36 Search Results for "Rochange, Christine"

Volume

OASIcs, Volume 6

7th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET'07)

WCET 2007, July 3, 2007, Pisa, Italy

Editors: Christine Rochange

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.12
Real-Time System Evaluation Techniques: A Systematic Mapping Study

Authors: Tilmann L. Unte and Sebastian Altmeyer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 335, 37th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2025)

Abstract
A systematic mapping study assesses a broad selection of research publications with the aim of categorizing them according to a research question. We present the first systematic mapping study on evaluation practices within the field of real-time systems, by analyzing publications from the top three conferences ECRTS, RTAS, and RTSS from 2017 until 2024. Our study provides a comprehensive view on the evaluation practices prevalent in our community, including benchmark software, task set and graph generators, case studies, industrial challenges, and custom solutions. Based on our study, we construct and publish a dataset enabling quantitative analysis of evaluation practices within the real-time systems community. Our analysis indicates shortcomings in current practice: custom case studies are abundant, while industrial challenges have very minor impact. Reproducibility has only been shown for a small subset of evaluations and there is no indication of change. Adoption of new and improved tools and benchmarks is very slow or even non-existent. Evaluation must not be viewed as an obligation when publishing a paper, but as a key element in ensuring practicability, comparability, and reproducibility. Based on our study, we conclude that our community currently falls short on these objectives.
Cite as

Tilmann L. Unte and Sebastian Altmeyer. Real-Time System Evaluation Techniques: A Systematic Mapping Study. In 37th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 335, pp. 12:1-12:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{unte_et_al:LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.12,
  author =	{Unte, Tilmann L. and Altmeyer, Sebastian},
  title =	{{Real-Time System Evaluation Techniques: A Systematic Mapping Study}},
  booktitle =	{37th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-377-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{335},
  editor =	{Mancuso, Renato},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235903},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Systematic Mapping Study, Real-Time Systems, Evaluation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.11
Bounding the WCET of a GPU Thread Block with a Multi-Phase Representation of Warps Execution

Authors: Louison Jeanmougin, Thomas Carle, and Christine Rochange

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 335, 37th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2025)

Abstract
This paper proposes to model the Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) of a GPU thread block as the Worst-Case Response Time (WCRT) of the warps composing the block. Inspired by the WCRT analyzes for classical CPU tasks, the response time of a warp is modeled as its execution time in isolation added to an interference term that accounts for the execution of higher priority warps. We provide an algorithm to build a representation of the execution of each warp of a thread block that distinguishes phases of execution on the functional units and phases of idleness due to operations latency. A simple formula relying on this model is then proposed to safely upper bound the WCRT of warps scheduled under greedy policies such as Greedy-Then-Oldest (GTO) or Loose Round-Robin (LRR). We experimented our approach using simulations of kernels from a GPU benchmark suite on the Accel-Sim simulator. We also evaluated the model on a GPU program that is likely to be found in safety critical systems : SGEMM (Single-precision GEneral Matrix Multiplication). This work constitutes a promising first building block of an analysis pipeline for enabling static WCET computation on GPUs.
Cite as

Louison Jeanmougin, Thomas Carle, and Christine Rochange. Bounding the WCET of a GPU Thread Block with a Multi-Phase Representation of Warps Execution. In 37th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 335, pp. 11:1-11:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jeanmougin_et_al:LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.11,
  author =	{Jeanmougin, Louison and Carle, Thomas and Rochange, Christine},
  title =	{{Bounding the WCET of a GPU Thread Block with a Multi-Phase Representation of Warps Execution}},
  booktitle =	{37th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-377-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{335},
  editor =	{Mancuso, Renato},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235898},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECRTS.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: GPU, WCET analysis}
}
Document
Artifact
DOI: 10.4230/DARTS.11.1.3
Bounding the WCET of a GPU Thread Block with a Multi-Phase Representation of Warps Execution (Artifact)

Authors: Louison Jeanmougin, Thomas Carle, and Christine Rochange

Published in: DARTS, Volume 11, Issue 1, Special Issue of the 37th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2025)

Abstract
This paper proposes to model the Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) of a GPU thread block as the Worst-Case Response Time (WCRT) of the warps composing the block. Inspired by the WCRT analyzes for classical CPU tasks, the response time of a warp is modeled as its execution time in isolation added to an interference term that accounts for the execution of higher priority warps. We provide an algorithm to build a representation of the execution of each warp of a thread block that distinguishes phases of execution on the functional units and phases of idleness due to operations latency. A simple formula relying on this model is then proposed to safely upper bound the WCRT of warps scheduled under greedy policies such as Greedy-Then-Oldest (GTO) or Loose Round-Robin (LRR). We experimented our approach using simulations of kernels from a GPU benchmark suite on the Accel-Sim simulator. We also evaluated the model on a GPU program that is likely to be found in safety critical systems : SGEMM (Single-precision GEneral Matrix Multiplication). This work constitutes a promising first building block of an analysis pipeline for enabling static WCET computation on GPUs.
Cite as

Louison Jeanmougin, Thomas Carle, and Christine Rochange. Bounding the WCET of a GPU Thread Block with a Multi-Phase Representation of Warps Execution (Artifact). In Special Issue of the 37th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2025). Dagstuhl Artifacts Series (DARTS), Volume 11, Issue 1, pp. 3:1-3:5, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{jeanmougin_et_al:DARTS.11.1.3,
  author =	{Jeanmougin, Louison and Carle, Thomas and Rochange, Christine},
  title =	{{Bounding the WCET of a GPU Thread Block with a Multi-Phase Representation of Warps Execution (Artifact)}},
  pages =	{3:1--3:5},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Artifacts Series},
  ISSN =	{2509-8195},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{11},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Jeanmougin, Louison and Carle, Thomas and Rochange, Christine},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DARTS.11.1.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236047},
  doi =		{10.4230/DARTS.11.1.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: GPU, WCET analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.NG-RES.2025.5
SP-IMPact: A Framework for Static Partitioning Interference Mitigation and Performance Analysis

Authors: Diogo Costa, Gonçalo Moreira, Afonso Oliveira, José Martins, and Sandro Pinto

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 128, Sixth Workshop on Next Generation Real-Time Embedded Systems (NG-RES 2025)

Abstract
Modern embedded systems are evolving toward complex, heterogeneous architectures to accommodate increasingly demanding applications. Driven by industry SWAP-C (Size, Weight, Power, and Cost) constraints, this shift has led to the consolidation of multiple systems onto single hardware platforms. Static Partitioning Hypervisors (SPHs) offer a promising solution to partition hardware resources and provide spatial isolation between critical workloads. However, shared hardware resources like the Last-Level Cache (LLC) and system bus can introduce significant temporal interference between virtual machines (VMs), negatively impacting performance and predictability. Over the past decade, academia and industry have focused on developing interference mitigation techniques, such as cache partitioning and memory bandwidth reservation. Configuring these techniques, however, is complex and time-consuming. Cache partitioning requires careful balancing of cache sections across VMs, while memory bandwidth reservation requires tuning bandwidth budgets and periods. With numerous possible configurations, testing all combinations is impractical and often leads to suboptimal configurations. Moreover, there is a gap in understanding how these techniques interact, as their combined use can result in compounded or conflicting effects on system performance. Static analysis solutions that estimate worst-case execution times (WCET) and upper bounds on execution times provide some guidance for configuring interference mitigation techniques. While useful in identifying potential interference effects, these tools often fail to capture the full complexity of modern multi-core systems, as they typically focus on a limited set of shared resources and neglect other sources of contention, such as IOMMUs and interrupt controllers. To address these challenges, we introduce SP-IMPact, an open-source framework designed to analyze and guide the configuration of interference mitigation techniques, through the deployment of diverse VM configurations and setups, and assessment of hardware-level contention (leveraging SPHs). It supports two mitigation techniques: (i) cache coloring and (ii) memory bandwidth reservation, while also evaluating the interactions between these techniques and their cumulative impact on system performance. By providing insights on real hardware platforms, SP-IMPact helps to optimize the configuration of these techniques in mixed-criticality systems, ensuring both performance and predictability.
Cite as

Diogo Costa, Gonçalo Moreira, Afonso Oliveira, José Martins, and Sandro Pinto. SP-IMPact: A Framework for Static Partitioning Interference Mitigation and Performance Analysis. In Sixth Workshop on Next Generation Real-Time Embedded Systems (NG-RES 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 128, pp. 5:1-5:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{costa_et_al:OASIcs.NG-RES.2025.5,
  author =	{Costa, Diogo and Moreira, Gon\c{c}alo and Oliveira, Afonso and Martins, Jos\'{e} and Pinto, Sandro},
  title =	{{SP-IMPact: A Framework for Static Partitioning Interference Mitigation and Performance Analysis}},
  booktitle =	{Sixth Workshop on Next Generation Real-Time Embedded Systems (NG-RES 2025)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-366-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{128},
  editor =	{Yomsi, Patrick Meumeu and Wildermann, Stefan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.NG-RES.2025.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-229911},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.NG-RES.2025.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Virtualization, Contention, Multi-core Interference, Mixed-Criticality Systems, Arm}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2023.1
Warp-Level CFG Construction for GPU Kernel WCET Analysis

Authors: Louison Jeanmougin, Pascal Sotin, Christine Rochange, and Thomas Carle

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 114, 21th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2023)

Abstract
We present an abstract interpretation technique to automatically build a Control Flow Graph (CFG) representation of the execution of a GPU kernel. GPUs implement an inherently parallel execution model, in which threads are grouped within so-called warps that execute in lockstep. This execution model enables the representation of the execution of the threads of a warp as a single CFG. However, thread divergence may appear within a warp and its effect must be captured explicitly within the CFG. Our method builds the CFG of a warp by applying abstract interpretation on the assembly (Nvidia SASS) code of a kernel, and by maintaining an abstract representation of which threads within the warp agree on which values. This allows the method to detect precisely the points in the program where thread divergence may occur, and avoid spurious reactivation edges in the CFG. We apply our technique on benchmark kernels as a proof-of-concept, and generate IPET systems using the resulting CFGs.
Cite as

Louison Jeanmougin, Pascal Sotin, Christine Rochange, and Thomas Carle. Warp-Level CFG Construction for GPU Kernel WCET Analysis. In 21th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2023). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 114, pp. 1:1-1:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jeanmougin_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2023.1,
  author =	{Jeanmougin, Louison and Sotin, Pascal and Rochange, Christine and Carle, Thomas},
  title =	{{Warp-Level CFG Construction for GPU Kernel WCET Analysis}},
  booktitle =	{21th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2023)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:13},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-293-8},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{114},
  editor =	{W\"{a}gemann, Peter},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2023.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-184303},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2023.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graphical Processing Unit (GPU), Control Flow Graphs (CFG), Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET), Program analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2023.2
Validation of Processor Timing Models Using Cycle-Accurate Timing Simulators

Authors: Alban Gruin, Thomas Carle, Christine Rochange, and Pascal Sainrat

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 114, 21th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2023)

Abstract
We propose a workflow to help find errors in the processor models that are used to prove their timing predictability. Recently, several papers have modeled processor cores using formal models that represent how instructions progress through the pipeline in each execution cycle. However, such models grow with the complexity of the cores and they are built by hand, using a description of the core, usually the HDL-level code. Such a task is error-prone, and verifying that the model actually captures the core’s timing behavior is required, otherwise the proofs become useless. Our workflow simulates the execution of benchmark applications using the HDL specification of a core in order to extract timing information as well as other relevant information (e.g. cache miss events, branch mispredictions). This information is used to replay the execution in a simulator of the core timing model, and to determine whether or not the model accurately represents the execution timing of the instructions. To avoid writing the simulator by hand for each new core, or new variation of a core, we developed a compiler that translates the timing model of a core into a C++ program. We evaluated our approach on the open source MINOTAuR core and we show how it enabled us to detect and correct errors in its model.
Cite as

Alban Gruin, Thomas Carle, Christine Rochange, and Pascal Sainrat. Validation of Processor Timing Models Using Cycle-Accurate Timing Simulators. In 21th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2023). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 114, pp. 2:1-2:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gruin_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2023.2,
  author =	{Gruin, Alban and Carle, Thomas and Rochange, Christine and Sainrat, Pascal},
  title =	{{Validation of Processor Timing Models Using Cycle-Accurate Timing Simulators}},
  booktitle =	{21th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2023)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:12},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-293-8},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{114},
  editor =	{W\"{a}gemann, Peter},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2023.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-184319},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2023.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Processor model, timing predictability, simulator generation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES-v006-i001-a002
Improving WCET Evaluation using Linear Relation Analysis

Authors: Pascal Raymond, Claire Maiza, Catherine Parent-Vigouroux, Erwan Jahier, Nicolas Halbwachs, Fabienne Carrier, Mihail Asavoae, and Rémy Boutonnet

Published in: LITES, Volume 6, Issue 1 (2019). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 6, Issue 1

Abstract
The precision of a worst case execution time (WCET) evaluation tool on a given program is highly dependent on how the tool is able to detect and discard semantically infeasible executions of the program. In this paper, we propose to use the classical abstract interpretation-based method of linear relation analysis to discover and exploit relations between execution paths. For this purpose, we add auxiliary variables (counters) to the program to trace its execution paths. The results are easily incorporated in the classical workflow of a WCET evaluator, when the evaluator is based on the popular implicit path enumeration technique. We use existing tools - a WCET evaluator and a linear relation analyzer - to build and experiment a prototype implementation of this idea.
Cite as

Pascal Raymond, Claire Maiza, Catherine Parent-Vigouroux, Erwan Jahier, Nicolas Halbwachs, Fabienne Carrier, Mihail Asavoae, and Rémy Boutonnet. Improving WCET Evaluation using Linear Relation Analysis. In LITES, Volume 6, Issue 1 (2019). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp. 02:1-02:28, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{raymond_et_al:LITES-v006-i001-a002,
  author =	{Raymond, Pascal and Maiza, Claire and Parent-Vigouroux, Catherine and Jahier, Erwan and Halbwachs, Nicolas and Carrier, Fabienne and Asavoae, Mihail and Boutonnet, R\'{e}my},
  title =	{{Improving WCET Evaluation using Linear Relation Analysis}},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  pages =	{02:1--02:28},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{6},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES-v006-i001-a002},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-192784},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES-v006-i001-a002},
  annote =	{Keywords: Worst Case Execution Time estimation, Infeasible Execution Paths, Abstract Interpretation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES-v004-i002-a002
EMSBench: Benchmark and Testbed for Reactive Real-Time Systems

Authors: Florian Kluge, Christine Rochange, and Theo Ungerer

Published in: LITES, Volume 4, Issue 2 (2017). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 4, Issue 2

Abstract
Benchmark suites for real-time embedded systems (RTES) usually contain only pure computations that are often used in this domain. They allow to evaluate computing performance, but do not reproduce the complexity and behaviour that is typical for such systems. Actual RTES have to interact with the physical environment, which is often reflected by code that is executed concurrently. In this article, we present the software package EMSBench that mimics such complex behaviour, and highlight some of its use cases. The benchmark code ems of EMSBench is based on the open-source engine management system (EMS) FreeEMS. Additionally, EMSBench contains a trace generator (tg) that provides input signals for ems and enables to execute ems close to reality. We provide detailed descriptions of the ems's execution behaviour and of trace generation. EMSBench can be used as test or benchmark program to compare different hardware platforms, e.g. in terms of schedulability. Also, we use EMSBench as a benchmark for static worst-case execution time (WCET) analysis and compare these results to measurements performed on existing hardware. Our results based on the OTAWA WCET estimation tool show WCET overestimations by the static analysis from 11.9% to 41.1% depending on the complexity of the analysed functions.
Cite as

Florian Kluge, Christine Rochange, and Theo Ungerer. EMSBench: Benchmark and Testbed for Reactive Real-Time Systems. In LITES, Volume 4, Issue 2 (2017). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp. 02:1-02:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{kluge_et_al:LITES-v004-i002-a002,
  author =	{Kluge, Florian and Rochange, Christine and Ungerer, Theo},
  title =	{{EMSBench: Benchmark and Testbed for Reactive Real-Time Systems}},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  pages =	{02:1--02:23},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{4},
  number =	{2},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES-v004-i002-a002},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-192698},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES-v004-i002-a002},
  annote =	{Keywords: Real-time benchmark, WCET Analysis, Engine Management System}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2017.9
The W-SEPT Project: Towards Semantic-Aware WCET Estimation

Authors: Claire Maiza, Pascal Raymond, Catherine Parent-Vigouroux, Armelle Bonenfant, Fabienne Carrier, Hugues Cassé, Philippe Cuenot, Denis Claraz, Nicolas Halbwachs, Erwan Jahier, Hanbing Li, Marianne de Michiel, Vincent Mussot, Isabelle Puaut, Christine Rochange, Erven Rohou, Jordy Ruiz, Pascal Sotin, and Wei-Tsun Sun

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 57, 17th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2017)

Abstract
Critical embedded systems are generally composed of repetitive tasks that must meet hard timing constraints, such as termination deadlines. Providing an upper bound of the worst-case execution time (WCET) of such tasks at design time is necessary to guarantee the correctness of the system. In static WCET analysis, a main source of over-approximation comes from the complexity of the modern hardware platforms: their timing behavior tends to become more unpredictable because of features like caches, pipeline, branch prediction, etc. Another source of over-approximation comes from the software itself: WCET analysis may consider potential worst-cases executions that are actually infeasible, because of the semantics of the program or because they correspond to unrealistic inputs. The W-SEPT project, for "WCET, Semantics, Precision and Traceability", has been carried out to study and exploit the influence of program semantics on the WCET estimation. This paper presents the results of this project : a semantic-aware WCET estimation workflow for high-level designed systems.
Cite as

Claire Maiza, Pascal Raymond, Catherine Parent-Vigouroux, Armelle Bonenfant, Fabienne Carrier, Hugues Cassé, Philippe Cuenot, Denis Claraz, Nicolas Halbwachs, Erwan Jahier, Hanbing Li, Marianne de Michiel, Vincent Mussot, Isabelle Puaut, Christine Rochange, Erven Rohou, Jordy Ruiz, Pascal Sotin, and Wei-Tsun Sun. The W-SEPT Project: Towards Semantic-Aware WCET Estimation. In 17th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2017). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 57, pp. 9:1-9:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{maiza_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2017.9,
  author =	{Maiza, Claire and Raymond, Pascal and Parent-Vigouroux, Catherine and Bonenfant, Armelle and Carrier, Fabienne and Cass\'{e}, Hugues and Cuenot, Philippe and Claraz, Denis and Halbwachs, Nicolas and Jahier, Erwan and Li, Hanbing and de Michiel, Marianne and Mussot, Vincent and Puaut, Isabelle and Rochange, Christine and Rohou, Erven and Ruiz, Jordy and Sotin, Pascal and Sun, Wei-Tsun},
  title =	{{The W-SEPT Project: Towards Semantic-Aware WCET Estimation}},
  booktitle =	{17th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2017)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:13},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-057-6},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{57},
  editor =	{Reineke, Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2017.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-73097},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2017.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Worst-case execution time analysis, Static analysis, Program analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2016.2
TACLeBench: A Benchmark Collection to Support Worst-Case Execution Time Research

Authors: Heiko Falk, Sebastian Altmeyer, Peter Hellinckx, Björn Lisper, Wolfgang Puffitsch, Christine Rochange, Martin Schoeberl, Rasmus Bo Sørensen, Peter Wägemann, and Simon Wegener

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 55, 16th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2016)

Abstract
Engineering related research, such as research on worst-case execution time, uses experimentation to evaluate ideas. For these experiments we need example programs. Furthermore, to make the research experimentation repeatable those programs shall be made publicly available. We collected open-source programs, adapted them to a common coding style, and provide the collection in open-source. The benchmark collection is called TACLeBench and is available from GitHub in version 1.9 at the publication date of this paper. One of the main features of TACLeBench is that all programs are self-contained without any dependencies on standard libraries or an operating system.
Cite as

Heiko Falk, Sebastian Altmeyer, Peter Hellinckx, Björn Lisper, Wolfgang Puffitsch, Christine Rochange, Martin Schoeberl, Rasmus Bo Sørensen, Peter Wägemann, and Simon Wegener. TACLeBench: A Benchmark Collection to Support Worst-Case Execution Time Research. In 16th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2016). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 55, pp. 2:1-2:10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{falk_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2016.2,
  author =	{Falk, Heiko and Altmeyer, Sebastian and Hellinckx, Peter and Lisper, Bj\"{o}rn and Puffitsch, Wolfgang and Rochange, Christine and Schoeberl, Martin and S{\o}rensen, Rasmus Bo and W\"{a}gemann, Peter and Wegener, Simon},
  title =	{{TACLeBench: A Benchmark Collection to Support Worst-Case Execution Time Research}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2016)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:10},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-025-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{55},
  editor =	{Schoeberl, Martin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2016.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-68958},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2016.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Benchmark, WCET analysis, real-time systems}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2016.11
Parallel Real-Time Tasks, as Viewed by WCET Analysis and Task Scheduling Approaches

Authors: Christine Rochange

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 55, 16th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2016)

Abstract
With the advent of multi-core platforms, research in the field of hard real-time has recently considered parallel software, from the perspective of both worst-case execution time (WCET) and task schedulability (or worst-case response time, WCRT) analyses. These two areas consider task models that are not completely identical and sometimes make different assumptions. This paper draws a brief overview of the state of the art in the timing analysis of parallel tasks and tries to identify points of convergence and divergence between the existing approaches.
Cite as

Christine Rochange. Parallel Real-Time Tasks, as Viewed by WCET Analysis and Task Scheduling Approaches. In 16th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2016). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 55, pp. 11:1-11:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{rochange:OASIcs.WCET.2016.11,
  author =	{Rochange, Christine},
  title =	{{Parallel Real-Time Tasks, as Viewed by WCET Analysis and Task Scheduling Approaches}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2016)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:11},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-025-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{55},
  editor =	{Schoeberl, Martin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2016.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-69048},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2016.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: multicore, parallel tasks, worst-case execution time analysis, schedulability, worst-case response time analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LITES-v003-i001-a005
A Survey on Static Cache Analysis for Real-Time Systems

Authors: Mingsong Lv, Nan Guan, Jan Reineke, Reinhard Wilhelm, and Wang Yi

Published in: LITES, Volume 3, Issue 1 (2016). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 3, Issue 1

Abstract
Real-time systems are reactive computer systems that must produce their reaction to a stimulus within given time bounds. A vital verification requirement is to estimate the Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) of programs. These estimates are then used to predict the timing behavior of the overall system. The execution time of a program heavily depends on the underlying hardware, among which cache has the biggest influence. Analyzing cache behavior is very challenging due to the versatile cache features and complex execution environment. This article provides a survey on static cache analysis for real-time systems. We first present the challenges and static analysis techniques for independent programs with respect to different cache features. Then, the discussion is extended to cache analysis in complex execution environment, followed by a survey of existing tools based on static techniques for cache analysis. An outlook for future research is provided at last.
Cite as

Mingsong Lv, Nan Guan, Jan Reineke, Reinhard Wilhelm, and Wang Yi. A Survey on Static Cache Analysis for Real-Time Systems. In LITES, Volume 3, Issue 1 (2016). Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp. 05:1-05:48, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{lv_et_al:LITES-v003-i001-a005,
  author =	{Lv, Mingsong and Guan, Nan and Reineke, Jan and Wilhelm, Reinhard and Yi, Wang},
  title =	{{A Survey on Static Cache Analysis for Real-Time Systems}},
  journal =	{Leibniz Transactions on Embedded Systems},
  pages =	{05:1--05:48},
  ISSN =	{2199-2002},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LITES-v003-i001-a005},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-192603},
  doi =		{10.4230/LITES-v003-i001-a005},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hard real-time, Cache analysis, Worst-case execution time}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.1
A Framework to Quantify the Overestimations of Static WCET Analysis

Authors: Hugues Cassé, Haluk Ozaktas, and Christine Rochange

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 47, 15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015)

Abstract
To reduce complexity while computing an upper bound on the worst-case execution time, static WCET analysis performs over-approximations. This feeds the general feeling that static WCET estimations can be far above the real WCET. This feeling is strengthened when these estimations are compared to measured execution times: generally, it is very unlikely to capture the worstcase from observations, then the difference between the highest watermark and the proven WCET upper bound might be considerable. In this paper, we introduce a framework to quantify the possible overestimation on WCET upper bounds obtained by static analysis. The objective is to derive a lower bound on the WCET to complement the upper bound.
Cite as

Hugues Cassé, Haluk Ozaktas, and Christine Rochange. A Framework to Quantify the Overestimations of Static WCET Analysis. In 15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 47, pp. 1-10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{casse_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2015.1,
  author =	{Cass\'{e}, Hugues and Ozaktas, Haluk and Rochange, Christine},
  title =	{{A Framework to Quantify the Overestimations of Static WCET Analysis}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015)},
  pages =	{1--10},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-95-8},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{47},
  editor =	{Cazorla, Francisco J.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-52517},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Static WCET analysis, uncertainty, overestimation, cache analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.65
WCET and Mixed-Criticality: What does Confidence in WCET Estimations Depend Upon?

Authors: Sebastian Altmeyer, Björn Lisper, Claire Maiza, Jan Reineke, and Christine Rochange

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 47, 15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015)

Abstract
Mixed-criticality systems integrate components of different criticality. Different criticality levels require different levels of confidence in the correct behavior of a component. One aspect of correctness is timing. Confidence in worst-case execution time (WCET) estimates depends on the process by which they have been obtained. A somewhat naive view is that static WCET analyses determines safe bounds in which we can have absolute confidence, while measurement-based approaches are inherently unreliable. In this paper, we refine this view by exploring sources of doubt in the correctness of both static and measurement-based WCET analysis.
Cite as

Sebastian Altmeyer, Björn Lisper, Claire Maiza, Jan Reineke, and Christine Rochange. WCET and Mixed-Criticality: What does Confidence in WCET Estimations Depend Upon?. In 15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 47, pp. 65-74, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2015)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{altmeyer_et_al:OASIcs.WCET.2015.65,
  author =	{Altmeyer, Sebastian and Lisper, Bj\"{o}rn and Maiza, Claire and Reineke, Jan and Rochange, Christine},
  title =	{{WCET and Mixed-Criticality: What does Confidence in WCET Estimations Depend Upon?}},
  booktitle =	{15th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis (WCET 2015)},
  pages =	{65--74},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-95-8},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2015},
  volume =	{47},
  editor =	{Cazorla, Francisco J.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.65},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-52574},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.WCET.2015.65},
  annote =	{Keywords: mixed criticality, WCET analysis, confidence in WCET estimates}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 35 Document/PDF
  • 3 Document/HTML
  • 1 Volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2025
  • 2 2023
  • 1 2019
  • 2 2017
  • 3 2016
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 18 Rochange, Christine
  • 4 Bonenfant, Armelle
  • 4 Carle, Thomas
  • 4 Sainrat, Pascal
  • 3 Altmeyer, Sebastian
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 2 LIPIcs
  • 29 OASIcs
  • 1 DARTS
  • 3 LITES

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Computer systems organization → Real-time systems
  • 2 Computer systems organization → Embedded systems
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Real-time systems software
  • 1 Computer systems organization
  • 1 Computer systems organization → Embedded software
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 11 WCET analysis
  • 4 WCET
  • 3 Worst-case execution time
  • 3 multicore
  • 2 Contention
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact