time of the algorithm is polynomial in m and b, where b is the bit length of the coefficients of f. The algorithm works even if X_k is a w_{k-1} x w_k matrix (with w_0 = w_d = 1), and v = (w_1, ..., w_{d-1}) is unknown. The result is obtained by designing a randomized polynomial time equivalence test for the family of iterated matrix multiplication polynomial IMM_{v,d}, the (1,1)-th entry of a product of d rectangular symbolic matrices whose dimensions are according to v in N^{d-1}. At its core, the algorithm exploits a connection between the irreducible invariant subspaces of the Lie algebra of the group of symmetries of a polynomial f that is equivalent to IMM_{v,d} and the 'layer spaces' of a full rank ABP computing f. This connection also helps determine the group of symmetries of IMM_{v,d} and show that IMM_{v,d} is characterized by its group of symmetries.
Cite as

Neeraj Kayal, Vineet Nair, Chandan Saha, and Sébastien Tavenas. Reconstruction of Full Rank Algebraic Branching Programs. In 32nd Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 79, pp. 21:1-21:61, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kayal_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2017.21,
  author =	{Kayal, Neeraj and Nair, Vineet and Saha, Chandan and Tavenas, S\'{e}bastien},
  title =	{{Reconstruction of Full Rank Algebraic Branching Programs}},
  booktitle =	{32nd Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2017)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:61},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-040-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{79},
  editor =	{O'Donnell, Ryan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2017.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-75318},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2017.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Circuit reconstruction, algebraic branching programs, equivalence test, iterated matrix multiplication, Lie algebra}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.33
An Almost Cubic Lower Bound for Depth Three Arithmetic Circuits

Authors: Neeraj Kayal, Chandan Saha, and Sébastien Tavenas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 55, 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)

Abstract
We show an almost cubic lower bound on the size of any depth three arithmetic circuit computing an explicit multilinear polynomial in n variables over any field. This improves upon the previously known quadratic lower bound by Shpilka and Wigderson [CCC, 1999].
Cite as

Neeraj Kayal, Chandan Saha, and Sébastien Tavenas. An Almost Cubic Lower Bound for Depth Three Arithmetic Circuits. In 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 55, pp. 33:1-33:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kayal_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.33,
  author =	{Kayal, Neeraj and Saha, Chandan and Tavenas, S\'{e}bastien},
  title =	{{An Almost Cubic Lower Bound for Depth Three Arithmetic Circuits}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-013-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{55},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Mitzenmacher, Michael and Rabani, Yuval and Sangiorgi, Davide},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-63126},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: arithmetic circuits, depth-3 circuits, shifted partials}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2016.46
Separation Between Read-once Oblivious Algebraic Branching Programs (ROABPs) and Multilinear Depth Three Circuits

Authors: Neeraj Kayal, Vineet Nair, and Chandan Saha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 47, 33rd Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2016)

Abstract
We show an exponential separation between two well-studied models of algebraic computation, namely read-once oblivious algebraic branching programs (ROABPs) and multilinear depth three circuits. In particular we show the following: 1. There exists an explicit n-variate polynomial computable by linear sized multilinear depth three circuits (with only two product gates) such that every ROABP computing it requires 2^{Omega(n)} size. 2. Any multilinear depth three circuit computing IMM_{n,d} (the iterated matrix multiplication polynomial formed by multiplying d, n * n symbolic matrices) has n^{Omega(d)} size. IMM_{n,d} can be easily computed by a poly(n,d) sized ROABP. 3. Further, the proof of 2 yields an exponential separation between multilinear depth four and multilinear depth three circuits: There is an explicit n-variate, degree d polynomial computable by a poly(n,d) sized multilinear depth four circuit such that any multilinear depth three circuit computing it has size n^{Omega(d)}. This improves upon the quasi-polynomial separation result by Raz and Yehudayoff [2009] between these two models. The hard polynomial in 1 is constructed using a novel application of expander graphs in conjunction with the evaluation dimension measure used previously in Nisan [1991], Raz [2006,2009], Raz and Yehudayoff [2009], and Forbes and Shpilka [2013], while 2 is proved via a new adaptation of the dimension of the partial derivatives measure used by Nisan and Wigderson [1997]. Our lower bounds hold over any field.
Cite as

Neeraj Kayal, Vineet Nair, and Chandan Saha. Separation Between Read-once Oblivious Algebraic Branching Programs (ROABPs) and Multilinear Depth Three Circuits. In 33rd Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 47, pp. 46:1-46:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kayal_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2016.46,
  author =	{Kayal, Neeraj and Nair, Vineet and Saha, Chandan},
  title =	{{Separation Between Read-once Oblivious Algebraic Branching Programs (ROABPs) and Multilinear Depth Three Circuits}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2016)},
  pages =	{46:1--46:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-001-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{47},
  editor =	{Ollinger, Nicolas and Vollmer, Heribert},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2016.46},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-57475},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2016.46},
  annote =	{Keywords: multilinear depth three circuits, read-once oblivious algebraic branching programs, evaluation dimension, skewed partial derivatives, expander graphs,}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2015.158
Lower Bounds for Depth Three Arithmetic Circuits with Small Bottom Fanin

Authors: Neeraj Kayal and Chandan Saha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 33, 30th Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2015)

Abstract
Shpilka and Wigderson (CCC 99) had posed the problem of proving exponential lower bounds for (nonhomogeneous) depth three arithmetic circuits with bounded bottom fanin over a field F of characteristic zero. We resolve this problem by proving a N^(Omega(d/t)) lower bound for (nonhomogeneous) depth three arithmetic circuits with bottom fanin at most t computing an explicit N-variate polynomial of degree d over F. Meanwhile, Nisan and Wigderson (CC 97) had posed the problem of proving superpolynomial lower bounds for homogeneous depth five arithmetic circuits. Over fields of characteristic zero, we show a lower bound of N^(Omega(sqrt(d))) for homogeneous depth five circuits (resp. also for depth three circuits) with bottom fanin at most N^(u), for any fixed u < 1. This resolves the problem posed by Nisan and Wigderson only partially because of the added restriction on the bottom fanin (a general homogeneous depth five circuit has bottom fanin at most N).
Cite as

Neeraj Kayal and Chandan Saha. Lower Bounds for Depth Three Arithmetic Circuits with Small Bottom Fanin. In 30th Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2015). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 33, pp. 158-182, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kayal_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2015.158,
  author =	{Kayal, Neeraj and Saha, Chandan},
  title =	{{Lower Bounds for Depth Three Arithmetic Circuits with Small Bottom Fanin}},
  booktitle =	{30th Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2015)},
  pages =	{158--182},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-81-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{33},
  editor =	{Zuckerman, David},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2015.158},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-50617},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2015.158},
  annote =	{Keywords: arithmetic circuits, depth three circuits, lower bound, bottom fanin}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2015.527
Multi-k-ic Depth Three Circuit Lower Bound

Authors: Neeraj Kayal and Chandan Saha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 30, 32nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2015)

Abstract
In a multi-k-ic depth three circuit every variable appears in at most k of the linear polynomials in every product gate of the circuit. This model is a natural generalization of multilinear depth three circuits that allows the formal degree of the circuit to exceed the number of underlying variables (as the formal degree of a multi-k-ic depth three circuit can be kn where n is the number of variables). The problem of proving lower bounds for depth three circuits with high formal degree has gained in importance following a work by Gupta, Kamath, Kayal and Saptharishi [7] on depth reduction to high formal degree depth three circuits. In this work, we show an exponential lower bound for multi-k-ic depth three circuits for any arbitrary constant k.
Cite as

Neeraj Kayal and Chandan Saha. Multi-k-ic Depth Three Circuit Lower Bound. In 32nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2015). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 30, pp. 527-539, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kayal_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2015.527,
  author =	{Kayal, Neeraj and Saha, Chandan},
  title =	{{Multi-k-ic Depth Three Circuit Lower Bound}},
  booktitle =	{32nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2015)},
  pages =	{527--539},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-78-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{30},
  editor =	{Mayr, Ernst W. and Ollinger, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2015.527},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-49395},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2015.527},
  annote =	{Keywords: arithmetic circuits, multilinear circuits, depth three circuits, lower bound, individual degree}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2009.2333
The Power of Depth 2 Circuits over Algebras

Authors: Chandan Saha, Ramprasad Saptharishi, and Nitin Saxena

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 4, IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (2009)

Abstract
We study the problem of polynomial identity testing (PIT) for depth $2$ arithmetic circuits over matrix algebra. We show that identity testing of depth $3$ ($\Sigma \Pi \Sigma$) arithmetic circuits over a field $\F$ is polynomial time equivalent to identity testing of depth $2$ ($\Pi \Sigma$) arithmetic circuits over $\mathsf{U}_2(\mathbb{F})$, the algebra of upper-triangular $2\times 2$ matrices with entries from $\F$. Such a connection is a bit surprising since we also show that, as computational models, $\Pi \Sigma$ circuits over $\mathsf{U}_2(\mathbb{F})$ are strictly `weaker' than $\Sigma \Pi \Sigma$ circuits over $\mathbb{F}$. The equivalence further implies that PIT of $\Sigma \Pi \Sigma$ circuits reduces to PIT of width-$2$ commutative \emph{Algebraic Branching Programs}(ABP). Further, we give a deterministic polynomial time identity testing algorithm for a $\Pi \Sigma$ circuit of size $s$ over commutative algebras of dimension $O(\log s/\log\log s)$ over $\F$. Over commutative algebras of dimension $\poly(s)$, we show that identity testing of $\Pi \Sigma$ circuits is at least as hard as that of $\Sigma \Pi \Sigma$ circuits over $\mathbb{F}$.
Cite as

Chandan Saha, Ramprasad Saptharishi, and Nitin Saxena. The Power of Depth 2 Circuits over Algebras. In IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 4, pp. 371-382, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{saha_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2009.2333,
  author =	{Saha, Chandan and Saptharishi, Ramprasad and Saxena, Nitin},
  title =	{{The Power of Depth 2 Circuits over Algebras}},
  booktitle =	{IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science},
  pages =	{371--382},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-13-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2009},
  volume =	{4},
  editor =	{Kannan, Ravi and Narayan Kumar, K.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2009.2333},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-23334},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2009.2333},
  annote =	{Keywords: Polynomial identity testing, depth 3 circuits, matrix algebras, local rings}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2008.1323
Factoring Polynomials over Finite Fields using Balance Test

Authors: Chandan Saha

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 1, 25th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (2008)

Abstract
We study the problem of factoring univariate polynomials over finite fields. Under the assumption of the Extended Riemann Hypothesis (ERH), (Gao, 2001) designed a polynomial time algorithm that fails to factor only if the input polynomial satisfies a strong symmetry property, namely square balance. In this paper, we propose an extension of Gao's algorithm that fails only under an even stronger symmetry property. We also show that our property can be used to improve the time complexity of best deterministic algorithms on most input polynomials. The property also yields a new randomized polynomial time algorithm.
Cite as

Chandan Saha. Factoring Polynomials over Finite Fields using Balance Test. In 25th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 1, pp. 609-620, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{saha:LIPIcs.STACS.2008.1323,
  author =	{Saha, Chandan},
  title =	{{Factoring Polynomials over Finite Fields using Balance Test}},
  booktitle =	{25th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science},
  pages =	{609--620},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-06-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{1},
  editor =	{Albers, Susanne and Weil, Pascal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2008.1323},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-13233},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2008.1323},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algebraic Algorithms, polynomial factorization, finite fields}
}
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact