34 Search Results for "Santos, Paulo"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.NG-RES.2026.1
Computer Vision Integration for Automated Piece Positioning in an Industry 4.0 Setup

Authors: Augusto de Souza, Alexandre dos Santos Roque, Carlos Eduardo Pereira, and Edison Pignaton de Freitas

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 140, 7th Workshop on Next Generation Real-Time Embedded Systems (NG-RES 2026)

Abstract
This paper presents the design and development of an alternative, cost-effective automated piece positioning system, specifically tailored for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), which integrates computer vision with EtherCAT-controlled servo motors. The proposed method combines a robust vision system with an AI-enhanced algorithm based on edge detection to precisely identify object contours. This enables a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) to control the servo motor, adjusting the piece’s angle with high accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate the solution’s practical viability, achieving a minimal angular oscillation of less than 0.0012° and a promising low image processing time of approximately 20ms, showcasing its potential for enhancing manufacturing efficiency and quality in industrial applications.
Cite as

Augusto de Souza, Alexandre dos Santos Roque, Carlos Eduardo Pereira, and Edison Pignaton de Freitas. Computer Vision Integration for Automated Piece Positioning in an Industry 4.0 Setup. In 7th Workshop on Next Generation Real-Time Embedded Systems (NG-RES 2026). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 140, pp. 1:1-1:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{desouza_et_al:OASIcs.NG-RES.2026.1,
  author =	{de Souza, Augusto and dos Santos Roque, Alexandre and Pereira, Carlos Eduardo and de Freitas, Edison Pignaton},
  title =	{{Computer Vision Integration for Automated Piece Positioning in an Industry 4.0 Setup}},
  booktitle =	{7th Workshop on Next Generation Real-Time Embedded Systems (NG-RES 2026)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:11},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-415-4},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{140},
  editor =	{Ali, Hazem Ismail and Kurunathan, Harrison},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.NG-RES.2026.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254191},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.NG-RES.2026.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Industry 4.0, Automation, Vision systems, Piece positioning, Servo motors}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7
Mobile Byzantine Agreement in a Trusted World

Authors: Bo Pan and Maria Potop-Butucaru

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
In this paper, we address the Byzantine Agreement problem in synchronous systems where Byzantine agents can move from process to process, corrupting their host. We focus on two representative models: Garay’s and Buhrman’s models. In Garay’s model, when a process has been left by the Byzantine agent, it enters a cured state, is aware of its condition, and can remain silent for a round to prevent the dissemination of incorrect information. In Buhrman’s model, a Byzantine agent moves together with the message. It has been shown that solving Byzantine Agreement requires at least 4t + 1 processes in Garay’s model, and at least 3t + 1 in Buhrman’s model. In this paper, we aim to increase the tolerance to mobile Byzantine agents by integrating a trusted counter abstraction into both models. This abstraction prevents nodes from equivocating. In the new models, we prove that at least 3t+1, respectively 2t+1 processors are needed to tolerate t mobile Byzantine agents. Furthermore, we propose novel Mobile Byzantine Agreement algorithms that match these new lower bounds for both Garay’s and Buhrman’s models, achieving agreement in 𝒪(n) synchronous rounds.
Cite as

Bo Pan and Maria Potop-Butucaru. Mobile Byzantine Agreement in a Trusted World. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 7:1-7:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pan_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7,
  author =	{Pan, Bo and Potop-Butucaru, Maria},
  title =	{{Mobile Byzantine Agreement in a Trusted World}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251809},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Byzantine Agreement, Mobile Faults, Trusted Abstractions}
}
Document
Resource
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.3.3.3
Supporting Psychometric Instrument Usage Through the POEM Ontology

Authors: Kelsey Rook, Henrique Santos, Deborah L. McGuinness, Manuel S. Sprung, Paulo Pinheiro, and Bruce F. Chorpita

Published in: TGDK, Volume 3, Issue 3 (2025). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 3, Issue 3

Abstract
Psychometrics is the field relating to the measurement of concepts within psychology, particularly the assessment of various social and psychological dimensions in humans. The relationship between psychometric entities is critical to finding an appropriate assessment instrument, especially in the context of clinical psychology and mental healthcare in which providing the best care based on empirical evidence is crucial. We aim to model these entities, which include psychometric questionnaires and their component elements, the subject and respondent, and the latent variables being assessed. The current standard for questionnaire-based assessment relies on text-based distributions of instruments; so, a structured representation is necessary to capture these relationships to enhance accessibility and use of existing measures, encourage reuse of questionnaires and their component elements, and enable sophisticated reasoning over assessment instruments and results by increasing interoperability. We present the design process and architecture of such a domain ontology, the Psychometric Ontology of Experiences and Measures, situating it within the context of related ontologies, and demonstrating its practical utility through evaluation against a series of competency questions concerning the creation, use, and reuse of psychometric questionnaires in clinical, research, and development settings.
Cite as

Kelsey Rook, Henrique Santos, Deborah L. McGuinness, Manuel S. Sprung, Paulo Pinheiro, and Bruce F. Chorpita. Supporting Psychometric Instrument Usage Through the POEM Ontology. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 3, pp. 3:1-3:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{rook_et_al:TGDK.3.3.3,
  author =	{Rook, Kelsey and Santos, Henrique and McGuinness, Deborah L. and Sprung, Manuel S. and Pinheiro, Paulo and Chorpita, Bruce F.},
  title =	{{Supporting Psychometric Instrument Usage Through the POEM Ontology}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{3:1--3:19},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{3},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.3.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252148},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.3.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: ontology, ontology development, psychometric assessment, psychometric ontology}
}
Artifact
Model
DOI: 10.4230/artifacts.25228
POEM Ontology

Authors: Kelsey Rook, Henrique Santos, Deborah L. McGuinness, Manuel S. Sprung, Paulo Pinheiro, and Bruce F. Chorpita

Abstract
Cite as

Kelsey Rook, Henrique Santos, Deborah L. McGuinness, Manuel S. Sprung, Paulo Pinheiro, Bruce F. Chorpita. POEM Ontology (Model, Source Code). Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@misc{dagstuhl-artifact-25228,
   title = {{POEM Ontology}}, 
   author = {Rook, Kelsey and Santos, Henrique and McGuinness, Deborah L. and Sprung, Manuel S. and Pinheiro, Paulo and Chorpita, Bruce F.},
   note = {Model (visited on 2025-12-10)},
   url = {https://github.com/tetherless-world/POEM},
   doi = {10.4230/artifacts.25228},
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagMan.11.1.1
Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility? (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 25122)

Authors: Bran Knowles, Vicki L. Hanson, Christoph Becker, Mike Berners-Lee, Andrew A. Chien, Benoit Combemale, Vlad Coroamă, Koen De Bosschere, Yi Ding, Adrian Friday, Boris Gamazaychikov, Lynda Hardman, Simon Hinterholzer, Mattias Höjer, Lynn Kaack, Lenneke Kuijer, Anne-Laure Ligozat, Jan Tobias Muehlberg, Yunmook Nah, Thomas Olsson, Anne-Cécile Orgerie, Daniel Pargman, Birgit Penzenstadler, Tom Romanoff, Emma Strubell, Colin Venters, and Junhua Zhao

Published in: Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 11, Issue 1 (2025)

Abstract
This Manifesto was produced from the Perspectives Workshop 25122 entitled "Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility?" held March 16-19, 2025 at Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany. The Workshop provided a forum for world-leading computer scientists and expert consultants on environmental policy and sustainable transition to engage in a critical and urgent conversation about computing’s responsibilities in addressing climate change - or more aptly, climate crisis. The resulting Manifesto outlines commitments and directions for future action which, if adopted as a basis for more responsible computing practices, will help ensure that these technologies do not threaten the long-term habitability of the planet. We preface our Manifesto with a recognition that humanity is on a path that is not in agreement with international global warming targets and explore how computing technologies are currently hastening the overshoot of these boundaries. We critically assess the vaunted potential for harnessing computing technologies for the mitigation of global warming, agreeing that, under current circumstances, computing is contributing to negative environmental impacts in other sectors. Computing primarily improves efficiency and reduces costs which leads to more consumption and more negative environmental impact. Relying solely on efficiency gains in computing has thus far proven to be insufficient to curb global greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, computing’s purpose within a strategy for tackling climate change must be reimagined. Our recommendations cover changes that need to be urgently made to the design priorities of computing technologies, but also speak to the more systemic shift in mindset, with sustainability and human rights providing a necessary moral foundation for developing the kinds of computing technologies most needed by society. We also stress the importance of digital policy that accounts for both the direct material impacts of computing and the detrimental indirect impacts arising from computing-enabled efficiencies, and the role of computing professionals in informing policy making.
Cite as

Bran Knowles, Vicki L. Hanson, Christoph Becker, Mike Berners-Lee, Andrew A. Chien, Benoit Combemale, Vlad Coroamă, Koen De Bosschere, Yi Ding, Adrian Friday, Boris Gamazaychikov, Lynda Hardman, Simon Hinterholzer, Mattias Höjer, Lynn Kaack, Lenneke Kuijer, Anne-Laure Ligozat, Jan Tobias Muehlberg, Yunmook Nah, Thomas Olsson, Anne-Cécile Orgerie, Daniel Pargman, Birgit Penzenstadler, Tom Romanoff, Emma Strubell, Colin Venters, and Junhua Zhao. Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility? (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 25122). In Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp. 1-18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{knowles_et_al:DagMan.11.1.1,
  author =	{Knowles, Bran and Hanson, Vicki L. and Becker, Christoph and Berners-Lee, Mike and Chien, Andrew A. and Combemale, Benoit and Coroam\u{a}, Vlad and De Bosschere, Koen and Ding, Yi and Friday, Adrian and Gamazaychikov, Boris and Hardman, Lynda and Hinterholzer, Simon and H\"{o}jer, Mattias and Kaack, Lynn and Kuijer, Lenneke and Ligozat, Anne-Laure and Muehlberg, Jan Tobias and Nah, Yunmook and Olsson, Thomas and Orgerie, Anne-C\'{e}cile and Pargman, Daniel and Penzenstadler, Birgit and Romanoff, Tom and Strubell, Emma and Venters, Colin and Zhao, Junhua},
  title =	{{Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility? (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 25122)}},
  pages =	{1--18},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Manifestos},
  ISSN =	{2193-2433},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{11},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Knowles, Bran and Hanson, Vicki L. and Becker, Christoph and Berners-Lee, Mike and Chien, Andrew A. and Combemale, Benoit and Coroam\u{a}, Vlad and De Bosschere, Koen and Ding, Yi and Friday, Adrian and Gamazaychikov, Boris and Hardman, Lynda and Hinterholzer, Simon and H\"{o}jer, Mattias and Kaack, Lynn and Kuijer, Lenneke and Ligozat, Anne-Laure and Muehlberg, Jan Tobias and Nah, Yunmook and Olsson, Thomas and Orgerie, Anne-C\'{e}cile and Pargman, Daniel and Penzenstadler, Birgit and Romanoff, Tom and Strubell, Emma and Venters, Colin and Zhao, Junhua},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagMan.11.1.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250724},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagMan.11.1.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: sustainability, climate change, efficiency, supply chain management, climate modelling}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.39
TEE Is Not a Healer: Rollback-Resistant Reliable Storage

Authors: Sadegh Keshavarzi, Gregory Chockler, and Alexey Gotsman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
Recent advances in secure hardware technologies, such as Intel SGX or ARM TrustZone, offer an opportunity to substantially reduce the costs of Byzantine fault-tolerance by placing the program code and state within a secure enclave known as a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE). However, the protection offered by a TEE only applies during program execution. Once power is switched off, the non-volatile portion of the program state becomes vulnerable to rollback attacks wherein it is undetectably reverted to an older version. In this paper we consider the problem of implementing reliable read/write registers out of failure-prone replicas subject to state rollbacks. To this end, we introduce a new unified model that captures multiple failure types that can affect a TEE-based system and establish tight bounds on the fault-tolerance of register constructions in this model. We consider both the static case, where failure thresholds hold throughout the entire execution, and the dynamic case, where any number of replicas can roll back, provided these failures do not occur too often. Our dynamic register emulation algorithm, TEE-Rex , provides the first correct implementation of a distributed state recovery procedure that requires neither durable storage nor specialized hardware, such as trusted monotonic counters.
Cite as

Sadegh Keshavarzi, Gregory Chockler, and Alexey Gotsman. TEE Is Not a Healer: Rollback-Resistant Reliable Storage. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 39:1-39:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{keshavarzi_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.39,
  author =	{Keshavarzi, Sadegh and Chockler, Gregory and Gotsman, Alexey},
  title =	{{TEE Is Not a Healer: Rollback-Resistant Reliable Storage}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248560},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: Trusted execution environments, fault tolerance, crash recovery}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2025.2
Enabling Secure Coding: Exploring GenAI for Developer Training and Education

Authors: Sathwik Amburi, Tiago Espinha Gasiba, Ulrike Lechner, and Maria Pinto-Albuquerque

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 133, 6th International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2025)

Abstract
The rapid adoption of GenAI for code generation presents unprecedented opportunities and significant security challenges. Raising awareness about secure coding is critical for preventing software vulnerabilities. To investigate how Generative AI can best support secure coding, we built an AI Secure Coding platform, an interactive training environment that embeds a GPT-4 based chatbot directly into a structured challenge workflow. The platform comprises a landing page, a challenges page with three AI-generated tasks, and a challenge page where participants work with code snippets. In each challenge, developers (1) identify vulnerabilities by reviewing code and adding comments, (2) ask the AI for help via a chat based interface, (3) review and refine comments based on AI feedback, and (4) fix vulnerabilities by submitting secure patches. The study involved 18 industry developers tackling three challenges. Participants used the AI Secure Coding Platform to detect and remediate vulnerabilities and then completed a survey to capture their opinions and comfort level with AI assisted platform for secure coding. Results show that AI assistance can boost productivity, reduce errors, and uncover more defects when treated as a "second pair of eyes," but it can also foster over-reliance. This study introduces the AI Secure Coding platform, presents preliminary results from a initial study, and shows that embedding GenAI into a structured secure-coding workflow can both enable and challenge developers. This work also opens the door to a new research field: leveraging GenAI to enable secure software development.
Cite as

Sathwik Amburi, Tiago Espinha Gasiba, Ulrike Lechner, and Maria Pinto-Albuquerque. Enabling Secure Coding: Exploring GenAI for Developer Training and Education. In 6th International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 133, pp. 2:1-2:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{amburi_et_al:OASIcs.ICPEC.2025.2,
  author =	{Amburi, Sathwik and Espinha Gasiba, Tiago and Lechner, Ulrike and Pinto-Albuquerque, Maria},
  title =	{{Enabling Secure Coding: Exploring GenAI for Developer Training and Education}},
  booktitle =	{6th International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-393-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{133},
  editor =	{Queir\'{o}s, Ricardo and Pinto, M\'{a}rio and Portela, Filipe and Sim\~{o}es, Alberto},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-240321},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Secure Coding, Industry, Software Development, Generative AI, Large Language Models, Teaching}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2025.4
Can Open Large Language Models Catch Vulnerabilities?

Authors: Diogo Gaspar Lopes, Tiago Espinha Gasiba, Sathwik Amburi, and Maria Pinto-Albuquerque

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 133, 6th International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2025)

Abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into secure software development workflows, a critical question remains unanswered: can these models not only detect insecure code but also reliably classify vulnerabilities according to standardized taxonomies? In this work, we conduct a systematic evaluation of three state-of-the-art LLMs - Llama3, Codestral, and Deepseek R1 - using a carefully filtered subset of the Big-Vul dataset annotated with eight representative Common Weakness Enumeration categories. Adopting a closed-world classification setup, we assess each model’s performance in both identifying the presence of vulnerabilities and mapping them to the correct CWE label. Our findings reveal a sharp contrast between high detection rates and markedly poor classification accuracy, with frequent overgeneralization and misclassification. Moreover, we analyze model-specific biases and common failure modes, shedding light on the limitations of current LLMs in performing fine-grained security reasoning.These insights are especially relevant in educational contexts, where LLMs are being adopted as learning aids despite their limitations. A nuanced understanding of their behaviour is essential to prevent the propagation of misconceptions among students. Our results expose key challenges that must be addressed before LLMs can be reliably deployed in security-sensitive environments.
Cite as

Diogo Gaspar Lopes, Tiago Espinha Gasiba, Sathwik Amburi, and Maria Pinto-Albuquerque. Can Open Large Language Models Catch Vulnerabilities?. In 6th International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 133, pp. 4:1-4:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gasparlopes_et_al:OASIcs.ICPEC.2025.4,
  author =	{Gaspar Lopes, Diogo and Espinha Gasiba, Tiago and Amburi, Sathwik and Pinto-Albuquerque, Maria},
  title =	{{Can Open Large Language Models Catch Vulnerabilities?}},
  booktitle =	{6th International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:14},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-393-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{133},
  editor =	{Queir\'{o}s, Ricardo and Pinto, M\'{a}rio and Portela, Filipe and Sim\~{o}es, Alberto},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-240340},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Large Language Models (LLMs), Secure Coding, CWE Classification, Machine Learning, Software Vulnerability Detection, Artificial Intelligence, Code Analysis, Big-Vul Dataset}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.10
Stepwise Source, a Supporting Tool for Source Code Demonstration

Authors: João Santos, Alvaro Costa Neto, and Pedro Rangel Henriques

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 135, 14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025)

Abstract
The difficulties in teaching and learning computer programming remain a pressing issue to this day. Several studies and tools have been developed over the years to tackle this challenge from many different points-of-view. One of the biggest tools an educator has to support him in a classroom is the progressive explanation of how a source code is constructed and what effects each of its parts has on the overall result. Attempts to translate this live-directed tool to an on-line experience is usually time-consuming and lacking in features. In order to tackle this concern, a tool to create piecewise source code writing demonstrations was developed - Stepwise Source. The main idea behind this application is to allow step-by-step explanation of a source code construction, along with any relevant annotations and automatically assessed challenges that an educator may add. By providing a dynamic platform for both students and lecturers, this software aims to improve the teaching and learning of computer programming, while trying to imitate the information flow of a live lecture, with the added benefit of student-directed pace of explanation. Through interactive guidance and automated assessment, this tool has the potential to foster a deeper understanding of computational principles and promote proficiency in programming skills.
Cite as

João Santos, Alvaro Costa Neto, and Pedro Rangel Henriques. Stepwise Source, a Supporting Tool for Source Code Demonstration. In 14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 135, pp. 10:1-10:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{santos_et_al:OASIcs.SLATE.2025.10,
  author =	{Santos, Jo\~{a}o and Costa Neto, Alvaro and Henriques, Pedro Rangel},
  title =	{{Stepwise Source, a Supporting Tool for Source Code Demonstration}},
  booktitle =	{14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:15},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-387-4},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{135},
  editor =	{Baptista, Jorge and Barateiro, Jos\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236906},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Computer Programming Education, Source Code Demonstration, Education Technology}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.9
Semantic Representation of Adverbs in the Lexicalized Meaning Representation (LMR) Framework

Authors: Jorge Baptista, Izabela Müller, and Sónia Reis

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 135, 14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025)

Abstract
Semantic parsing serves as a crucial interface between natural language and formal meaning representations, enabling computational systems to capture the underlying semantic structure of linguistic expressions. This paper addresses a relatively understudied area in both linguistic theory and natural language processing: the semantic representation of adverbs. We conduct a comparative analysis of annotation guidelines and practices across two semantic representation frameworks: Lexicalized Meaning Representation (LMR), applied to the European Portuguese edition of the novella "O Principezinho" by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (1943); and Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR), applied to the Brazilian Portuguese edition, "O Pequeno Príncipe". The study reveals significant limitations in AMR’s handling of adverbial constructions, particularly when assessed against contemporary syntactic-semantic advances in linguistic theory. Furthermore, it highlights the theoretical and practical challenges that LMR continues to face in this domain.
Cite as

Jorge Baptista, Izabela Müller, and Sónia Reis. Semantic Representation of Adverbs in the Lexicalized Meaning Representation (LMR) Framework. In 14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 135, pp. 9:1-9:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{baptista_et_al:OASIcs.SLATE.2025.9,
  author =	{Baptista, Jorge and M\"{u}ller, Izabela and Reis, S\'{o}nia},
  title =	{{Semantic Representation of Adverbs in the Lexicalized Meaning Representation (LMR) Framework}},
  booktitle =	{14th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:18},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-387-4},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{135},
  editor =	{Baptista, Jorge and Barateiro, Jos\'{e}},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236891},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Semantic representation, Adverbs, Lexicalized Meaning Representation (LMR), Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR), Annotation guidelines, European Portuguese, Brazilian Portuguese, Comparative analysis, The Little Prince, Corpus linguistics, Natural Language Processing (NLP), Multi-word expressions, Syntactic-semantic interface, Linguistic theory}
}
Document
Survey
DOI: 10.4230/TGDK.3.1.3
Uncertainty Management in the Construction of Knowledge Graphs: A Survey

Authors: Lucas Jarnac, Yoan Chabot, and Miguel Couceiro

Published in: TGDK, Volume 3, Issue 1 (2025). Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge, Volume 3, Issue 1

Abstract
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are a major asset for companies thanks to their great flexibility in data representation and their numerous applications, e.g., vocabulary sharing, Q&A or recommendation systems. To build a KG, it is a common practice to rely on automatic methods for extracting knowledge from various heterogeneous sources. However, in a noisy and uncertain world, knowledge may not be reliable and conflicts between data sources may occur. Integrating unreliable data would directly impact the use of the KG, therefore such conflicts must be resolved. This could be done manually by selecting the best data to integrate. This first approach is highly accurate, but costly and time-consuming. That is why recent efforts focus on automatic approaches, which represent a challenging task since it requires handling the uncertainty of extracted knowledge throughout its integration into the KG. We survey state-of-the-art approaches in this direction and present constructions of both open and enterprise KGs. We then describe different knowledge extraction methods and discuss downstream tasks after knowledge acquisition, including KG completion using embedding models, knowledge alignment, and knowledge fusion in order to address the problem of knowledge uncertainty in KG construction. We conclude with a discussion on the remaining challenges and perspectives when constructing a KG taking into account uncertainty.
Cite as

Lucas Jarnac, Yoan Chabot, and Miguel Couceiro. Uncertainty Management in the Construction of Knowledge Graphs: A Survey. In Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge (TGDK), Volume 3, Issue 1, pp. 3:1-3:48, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{jarnac_et_al:TGDK.3.1.3,
  author =	{Jarnac, Lucas and Chabot, Yoan and Couceiro, Miguel},
  title =	{{Uncertainty Management in the Construction of Knowledge Graphs: A Survey}},
  journal =	{Transactions on Graph Data and Knowledge},
  pages =	{3:1--3:48},
  ISSN =	{2942-7517},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{3},
  number =	{1},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/TGDK.3.1.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233733},
  doi =		{10.4230/TGDK.3.1.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge reconciliation, Uncertainty, Heterogeneous sources, Knowledge graph construction}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.8
Formal Verification of a Fail-Safe Cross-Chain Bridge

Authors: Filip Marić, Bernhard Scholz, and Pavle Subotić

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 129, 6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025)

Abstract
Cross-chain bridges are financial services that interconnect blockchains. High monetary values flow through these bridges, and their security must be safeguarded. However, designing real-world cross-chain bridges is a difficult endeavor. Due to blockchain’s closed-world nature, tokens cannot be transferred from a sender to a receiver chain; on the contrary, they need complex logic that maintains an equilibrium on both chains, even if either the chains or the bridge fail. This paper formally verifies a model of a novel fail-safe cross-chain bridge to ensure correctness. We define formal requirements and prove the bridge is safe using the Isabelle/HOL proof assistant.
Cite as

Filip Marić, Bernhard Scholz, and Pavle Subotić. Formal Verification of a Fail-Safe Cross-Chain Bridge. In 6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 129, pp. 8:1-8:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{maric_et_al:OASIcs.FMBC.2025.8,
  author =	{Mari\'{c}, Filip and Scholz, Bernhard and Suboti\'{c}, Pavle},
  title =	{{Formal Verification of a Fail-Safe Cross-Chain Bridge}},
  booktitle =	{6th International Workshop on Formal Methods for Blockchains (FMBC 2025)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:18},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-371-3},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{129},
  editor =	{Marmsoler, Diego and Xu, Meng},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-230342},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.FMBC.2025.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Cross-Chain Bridge, Formal Verification, Logic, Security}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.20
How Robust Are Synchronous Consensus Protocols?

Authors: Nenad Milošević, Daniel Cason, Zarko Milošević, and Fernando Pedone

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
Synchronous Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) protocols have long been a reality in an academic setting, yet their practicality remains debated. The main concern of skeptics of synchronous systems is that the correctness of these protocols depends on the timely delivery of all messages within a predefined synchronous bound, Δ. This dependency creates a challenging tradeoff between protocol correctness and performance, as Δ directly impacts both. In this paper, we examine this tradeoff in detail. Specifically, we introduce BoundBFT, a new synchronous BFT consensus protocol. We analyze how BoundBFT’s correctness can be compromised and use this analysis to design and implement the most effective attack strategies that malicious processes could employ. Furthermore, we experimentally determine the synchronous bound Δ that provides sufficient confidence in maintaining protocol correctness even in the presence of malicious replicas. Finally, we apply this discovered bound to BoundBFT, evaluate its performance, and compare it to state-of-the-art synchronous and partially synchronous protocols.
Cite as

Nenad Milošević, Daniel Cason, Zarko Milošević, and Fernando Pedone. How Robust Are Synchronous Consensus Protocols?. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 20:1-20:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{milosevic_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.20,
  author =	{Milo\v{s}evi\'{c}, Nenad and Cason, Daniel and Milo\v{s}evi\'{c}, Zarko and Pedone, Fernando},
  title =	{{How Robust Are Synchronous Consensus Protocols?}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225560},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Synchronous Consensus, Byzantine Failures, Blockchain}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25
Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models

Authors: Rowdy Chotkan, Bart Cox, Vincent Rahli, and Jérémie Decouchant

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
Reliable communication is a fundamental distributed communication abstraction that allows any two nodes within a network to communicate with each other. It is necessary for more powerful communication primitives, such as broadcast and consensus. Using different authentication models, two classical protocols implement reliable communication in unknown and sufficiently connected networks. In the former, network links are authenticated, and processes rely on dissemination paths to authenticate messages. In the latter, processes generate digital signatures that are flooded throughout the network. This work considers the hybrid system model that combines authenticated links and authenticated processes. Additionally, we aim to leverage the possible presence of trusted nodes (e.g., network gateways) and trusted components (e.g., Intel SGX enclaves). We first extend the two classical reliable communication protocols to leverage trusted nodes. Then we propose DualRC, our most generic algorithm that considers the hybrid authentication model by manipulating dissemination paths and digital signatures, and leverages the possible presence of trusted nodes and trusted components. We describe and prove methods that establish whether our algorithms implement reliable communication on a given network.
Cite as

Rowdy Chotkan, Bart Cox, Vincent Rahli, and Jérémie Decouchant. Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 25:1-25:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chotkan_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25,
  author =	{Chotkan, Rowdy and Cox, Bart and Rahli, Vincent and Decouchant, J\'{e}r\'{e}mie},
  title =	{{Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225611},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: Reliable communication, Byzantine, Authentication models, Trust}
}
Document
Short Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2024.4
Early Findings in Using LLMs to Assess Semantic Relations Strength (Short Paper)

Authors: André Fernandes dos Santos and José Paulo Leal

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 120, 13th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2024)

Abstract
Semantic measure (SM) algorithms allow software to mimic the human ability of assessing the strength of the semantic relations between elements such as concepts, entities, words, or sentences. SM algorithms are typically evaluated by comparison against gold standard datasets built by human annotators. These datasets are composed of pairs of elements and an averaged numeric rating. Building such datasets usually requires asking human annotators to assign a numeric value to their perception of the strength of the semantic relation between two elements. Large language models (LLMs) have recently been successfully used to perform tasks which previously required human intervention, such as text summarization, essay writing, image description, image synthesis, question answering, and so on. In this paper, we present ongoing research on LLMs capabilities for semantic relations assessment. We queried several LLMs to rate the relationship of pairs of elements from existing semantic measures evaluation datasets, and measured the correlation between the results from the LLMs and gold standard datasets. Furthermore, we performed additional experiments to evaluate which other factors can influence LLMs performance in this task. We present and discuss the results obtained so far.
Cite as

André Fernandes dos Santos and José Paulo Leal. Early Findings in Using LLMs to Assess Semantic Relations Strength (Short Paper). In 13th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2024). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 120, pp. 4:1-4:9, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dossantos_et_al:OASIcs.SLATE.2024.4,
  author =	{dos Santos, Andr\'{e} Fernandes and Leal, Jos\'{e} Paulo},
  title =	{{Early Findings in Using LLMs to Assess Semantic Relations Strength}},
  booktitle =	{13th Symposium on Languages, Applications and Technologies (SLATE 2024)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:9},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-321-8},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{120},
  editor =	{Rodrigues, M\'{a}rio and Leal, Jos\'{e} Paulo and Portela, Filipe},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2024.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-220758},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2024.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: large language models, semantic measures, semantic datasets}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 33 Document/PDF
  • 16 Document/HTML
  • 1 Artifact

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2026
  • 12 2025
  • 5 2024
  • 6 2023
  • 2 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 6 Leal, José Paulo
  • 3 Santos, André
  • 3 Santos, Henrique
  • 2 Amburi, Sathwik
  • 2 Chorpita, Bruce F.
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 4 LIPIcs
  • 19 OASIcs
  • 6 TGDK
  • 1 DagMan
  • 2 DagRep
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Information systems → Graph-based database models
  • 2 Applied computing → Computer-assisted instruction
  • 2 Applied computing → Interactive learning environments
  • 2 Computing methodologies → Artificial intelligence
  • 2 Computing methodologies → Knowledge representation and reasoning
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 RDF
  • 2 Knowledge Graphs
  • 2 Secure Coding
  • 2 Trust
  • 1 AI
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact