41 Search Results for "Waleń, Tomasz"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.35
Efficient Index for Square Pattern Matching

Authors: Po-Chun Chen, Che-Wei Tsao, Wing-Kai Hon, and Dominik Köppl

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 369, 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)

Abstract
A string S is called a square if it can be written as the concatenation of two identical strings. Two strings P and Q of the same length are said to square match if, for every substring of P, it is a square if and only if the corresponding substring of Q is also a square. The square pattern matching problem asks for locating all substrings of a given text T of length n that square match a query pattern P of length m. This notion captures similarity in repetition structures and is motivated by applications in areas such as bioinformatics and music structure analysis. In this paper, we introduce a novel technique, called the longest prefix square (LPS) encoding, which represents the square structure of a string as an integer array of the same length. We show that two strings square match if and only if they have identical LPS encodings. Based on this result, we construct an index solving the square pattern matching problem in time O(m lg m + occ) using O(nlg²n) bits of space, where occ denotes the number of occurrences of substrings in T that square match P. If the LPS encoding of P is precomputed, the query time improves to O(m + occ).
Cite as

Po-Chun Chen, Che-Wei Tsao, Wing-Kai Hon, and Dominik Köppl. Efficient Index for Square Pattern Matching. In 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 369, pp. 35:1-35:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chen_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2026.35,
  author =	{Chen, Po-Chun and Tsao, Che-Wei and Hon, Wing-Kai and K\"{o}ppl, Dominik},
  title =	{{Efficient Index for Square Pattern Matching}},
  booktitle =	{37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)},
  pages =	{35:1--35:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-420-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{369},
  editor =	{Bille, Philip and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.35},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259617},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.35},
  annote =	{Keywords: string algorithms, pattern matching, indexing, squares}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.1
Hamming Distance Oracles

Authors: Itai Boneh, Dvir Fried, Shay Golan, Matan Kraus, and Ely Porat

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 369, 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)

Abstract
In this paper, we present and study the Hamming distance oracle problem. In this problem, the task is to preprocess two strings S and T of lengths n and m, respectively, to obtain a data structure that is able to return the Hamming distance between a substring of S and a substring of T. For strings over a constant-size alphabet, we show that for every x ≤ min{n,m} there is a data structure with Õ(nm/x) preprocessing time and O(x) query time. We also provide a conditional lower bound, showing that for every ε > 0 there is no combinatorial data structure with query time O(x) and preprocessing time O((nm/x)^{1-ε}) unless combinatorial fast matrix multiplication is possible. For strings over a general alphabet, we present a data structure with Õ(nm/√x) pre-processing time and O(x) query time for every x ≤ min {n,m}. Moreover, for every ε > 0 we provide a data structure with a preprocessing time of Õ((n+m)/ε³) that returns with high probability a (1±ε) approximation of the Hamming distance of two input substrings. The query time of the approximation data structure is Õ(1/ε²).
Cite as

Itai Boneh, Dvir Fried, Shay Golan, Matan Kraus, and Ely Porat. Hamming Distance Oracles. In 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 369, pp. 1:1-1:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{boneh_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2026.1,
  author =	{Boneh, Itai and Fried, Dvir and Golan, Shay and Kraus, Matan and Porat, Ely},
  title =	{{Hamming Distance Oracles}},
  booktitle =	{37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-420-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{369},
  editor =	{Bille, Philip and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259278},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hamming distance, Fine-grained complexity, Data structure, Oracle}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.6
Improved Bounds on the Maximum Number of Distinct Squares in Circular Words

Authors: Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Manal Mohamed, Jakub Radoszewski, Wojciech Rytter, Tomasz Waleń, and Wiktor Zuba

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 369, 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)

Abstract
We investigate the asymptotic growth of function CS(n), which maps n to the maximum number of distinct squares in a circular word of length n (that is, the maximum number of distinct squares of length at most n in a word ww of length 2n). We improve upon the lower bound of 1.25n established by Amit and Gawrychowski [SPIRE 2017] and the straightforward upper bound of 2n, which follows from the recent result of Brlek and Li [Comb. Theory, 2025] stating that there are fewer than n squares in standard (i.e., non-circular) words of length n. (Previously, Amit and Gawrychowski gave an upper bound of 32/15n using a weaker upper bound on squares in standard words.) Specifically, we show that CS(n) ≤ ⌈1.8 n⌉ and that, for infinitely many n, CS(n) ≥ 1.5n-𝒪(√n). For the lower bound, we exploit the combinatorial structure of Fibonacci words to construct a family of square-rich circular words. For the upper bound, we exploit density properties of the starting positions of long squares, adapting an approach of Amit and Gawrychowski.
Cite as

Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Manal Mohamed, Jakub Radoszewski, Wojciech Rytter, Tomasz Waleń, and Wiktor Zuba. Improved Bounds on the Maximum Number of Distinct Squares in Circular Words. In 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 369, pp. 6:1-6:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{charalampopoulos_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2026.6,
  author =	{Charalampopoulos, Panagiotis and Mohamed, Manal and Radoszewski, Jakub and Rytter, Wojciech and Wale\'{n}, Tomasz and Zuba, Wiktor},
  title =	{{Improved Bounds on the Maximum Number of Distinct Squares in Circular Words}},
  booktitle =	{37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-420-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{369},
  editor =	{Bille, Philip and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259325},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: circular words, squares, repetitions}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.14
Hardness Results on Characteristics for Elastic-Degenerate Strings

Authors: Dominik Köppl and Jannik Olbrich

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 369, 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)

Abstract
Generalizations of plain strings have been proposed as a compact way to represent a collection of nearly identical sequences or to express uncertainty at specific text positions by enumerating all possibilities. While a plain string stores a character at each of its positions, generalizations consider a set of characters (indeterminate strings), a set of strings of equal length (generalized degenerate strings, or shortly GD strings), or a set of strings of arbitrary lengths (elastic-degenerate strings, or shortly ED strings). These generalizations are of importance to compactly represent such type of data, and find applications in bioinformatics for representing and maintaining a set of genetic sequences of the same taxonomy or a multiple sequence alignment. To be of use, attention has been drawn to answering various query types such as pattern matching or measuring similarity of ED strings by generalizing techniques known to plain strings. However, for some types of queries, it has been shown that a generalization of a polynomial-time solvable query on classic strings becomes NP-hard on ED strings, e.g. [Russo et al., 2022]. In that light, we wonder about other types of queries that are of particular interest to bioinformatics: unique substrings, absent words, anti-powers, longest previous factors, and Lempel-Ziv-like compression schemes. While we obtain a polynomial time algorithm for a variation of longest previous factors, we show that all other problems are NP-hard to compute, some of them even under the restriction that the input can be modeled as an indeterminate or GD string.
Cite as

Dominik Köppl and Jannik Olbrich. Hardness Results on Characteristics for Elastic-Degenerate Strings. In 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 369, pp. 14:1-14:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{koppl_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2026.14,
  author =	{K\"{o}ppl, Dominik and Olbrich, Jannik},
  title =	{{Hardness Results on Characteristics for Elastic-Degenerate Strings}},
  booktitle =	{37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-420-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{369},
  editor =	{Bille, Philip and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259409},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: Elastic-degenerate strings, NP-hardness, longest common factor, minimal unique substring, minimal absent word, anti-power, longest previous factor}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.15
Improved Approximation Ratios for the Shortest Common Superstring Problem with Reverse Complements

Authors: Ryosuke Yamano and Tetsuo Shibuya

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 369, 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)

Abstract
The Shortest Common Superstring (SCS) problem asks for the shortest string that contains each of a given set of strings as a substring. Its reverse-complement variant, the Shortest Common Superstring problem with Reverse Complements (SCS-RC), naturally arises in bioinformatics applications, where for each input string, either the string itself or its reverse complement must appear as a substring of the superstring. The well-known MGREEDY algorithm for the standard SCS constructs a superstring by first computing an optimal cycle cover on the overlap graph and then concatenating the strings corresponding to the cycles, while its refined variant, TGREEDY, further improves the approximation ratio. Although the original 4- and 3-approximation bounds of these algorithms have been successively improved for the standard SCS, no such progress has been made for the reverse-complement setting. A previous study extended MGREEDY to SCS-RC with a 4-approximation guarantee and briefly suggested that extending TGREEDY to the reverse-complement setting could achieve a 3-approximation. In this work, we strengthen these results by proving that the extensions of MGREEDY and TGREEDY to the reverse-complement setting achieve 3.75- and 2.875-approximation ratios, respectively. Our analysis extends the classical proofs for the standard SCS to handle the bidirectional overlaps introduced by reverse complements. These results provide the first formal improvement of approximation guarantees for SCS-RC, with the 2.875-approximate algorithm currently representing the best known bound for this problem.
Cite as

Ryosuke Yamano and Tetsuo Shibuya. Improved Approximation Ratios for the Shortest Common Superstring Problem with Reverse Complements. In 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 369, pp. 15:1-15:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{yamano_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2026.15,
  author =	{Yamano, Ryosuke and Shibuya, Tetsuo},
  title =	{{Improved Approximation Ratios for the Shortest Common Superstring Problem with Reverse Complements}},
  booktitle =	{37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:11},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-420-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{369},
  editor =	{Bille, Philip and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259412},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: Shortest Common Superstring, Approximation Algorithms, DNA Sequencing}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.23
Improved Bounds on the Sum of Exponents of Runs in a String

Authors: Arkadiusz Czarkowski

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 369, 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)

Abstract
A substring of a word is a run if it is at least twice as long as its minimum period and cannot be extended to either side with the same period. The exponent of a run is the quotient of its length and its minimum period. ρ(n) is the maximum number of runs in a string of length n, while σ(n) is the maximum sum of exponents of runs in a string of length n. While quite tight bounds on ρ(n) are known (0.944575712n ≤ ρ(n) ≤ n), the best upper bound on σ(n) is 3n whereas the best lower bound on σ(n) is 2.035n. In this paper, we improve the upper bound on σ(n) to 2.3n and the lower bound on σ(n) to 2.04448n. We also provide an improved upper bound on σ(n) of 2.2n in the case of a binary alphabet. Our results are achieved using a combination of theoretical and computer-based approaches.
Cite as

Arkadiusz Czarkowski. Improved Bounds on the Sum of Exponents of Runs in a String. In 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 369, pp. 23:1-23:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{czarkowski:LIPIcs.CPM.2026.23,
  author =	{Czarkowski, Arkadiusz},
  title =	{{Improved Bounds on the Sum of Exponents of Runs in a String}},
  booktitle =	{37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-420-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{369},
  editor =	{Bille, Philip and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259494},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: strings, runs, sum of exponents of runs, Lyndon words, L-roots, maximal repetitions, combinatorics on words}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.20
Longest Common Extension of a Dynamic String in Parallel Constant Time

Authors: Daniel Alexander Albert

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 369, 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)

Abstract
A longest common extension (LCE) query on a string computes the length of the longest common suffix or prefix at two given positions. A dynamic LCE algorithm maintains a data structure that allows efficient LCE queries on a string that can change via character insertions and deletions. A dynamic parallel constant-time algorithm is presented that can maintain LCE queries on a common CRCW PRAM with 𝒪(n^ε) work, for any ε > 0. The algorithm maintains a string synchronizing sets hierarchy, which it uses to answer substring equality queries, which it in turn uses to answer LCE queries. To achieve constant runtime, the algorithm allows parts of its information to become outdated by up to log n log^* n updates. It answers queries by combining this slightly outdated information with a list of the recent changes. Two applications of this dynamic LCE algorithm are shown. Firstly, a dynamic parallel constant-time algorithm can maintain membership in a Dyck language D_k, k > 0 with 𝒪(n^ε) work for any ε > 0. Secondly, a dynamic parallel constant-time algorithm can maintain squares with 𝒪(n^ε) work for any ε > 0.
Cite as

Daniel Alexander Albert. Longest Common Extension of a Dynamic String in Parallel Constant Time. In 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 369, pp. 20:1-20:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{albert:LIPIcs.CPM.2026.20,
  author =	{Albert, Daniel Alexander},
  title =	{{Longest Common Extension of a Dynamic String in Parallel Constant Time}},
  booktitle =	{37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-420-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{369},
  editor =	{Bille, Philip and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259467},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dynamic Strings, Work, Parallel Constant Time, Longest Common Extension, Longest Common Prefix}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.13
Faster Algorithms for Shortest Unique or Absent Substrings

Authors: Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Manal Mohamed, Solon P. Pissis, Hilde Verbeek, and Wiktor Zuba

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 370, 20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026)

Abstract
We revisit two well-known algorithmic problems on strings: computing a shortest unique substring (SUS) and a shortest absent substring (SAS) in a string S of length n. Both problems admit folklore 𝒪(n)-time solutions using the suffix tree of S. However, for small alphabets, this complexity is not necessarily optimal in the word RAM model, where a string of length n over alphabet [0,σ) can be stored in 𝒪(n log σ/log n) space and read in 𝒪(n log σ/log n) time. We present an 𝒪(n log σ/√{log n})-time algorithm for computing a SUS in S. This algorithm decomposes the problem according to the length and the period of the sought substring and uses several tools and techniques, such as synchronizing sets, the analysis of runs, and wavelet trees, to reduce the computation of a SUS to a simple geometric problem. Further, we adapt this algorithm and combine it with an efficient construction of de Bruijn sequences in order to obtain an 𝒪(n log σ/√{log n})-time algorithm for computing a SAS in S.
Cite as

Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Manal Mohamed, Solon P. Pissis, Hilde Verbeek, and Wiktor Zuba. Faster Algorithms for Shortest Unique or Absent Substrings. In 20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 370, pp. 13:1-13:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{charalampopoulos_et_al:LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.13,
  author =	{Charalampopoulos, Panagiotis and Mohamed, Manal and Pissis, Solon P. and Verbeek, Hilde and Zuba, Wiktor},
  title =	{{Faster Algorithms for Shortest Unique or Absent Substrings}},
  booktitle =	{20th Scandinavian Symposium on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2026)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-421-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{370},
  editor =	{Fraigniaud, Pierre},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-260493},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2026.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: string algorithms, unique substrings, absent substrings, absent words}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.27
Exploring the Gap Between LCS and LCStr

Authors: Shay Golan, Matan Kraus, Ely Porat, and B. Riva Shalom

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 369, 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)

Abstract
The Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) problem and the Longest Common Substring (LCStr) problem are classical string problems with broad theoretical and practical significance. The former has a quadratic conditional lower bound [FOCS, 2015], while the latter admits a linear-time solution. In this paper, we study a natural variation of these problems, the Longest Common Subsequence-Substring (LCSS) problem. The LCSS problem seeks the longest string that is simultaneously a subsequence of one input string and a substring of the other. This variant bridges LCS and LCStr, raising intriguing algorithmic questions: Does the complexity of computing LCSS interpolate between the linear time of LCStr and the quadratic time of LCS? What about approximability? We also examine a natural extension of LCSS to multiple strings, parameterizing the balance between subsequence and substring requirements. Our results reveal several insights. First, under the SETH conjecture, the inherent complexity of LCSS is quadratic, similar to LCS. In contrast, we provide a linear-time approximation for LCSS. Finally, for the multi-string variant, unlike both problems, we design a quadratic-time algorithm, uncovering deeper structural properties of the problem. By studying the complexity of the LCSS problem, we aim to gain some understanding of what influences whether a variant of the LCS problem behaves more like the standard LCS or like LCStr. Our findings suggest that hybrid constraints can create computational "sweet spots," where problems become more tractable than their pure counterparts. This opens a broader research direction in constraint-mediated algorithm design. Beyond LCSS itself, our work highlights unexpected connections between subsequence and substring constraints, advancing the theoretical understanding of string problems and laying the foundation for new algorithmic techniques and complexity-theoretic insights in the rich space between classical string comparison paradigms.
Cite as

Shay Golan, Matan Kraus, Ely Porat, and B. Riva Shalom. Exploring the Gap Between LCS and LCStr. In 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 369, pp. 27:1-27:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{golan_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2026.27,
  author =	{Golan, Shay and Kraus, Matan and Porat, Ely and Shalom, B. Riva},
  title =	{{Exploring the Gap Between LCS and LCStr}},
  booktitle =	{37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-420-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{369},
  editor =	{Bille, Philip and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259535},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Longest Common Subsequence, Longest Common Substring, Conditional Lower Bound}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.28
Periodicity Property Testing on Strings with Wildcards

Authors: Carl Barton, Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Taha El Ghazi, Jonas Ellert, Oded Lachish, and Tatiana Starikovskaya

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 369, 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)

Abstract
In this work, we study periodicity in strings with wildcards. A string T with at most k wildcards is called strongly (p,k)-periodic if the wildcards in T can be replaced with alphabet symbols to obtain a string with period p, and weakly (p,k)-periodic if T[i] matches T[i+p] for all i. Intuitively, both generalize to (≤ g, k)-periodicity, which is the property of being (p,k)-periodic for some p ∈ [1..g]. An ε-tester for a property 𝒫 is an algorithm that distinguishes between strings that satisfy 𝒫 and strings where one needs to change at least an ε-fraction of the symbols to obtain a string that satisfies 𝒫. We study one-sided error testers, where strings satisfying 𝒫 must always be accepted, while strings that are ε-far must be rejected with probability at least 2/3. The complexity of a tester is the worst-case number of symbols of an input of length n it must read to make the decision. We design the following testers for p,g ≤ n/2: 1) An ε-tester for strong (p,k)-periodicity with complexity Õ_ε(1) . 2) An ε-tester for strong (≤ g,k)-periodicity with complexity Õ_ε(√g). 3) An ε-tester for weak (p,k)-periodicity with complexity Õ_ε(min(k, n /(k+p))). 4) An ε-tester for weak (≤ g,k)-periodicity with complexity Õ_ε(min(k+ √{gk}, n/√k)). Additionally, we show a lower bound on the complexity of ε-testers for weak (≤ g,k)-periodicity, implying that our tester for weak (≤ g,k)-periodicity is optimal up to a multiplicative (ε^{-1} ln(gk))^O(1) factor for a wide range of g and k. Finally, our tester for strong (≤ g,k)-periodicity generalizes the one of [Lachish and Newman; Algorithmica 2011] for strings without wildcards, matching (up to polylogarithmic factors) the unconditional lower bound of ̃Ω(√g) in said work for constant ε.
Cite as

Carl Barton, Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Taha El Ghazi, Jonas Ellert, Oded Lachish, and Tatiana Starikovskaya. Periodicity Property Testing on Strings with Wildcards. In 37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 369, pp. 28:1-28:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{barton_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2026.28,
  author =	{Barton, Carl and Charalampopoulos, Panagiotis and Ghazi, Taha El and Ellert, Jonas and Lachish, Oded and Starikovskaya, Tatiana},
  title =	{{Periodicity Property Testing on Strings with Wildcards}},
  booktitle =	{37th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2026)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-420-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{369},
  editor =	{Bille, Philip and Prezza, Nicola},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-259543},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: periodicity, property testing, wildcards}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.36
Time-Optimal Construction of String Synchronizing Sets

Authors: Jonas Ellert and Tomasz Kociumaka

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
A powerful design principle behind many modern string algorithms is local consistency: breaking the symmetry between string positions based on their small contexts so that matching fragments are handled consistently. Among the most influential instantiations of this principle are string synchronizing sets [Kempa & Kociumaka; STOC 2019]. A τ-synchronizing set of a string of length n is a set of O(n/τ) string positions, chosen using their length-2τ contexts, such that (outside of highly periodic regions) every block of τ consecutive positions contains at least one element of the set. Synchronizing sets have found dozens of applications in diverse settings, from quantum and dynamic algorithms to fully compressed computation. In the classic word RAM model, particularly for strings over small alphabets, they enabled faster solutions to core problems in data compression, text indexing, and string similarity. In this work, we show that any string T ∈ [0 .. σ)ⁿ can be preprocessed in O(n log σ / log n) time so that, for any given integer τ ∈ [1 .. n], a τ-synchronizing set of T can be constructed in O((n log τ)/(τ log n)) time. Both bounds are optimal in the word RAM model with machine word size w = Θ(log n), matching the information-theoretic minimum for the input and output sizes, respectively. Previously, constructing a τ-synchronizing set required O(n/τ) time after an O(n)-time preprocessing [Kociumaka, Radoszewski, Rytter, and Waleń; SICOMP 2024], or, in the restricted regime of τ < 0.2 log_σ n, without any preprocessing needed [Kempa & Kociumaka; STOC 2019]. A simple instantiation of our method outputs the synchronizing set as a sorted list in O(n/τ) time, or as a bitmask in O(n/log n) time. Our optimal construction produces a compact fully indexable dictionary, supporting select queries in O(1) time and rank queries in O(log ((log τ)/(log log n))) time. The latter complexity matches known unconditional cell-probe lower bounds for τ ≤ n^{1-Ω(1)}. To achieve this, we introduce a general framework for efficiently processing sparse integer sequences via a custom variable-length encoding. We also augment the optimal variant of van Emde Boas trees [Pătraşcu & Thorup; STOC 2006] with a deterministic linear-time construction. When the set is represented as a bitmask under our sparse encoding, the same guarantees for select and rank queries hold after preprocessing in time proportional to the size of our encoding (in words).
Cite as

Jonas Ellert and Tomasz Kociumaka. Time-Optimal Construction of String Synchronizing Sets. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 36:1-36:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ellert_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.36,
  author =	{Ellert, Jonas and Kociumaka, Tomasz},
  title =	{{Time-Optimal Construction of String Synchronizing Sets}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255258},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: synchronizing sets, local consistency, packed strings}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.24
Languages of Words of Low Automatic Complexity Are Hard to Compute

Authors: Joey Chen, Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen, Ivan Koswara, Linus Richter, and Frank Stephan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 360, 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)

Abstract
The automatic complexity of a finite word (string) is an analogue for finite automata of Sipser’s distinguishing complexity (1983) and was introduced by Shallit and Wang (2001). For a finite alphabet Σ of at least two elements, we consider the non-deterministic automatic complexity given by exactly - yet not necessarily uniquely - accepting automata: a word x ∈ Σ^* has exact non-deterministic automatic complexity k ∈ ℕ if there exists a non-deterministic automaton of k states which accepts x while rejecting every other word of the same length as x, and no automaton of fewer states has this property. Importantly, and in contrast to the classical notion, the witnessing automaton may have multiple paths of computation accepting x. We denote this measure of complexity by A_{Ne}, and study a class of languages of low A_{Ne}-complexity defined as L_q = {x ∈ Σ^* : A_{Ne}(x) < q|x|}, which is parameterised by rationals q ∈ (0,1/2) (generalising a class of sets first studied by Kjos-Hanssen). We show that for every q ∈ (0,1/2), this class is neither context-free nor recognisable by certain Boolean circuits. In the process, we answer an open question of Kjos-Hanssen quantifying the complexity of L_{1/3} in terms of Boolean circuits, and also prove the Shannon effect for A_{Ne}.
Cite as

Joey Chen, Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen, Ivan Koswara, Linus Richter, and Frank Stephan. Languages of Words of Low Automatic Complexity Are Hard to Compute. In 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 360, pp. 24:1-24:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chen_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.24,
  author =	{Chen, Joey and Kjos-Hanssen, Bj{\o}rn and Koswara, Ivan and Richter, Linus and Stephan, Frank},
  title =	{{Languages of Words of Low Automatic Complexity Are Hard to Compute}},
  booktitle =	{45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-406-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{360},
  editor =	{Aiswarya, C. and Mehta, Ruta and Roy, Subhajit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251055},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Automatic complexity, automata theory, formal languages, Boolean circuits, Shannon effect}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.72
Color Distance Oracles and Snippets: Separation Between Exact and Approximate Solutions

Authors: Noam Horowicz and Tsvi Kopelowitz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
In the snippets problem, the goal is to preprocess a text T so that given two pattern queries, P₁ and P₂, one can quickly locate the occurrences of the two patterns in T that are closest to each other, or report the distance between these occurrences. Kopelowitz and Krauthgamer [CPM2016] showed upper bound tradeoffs and conditional lower bounds tradeoffs for the snippets problem, by utilizing connections between the snippets problem and the problem of constructing a color distance oracle (CDO), which is a data structure that preprocess a set of points with associated colors so that given two colors c and c' one can quickly find the (distance between the) closest pair of points where one has color c and the other has color c'. However, the existing upper bound and lower bound curves are not tight. Inspired by recent advances by Kopelowitz and Vassilevska-Williams [ICALP2020] regarding tradeoff curves for Set-disjointness data structures, in this paper we introduce new conditionally optimal algorithms for a (1+ε) approximation version of the snippets problem and a (1+ε) approximation version of the CDO problem, by applying fast matrix multiplication. For example, for CDO on n points in an array, if the preprocessing time is Õ(n^a) and the query time is Õ(n^b) then, assuming that ω = 2 (where ω is the exponent of n in the runtime of the fastest matrix multiplication algorithm on two squared matrices of size n× n), we show that approximate CDO can be solved with the following tradeoff a + 2b = 2 (if 0 ≤ b ≤ 1/3) 2a + b = 3 (if 1/3 ≤ b ≤ 1). Moreover, we prove that for exact CDO on points in an array, the algorithm of Kopelowitz and Krauthgamer [CPM2016], which obtains a tradeoff of a+b = 2, is essentially optimal assuming that the strong all-pairs shortest paths hypothesis holds for randomized algorithms. Thus, we demonstrate that the exact version of CDO is strictly harder than the approximate version. Moreover, this separation carries over to the snippets problem.
Cite as

Noam Horowicz and Tsvi Kopelowitz. Color Distance Oracles and Snippets: Separation Between Exact and Approximate Solutions. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 72:1-72:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{horowicz_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.72,
  author =	{Horowicz, Noam and Kopelowitz, Tsvi},
  title =	{{Color Distance Oracles and Snippets: Separation Between Exact and Approximate Solutions}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{72:1--72:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.72},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245403},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.72},
  annote =	{Keywords: data structures, fast matrix multiplication, fine-grained complexity, pattern matching, distance oracles}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.8
Fast Computation of k-Runs, Parameterized Squares, and Other Generalised Squares

Authors: Yuto Nakashima, Jakub Radoszewski, and Tomasz Waleń

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
A k-mismatch square is a string of the form XY where X and Y are two equal-length strings that have at most k mismatches. Kolpakov and Kucherov [Theor. Comput. Sci., 2003] defined two notions of k-mismatch repeats, called k-repetitions and k-runs, each representing a sequence of consecutive k-mismatch squares of equal length. They proposed algorithms for computing k-repetitions and k-runs working in 𝒪(nklog k+output) time for a string of length n over an integer alphabet, where output is the number of the reported repeats. We show that output = 𝒪(nk log k), both in case of k-repetitions and k-runs, which implies that the complexity of their algorithms is actually 𝒪(nk log k). We apply this result to computing parameterized squares. A parameterized square is a string of the form XY such that X and Y parameterized-match, i.e., there exists a bijection f on the alphabet such that f(X) = Y. Two parameterized squares XY and X'Y' are equivalent if they parameterized match. Recently Hamai et al. [SPIRE 2024] showed that a string of length n over an alphabet of size σ contains less than nσ non-equivalent parameterized squares, improving an earlier bound by Kociumaka et al. [Theor. Comput. Sci., 2016]. We apply our bound for k-mismatch repeats to propose an algorithm that reports all non-equivalent parameterized squares in 𝒪(nσ log σ) time. We also show that the number of non-equivalent parameterized squares can be computed in 𝒪(n log n) time. This last algorithm applies to squares under any substring compatible equivalence relation and also to counting squares that are distinct as strings. In particular, this improves upon the 𝒪(nσ)-time algorithm of Gawrychowski et al. [CPM 2023] for counting order-preserving squares that are distinct as strings if σ = ω(log n).
Cite as

Yuto Nakashima, Jakub Radoszewski, and Tomasz Waleń. Fast Computation of k-Runs, Parameterized Squares, and Other Generalised Squares. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 8:1-8:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nakashima_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.8,
  author =	{Nakashima, Yuto and Radoszewski, Jakub and Wale\'{n}, Tomasz},
  title =	{{Fast Computation of k-Runs, Parameterized Squares, and Other Generalised Squares}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244768},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: string algorithm, k-mismatch square, parameterized square, order-preserving square, maximum gapped repeat}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.36
Counting Distinct Square Substrings in Sublinear Time

Authors: Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Manal Mohamed, Jakub Radoszewski, Wojciech Rytter, Tomasz Waleń, and Wiktor Zuba

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 345, 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)

Abstract
We show that the number of distinct squares in a packed string of length n over an alphabet of size σ can be computed in 𝒪(n/log_{σ}n) time in the word-RAM model of computation. This paper is the first to introduce a sublinear time algorithm for the packed version of squares counting. The packed representation of a string of length n over an alphabet of size σ is given as a sequence of 𝒪(n/ log_{σ} n) machine words in the word-RAM model (a machine word consists of ω ≥ log₂ n bits). Previously it was known how to count distinct squares in 𝒪(n) time [Gusfield and Stoye, JCSS 2004], even for a string over an integer alphabet, see [Crochemore et al., TCS 2014; Bannai et al., CPM 2017; Charalampopoulos et al., SPIRE 2020]. We use techniques of squares extraction from runs described by Crochemore et al. [TCS 2014]. However, the packed model requires novel approaches. In particular, we need an 𝒪(n/log_{σ}n) sized representation of all long-period runs (runs with periods that are Ω(log_{σ}n)) which guarantees sublinear time counting of potentially linearly-many implied squares. The long-period runs with a string period that is periodic itself (called layer runs) are an obstacle, since their number can be Ω(n). Fortunately, the number of all other long-period runs is 𝒪(n/log_{σ}n) and we can construct an implicit representation of all long-period runs in 𝒪(n/log_{σ}n) time by adopting the insights of Amir et al. [ESA 2019], combined with sublinear time tools provided by the PILLAR model of computations in case of packed strings. We count squares in layer runs in sublinear time by exploiting combinatorial properties of types of pyramidally-shaped groups of layer runs. As a by-product, we discover several new structural properties of runs. Another difficulty is to compute, in sublinear time, locations of Lyndon roots of runs in packed strings, which is needed for grouping of runs that can generate equal squares. To overcome this difficulty, we introduce sparse-Lyndon roots which are based on the notion of string synchronizers proposed by Kempa and Kociumaka [STOC 2019].
Cite as

Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Manal Mohamed, Jakub Radoszewski, Wojciech Rytter, Tomasz Waleń, and Wiktor Zuba. Counting Distinct Square Substrings in Sublinear Time. In 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 345, pp. 36:1-36:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{charalampopoulos_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.36,
  author =	{Charalampopoulos, Panagiotis and Mohamed, Manal and Radoszewski, Jakub and Rytter, Wojciech and Wale\'{n}, Tomasz and Zuba, Wiktor},
  title =	{{Counting Distinct Square Substrings in Sublinear Time}},
  booktitle =	{50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-388-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{345},
  editor =	{Gawrychowski, Pawe{\l} and Mazowiecki, Filip and Skrzypczak, Micha{\l}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-241439},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: square in a string, packed model, run (maximal repetition), Lyndon word}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 41 Document/PDF
  • 25 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 11 2026
  • 14 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2023
  • 3 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 18 Radoszewski, Jakub
  • 16 Rytter, Wojciech
  • 15 Waleń, Tomasz
  • 15 Zuba, Wiktor
  • 12 Charalampopoulos, Panagiotis
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 40 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 24 Theory of computation → Pattern matching
  • 5 Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms
  • 3 Mathematics of computing → Combinatorics on words
  • 2 Theory of computation
  • 1 Information systems → Information retrieval
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 4 Hamming distance
  • 4 edit distance
  • 4 internal pattern matching
  • 3 circular pattern matching
  • 3 dictionary matching
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact