24 Search Results for "Guerrieri, Giulio"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.47
Useful Call-by-Value: A Semantic Interpretation via Quantitative Types

Authors: Pablo Barenbaum, Delia Kesner, and Mariana Milicich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
Useful evaluation is an optimised evaluation mechanism for functional programming languages. It relies on representing terms with sharing and imposing a restricted notion of useful substitutions, that intuitively disallows copying subterms that do not contribute to the progress of the computation. In particular, useful call-by-value evaluation optimises the standard call-by-value strategy by preserving its original semantics. This preservation result has been shown by means of syntactical rewriting techniques, difficult to adapt to alternative variants of the calculi at play. In this work, we present the first semantic model of useful call-by-value evaluation through the non-idempotent intersection type system 𝒰. Our first contribution is a characterisation of termination for useful call-by-value evaluation via system 𝒰. That is, a term is typable in system 𝒰 if and only if it terminates in the useful call-by-value strategy. As a second contribution, we show that system 𝒰 provides a quantitative interpretation for useful call-by-value evaluation, offering exact step-count information for program evaluation. Our third contribution is that termination in call-by-value and useful call-by-value are equivalent. This ensures in particular that call-by-value, which is (potentially) erasing, and useful call-by-value, which is non-erasing, are observationally equivalent. Even though the specification of the operational semantics of useful evaluation is highly complex, system 𝒰 is notably simple. As far as we know, system 𝒰 is one of the scarce quantitative type systems capturing exactly the substitution step-count for variables and abstractions in an open call-by-value strategy.
Cite as

Pablo Barenbaum, Delia Kesner, and Mariana Milicich. Useful Call-by-Value: A Semantic Interpretation via Quantitative Types. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 47:1-47:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{barenbaum_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.47,
  author =	{Barenbaum, Pablo and Kesner, Delia and Milicich, Mariana},
  title =	{{Useful Call-by-Value: A Semantic Interpretation via Quantitative Types}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{47:1--47:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.47},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254721},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.47},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda calculus, Evaluation strategies, Call-by-Value, Useful Evaluation, Intersection types, Quantitative models}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.7
A Verified Cost Model for Call-By-Push-Value

Authors: Zhuo Zoey Chen, Johannes Åman Pohjola, and Christine Rizkallah

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
The call-by-push-value λ-calculus allows for syntactically specifying the order of evaluation as part of the term language. Hence, it serves as a unifying language for embedding various evaluation strategies including call-by-value and call-by-name. Given the impact of call-by-push-value, it is remarkable that its adequacy as a model for computational complexity theory has not yet been studied. In this paper, we show that the call-by-push-value λ-calculus is reasonable for both time and space complexity. A reasonable cost model can encode other reasonable cost models with polynomial overhead in time and constant factor overhead in space. We achieve this by encoding call-by-push-value λ-calculus into Turing machines, following a simulation strategy by Forster et al.; for the converse direction, we prove that Levy’s encoding of the call-by-value λ-calculus has reasonable complexity bounds. The main results have been formalised in the HOL4 theorem prover.
Cite as

Zhuo Zoey Chen, Johannes Åman Pohjola, and Christine Rizkallah. A Verified Cost Model for Call-By-Push-Value. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 7:1-7:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chen_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.7,
  author =	{Chen, Zhuo Zoey and \r{A}man Pohjola, Johannes and Rizkallah, Christine},
  title =	{{A Verified Cost Model for Call-By-Push-Value}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246067},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda calculus, formalizations of computational models, computability theory, HOL, call-by-push-value reduction, time and space complexity, abstract machines}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13
Barendregt’s Theory of the λ-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized

Authors: Adrienne Lancelot, Beniamino Accattoli, and Maxime Vemclefs

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Barendregt’s book on the untyped λ-calculus refines the inconsistent view of β-divergence as representation of the undefined via the key concept of head reduction. In this paper, we put together recent revisitations of some key theorems laid out in Barendregt’s book, and we formalize them in the Abella proof assistant. Our work provides a compact and refreshed presentation of the core of the book. The formalization faithfully mimics pen-and-paper proofs. Two interesting aspects are the manipulation of contexts for the study of contextual equivalence and a formal alternative to the informal trick at work in Takahashi’s proof of the genericity lemma. As a by-product, we obtain an alternative definition of contextual equivalence that does not mention contexts.
Cite as

Adrienne Lancelot, Beniamino Accattoli, and Maxime Vemclefs. Barendregt’s Theory of the λ-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 13:1-13:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lancelot_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13,
  author =	{Lancelot, Adrienne and Accattoli, Beniamino and Vemclefs, Maxime},
  title =	{{Barendregt’s Theory of the \lambda-Calculus, Refreshed and Formalized}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246114},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda-calculus, head reduction, equational theory}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.5
The Cost of Skeletal Call-By-Need, Smoothly

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Francesco Magliocca, Loïc Peyrot, and Claudio Sacerdoti Coen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
Skeletal call-by-need is an optimization of call-by-need evaluation also known as "fully lazy sharing": when the duplication of a value has to take place, it is first split into "skeleton", which is then duplicated, and "flesh" which is instead kept shared. Here, we provide two cost analyses of skeletal call-by-need. Firstly, we provide a family of terms showing that skeletal call-by-need can be asymptotically exponentially faster than call-by-need in both time and space; it is the first such evidence, to our knowledge. Secondly, we prove that skeletal call-by-need can be implemented efficiently, that is, with bi-linear overhead. This result is obtained by providing a new smooth presentation of ideas by Shivers and Wand for the reconstruction of skeletons, which is then smoothly plugged into the study of an abstract machine following the distillation technique by Accattoli et al.
Cite as

Beniamino Accattoli, Francesco Magliocca, Loïc Peyrot, and Claudio Sacerdoti Coen. The Cost of Skeletal Call-By-Need, Smoothly. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 5:1-5:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{accattoli_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.5,
  author =	{Accattoli, Beniamino and Magliocca, Francesco and Peyrot, Lo\"{i}c and Sacerdoti Coen, Claudio},
  title =	{{The Cost of Skeletal Call-By-Need, Smoothly}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236206},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: \lambda-calculus, abstract machines, call-by-need, cost models}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.16
Yeo’s Theorem for Locally Colored Graphs: the Path to Sequentialization in Linear Logic

Authors: Rémi Di Guardia, Olivier Laurent, Lorenzo Tortora de Falco, and Lionel Vaux Auclair

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
We revisit sequentialization proofs associated with the Danos-Regnier correctness criterion in the theory of proof nets of linear logic. Our approach relies on a generalization of Yeo’s theorem for graphs, based on colorings of half-edges. This happens to be the appropriate level of abstraction to extract sequentiality information from a proof net without modifying its graph structure. We thus obtain different ways of recovering a sequent calculus derivation from a proof net inductively, by relying on a splitting ⅋-vertex, on a splitting ⊗-vertex, on a splitting terminal vertex, etc. The proof of our Yeo-style theorem relies on a key lemma that we call cusp minimization. Given a coloring of half-edges, a cusp in a path is a vertex whose adjacent half-edges in the path have the same color. And, given a cycle with at least one cusp and subject to suitable hypotheses, cusp minimization constructs a cycle with strictly less cusps. In the absence of cusp-free cycles, cusp minimization is then enough to ensure the existence of a splitting vertex, i.e. a vertex that is a cusp of any cycle it belongs to. Our theorem subsumes several graph-theoretical results, including some known to be equivalent to Yeo’s theorem. The novelty is that they can be derived in a straightforward way, just by defining a dedicated coloring, again without any modification of the underlying graph structure (vertices and edges) - similar results from the literature required more involved encodings.
Cite as

Rémi Di Guardia, Olivier Laurent, Lorenzo Tortora de Falco, and Lionel Vaux Auclair. Yeo’s Theorem for Locally Colored Graphs: the Path to Sequentialization in Linear Logic. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 16:1-16:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{diguardia_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.16,
  author =	{Di Guardia, R\'{e}mi and Laurent, Olivier and Tortora de Falco, Lorenzo and Vaux Auclair, Lionel},
  title =	{{Yeo’s Theorem for Locally Colored Graphs: the Path to Sequentialization in Linear Logic}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236317},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Linear Logic, Proof Net, Sequentialization, Graph Theory, Yeo’s Theorem}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4
Separating Terms by Means of Multi Types, Coinductively

Authors: Adrienne Lancelot

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 336, 30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024)

Abstract
Intersection type systems, as adequate models of the λ-calculus, induce an equational theory on terms, that we refer to as type equivalence. We give a new proof technique to coinductively characterize type equivalence. To do so, we explore a simple setting, namely weak head type equivalence, which is the equational theory induced by a weak head non-idempotent intersection type system. We prove a folklore result: weak head type equivalence coincides with Sangiorgi’s normal form bisimilarity. What is new in our development is that we only rely on coinductive program equivalences, bypassing the need to introduce term approximants, which were used in previous works characterizing type equivalence. The crucial part of this characterization is to show that type equivalent terms are normal form bisimilar: we do so by constructing shape typings that can only type terms of a specific normal form structure. Shape typings are a light form of principal types, a technique often used in intersection types to generate from one or few principal typing all possible typings of a term.
Cite as

Adrienne Lancelot. Separating Terms by Means of Multi Types, Coinductively. In 30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 336, pp. 4:1-4:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lancelot:LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4,
  author =	{Lancelot, Adrienne},
  title =	{{Separating Terms by Means of Multi Types, Coinductively}},
  booktitle =	{30th International Conference on Types for Proofs and Programs (TYPES 2024)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-376-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{336},
  editor =	{M{\o}gelberg, Rasmus Ejlers and van den Berg, Benno},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233660},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.TYPES.2024.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda calculus, intersection types, program equivalence}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.23
How to Play the Accordion: Uniformity and the (Non-)Conservativity of the Linear Approximation of the λ-Calculus

Authors: Rémy Cerda and Lionel Vaux Auclair

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
Twenty years after its introduction by Ehrhard and Regnier, differentiation in λ-calculus and in linear logic is now a celebrated tool. In particular, it allows to write the Taylor formula in various λ-calculi, hence providing a theory of linear approximations for these calculi. In the standard λ-calculus, this linear approximation is expressed by results stating that the (possibly) infinitary β-reduction of λ-terms is simulated by the reduction of their Taylor expansion: in terms of rewriting systems, the resource reduction (operating on Taylor approximants) is an extension of the β-reduction. In this paper, we address the converse property, conservativity: are there reductions of the Taylor approximants that do not arise from an actual β-reduction of the approximated term? We show that if we restrict the setting to finite terms and β-reduction sequences, then the linear approximation is conservative. However, as soon as one allows infinitary reduction sequences this property is broken. We design a counter-example, the Accordion. Then we show how restricting the reduction of the Taylor approximants allows to build a conservative extension of the β-reduction preserving good simulation properties. This restriction relies on uniformity, a property that was already at the core of Ehrhard and Regnier’s pioneering work.
Cite as

Rémy Cerda and Lionel Vaux Auclair. How to Play the Accordion: Uniformity and the (Non-)Conservativity of the Linear Approximation of the λ-Calculus. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 23:1-23:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cerda_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.23,
  author =	{Cerda, R\'{e}my and Vaux Auclair, Lionel},
  title =	{{How to Play the Accordion: Uniformity and the (Non-)Conservativity of the Linear Approximation of the \lambda-Calculus}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228480},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: program approximation, quantitative semantics, lambda-calculus, linear approximation, Taylor expansion, conservativity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47
A Rewriting Theory for Quantum λ-Calculus

Authors: Claudia Faggian, Gaetan Lopez, and Benoît Valiron

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
Quantum lambda calculus has been studied mainly as an idealized programming language - the evaluation essentially corresponds to a deterministic abstract machine. Very little work has been done to develop a rewriting theory for quantum lambda calculus. Recent advances in the theory of probabilistic rewriting give us a way to tackle this task with tools unavailable a decade ago. Our primary focus are standardization and normalization results.
Cite as

Claudia Faggian, Gaetan Lopez, and Benoît Valiron. A Rewriting Theory for Quantum λ-Calculus. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 47:1-47:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{faggian_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47,
  author =	{Faggian, Claudia and Lopez, Gaetan and Valiron, Beno\^{i}t},
  title =	{{A Rewriting Theory for Quantum \lambda-Calculus}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{47:1--47:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228046},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.47},
  annote =	{Keywords: quantum lambda-calculus, probabilistic rewriting, operational semantics, asymptotic normalization, principles of quantum programming languages}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.34
The Lambda Calculus Is Quantifiable

Authors: Valentin Maestracci and Paolo Pistone

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
In this paper we introduce several quantitative methods for the lambda-calculus based on partial metrics, a well-studied variant of standard metric spaces that have been used to metrize non-Hausdorff topologies, like those arising from Scott domains. First, we study quantitative variants, based on program distances, of sensible equational theories for the λ-calculus, like those arising from Böhm trees and from the contextual preorder. Then, we introduce applicative distances capturing higher-order Scott topologies, including reflexive objects like the D_∞ model. Finally, we provide a quantitative insight on the well-known connection between the Böhm tree of a λ-term and its Taylor expansion, by showing that the latter can be presented as an isometric transformation.
Cite as

Valentin Maestracci and Paolo Pistone. The Lambda Calculus Is Quantifiable. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 34:1-34:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{maestracci_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.34,
  author =	{Maestracci, Valentin and Pistone, Paolo},
  title =	{{The Lambda Calculus Is Quantifiable}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227911},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda-calculus, Scott semantics, Partial metric spaces, B\"{o}hm trees, Taylor expansion}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.31
Simple Types for Probabilistic Termination

Authors: Willem Heijltjes and Georgina Majury

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
We present a new typing discipline to guarantee the probability of termination in probabilistic lambda-calculi. The main contribution is a particular naturality and simplicity: our probabilistic types are as simple types, but generated from probabilities as base types, representing a least probability of termination. Simple types are recovered by restricting probabilities to one. Our vehicle is the Probabilistic Event Lambda-Calculus by Dal Lago, Guerrieri, and Heijltjes, which presents a solution to the issue of confluence in probabilistic lambda-calculi. Our probabilistic type system provides an alternative solution to that using counting quantifiers by Antonelli, Dal Lago, and Pistone, for the same calculus. The problem that both type systems address is to give a lower bound on the probability that terms head-normalize. Following the recent Functional Machine Calculus by Heijltjes, our development takes the (simplified) Krivine machine as primary, and proceeds via an extension of the calculus with sequential composition and identity on the machine. Our type system then gives a natural account of termination probability on the Krivine machine, reflected back onto head-normalization for the original calculus. In this way we are able to avoid the use of counting quantifiers, while improving on the termination bounds given by Antonelli, Dal Lago, and Pistone.
Cite as

Willem Heijltjes and Georgina Majury. Simple Types for Probabilistic Termination. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 31:1-31:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{heijltjes_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.31,
  author =	{Heijltjes, Willem and Majury, Georgina},
  title =	{{Simple Types for Probabilistic Termination}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227885},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda-calculus, probabilistic termination, simple types}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.1
Meaningfulness and Genericity in a Subsuming Framework (Invited Talk)

Authors: Delia Kesner, Victor Arrial, and Giulio Guerrieri

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 299, 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)

Abstract
This paper studies the notion of meaningfulness for a unifying framework called dBang-calculus, which subsumes both call-by-name (dCBN) and call-by-value (dCBV). We first define meaningfulness in dBang and then characterize it by means of typability and inhabitation in an associated non-idempotent intersection type system previously appearing in the literature. We validate the proposed notion of meaningfulness by showing two properties: (1) consistency of the smallest theory, called ℋ, equating all meaningless terms, and (2) genericity, stating that meaningless subterms have no bearing on the significance of meaningful terms. The theory ℋ is also shown to have a unique consistent and maximal extension ℋ*, which coincides with a well-known notion of observational equivalence. Last but not least, we show that the notions of meaningfulness and genericity in the literature for dCBN and dCBV are subsumed by the corresponding ones proposed here for the dBang-calculus.
Cite as

Delia Kesner, Delia Kesner, Victor Arrial, Victor Arrial, Giulio Guerrieri, and Giulio Guerrieri. Meaningfulness and Genericity in a Subsuming Framework (Invited Talk). In 9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 299, pp. 1:1-1:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kesner_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.1,
  author =	{Kesner, Delia and Arrial, Victor and Guerrieri, Giulio},
  title =	{{Meaningfulness and Genericity in a Subsuming Framework}},
  booktitle =	{9th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2024)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-323-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{299},
  editor =	{Rehof, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-203305},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2024.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lambda calculus, Solvability, Meaningfulness, Inhabitation, Genericity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.8
Infinitary Cut-Elimination via Finite Approximations

Authors: Matteo Acclavio, Gianluca Curzi, and Giulio Guerrieri

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 288, 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)

Abstract
We investigate non-wellfounded proof systems based on parsimonious logic, a weaker variant of linear logic where the exponential modality ! is interpreted as a constructor for streams over finite data. Logical consistency is maintained at a global level by adapting a standard progressing criterion. We present an infinitary version of cut-elimination based on finite approximations, and we prove that, in presence of the progressing criterion, it returns well-defined non-wellfounded proofs at its limit. Furthermore, we show that cut-elimination preserves the progressing criterion and various regularity conditions internalizing degrees of proof-theoretical uniformity. Finally, we provide a denotational semantics for our systems based on the relational model.
Cite as

Matteo Acclavio, Gianluca Curzi, and Giulio Guerrieri. Infinitary Cut-Elimination via Finite Approximations. In 32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 288, pp. 8:1-8:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{acclavio_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2024.8,
  author =	{Acclavio, Matteo and Curzi, Gianluca and Guerrieri, Giulio},
  title =	{{Infinitary Cut-Elimination via Finite Approximations}},
  booktitle =	{32nd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2024)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-310-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{288},
  editor =	{Murano, Aniello and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196510},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2024.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: cut-elimination, non-wellfounded proofs, parsimonious logic, linear logic, proof theory, approximation, sequent calculus, non-uniform proofs}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2023.1
Asymptotic Rewriting (Invited Talk)

Authors: Claudia Faggian

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 252, 31st EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2023)

Abstract
Rewriting is a foundation for the operational theory of programming languages. The process of rewriting describes the computation of a result (typically, a normal form), with lambda-calculus being the paradigmatic example for rewriting as an abstract form of program execution. Taking this view, the execution of a program is formalized as a specific evaluation strategy, while the general rewriting theory allows for program transformations, optimizations, parallel/distributed implementations, and provides a base on which to reason about program equivalence. In this talk, we discuss what happens when the notion of termination is asymptotic, that is, the result of computation appears as a limit, as opposed to reaching a normal form in a finite number of steps. - Example 1. A natural example is probabilistic computation. A probabilistic program P is a stochastic model generating a distribution over all possible outputs of P. Even if the termination probability is 1 (almost sure termination), that degree of certitude is typically not reached in a finite number of steps, but as a limit. A standard example is a term M that reduces to either a normal form or M itself, with equal probability 1/2. After n steps, M is in normal form with probability 1/2 + 1/(2²) + … + 1/(2ⁿ). Only at the limit this computation terminates with probability 1. - Example 2. Infinitary lambda-calculi (where the limits are infinitary terms such as Böhm trees), streams, algebraic rewriting systems, effectful computation (e.g. computation with outputs), quantum lambda-calculi provide several other relevant examples. Instances of asymptotic computation are quite diverse, and moreover the specific syntax of each system may be rather complex. In the talk, we present asymptotic rewriting in a way which is independent of the specific details of each calculus, and we provide a toolkit of proof-techniques which are of general application. To do so, we rely on Quantitative Abstract Rewriting System [Claudia Faggian, 2022; Claudia Faggian and Giulio Guerrieri, 2022], building on work by Ariola and Blom [Ariola and Blom, 2002], which enrich with quantitative information the theory of Abstract Rewriting Systems (ARS) (see e.g. [Terese, 2003] or [Baader and Nipkow, 1998]). ARS are indeed the core of finitary rewriting, capturing the common substratum of rewriting theory and term transformation, independently from the particular structure of the objects. It seems then natural to seek a similar foundation for asymptotic computation. The issue is that the arguments relying on finitary termination do not transfer, in general, to limits (a game changer being that asymptotic termination does not provide a well-founded order): we need to develope an opportune formalization and suitable proof techniques. The goal is then to identify and develop methods which only rely on the asymptotic argument - abstracting from structure specific to a setting - and so will apply to any concrete instance. For example, in infinitary lambda calculus, the limit is usually a (possibly infinite) limit term, while in probabilistic lambda calculus, the limit is a distribution over (finite) terms. The former is concerned with the depth of the redexes, the latter with the probability of reaching a result. The abstract notions of limit and of normalization subsumes both, and so abstract results apply to either setting.
Cite as

Claudia Faggian. Asymptotic Rewriting (Invited Talk). In 31st EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 252, pp. 1:1-1:2, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{faggian:LIPIcs.CSL.2023.1,
  author =	{Faggian, Claudia},
  title =	{{Asymptotic Rewriting}},
  booktitle =	{31st EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2023)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:2},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-264-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{252},
  editor =	{Klin, Bartek and Pimentel, Elaine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2023.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-174621},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2023.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: rewriting, probabilistic rewriting, confluence, strategies, asymptotic normalization, lambda calculus}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2023.10
The Functional Machine Calculus II: Semantics

Authors: Chris Barrett, Willem Heijltjes, and Guy McCusker

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 252, 31st EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2023)

Abstract
The Functional Machine Calculus (FMC), recently introduced by the second author, is a generalization of the lambda-calculus which may faithfully encode the effects of higher-order mutable store, I/O and probabilistic/non-deterministic input. Significantly, it remains confluent and can be simply typed in the presence of these effects. In this paper, we explore the denotational semantics of the FMC. We have three main contributions: first, we argue that its syntax - in which both effects and lambda-calculus are realised using the same syntactic constructs - is semantically natural, corresponding closely to the structure of a Scott-style domain theoretic semantics. Second, we show that simple types confer strong normalization by extending Gandy’s proof for the lambda-calculus, including a small simplification of the technique. Finally, we show that the typed FMC (without considering the specifics of encoded effects), modulo an appropriate equational theory, is a complete language for Cartesian closed categories.
Cite as

Chris Barrett, Willem Heijltjes, and Guy McCusker. The Functional Machine Calculus II: Semantics. In 31st EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 252, pp. 10:1-10:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{barrett_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2023.10,
  author =	{Barrett, Chris and Heijltjes, Willem and McCusker, Guy},
  title =	{{The Functional Machine Calculus II: Semantics}},
  booktitle =	{31st EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2023)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-264-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{252},
  editor =	{Klin, Bartek and Pimentel, Elaine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2023.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-174716},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2023.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: lambda-calculus, computational effects, denotational semantics, strong normalization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2022.17
Strategies for Asymptotic Normalization

Authors: Claudia Faggian and Giulio Guerrieri

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 228, 7th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2022)

Abstract
We present an abstract technique to study normalizing strategies when termination is asymptotic, that is, it appears as a limit. Asymptotic termination occurs in several settings, such as effectful, and in particular probabilistic computation - where the limits are distributions over the possible outputs - or infinitary lambda-calculi - where the limits are infinitary terms such as Böhm trees. As a concrete application, we obtain a result which is of independent interest: a normalization theorem for Call-by-Value (and - in a uniform way - for Call-by-Name) probabilistic lambda-calculus.
Cite as

Claudia Faggian and Giulio Guerrieri. Strategies for Asymptotic Normalization. In 7th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 228, pp. 17:1-17:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{faggian_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2022.17,
  author =	{Faggian, Claudia and Guerrieri, Giulio},
  title =	{{Strategies for Asymptotic Normalization}},
  booktitle =	{7th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2022)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-233-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{228},
  editor =	{Felty, Amy P.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2022.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-162987},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2022.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: rewriting, strategies, normalization, lambda calculus, probabilistic rewriting}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 24 Document/PDF
  • 9 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 9 2025
  • 2 2024
  • 2 2023
  • 1 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 10 Guerrieri, Giulio
  • 4 Accattoli, Beniamino
  • 4 Faggian, Claudia
  • 3 Tortora de Falco, Lorenzo
  • 2 Heijltjes, Willem
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 23 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 14 Theory of computation → Lambda calculus
  • 7 Theory of computation → Linear logic
  • 4 Theory of computation → Operational semantics
  • 3 Theory of computation → Equational logic and rewriting
  • 3 Theory of computation → Proof theory
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 6 lambda-calculus
  • 4 Taylor expansion
  • 4 lambda calculus
  • 3 abstract machines
  • 3 call-by-value
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact