24 Search Results for "Rudolph, Sebastian"

Document
Research
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.4.1.3
Semantically Reflected Programs

Authors: Eduard Kamburjan, Vidar Norstein Klungre, Yuanwei Qu, Rudolf Schlatte, Egor V. Kostylev, Martin Giese, and Einar Broch Johnsen

Published in: TGDK, Volume 4, Issue 1 (2026). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 4, Issue 1

Abstract
This paper addresses the dichotomy between the formalization of structural and the formalization of executable behavioral knowledge by means of semantically lifted programs, which explore an intuitive connection between imperative programs and knowledge graphs. While knowledge graphs and ontologies are eminently useful to represent formal knowledge about a system’s individuals and universals, programming languages are designed to describe the system’s evolution. To address this dichotomy, we introduce a semantic lifting of the program states of an executing progam into a knowledge graph, for an object-oriented programming language. The resulting graph is exposed as a semantic reflection layer within the programming language, allowing programmers to leverage knowledge of the application domain in their programs during execution. In this paper, we formalize semantic lifting and semantic reflection for a small imperative programming language, SMOL, explain the operational aspects of the language, and consider type correctness and virtualization for runtime program queries through the semantic reflection layer. We illustrate semantic lifting and semantic reflection through a case study of geological modeling and discuss different applications of the technique. The language implementation is open source and available online.
Cite as

Eduard Kamburjan, Vidar Norstein Klungre, Yuanwei Qu, Rudolf Schlatte, Egor V. Kostylev, Martin Giese, and Einar Broch Johnsen. Semantically Reflected Programs. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 3:1-3:52, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{kamburjan_et_al:TGDK.4.1.3,
  author =	{Kamburjan, Eduard and Klungre, Vidar Norstein and Qu, Yuanwei and Schlatte, Rudolf and Kostylev, Egor V. and Giese, Martin and Johnsen, Einar Broch},
  title =	{{Semantically Reflected Programs}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{3:1--3:52},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{4},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.4.1.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-256884},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.4.1.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge Graphs, Ontologies, Object-Oriented Modelling, Imperative Programming Languages, Reflection, Type Safety}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.37
Random Models and Guarded Logic

Authors: Oskar Fiuk

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
Building on ideas of Gurevich and Shelah for the Gödel Class, we present a new probabilistic proof of the finite model property for the Guarded Fragment of First-Order Logic. Our proof is conceptually simple and yields the optimal doubly-exponential upper bound on the size of minimal models. We precisely analyse the obtained bound, up to constant factors in the exponents, and construct sentences that enforce models of tightly matching size. The probabilistic approach adapts naturally to the Triguarded Fragment, an extension of the Guarded Fragment that also subsumes the Two-Variable Fragment. Finally, we derandomise the probabilistic proof by providing an explicit model construction which replaces randomness with deterministic hash functions.
Cite as

Oskar Fiuk. Random Models and Guarded Logic. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 37:1-37:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fiuk:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.37,
  author =	{Fiuk, Oskar},
  title =	{{Random Models and Guarded Logic}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255269},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: guarded fragment, finite model property, probabilistic method}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.56
A Practical 73/50 Approximation for Contiguous Monotone Moldable Job Scheduling

Authors: Klaus Jansen and Felix Ohnesorge

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
In moldable job scheduling, we are provided m identical machines and n jobs that can be executed on a variable number of machines. The execution time of each job depends on the number of machines assigned to execute that job. For the specific problem of monotone moldable job scheduling, jobs are assumed to have a processing time that is non-increasing in the number of machines. The previous best-known algorithms are: (1) a Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (PTAS) with time complexity Ω(n^{g(1/ε)}), where g(⋅) is a super-exponential function [Jansen and Thöle '08; Jansen and Land '18], (2) a Fully Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme (FPTAS) for the case of m ≥ 8n/(ε) [Jansen and Land '18], and (3) a 3/2 approximation with time complexity O(nmlog(mn)) [Wu, Zhang, and Chen '23]. We present a new practically efficient algorithm with an approximation ratio of ≈ (1.4593 + ε) and a time complexity of O(nm log 1/(ε)). Our result also applies to the contiguous variant of the problem. In addition to our theoretical results, we implement the presented algorithm and show that the practical performance is significantly better than the theoretical worst-case approximation ratio.
Cite as

Klaus Jansen and Felix Ohnesorge. A Practical 73/50 Approximation for Contiguous Monotone Moldable Job Scheduling. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 56:1-56:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jansen_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.56,
  author =	{Jansen, Klaus and Ohnesorge, Felix},
  title =	{{A Practical 73/50 Approximation for Contiguous Monotone Moldable Job Scheduling}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{56:1--56:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.56},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255453},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.56},
  annote =	{Keywords: computing, machine scheduling, moldable, polynomial approximation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.27
Analysis of Logics with Arithmetic

Authors: Michael Benedikt, Chia-Hsuan Lu, and Tony Tan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
We present new results on finite satisfiability of logics with counting and arithmetic. One result is a tight bound on the complexity of satisfiability of logics with so-called local Presburger quantifiers, which sum over neighbors of a node in a graph. A second contribution concerns computing a semilinear representation of the cardinalities associated with a formula in two variable logic extended with counting quantifiers. Such a representation allows you to get bounds not only on satisfiability for these logics, but for satisfiability in the presence of additional "global cardinality constraints": restrictions on cardinalities of unary formulas, expressed using arbitrary decidability logics over arithmetic. In the process, we provide simpler proofs of some key prior results on finite satisfiability and semi-linearity of the spectrum for these logics.
Cite as

Michael Benedikt, Chia-Hsuan Lu, and Tony Tan. Analysis of Logics with Arithmetic. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 27:1-27:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{benedikt_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.27,
  author =	{Benedikt, Michael and Lu, Chia-Hsuan and Tan, Tony},
  title =	{{Analysis of Logics with Arithmetic}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254510},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Presburger quantifiers, Spectrum, Guarded logics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.6
Hereditary First-Order Logic: the Tractable Quantifier Prefix Classes

Authors: Manuel Bodirsky and Santiago Guzmán-Pro

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
Many computational problems can be modelled as the class of all finite structures A that satisfy a fixed first-order sentence ϕ hereditarily, i.e., we require that every (induced) substructure of A satisfies ϕ. We call the corresponding computational problem the hereditary model checking problem for ϕ, and denote it by Her(ϕ). We present a complete description of the quantifier prefixes for ϕ such that Her(ϕ) is in P; we show that for every other quantifier prefix there exists a formula ϕ with this prefix such that Her(ϕ) is coNP-complete. Specifically, we show that if Q is of the form ∀*∃∀* or of the form ∀*∃*, then Her(ϕ) can be solved in polynomial time whenever the quantifier prefix of ϕ is Q. Otherwise, Q contains ∃∃∀ or ∃∀∃ as a subword, and in this case, there is a first-order formula ϕ whose quantifier prefix is Q and Her(ϕ) is coNP-complete. Moreover, we show that there is no algorithm that decides for a given first-order formula ϕ whether Her(ϕ) is in P (unless P=NP).
Cite as

Manuel Bodirsky and Santiago Guzmán-Pro. Hereditary First-Order Logic: the Tractable Quantifier Prefix Classes. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 6:1-6:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bodirsky_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.6,
  author =	{Bodirsky, Manuel and Guzm\'{a}n-Pro, Santiago},
  title =	{{Hereditary First-Order Logic: the Tractable Quantifier Prefix Classes}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254308},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantifier prefix, first-order Logic, Computational Complexity, Polynomial-time algorithm, coNP-completeness}
}
Document
Research
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.3.3.4
Mining Inter-Document Argument Structures in Scientific Papers for an Argument Web

Authors: Florian Ruosch, Cristina Sarasua, and Abraham Bernstein

Published in: TGDK, Volume 3, Issue 3 (2025). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 3, Issue 3

Abstract
In Argument Mining, predicting argumentative relations between texts (or spans) remains one of the most challenging aspects, even more so in the cross-document setting. This paper makes three key contributions to advance research in this domain. We first extend an existing dataset, the Sci-Arg corpus, by annotating it with explicit inter-document argumentative relations, thereby allowing arguments to be distributed over several documents forming an Argument Web; these new annotations are published using Semantic Web technologies (RDF, OWL). Second, we explore and evaluate three automated approaches for predicting these inter-document argumentative relations, establishing critical baselines on the new dataset. We find that a simple classifier based on discourse indicators with access to context outperforms neural methods. Third, we conduct a comparative analysis of these approaches for both intra- and inter-document settings, identifying statistically significant differences in results that indicate the necessity of distinguishing between these two scenarios. Our findings highlight significant challenges in this complex domain and open crucial avenues for future research on the Argument Web of Science, particularly for those interested in leveraging Semantic Web technologies and knowledge graphs to understand scholarly discourse. With this, we provide the first stepping stones in the form of a benchmark dataset, three baseline methods, and an initial analysis for a systematic exploration of this field relevant to the Web of Data and Science.
Cite as

Florian Ruosch, Cristina Sarasua, and Abraham Bernstein. Mining Inter-Document Argument Structures in Scientific Papers for an Argument Web. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 3, pp. 4:1-4:33, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{ruosch_et_al:TGDK.3.3.4,
  author =	{Ruosch, Florian and Sarasua, Cristina and Bernstein, Abraham},
  title =	{{Mining Inter-Document Argument Structures in Scientific Papers for an Argument Web}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{4:1--4:33},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{3},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.3.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252159},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.3.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Argument Mining, Large Language Models, Knowledge Graphs, Link Prediction}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6
Explaining Reasoning Results for Description Logic Ontologies (Invited Paper)

Authors: Patrick Koopmann

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
The Web Ontology Language (OWL), grounded in description logics, enables reasoning systems to infer implicit knowledge in a transparent manner. However, the expressivity of description logics and the complexity of large ontologies often results in reasoning outcomes that are hard to understand without additional tool support. Explanations of these outcomes are essential for users to understand ontology content, communicate its structure and behavior effectively, and debug undesired or missing inferences. This chapter provides an overview of the central explanation techniques that have been developed for explaining reasoning with description logic ontologies. Here, we consider both explanations for positive entailments (explaining why something can be deduced), as well as negative entailments (why something cannot be deduced). More specifically, we discuss justifications, proofs and interpolation as a means to explain positive entailments, and abduction for explaining negative entailments, where we also have a closer look at practical algorithms as well as practical and theoretical challenges.
Cite as

Patrick Koopmann. Explaining Reasoning Results for Description Logic Ontologies (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 6:1-6:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{koopmann:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6,
  author =	{Koopmann, Patrick},
  title =	{{Explaining Reasoning Results for Description Logic Ontologies}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:29},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250514},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Explanations, Justifications, Proofs, Craig Interpolation, Contrastive Explanations}
}
Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7
Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications (Invited Paper)

Authors: Markus Krötzsch

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
Pure Datalog is arguably the most fundamental rule language, elegant and simple, but also often too limited to be useful in practice. This has motivated the introduction of many new expressive features, ranging from datatypes and related functions, over aggregates and semi-ring generalisations, to existential quantifiers and complex terms. In spite of their variety, all these approaches remain true to the nature of Datalog as a direct, pattern-based way of computing on structured data. We therefore find that a modern notion of Datalog is emerging, distinctly different from other approaches of logic programming and with its own set of related methods and applications. In this course, we introduce Datalog and its most common extensions, and explain when and how these features can be used together (which is often, but not always, safe to do). We further look at modern Datalog systems and some of their primary use cases. Hands-on work with Datalog and its extensions is done with the free Datalog engine https://knowsys.github.io/nemo-doc/. The course is accessible to all audiences and does not assume specific prior knowledge.
Cite as

Markus Krötzsch. Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 7:1-7:41, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{krotzsch:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7,
  author =	{Kr\"{o}tzsch, Markus},
  title =	{{Modern Datalog: Concepts, Methods, Applications}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:41},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250524},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Datalog, query language, knowlegde representation and reasoning, logic programming, Horn logic, SPARQL, datatypes and aggregation, lecture notes, tutorial}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.24
Enumerating the Irreducible Closed Sets of an Acyclic Implicational Base of Bounded Degree

Authors: Oscar Defrain, Arthur Ohana, and Simon Vilmin

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 359, 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)

Abstract
We consider the problem of enumerating the irreducible closed sets of a closure system given by an implicational base. To date, the complexity status of this problem is widely open, and it is further known to generalize the notorious hypergraph dualization problem, even in the case of acyclic convex geometries, i.e., closure systems admitting an acyclic implicational base. This paper studies this case with a focus on the degree, which corresponds to the maximal number of implications in which an element occurs. We show that the problem is tractable for bounded values of this parameter, even when relaxed to the notions of premise- and conclusion-degree. Our algorithms rely on a sequential approach leveraging from acyclicity, combined with the solution graph traversal technique for the case of premise-degree. They are shown to perform in incremental-polynomial time. These results are complemented in the long version of this document by showing that the dual problem of constructing the implicational base can be solved in polynomial time. Finally, we argue that our running times cannot be improved to polynomial delay using the standard framework of flashlight search.
Cite as

Oscar Defrain, Arthur Ohana, and Simon Vilmin. Enumerating the Irreducible Closed Sets of an Acyclic Implicational Base of Bounded Degree. In 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 359, pp. 24:1-24:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{defrain_et_al:LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.24,
  author =	{Defrain, Oscar and Ohana, Arthur and Vilmin, Simon},
  title =	{{Enumerating the Irreducible Closed Sets of an Acyclic Implicational Base of Bounded Degree}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-408-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{359},
  editor =	{Chen, Ho-Lin and Hon, Wing-Kai and Tsai, Meng-Tsung},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249321},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algorithmic enumeration, closure systems, acyclic convex geometries, solution graph traversal, flashlight search, extension, hypergraph dualization}
}
Document
Research
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.3.2.2
Distances Between Formal Concept Analysis Structures

Authors: Alexandre Bazin and Giacomo Kahn

Published in: TGDK, Volume 3, Issue 2 (2025). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 3, Issue 2

Abstract
In this paper, we study the notion of distance between the most important structures of formal concept analysis: formal contexts, concept lattices, and implication bases. We first define three families of Minkowski-like distances between these three structures. We then present experiments showing that the correlations of these distances are low and depend on the distance between formal contexts.
Cite as

Alexandre Bazin and Giacomo Kahn. Distances Between Formal Concept Analysis Structures. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 2, pp. 2:1-2:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{bazin_et_al:TGDK.3.2.2,
  author =	{Bazin, Alexandre and Kahn, Giacomo},
  title =	{{Distances Between Formal Concept Analysis Structures}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{2:1--2:18},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{2},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.2.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248126},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.2.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formal Concept Analysis, Implication Base, Concept Lattice, Pattern Mining, Ordinal Data Science}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2025.4
Precomputed Topological Relations for Integrated Geospatial Analysis Across Knowledge Graphs

Authors: Katrina Schweikert, David K. Kedrowski, Shirly Stephen, and Torsten Hahmann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 346, 13th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2025)

Abstract
Geospatial Knowledge Graphs (GeoKGs) represent a significant advancement in the integration of AI-driven geographic information, facilitating interoperable and semantically rich geospatial analytics across various domains. This paper explores the use of topologically enriched GeoKGs, built on an explicit representation of S2 Geometry alongside precomputed topological relations, for constructing efficient geospatial analysis workflows within and across knowledge graphs (KGs). Using the SAWGraph knowledge graph as a case study focused on enviromental contamination by PFAS, we demonstrate how this framework supports fundamental GIS operations - such as spatial filtering, proximity analysis, overlay operations and network analysis - in a GeoKG setting while allowing for the easy linking of these operations with one another and with semantic filters. This enables the efficient execution of complex geospatial analyses as semantically-explicit queries and enhances the usability of geospatial data across graphs. Additionally, the framework eliminates the need for explicit support for GeoSPARQL’s topological operations in the utilized graph databases and better integrates spatial knowledge into the overall semantic inference process supported by RDFS and OWL ontologies.
Cite as

Katrina Schweikert, David K. Kedrowski, Shirly Stephen, and Torsten Hahmann. Precomputed Topological Relations for Integrated Geospatial Analysis Across Knowledge Graphs. In 13th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 346, pp. 4:1-4:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{schweikert_et_al:LIPIcs.GIScience.2025.4,
  author =	{Schweikert, Katrina and Kedrowski, David K. and Stephen, Shirly and Hahmann, Torsten},
  title =	{{Precomputed Topological Relations for Integrated Geospatial Analysis Across Knowledge Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{13th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-378-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{346},
  editor =	{Sila-Nowicka, Katarzyna and Moore, Antoni and O'Sullivan, David and Adams, Benjamin and Gahegan, Mark},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238332},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: knowledge graph, GeoKG, spatial analysis, ontology, SPARQL, GeoSPARQL, discrete global grid system, S2 geometry, GeoAI, PFAS}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.2.3.2
Strong Faithfulness for ELH Ontology Embeddings

Authors: Victor Lacerda, Ana Ozaki, and Ricardo Guimarães

Published in: TGDK, Volume 2, Issue 3 (2024). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 2, Issue 3

Abstract
Ontology embedding methods are powerful approaches to represent and reason over structured knowledge in various domains. One advantage of ontology embeddings over knowledge graph embeddings is their ability to capture and impose an underlying schema to which the model must conform. Despite advances, most current approaches do not guarantee that the resulting embedding respects the axioms the ontology entails. In this work, we formally prove that normalized ELH has the strong faithfulness property on convex geometric models, which means that there is an embedding that precisely captures the original ontology. We present a region-based geometric model for embedding normalized ELH ontologies into a continuous vector space. To prove strong faithfulness, our construction takes advantage of the fact that normalized ELH has a finite canonical model. We first prove the statement assuming (possibly) non-convex regions, allowing us to keep the required dimensions low. Then, we impose convexity on the regions and show the property still holds. Finally, we consider reasoning tasks on geometric models and analyze the complexity in the class of convex geometric models used for proving strong faithfulness.
Cite as

Victor Lacerda, Ana Ozaki, and Ricardo Guimarães. Strong Faithfulness for ELH Ontology Embeddings. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 2, Issue 3, pp. 2:1-2:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{lacerda_et_al:TGDK.2.3.2,
  author =	{Lacerda, Victor and Ozaki, Ana and Guimar\~{a}es, Ricardo},
  title =	{{Strong Faithfulness for ELH Ontology Embeddings}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{2:1--2:29},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{2},
  number =	{3},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.2.3.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225965},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.2.3.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge Graph Embeddings, Ontologies, Description Logic}
}
Document
Position
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.2.1.2
Grounding Stream Reasoning Research

Authors: Pieter Bonte, Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Daniel de Leng, Daniele Dell'Aglio, Emanuele Della Valle, Thomas Eiter, Federico Giannini, Fredrik Heintz, Konstantin Schekotihin, Danh Le-Phuoc, Alessandra Mileo, Patrik Schneider, Riccardo Tommasini, Jacopo Urbani, and Giacomo Ziffer

Published in: TGDK, Volume 2, Issue 1 (2024): Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge - Part 2. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 2, Issue 1

Abstract
In the last decade, there has been a growing interest in applying AI technologies to implement complex data analytics over data streams. To this end, researchers in various fields have been organising a yearly event called the "Stream Reasoning Workshop" to share perspectives, challenges, and experiences around this topic. In this paper, the previous organisers of the workshops and other community members provide a summary of the main research results that have been discussed during the first six editions of the event. These results can be categorised into four main research areas: The first is concerned with the technological challenges related to handling large data streams. The second area aims at adapting and extending existing semantic technologies to data streams. The third and fourth areas focus on how to implement reasoning techniques, either considering deductive or inductive techniques, to extract new and valuable knowledge from the data in the stream. This summary is written not only to provide a crystallisation of the field, but also to point out distinctive traits of the stream reasoning community. Moreover, it also provides a foundation for future research by enumerating a list of use cases and open challenges, to stimulate others to join this exciting research area.
Cite as

Pieter Bonte, Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Daniel de Leng, Daniele Dell'Aglio, Emanuele Della Valle, Thomas Eiter, Federico Giannini, Fredrik Heintz, Konstantin Schekotihin, Danh Le-Phuoc, Alessandra Mileo, Patrik Schneider, Riccardo Tommasini, Jacopo Urbani, and Giacomo Ziffer. Grounding Stream Reasoning Research. In Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge - Part 2. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 2, Issue 1, pp. 2:1-2:47, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{bonte_et_al:TGDK.2.1.2,
  author =	{Bonte, Pieter and Calbimonte, Jean-Paul and de Leng, Daniel and Dell'Aglio, Daniele and Della Valle, Emanuele and Eiter, Thomas and Giannini, Federico and Heintz, Fredrik and Schekotihin, Konstantin and Le-Phuoc, Danh and Mileo, Alessandra and Schneider, Patrik and Tommasini, Riccardo and Urbani, Jacopo and Ziffer, Giacomo},
  title =	{{Grounding Stream Reasoning Research}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{2:1--2:47},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{2},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.2.1.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-198597},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.2.1.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Stream Reasoning, Stream Processing, RDF streams, Streaming Linked Data, Continuous query processing, Temporal Logics, High-performance computing, Databases}
}
Document
Survey
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.2.1.3
Semantic Web: Past, Present, and Future

Authors: Ansgar Scherp, Gerd Groener, Petr Škoda, Katja Hose, and Maria-Esther Vidal

Published in: TGDK, Volume 2, Issue 1 (2024): Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge - Part 2. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 2, Issue 1

Abstract
Ever since the vision was formulated, the Semantic Web has inspired many generations of innovations. Semantic technologies have been used to share vast amounts of information on the Web, enhance them with semantics to give them meaning, and enable inference and reasoning on them. Throughout the years, semantic technologies, and in particular knowledge graphs, have been used in search engines, data integration, enterprise settings, and machine learning. In this paper, we recap the classical concepts and foundations of the Semantic Web as well as modern and recent concepts and applications, building upon these foundations. The classical topics we cover include knowledge representation, creating and validating knowledge on the Web, reasoning and linking, and distributed querying. We enhance this classical view of the so-called "Semantic Web Layer Cake" with an update of recent concepts that include provenance, security and trust, as well as a discussion of practical impacts from industry-led contributions. We conclude with an outlook on the future directions of the Semantic Web. This is a living document. If you like to contribute, please contact the first author and visit: https://github.com/ascherp/semantic-web-primer
Cite as

Ansgar Scherp, Gerd Groener, Petr Škoda, Katja Hose, and Maria-Esther Vidal. Semantic Web: Past, Present, and Future. In Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge - Part 2. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 2, Issue 1, pp. 3:1-3:37, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{scherp_et_al:TGDK.2.1.3,
  author =	{Scherp, Ansgar and Groener, Gerd and \v{S}koda, Petr and Hose, Katja and Vidal, Maria-Esther},
  title =	{{Semantic Web: Past, Present, and Future}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{3:1--3:37},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{2},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.2.1.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-198607},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.2.1.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Linked Open Data, Semantic Web Graphs, Knowledge Graphs}
}
Document
Survey
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.2.1.1
Towards Representing Processes and Reasoning with Process Descriptions on the Web

Authors: Andreas Harth, Tobias Käfer, Anisa Rula, Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Eduard Kamburjan, and Martin Giese

Published in: TGDK, Volume 2, Issue 1 (2024): Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge - Part 2. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 2, Issue 1

Abstract
We work towards a vocabulary to represent processes and temporal logic specifications as graph-structured data. Different fields use incompatible terminologies for describing essentially the same process-related concepts. In addition, processes can be represented from different perspectives and levels of abstraction: both state-centric and event-centric perspectives offer distinct insights into the underlying processes. In this work, we strive to unify the representation of processes and related concepts by leveraging the power of knowledge graphs. We survey approaches to representing processes and reasoning with process descriptions from different fields and provide a selection of scenarios to help inform the scope of a unified representation of processes. We focus on processes that can be executed and observed via web interfaces. We propose to provide a representation designed to combine state-centric and event-centric perspectives while incorporating temporal querying and reasoning capabilities on temporal logic specifications. A standardised vocabulary and representation for processes and temporal specifications would contribute towards bridging the gap between the terminologies from different fields and fostering the broader application of methods involving temporal logics, such as formal verification and program synthesis.
Cite as

Andreas Harth, Tobias Käfer, Anisa Rula, Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Eduard Kamburjan, and Martin Giese. Towards Representing Processes and Reasoning with Process Descriptions on the Web. In Special Issue on Trends in Graph Data and Knowledge - Part 2. Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 2, Issue 1, pp. 1:1-1:32, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{harth_et_al:TGDK.2.1.1,
  author =	{Harth, Andreas and K\"{a}fer, Tobias and Rula, Anisa and Calbimonte, Jean-Paul and Kamburjan, Eduard and Giese, Martin},
  title =	{{Towards Representing Processes and Reasoning with Process Descriptions on the Web}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{1:1--1:32},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{2},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.2.1.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-198583},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.2.1.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Process modelling, Process ontology, Temporal logic, Web services}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 24 Document/PDF
  • 16 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 5 2026
  • 6 2025
  • 5 2024
  • 3 2023
  • 1 2021
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 6 Rudolph, Sebastian
  • 4 Krötzsch, Markus
  • 3 Scherp, Ansgar
  • 2 Bodirsky, Manuel
  • 2 Calbimonte, Jean-Paul
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 12 LIPIcs
  • 2 OASIcs
  • 9 TGDK
  • 1 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Computing methodologies → Ontology engineering
  • 3 Information systems → Graph-based database models
  • 3 Information systems → Semantic web description languages
  • 3 Theory of computation → Database query languages (principles)
  • 3 Theory of computation → Logic and databases
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Knowledge Graphs
  • 2 Datalog
  • 2 Horn logic
  • 2 Ontologies
  • 2 SPARQL
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact