12 Search Results for "Kullmann, Oliver"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.67
Compact Representation of Semilinear and Terrain-Like Graphs

Authors: Jean Cardinal and Yelena Yuditsky

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
We consider the existence and construction of biclique covers of graphs, consisting of coverings of their edge sets by complete bipartite graphs. The size of such a cover is the sum of the sizes of the bicliques. Small-size biclique covers of graphs are ubiquitous in computational geometry, and have been shown to be useful compact representations of graphs. We give a brief survey of classical and recent results on biclique covers and their applications, and give new families of graphs having biclique covers of near-linear size. In particular, we show that semilinear graphs, whose edges are defined by linear relations in bounded dimensional space, always have biclique covers of size O(npolylog n). This generalizes many previously known results on special classes of graphs including interval graphs, permutation graphs, and graphs of bounded boxicity, but also new classes such as intersection graphs of L-shapes in the plane. It also directly implies the bounds for Zarankiewicz’s problem derived by Basit, Chernikov, Starchenko, Tao, and Tran (Forum Math. Sigma, 2021). We also consider capped graphs, also known as terrain-like graphs, defined as ordered graphs forbidding a certain ordered pattern on four vertices. Terrain-like graphs contain the induced subgraphs of terrain visibility graphs. We give an elementary proof that these graphs admit biclique partitions of size O(nlog³ n). This provides a simple combinatorial analogue of a classical result from Agarwal, Alon, Aronov, and Suri on polygon visibility graphs (Discrete Comput. Geom. 1994). Finally, we prove that there exists families of unit disk graphs on n vertices that do not admit biclique coverings of size o(n^{4/3}), showing that we are unlikely to improve on Szemerédi-Trotter type incidence bounds for higher-degree semialgebraic graphs.
Cite as

Jean Cardinal and Yelena Yuditsky. Compact Representation of Semilinear and Terrain-Like Graphs. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 67:1-67:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cardinal_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.67,
  author =	{Cardinal, Jean and Yuditsky, Yelena},
  title =	{{Compact Representation of Semilinear and Terrain-Like Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{67:1--67:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.67},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245359},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.67},
  annote =	{Keywords: Biclique covers, intersection graphs, visibility graphs, Zarankiewicz’s problem}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.39
The 3-Decomposition Conjecture: A SAT-Based Approach with Specialized Propagators

Authors: Tianwei Zhang and Stefan Szeider

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
We investigate the 3-decomposition conjecture, which states that every connected cubic graph can be decomposed into a spanning tree, a collection of cycles, and a matching. Using a SAT-based approach enhanced with specialized propagators, we verify the conjecture for all relevant graphs up to 28 vertices. Our method extends the Satisfiability Modulo Symmetries (SMS) framework with specialized propagators that exploit theoretical properties of minimal counterexamples (counterexamples with the minimal number of vertices), enabling efficient pruning. We demonstrate that graphs containing certain substructures cannot be minimal counterexamples to the conjecture, allowing us to exclude these patterns during the search dynamically. Our experimental results quantify the impact of different propagator configurations and forbidden subgraph constraints on solving efficiency, showing significant performance improvements when leveraging these techniques. The approach scales effectively to graphs of 28 vertices. Our work illustrates how combining SAT solving with specialized constraint propagation techniques can successfully address challenging combinatorial problems in contemporary graph theory.
Cite as

Tianwei Zhang and Stefan Szeider. The 3-Decomposition Conjecture: A SAT-Based Approach with Specialized Propagators. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 39:1-39:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zhang_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.39,
  author =	{Zhang, Tianwei and Szeider, Stefan},
  title =	{{The 3-Decomposition Conjecture: A SAT-Based Approach with Specialized Propagators}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239005},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: SAT, Symmetry Breaking, Subgraphs, Propagators, Combinatorics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.19
Analyzing Self-Stabilization of Synchronous Unison via Propositional Satisfiability

Authors: Asma Khoualdia, Sami Cherif, Stéphane Devismes, and Léo Robert

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Synchronous unison is a classical clock synchronization problem in distributed computing, and especially in self-stabilization. This paper explores the self-stabilization of a synchronous unison algorithm proposed by Arora et al. using a propositional satisfiability-based approach. We give a logical formulation of the algorithm. This formulation includes the uniqueness of clock values at each node, the updates of clocks based on the minimum clock value in the neighborhood, and the detection of convergence or divergence. To optimize the models, additional constraints are introduced to reduce redundant cases of initial configurations to be analyzed. Our approach not only verifies the algorithm’s behaviour but also offers insights into enhancing its robustness and applicability to broader distributed systems.
Cite as

Asma Khoualdia, Sami Cherif, Stéphane Devismes, and Léo Robert. Analyzing Self-Stabilization of Synchronous Unison via Propositional Satisfiability. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 19:1-19:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{khoualdia_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.19,
  author =	{Khoualdia, Asma and Cherif, Sami and Devismes, St\'{e}phane and Robert, L\'{e}o},
  title =	{{Analyzing Self-Stabilization of Synchronous Unison via Propositional Satisfiability}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238806},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Self-stabilization, Synchronous Unison, Satisfiability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.32
Efficient Certified Reasoning for Binarized Neural Networks

Authors: Jiong Yang, Yong Kiam Tan, Mate Soos, Magnus O. Myreen, and Kuldeep S. Meel

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Neural networks have emerged as essential components in safety-critical applications - these use cases demand complex, yet trustworthy computations. Binarized Neural Networks (BNNs) are a type of neural network where each neuron is constrained to a Boolean value; they are particularly well-suited for safety-critical tasks because they retain much of the computational capacities of full-scale (floating-point or quantized) deep neural networks, but remain compatible with satisfiability solvers for qualitative verification and with model counters for quantitative reasoning. However, existing methods for BNN analysis suffer from either limited scalability or susceptibility to soundness errors, which hinders their applicability in real-world scenarios. In this work, we present a scalable and trustworthy approach for both qualitative and quantitative verification of BNNs. Our approach introduces a native representation of BNN constraints in a custom-designed solver for qualitative reasoning, and in an approximate model counter for quantitative reasoning. We further develop specialized proof generation and checking pipelines with native support for BNN constraint reasoning, ensuring trustworthiness for all of our verification results. Empirical evaluations on a BNN robustness verification benchmark suite demonstrate that our certified solving approach achieves a 9× speedup over prior certified CNF and PB-based approaches, and our certified counting approach achieves a 218× speedup over the existing CNF-based baseline. In terms of coverage, our pipeline produces fully certified results for 99% and 86% of the qualitative and quantitative reasoning queries on BNNs, respectively. This is in sharp contrast to the best existing baselines which can fully certify only 62% and 4% of the queries, respectively.
Cite as

Jiong Yang, Yong Kiam Tan, Mate Soos, Magnus O. Myreen, and Kuldeep S. Meel. Efficient Certified Reasoning for Binarized Neural Networks. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 32:1-32:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{yang_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.32,
  author =	{Yang, Jiong and Tan, Yong Kiam and Soos, Mate and Myreen, Magnus O. and Meel, Kuldeep S.},
  title =	{{Efficient Certified Reasoning for Binarized Neural Networks}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237665},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Neural network verification, proof certification, SAT solving, approximate model counting}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.27
Streamlining Distributed SAT Solver Design

Authors: Dominik Schreiber, Niccolò Rigi-Luperti, and Armin Biere

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Distributed clause-sharing SAT solvers have recently been established as powerful automated reasoning tools that can conquer previously infeasible instances. A common design of distributed SAT solvers is to run many off-the-shelf sequential solvers in parallel, employ some diversification (e.g., restart intervals or decision orders), and share conflict clauses among the solver threads. This approach, naïvely, adopts all best practices of sequential solver design for distributed solving, where these practices may be less useful or even actively detrimental. In this work we diagnose such shortcomings in the state-of-the-art system MallobSat and propose first effective mitigations. In particular, we replace the redundant pre- and inprocessing at all threads with single-core preprocessing that runs next to the parallel search, remove LBD values from the clause-sharing operation, and slim down solver diversification to very few lightweight and uniform methods. Experimental evaluations on up to 3072 cores (64 nodes) confirm that our measures improve performance while also drastically simplifying the SAT solving program that is run in parallel.
Cite as

Dominik Schreiber, Niccolò Rigi-Luperti, and Armin Biere. Streamlining Distributed SAT Solver Design. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 27:1-27:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{schreiber_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.27,
  author =	{Schreiber, Dominik and Rigi-Luperti, Niccol\`{o} and Biere, Armin},
  title =	{{Streamlining Distributed SAT Solver Design}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237615},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Satisfiability, parallel SAT solving, distributed computing, preprocessing}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3
Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes

Authors: Zachary Battleman, Joseph E. Reeves, and Marijn J. H. Heule

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Satisfiability solvers have been instrumental in tackling hard problems, including mathematical challenges that require years of computation. A key obstacle in efficiently solving such problems lies in effectively partitioning them into many, frequently millions of subproblems. Existing automated partitioning techniques, primarily based on lookahead methods, perform well on some instances but fail to generate effective partitions for many others. This paper introduces a powerful partitioning approach that leverages prefixes of proofs derived from conflict-driven clause-learning solvers. This method enables non-experts to harness the power of massively parallel SAT solving for their problems. We also propose a semantically-driven partitioning technique tailored for problems with large cardinality constraints, which frequently arise in optimization tasks. We evaluate our methods on diverse benchmarks, including combinatorial problems and formulas from SAT and MaxSAT competitions. Our results demonstrate that these techniques outperform existing partitioning strategies in many cases, offering improved scalability and efficiency.
Cite as

Zachary Battleman, Joseph E. Reeves, and Marijn J. H. Heule. Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 3:1-3:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{battleman_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3,
  author =	{Battleman, Zachary and Reeves, Joseph E. and Heule, Marijn J. H.},
  title =	{{Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237378},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Satisfiability solving, parallel computing, problem partitioning}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.7
Redundancy Rules for MaxSAT

Authors: Ilario Bonacina, Maria Luisa Bonet, Sam Buss, and Massimo Lauria

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
The concept of redundancy in SAT leads to more expressive and powerful proof search techniques, e.g., able to express various inprocessing techniques, and originates interesting hierarchies of proof systems [Heule et.al'20, Buss-Thapen'19]. Redundancy has also been integrated in MaxSAT [Ihalainen et.al'22, Berg et.al'23, Bonacina et.al'24]. In this paper, we define a structured hierarchy of redundancy proof systems for MaxSAT, with the goal of studying its proof complexity. We obtain MaxSAT variants of proof systems such as SPR, PR, SR, and others, previously defined for SAT. All our rules are polynomially checkable, unlike [Ihalainen et.al'22]. Moreover, they are simpler and weaker than [Berg et.al'23], and possibly amenable to lower bounds. This work also complements the approach of [Bonacina et.al'24]. Their proof systems use different rule sets for soft and hard clauses, while here we propose a system using only hard clauses and blocking variables. This is easier to integrate with current solvers and proof checkers. We discuss the strength of the systems introduced, we show some limitations of them, and we give a short cost-SR proof that any assignment for the weak pigeonhole principle PHP^m_n falsifies at least m-n clauses.
Cite as

Ilario Bonacina, Maria Luisa Bonet, Sam Buss, and Massimo Lauria. Redundancy Rules for MaxSAT. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 7:1-7:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bonacina_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.7,
  author =	{Bonacina, Ilario and Bonet, Maria Luisa and Buss, Sam and Lauria, Massimo},
  title =	{{Redundancy Rules for MaxSAT}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237411},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: MaxSAT, Redundancy Rules, Pigeonhole Principle}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23
Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization

Authors: Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell, and Rui Zhao

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
In the the last two decades, a lot of effort has been devoted to the development of satisfiability-checking tools for a variety of SAT-related problems. However, most of these tools lack optimization capabilities. That is, instead of finding any solution, one is sometimes interested in a solution that is best according to some criterion. Pseudo-Boolean solvers can be used to deal with optimization by successively solving a series of problems that contain an additional pseudo-Boolean constraint expressing that a better solution is required. A key point for the success of this simple approach is that lemmas that are learned for one problem can be reused for subsequent ones. In this paper we go one step further and show how, by using a simple symbolic conflict analysis procedure, not only can lemmas be reused between problems but also strengthened, thus further pruning the search space traversal. In addition, we show how this technique automatically allows one to infer upper bounds in maximization problems, thus giving an estimation of how far the solver is from finding an optimal solution. Experimental results with our PB solver reveal that (i) this technique is indeed effective in practice, providing important speedups in problems where several solutions are found and (ii) on problems with very few solutions, where the impact of our technique is limited, its overhead is negligible.
Cite as

Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell, and Rui Zhao. Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 23:1-23:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nieuwenhuis_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23,
  author =	{Nieuwenhuis, Robert and Oliveras, Albert and Rodr{\'\i}guez-Carbonell, Enric and Zhao, Rui},
  title =	{{Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237579},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: SAT, Pseudo-Boolean Optimization, Conflict Analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.48
Proving Unsatisfiability with Hitting Formulas

Authors: Yuval Filmus, Edward A. Hirsch, Artur Riazanov, Alexander Smal, and Marc Vinyals

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 287, 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024)

Abstract
A hitting formula is a set of Boolean clauses such that any two of the clauses cannot be simultaneously falsified. Hitting formulas have been studied in many different contexts at least since [Iwama, 1989] and, based on experimental evidence, Peitl and Szeider [Tomás Peitl and Stefan Szeider, 2022] conjectured that unsatisfiable hitting formulas are among the hardest for resolution. Using the fact that hitting formulas are easy to check for satisfiability we make them the foundation of a new static proof system {{rmHitting}}: a refutation of a CNF in {{rmHitting}} is an unsatisfiable hitting formula such that each of its clauses is a weakening of a clause of the refuted CNF. Comparing this system to resolution and other proof systems is equivalent to studying the hardness of hitting formulas. Our first result is that {{rmHitting}} is quasi-polynomially simulated by tree-like resolution, which means that hitting formulas cannot be exponentially hard for resolution and partially refutes the conjecture of Peitl and Szeider. We show that tree-like resolution and {{rmHitting}} are quasi-polynomially separated, while for resolution, this question remains open. For a system that is only quasi-polynomially stronger than tree-like resolution, {{rmHitting}} is surprisingly difficult to polynomially simulate in another proof system. Using the ideas of Raz-Shpilka’s polynomial identity testing for noncommutative circuits [Raz and Shpilka, 2005] we show that {{rmHitting}} is p-simulated by {{rmExtended {{rmFrege}}}}, but we conjecture that much more efficient simulations exist. As a byproduct, we show that a number of static (semi)algebraic systems are verifiable in deterministic polynomial time. We consider multiple extensions of {{rmHitting}}, and in particular a proof system {{{rmHitting}}(⊕)} related to the {{{rmRes}}(⊕)} proof system for which no superpolynomial-size lower bounds are known. {{{rmHitting}}(⊕)} p-simulates the tree-like version of {{{rmRes}}(⊕)} and is at least quasi-polynomially stronger. We show that formulas expressing the non-existence of perfect matchings in the graphs K_{n,n+2} are exponentially hard for {{{rmHitting}}(⊕)} via a reduction to the partition bound for communication complexity. See the full version of the paper for the proofs. They are omitted in this Extended Abstract.
Cite as

Yuval Filmus, Edward A. Hirsch, Artur Riazanov, Alexander Smal, and Marc Vinyals. Proving Unsatisfiability with Hitting Formulas. In 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 287, pp. 48:1-48:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{filmus_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.48,
  author =	{Filmus, Yuval and Hirsch, Edward A. and Riazanov, Artur and Smal, Alexander and Vinyals, Marc},
  title =	{{Proving Unsatisfiability with Hitting Formulas}},
  booktitle =	{15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024)},
  pages =	{48:1--48:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-309-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{287},
  editor =	{Guruswami, Venkatesan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.48},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-195762},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.48},
  annote =	{Keywords: hitting formulas, polynomial identity testing, query complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2022.2
A Comprehensive Study of k-Portfolios of Recent SAT Solvers

Authors: Jakob Bach, Ashlin Iser, and Klemens Böhm

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 236, 25th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2022)

Abstract
Hard combinatorial problems such as propositional satisfiability are ubiquitous. The holy grail are solution methods that show good performance on all problem instances. However, new approaches emerge regularly, some of which are complementary to existing solvers in that they only run faster on some instances but not on many others. While portfolios, i.e., sets of solvers, have been touted as useful, putting together such portfolios also needs to be efficient. In particular, it remains an open question how well portfolios can exploit the complementarity of solvers. This paper features a comprehensive analysis of portfolios of recent SAT solvers, the ones from the SAT Competitions 2020 and 2021. We determine optimal portfolios with exact and approximate approaches and study the impact of portfolio size k on performance. We also investigate how effective off-the-shelf prediction models are for instance-specific solver recommendations. One result is that the portfolios found with an approximate approach are as good as the optimal solution in practice. We also observe that marginal returns decrease very quickly with larger k, and our prediction models do not give way to better performance beyond very small portfolio sizes.
Cite as

Jakob Bach, Ashlin Iser, and Klemens Böhm. A Comprehensive Study of k-Portfolios of Recent SAT Solvers. In 25th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 236, pp. 2:1-2:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bach_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2022.2,
  author =	{Bach, Jakob and Iser, Ashlin and B\"{o}hm, Klemens},
  title =	{{A Comprehensive Study of k-Portfolios of Recent SAT Solvers}},
  booktitle =	{25th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2022)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-242-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{236},
  editor =	{Meel, Kuldeep S. and Strichman, Ofer},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2022.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-166767},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2022.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Propositional satisfiability, solver portfolios, runtime prediction, machine learning, integer programming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagRep.2.11.87
SAT Interactions (Dagstuhl Seminar 12471)

Authors: Nadia Creignou, Nicola Galesi, Oliver Kullmann, and Heribert Vollmer

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 2, Issue 11 (2013)

Abstract
This report documents the programme and outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 12471 "SAT Interactions". The seminar brought together researchers from different areas from theoretical computer science as well as the area of SAT solvers. A key objective of the seminar has been to initiate or consolidate discussions among the different groups for a fresh attack on one of the most important problems in theoretical computer science and mathematics.
Cite as

Nadia Creignou, Nicola Galesi, Oliver Kullmann, and Heribert Vollmer. SAT Interactions (Dagstuhl Seminar 12471). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 2, Issue 11, pp. 87-101, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{creignou_et_al:DagRep.2.11.87,
  author =	{Creignou, Nadia and Galesi, Nicola and Kullmann, Oliver and Vollmer, Heribert},
  title =	{{SAT Interactions (Dagstuhl Seminar 12471)}},
  pages =	{87--101},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2013},
  volume =	{2},
  number =	{11},
  editor =	{Creignou, Nadia and Galesi, Nicola and Kullmann, Oliver and Vollmer, Heribert},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.2.11.87},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-39786},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.2.11.87},
  annote =	{Keywords: satisfiability problem, computational complexity, P-NP question, proof complexity, combinatorics, SAT-solvers, quantified Boolean formulas}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.06401.4
Constraint satisfaction problems in clausal form: Autarkies, minimal unsatisfiability, and applications to hypergraph inequalities

Authors: Oliver Kullmann

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6401, Complexity of Constraints (2006)

Abstract
Generalised CNFs are considered using such literals, which exclude exactly one possible value from the domain of the variable. First we consider poly-time SAT decision (and fixed-parameter tractability) exploiting matching theory. Then we consider irredundant generalised CNFs, and characterise some extremal minimally unsatisfiable CNFs.
Cite as

Oliver Kullmann. Constraint satisfaction problems in clausal form: Autarkies, minimal unsatisfiability, and applications to hypergraph inequalities. In Complexity of Constraints. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6401, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2006)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kullmann:DagSemProc.06401.4,
  author =	{Kullmann, Oliver},
  title =	{{Constraint satisfaction problems in clausal form: Autarkies, minimal unsatisfiability, and applications to hypergraph inequalities}},
  booktitle =	{Complexity of Constraints},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2006},
  volume =	{6401},
  editor =	{Nadia Creignou and Phokion Kolaitis and Heribert Vollmer},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.06401.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-8030},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.06401.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Signed CNF, autarkies, minimal unsatisfiable, hypergraph colouring, block designs}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 12 Document/PDF
  • 8 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 8 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2013
  • 1 2006

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Kullmann, Oliver
  • 1 Bach, Jakob
  • 1 Battleman, Zachary
  • 1 Biere, Armin
  • 1 Bonacina, Ilario
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 10 LIPIcs
  • 1 DagRep
  • 1 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 4 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 2 Theory of computation → Automated reasoning
  • 2 Theory of computation → Constraint and logic programming
  • 2 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
  • 2 Theory of computation → Proof complexity
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 SAT
  • 2 Satisfiability
  • 1 Biclique covers
  • 1 Combinatorics
  • 1 Conflict Analysis
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact