21 Search Results for "Mucha, Marcin"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.79
Mind the Gap. Doubling Constant Parametrization of Weighted Problems: TSP, Max-Cut, and More

Authors: Mihail Stoian

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
Despite much research, hard weighted problems still resist super-polynomial improvements over their textbook solution. On the other hand, the unweighted versions of these problems have recently witnessed the sought-after speedups. Currently, the only way to repurpose the algorithm of the unweighted version for the weighted version is to employ a polynomial embedding of the input weights. This, however, introduces a pseudo-polynomial factor into the running time, which becomes impractical for arbitrarily weighted instances. In this paper, we introduce a new way to repurpose the algorithm of the unweighted problem. Specifically, we show that the time complexity of several well-known NP-hard problems operating over the (min, +) and (max, +) semirings, such as TSP, Weighted Max-Cut, and Edge-Weighted k-Clique, is proportional to that of their unweighted versions when the set of input weights has small doubling. We achieve this by a meta-algorithm that converts the input weights into polynomially bounded integers using the recent constructive Freiman’s theorem by Randolph and Węgrzycki [ESA 2024] before applying the polynomial embedding.
Cite as

Mihail Stoian. Mind the Gap. Doubling Constant Parametrization of Weighted Problems: TSP, Max-Cut, and More. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 79:1-79:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{stoian:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.79,
  author =	{Stoian, Mihail},
  title =	{{Mind the Gap. Doubling Constant Parametrization of Weighted Problems: TSP, Max-Cut, and More}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{79:1--79:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.79},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255680},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.79},
  annote =	{Keywords: doubling constant parametrization, weighted problems, traveling salesman, weighted max-cut, edge-weighted k-clique}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.50
On the PTAS Complexity of Multidimensional Knapsack

Authors: Ilan Doron-Arad, Ariel Kulik, and Pasin Manurangsi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
We study the d-dimensional knapsack problem. We are given a set of items, each with a d-dimensional cost vector and a profit, along with a d-dimensional budget vector. The goal is to select a set of items that do not exceed the budget in all dimensions and maximize the total profit. A polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) with running time n^{Θ(d/{ε})} has long been known for this problem, where {ε} is the error parameter and n is the encoding size. Despite decades of active research, the best running time of a PTAS has remained O(n^{⌈ d/{ε} ⌉ - d}). Unfortunately, existing lower bounds only cover the special case with two dimensions d = 2, and do not answer whether there is a n^{o(d/({ε)})}-time PTAS for larger values of d. In this work, we show that the running times of the best-known PTAS cannot be improved up to a polylogarithmic factor assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Our techniques are based on a robust reduction from 2-CSP, which embeds 2-CSP constraints into a desired number of dimensions. Then, using a recent result of [Bafna Karthik and Minzer, STOC'25], we succeed in exhibiting tight trade-off between d and {ε} for all regimes of the parameters assuming d is sufficiently large. Informally, our result also shows that under ETH, for any function f there is no f(d/({ε)}) ⋅ n^{õ(d/({ε)})}-time (1-{ε})-approximation for d-dimensional knapsack, where n is the number of items and õ hides polylogarithmic factors in d/({ε)}.
Cite as

Ilan Doron-Arad, Ariel Kulik, and Pasin Manurangsi. On the PTAS Complexity of Multidimensional Knapsack. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 50:1-50:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{doronarad_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.50,
  author =	{Doron-Arad, Ilan and Kulik, Ariel and Manurangsi, Pasin},
  title =	{{On the PTAS Complexity of Multidimensional Knapsack}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{50:1--50:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.50},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253377},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.50},
  annote =	{Keywords: d-dimensional Knapsack, Multidimensional Knapsack, PTAS, CSP}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.17
Treedepth Inapproximability and Exponential ETH Lower Bound

Authors: Édouard Bonnet, Daniel Neuen, and Marek Sokołowski

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
Treedepth is a central parameter to algorithmic graph theory. The current state-of-the-art in computing and approximating treedepth consists of a 2^{O(k²)} n-time exact algorithm and a polynomial-time O(OPT log^{3/2} OPT)-approximation algorithm, where the former algorithm returns an elimination forest of height k (witnessing that treedepth is at most k) for the n-vertex input graph G, or correctly reports that G has treedepth larger than k, and OPT is the actual value of the treedepth. On the complexity side, exactly computing treedepth is NP-complete, but the known reductions do not rule out a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS), and under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) only exclude a running time of 2^o(√n) for exact algorithms. We show that 1.0003-approximating Treedepth is NP-hard, and that exactly computing the treedepth of an n-vertex graph requires time 2^Ω(n), unless the ETH fails. We further derive that there exist absolute constants δ, c > 0 such that any (1+δ)-approximation algorithm requires time 2^Ω(n/log^c n). We do so via a simple direct reduction from Satisfiability to Treedepth, inspired by a reduction recently designed for Treewidth [STOC '25].
Cite as

Édouard Bonnet, Daniel Neuen, and Marek Sokołowski. Treedepth Inapproximability and Exponential ETH Lower Bound. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 17:1-17:10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bonnet_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.17,
  author =	{Bonnet, \'{E}douard and Neuen, Daniel and Soko{\l}owski, Marek},
  title =	{{Treedepth Inapproximability and Exponential ETH Lower Bound}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:10},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251494},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: treedepth, lower bounds, approximation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32
The PACE 2025 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Dominating Set and Hitting Set

Authors: Mario Grobler and Sebastian Siebertz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
The 10th iteration of the of the Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments challenge (PACE) 2025 was devoted to engineer algorithms solving the Dominating Set problem as well as the Hitting Set problem. In contrast to the last iterations, these problems are (under standard assumptions) not fixed-parameter tractable (fpt) in general. However, restricting the structure of the input (e.g. to planar graphs or degenerate graphs for Dominating Set, or to set systems with sets of bounded size for Hitting Set) renders these problems fpt. Following the spirit of the last iterations of the PACE challenge, there is an exact track and a heuristic track for each problem; each track coming with a benchmark set of 100 public instances and 100 private instances. Overall, the PACE 2025 had 71 participants from 25 teams, 13 countries, and 3 continents. In this report, we briefly describe the setup of the challenge, the selection of benchmark instances, as well as the ranking of the participating teams. We also briefly outline the approaches used in the submitted solvers.
Cite as

Mario Grobler and Sebastian Siebertz. The PACE 2025 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Dominating Set and Hitting Set. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 32:1-32:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{grobler_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32,
  author =	{Grobler, Mario and Siebertz, Sebastian},
  title =	{{The PACE 2025 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Dominating Set and Hitting Set}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251644},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: PACE 2025 Report, Dominating Set, Hitting Set, Algorithm Engineering, FPT, Heuristics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.44
Approximation Schemes for k-Subset Sum Ratio and k-Way Number Partitioning Ratio

Authors: Sotiris Kanellopoulos, Giorgos Mitropoulos, Antonis Antonopoulos, Nikos Leonardos, Aris Pagourtzis, Christos Pergaminelis, Stavros Petsalakis, and Kanellos Tsitouras

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 359, 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)

Abstract
The Subset Sum Ratio problem (SSR) asks, given a multiset A of positive integers, to find two disjoint subsets of A such that the largest-to-smallest ratio of their sums is minimized. In this paper we study the k-version of SSR, namely k-Subset Sum Ratio (k-SSR), which asks to minimize the largest-to-smallest ratio of sums of k disjoint subsets of A. We develop an approximation scheme for k-SSR running in O(n^{2k}/ε^{k-1}) time, where n = |A| and ε is the error parameter. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first FPTAS for k-SSR for fixed k > 2. We also study the k-way Number Partitioning Ratio (k-PART) problem, which differs from k-SSR in that the k subsets must constitute a partition of A; this problem in fact corresponds to the objective of minimizing the largest-to-smallest sum ratio in the family of Multiway Number Partitioning problems. We present a more involved FPTAS for k-PART, also achieving O(n^{2k}/ε^{k-1}) time complexity. Notably, k-PART is also equivalent to the Minimum Envy-Ratio problem with identical valuation functions, which has been studied in the context of fair division of indivisible goods. Thus, for the case of identical valuations, our FPTAS represents a significant improvement over the O(n^{4k²+1}/ε^{2k²}) bound obtained by Nguyen and Rothe’s FPTAS [Trung Thanh Nguyen and Jörg Rothe, 2014] for Minimum Envy-Ratio with general additive valuations. Lastly, we propose a second FPTAS for k-SSR, which employs carefully designed calls to the first one; the new scheme has a time complexity of Õ(n/ε^{3k-1}), thus being much faster when n≫ 1/ ε.
Cite as

Sotiris Kanellopoulos, Giorgos Mitropoulos, Antonis Antonopoulos, Nikos Leonardos, Aris Pagourtzis, Christos Pergaminelis, Stavros Petsalakis, and Kanellos Tsitouras. Approximation Schemes for k-Subset Sum Ratio and k-Way Number Partitioning Ratio. In 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 359, pp. 44:1-44:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kanellopoulos_et_al:LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.44,
  author =	{Kanellopoulos, Sotiris and Mitropoulos, Giorgos and Antonopoulos, Antonis and Leonardos, Nikos and Pagourtzis, Aris and Pergaminelis, Christos and Petsalakis, Stavros and Tsitouras, Kanellos},
  title =	{{Approximation Schemes for k-Subset Sum Ratio and k-Way Number Partitioning Ratio}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)},
  pages =	{44:1--44:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-408-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{359},
  editor =	{Chen, Ho-Lin and Hon, Wing-Kai and Tsai, Meng-Tsung},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.44},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249521},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.44},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fully polynomial-time approximation schemes, Subset Sum Ratio, Number Partitioning, Fair division, Envy minimization, Pseudo-polynomial time algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.15
Parameterized Complexity of Directed Traveling Salesman Problem

Authors: Václav Blažej, Andreas Emil Feldmann, Foivos Fioravantes, Paweł Rzążewski, and Ondřej Suchý

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 359, 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)

Abstract
The Directed Traveling Salesman Problem (DTSP) is a variant of the classical Traveling Salesman Problem in which the edges in the graph are directed and a vertex and edge can be visited multiple times. The goal is to find a directed closed walk of minimum length (or total weight) that visits every vertex of the given graph at least once. In a yet more general version, Directed Waypoint Routing Problem (DWRP), some vertices are marked as terminals and we are only required to visit all terminals. Furthermore, each edge has its capacity bounding the number of times this edge can be used by a solution. While both problems (and many other variants of TSP) were extensively investigated, mostly from the approximation point of view, there are surprisingly few results concerning the parameterized complexity. Our starting point is the result of Marx et al. [APPROX/RANDOM 2016] who proved that DTSP is W[1]-hard parameterized by distance to pathwidth 3. In this paper we aim to initiate the systematic complexity study of variants of Directed Traveling Salesman Problem with respect to various, mostly structural, parameters. We show that DWRP is FPT parameterized by the solution size, the feedback edge number and the vertex integrity of the underlying undirected graph. Furthermore, the problem is XP parameterized by treewidth. On the complexity side, we show that the problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by the distance to constant treedepth.
Cite as

Václav Blažej, Andreas Emil Feldmann, Foivos Fioravantes, Paweł Rzążewski, and Ondřej Suchý. Parameterized Complexity of Directed Traveling Salesman Problem. In 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 359, pp. 15:1-15:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{blazej_et_al:LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.15,
  author =	{Bla\v{z}ej, V\'{a}clav and Feldmann, Andreas Emil and Fioravantes, Foivos and Rz\k{a}\.{z}ewski, Pawe{\l} and Such\'{y}, Ond\v{r}ej},
  title =	{{Parameterized Complexity of Directed Traveling Salesman Problem}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-408-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{359},
  editor =	{Chen, Ho-Lin and Hon, Wing-Kai and Tsai, Meng-Tsung},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249231},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: Directed TSP, parameterized complexity, vertex integrity, treedepth}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.86
New Algorithms for Pigeonhole Equal Subset Sum

Authors: Ce Jin, Ryan Williams, and Stan Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
We study the Pigeonhole Equal Subset Sum problem, which is a total-search variant of the Subset Sum problem introduced by Papadimitriou (1994): we are given a set of n positive integers {w₁,…,w_n} with the additional restriction that ∑_{i=1}^n w_i < 2ⁿ - 1, and want to find two different subsets A,B ⊆ [n] such that ∑_{i∈A} w_i = ∑_{i∈B} w_i. Very recently, Jin and Wu (ICALP 2024) gave a randomized algorithm solving Pigeonhole Equal Subset Sum in O^*(2^{0.4n}) time, beating the classical meet-in-the-middle algorithm with O^*(2^{n/2}) runtime. In this paper, we refine Jin and Wu’s techniques to improve the runtime even further to O^*(2^{n/3}).
Cite as

Ce Jin, Ryan Williams, and Stan Zhang. New Algorithms for Pigeonhole Equal Subset Sum. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 86:1-86:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jin_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.86,
  author =	{Jin, Ce and Williams, Ryan and Zhang, Stan},
  title =	{{New Algorithms for Pigeonhole Equal Subset Sum}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{86:1--86:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.86},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245541},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.86},
  annote =	{Keywords: pigeonhole principle, subset sums}
}
Document
APPROX
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.21
Dual Charging for Half-Integral TSP

Authors: Nathan Klein and Mehrshad Taziki

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 353, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)

Abstract
In this extended abstract, we show that the max entropy algorithm is a randomized 1.49776 approximation for half-integral TSP, improving upon the previous known bound of 1.49993 from Karlin et al. This also improves upon the best-known approximation for half-integral TSP due to Gupta et al. Our improvement results from using the dual, instead of the primal, to analyze the expected cost of the matching. We believe this method of analysis could lead to a simpler proof that max entropy is a better-than-3/2 approximation in the general case.
Cite as

Nathan Klein and Mehrshad Taziki. Dual Charging for Half-Integral TSP. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 353, pp. 21:1-21:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{klein_et_al:LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.21,
  author =	{Klein, Nathan and Taziki, Mehrshad},
  title =	{{Dual Charging for Half-Integral TSP}},
  booktitle =	{Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-397-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{353},
  editor =	{Ene, Alina and Chattopadhyay, Eshan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-243879},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Approximation Algorithms, Graph Algorithms, Randomized Rounding, Linear Programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.30
Convolution and Knapsack in Higher Dimensions

Authors: Kilian Grage, Klaus Jansen, and Björn Schumacher

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 349, 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)

Abstract
In the Knapsack problem, one is given the task of packing a knapsack of a given size with items in order to gain a packing with a high profit value. As one of the most classical problems in computer science, research for this problem has gone a long way. One important connection to the (max,+)-convolution problem has been established, where knapsack solutions can be combined by building the convolution of two sequences. This observation has been used in recent years to give conditional lower bounds but also parameterized algorithms. In this paper we carry these results into higher dimensions. We consider Knapsack where items are characterized by multiple properties - given through a vector - and a knapsack that has a capacity vector. The packing must not exceed any of the given capacity constraints. In order to show a similar sub-quadratic lower bound we consider a multidimensional version of (max, +)-convolution. We then consider variants of this problem introduced by Cygan et al. and prove that they are all equivalent in terms of algorithms that allow for a running time sub-quadratic in the number of entries of the array. We further develop a parameterized algorithm to solve higher dimensional Knapsack. The techniques we apply are inspired by an algorithm introduced by Axiotis and Tzamos. We will show that even for higher dimensional Knapsack, we can reduce the problem to convolution on one-dimensional, concave sequences, leading to an 𝒪(dn + dD ⋅ max{(Π_{i=1}^d t_i), t_max log t_max}) algorithm, where D is the number of different weight vectors, t the capacity vector and d is the dimension of the problem. Then, we use the techniques to improve the approach of Eisenbrand and Weismantel to obtain an algorithm for Integer Linear Programming with upper bounds with running time 𝒪(dn) + D ⋅ 𝒪(d Δ)^{d(d+1)} + T_LP. Finally, we give an divide-and-conquer algorithm for ILP with running time n^{d+1} ⋅ O(Δ)^d ⋅ log(|u - 𝓁|_∞).
Cite as

Kilian Grage, Klaus Jansen, and Björn Schumacher. Convolution and Knapsack in Higher Dimensions. In 19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 349, pp. 30:1-30:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{grage_et_al:LIPIcs.WADS.2025.30,
  author =	{Grage, Kilian and Jansen, Klaus and Schumacher, Bj\"{o}rn},
  title =	{{Convolution and Knapsack in Higher Dimensions}},
  booktitle =	{19th International Symposium on Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2025)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-398-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{349},
  editor =	{Morin, Pat and Oh, Eunjin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-242618},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.WADS.2025.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knapsack, Convolution, Integer Linear Programming}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.51
Weakly Approximating Knapsack in Subquadratic Time

Authors: Lin Chen, Jiayi Lian, Yuchen Mao, and Guochuan Zhang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We consider the classic Knapsack problem. Let t and OPT be the capacity and the optimal value, respectively. If one seeks a solution with total profit at least OPT/(1 + ε) and total weight at most t, then Knapsack can be solved in Õ(n + (1/(ε))²) time [Chen, Lian, Mao, and Zhang '24][Mao '24]. This running time is the best possible (up to a logarithmic factor), assuming that (min,+)-convolution cannot be solved in truly subquadratic time [Künnemann, Paturi, and Schneider '17][Cygan, Mucha, Węgrzycki, and Włodarczyk '19]. The same upper and lower bounds hold if one seeks a solution with total profit at least OPT and total weight at most (1 + ε)t. Therefore, it is natural to ask the following question. If one seeks a solution with total profit at least OPT/(1+ε) and total weight at most (1 + ε)t, can Knsapck be solved in Õ(n + (1/(ε))^{2-δ}) time for some constant δ > 0? We answer this open question affirmatively by proposing an Õ(n + (1/(ε))^{7/4})-time algorithm.
Cite as

Lin Chen, Jiayi Lian, Yuchen Mao, and Guochuan Zhang. Weakly Approximating Knapsack in Subquadratic Time. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 51:1-51:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chen_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.51,
  author =	{Chen, Lin and Lian, Jiayi and Mao, Yuchen and Zhang, Guochuan},
  title =	{{Weakly Approximating Knapsack in Subquadratic Time}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{51:1--51:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.51},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-234286},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.51},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knapsack, FPTAS}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.9
Improved Approximation Algorithms for (1,2)-TSP and Max-TSP Using Path Covers in the Semi-Streaming Model

Authors: Sharareh Alipour, Ermiya Farokhnejad, and Tobias Mömke

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
We investigate semi-streaming algorithms for the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP). Specifically, we focus on a variant known as the (1,2)-TSP, where the distances between any two vertices are either one or two. Our primary emphasis is on the closely related Maximum Path Cover Problem, which aims to find a collection of vertex-disjoint paths that covers the maximum number of edges in a graph. We propose an algorithm that, for any ε > 0, achieves a (2/3-ε)-approximation of the maximum path cover size for an n-vertex graph, using poly(1/ε) passes. This result improves upon the previous 1/2-approximation by Behnezhad et al. [Soheil Behnezhad et al., 2023] in the semi-streaming model. Building on this result, we design a semi-streaming algorithm that constructs a tour for an instance of (1,2)-TSP with an approximation factor of (4/3 + ε), improving upon the previous 3/2-approximation factor algorithm by Behnezhad et al. [Soheil Behnezhad et al., 2023]. Furthermore, we extend our approach to develop an approximation algorithm for the Maximum TSP (Max-TSP), where the goal is to find a Hamiltonian cycle with the maximum possible weight in a given weighted graph G. Our algorithm provides a (7/12 - ε)-approximation for Max-TSP in poly(1/(ε)) passes, improving on the previously known (1/2-ε)-approximation obtained via maximum weight matching in the semi-streaming model.
Cite as

Sharareh Alipour, Ermiya Farokhnejad, and Tobias Mömke. Improved Approximation Algorithms for (1,2)-TSP and Max-TSP Using Path Covers in the Semi-Streaming Model. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 9:1-9:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alipour_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.9,
  author =	{Alipour, Sharareh and Farokhnejad, Ermiya and M\"{o}mke, Tobias},
  title =	{{Improved Approximation Algorithms for (1,2)-TSP and Max-TSP Using Path Covers in the Semi-Streaming Model}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228342},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: (1,2)-TSP, Max-TSP, Maximum Path Cover, Semi-Streaming Algorithms, Approximation Algorithms, Graph Algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.55
Completeness Theorems for k-SUM and Geometric Friends: Deciding Fragments of Linear Integer Arithmetic

Authors: Geri Gokaj and Marvin Künnemann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
In the last three decades, the k-SUM hypothesis has emerged as a satisfying explanation of long-standing time barriers for a variety of algorithmic problems. Yet to this day, the literature knows of only few proven consequences of a refutation of this hypothesis. Taking a descriptive complexity viewpoint, we ask: What is the largest logically defined class of problems captured by the k-SUM problem? To this end, we introduce a class FOP_ℤ of problems corresponding to deciding sentences in Presburger arithmetic/linear integer arithmetic over finite subsets of integers. We establish two large fragments for which the k-SUM problem is complete under fine-grained reductions: 1) The k-SUM problem is complete for deciding the sentences with k existential quantifiers. 2) The 3-SUM problem is complete for all 3-quantifier sentences of FOP_ℤ expressible using at most 3 linear inequalities. Specifically, a faster-than-n^{⌈k/2⌉ ± o(1)} algorithm for k-SUM (or faster-than-n^{2 ± o(1)} algorithm for 3-SUM, respectively) directly translate to polynomial speedups of a general algorithm for all sentences in the respective fragment. Observing a barrier for proving completeness of 3-SUM for the entire class FOP_ℤ, we turn to the question which other - seemingly more general - problems are complete for FOP_ℤ. In this direction, we establish FOP_ℤ-completeness of the problem pair of Pareto Sum Verification and Hausdorff Distance under n Translations under the L_∞/L₁ norm in ℤ^d. In particular, our results invite to investigate Pareto Sum Verification as a high-dimensional generalization of 3-SUM.
Cite as

Geri Gokaj and Marvin Künnemann. Completeness Theorems for k-SUM and Geometric Friends: Deciding Fragments of Linear Integer Arithmetic. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 55:1-55:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gokaj_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.55,
  author =	{Gokaj, Geri and K\"{u}nnemann, Marvin},
  title =	{{Completeness Theorems for k-SUM and Geometric Friends: Deciding Fragments of Linear Integer Arithmetic}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{55:1--55:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.55},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226835},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.55},
  annote =	{Keywords: fine-grained complexity theory, descriptive complexity, presburger arithmetic, completeness results, k-SUM}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2022.79
Computing Treedepth in Polynomial Space and Linear FPT Time

Authors: Wojciech Nadara, Michał Pilipczuk, and Marcin Smulewicz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 244, 30th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2022)

Abstract
The treedepth of a graph G is the least possible depth of an elimination forest of G: a rooted forest on the same vertex set where every pair of vertices adjacent in G is bound by the ancestor/descendant relation. We propose an algorithm that given a graph G and an integer d, either finds an elimination forest of G of depth at most d or concludes that no such forest exists; thus the algorithm decides whether the treedepth of G is at most d. The running time is 2^𝒪(d²)⋅n^𝒪(1) and the space usage is polynomial in n. Further, by allowing randomization, the time and space complexities can be improved to 2^𝒪(d²)⋅n and d^𝒪(1)⋅n, respectively. This improves upon the algorithm of Reidl et al. [ICALP 2014], which also has time complexity 2^𝒪(d²)⋅n, but uses exponential space.
Cite as

Wojciech Nadara, Michał Pilipczuk, and Marcin Smulewicz. Computing Treedepth in Polynomial Space and Linear FPT Time. In 30th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 244, pp. 79:1-79:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nadara_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2022.79,
  author =	{Nadara, Wojciech and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Smulewicz, Marcin},
  title =	{{Computing Treedepth in Polynomial Space and Linear FPT Time}},
  booktitle =	{30th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2022)},
  pages =	{79:1--79:14},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-247-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{244},
  editor =	{Chechik, Shiri and Navarro, Gonzalo and Rotenberg, Eva and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2022.79},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-170175},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2022.79},
  annote =	{Keywords: treedepth, FPT, polynomial space}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2020.37
The PACE 2020 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Treedepth

Authors: Łukasz Kowalik, Marcin Mucha, Wojciech Nadara, Marcin Pilipczuk, Manuel Sorge, and Piotr Wygocki

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 180, 15th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2020)

Abstract
This year’s Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments challenge (PACE 2020) was devoted to the problem of computing the treedepth of a given graph. Altogether 51 participants from 20 teams, 12 countries and 3 continents submitted their implementations to the competition. In this report, we describe the setup of the challenge, the selection of benchmark instances and the ranking of the participating teams. We also briefly discuss the approaches used in the submitted solvers and the differences in their performance on our benchmark dataset.
Cite as

Łukasz Kowalik, Marcin Mucha, Wojciech Nadara, Marcin Pilipczuk, Manuel Sorge, and Piotr Wygocki. The PACE 2020 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Treedepth. In 15th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 180, pp. 37:1-37:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kowalik_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2020.37,
  author =	{Kowalik, {\L}ukasz and Mucha, Marcin and Nadara, Wojciech and Pilipczuk, Marcin and Sorge, Manuel and Wygocki, Piotr},
  title =	{{The PACE 2020 Parameterized Algorithms and Computational Experiments Challenge: Treedepth}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2020)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-172-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{180},
  editor =	{Cao, Yixin and Pilipczuk, Marcin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2020.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-133404},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2020.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: computing treedepth, contest, implementation challenge, FPT}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2019.73
Equal-Subset-Sum Faster Than the Meet-in-the-Middle

Authors: Marcin Mucha, Jesper Nederlof, Jakub Pawlewicz, and Karol Węgrzycki

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 144, 27th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2019)

Abstract
In the Equal-Subset-Sum problem, we are given a set S of n integers and the problem is to decide if there exist two disjoint nonempty subsets A,B subseteq S, whose elements sum up to the same value. The problem is NP-complete. The state-of-the-art algorithm runs in O^*(3^(n/2)) <= O^*(1.7321^n) time and is based on the meet-in-the-middle technique. In this paper, we improve upon this algorithm and give O^*(1.7088^n) worst case Monte Carlo algorithm. This answers a question suggested by Woeginger in his inspirational survey. Additionally, we analyse the polynomial space algorithm for Equal-Subset-Sum. A naive polynomial space algorithm for Equal-Subset-Sum runs in O^*(3^n) time. With read-only access to the exponentially many random bits, we show a randomized algorithm running in O^*(2.6817^n) time and polynomial space.
Cite as

Marcin Mucha, Jesper Nederlof, Jakub Pawlewicz, and Karol Węgrzycki. Equal-Subset-Sum Faster Than the Meet-in-the-Middle. In 27th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 144, pp. 73:1-73:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mucha_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2019.73,
  author =	{Mucha, Marcin and Nederlof, Jesper and Pawlewicz, Jakub and W\k{e}grzycki, Karol},
  title =	{{Equal-Subset-Sum Faster Than the Meet-in-the-Middle}},
  booktitle =	{27th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2019)},
  pages =	{73:1--73:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-124-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{144},
  editor =	{Bender, Michael A. and Svensson, Ola and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2019.73},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-111946},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2019.73},
  annote =	{Keywords: Equal-Subset-Sum, Subset-Sum, meet-in-the-middle, enumeration technique, randomized algorithm}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 21 Document/PDF
  • 12 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2026
  • 10 2025
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2019
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 8 Mucha, Marcin
  • 3 Cygan, Marek
  • 2 Nadara, Wojciech
  • 2 Pilipczuk, Marcin
  • 2 Sankowski, Piotr
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 21 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 7 Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
  • 5 Theory of computation → Graph algorithms analysis
  • 4 Theory of computation → Approximation algorithms analysis
  • 2 Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Combinatorial algorithms
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 FPT
  • 3 treedepth
  • 2 Approximation Algorithms
  • 2 Graph Algorithms
  • 2 Knapsack
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact