31 Search Results for "Nieuwenhuis, Robert"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14
Canonical for Automated Theorem Proving in Lean

Authors: Chase Norman and Jeremy Avigad

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Canonical is a solver for type inhabitation in dependent type theory, that is, the problem of producing a term of a given type. We present a Lean tactic which invokes Canonical to generate proof terms and synthesize programs. The tactic supports higher-order and dependently-typed goals, structural recursion over indexed inductive types, and definitional equality. Canonical finds proofs for 84% of Natural Number Game problems in 51 seconds total.
Cite as

Chase Norman and Jeremy Avigad. Canonical for Automated Theorem Proving in Lean. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 14:1-14:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{norman_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14,
  author =	{Norman, Chase and Avigad, Jeremy},
  title =	{{Canonical for Automated Theorem Proving in Lean}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246128},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: Automated Reasoning, Interactive Theorem Proving, Dependent Type Theory, Inhabitation, Unification, Program Synthesis, Formal Methods}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.22
Formalizing Splitting in Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Ghilain Bergeron, Florent Krasnopol, and Sophie Tourret

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
We describe the formalization in Isabelle/HOL of a framework for splitting, a theorem proving technique that extends saturation-based calculi with branching abilities. The framework preserves the completeness of the original calculus. We focus here on the simplest splitting model and provide an extension of the ordered resolution calculus with a variant of splitting called Lightweight AVATAR.
Cite as

Ghilain Bergeron, Florent Krasnopol, and Sophie Tourret. Formalizing Splitting in Isabelle/HOL. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 22:1-22:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bergeron_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.22,
  author =	{Bergeron, Ghilain and Krasnopol, Florent and Tourret, Sophie},
  title =	{{Formalizing Splitting in Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246208},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Isabelle/HOL, saturation-based calculi, splitting}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.4
Conflict Analysis Based on Cutting-Planes for Constraint Programming

Authors: Robbin Baauw, Maarten Flippo, and Emir Demirović

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
This paper introduces a novel constraint learning mechanism for Constraint Programming (CP) solvers that integrates cutting planes reasoning into the conflict analysis procedure. Drawing inspiration from Lazy Clause Generation (LCG), our approach, named Lazy Linear Generation (LLG), can generate linear integer inequalities to prune the search space, rather than propositional clauses as in LCG. This combines the strengths of constraint programming (strong propagation through global constraints) with cutting-planes reasoning. We present linear constraint explanations for various arithmetic constraints and the element constraint. An experimental evaluation shows that the improved generality of linear constraints has a practical impact on a CP solver by reducing the number of encountered conflicts in 45% of our benchmark instances. Our analysis and prototype implementation show promising results and are an important step towards a new paradigm to make constraint programming solvers more effective.
Cite as

Robbin Baauw, Maarten Flippo, and Emir Demirović. Conflict Analysis Based on Cutting-Planes for Constraint Programming. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 4:1-4:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{baauw_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.4,
  author =	{Baauw, Robbin and Flippo, Maarten and Demirovi\'{c}, Emir},
  title =	{{Conflict Analysis Based on Cutting-Planes for Constraint Programming}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238655},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: constraint programming, learning, conflict analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.19
Analyzing Self-Stabilization of Synchronous Unison via Propositional Satisfiability

Authors: Asma Khoualdia, Sami Cherif, Stéphane Devismes, and Léo Robert

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Synchronous unison is a classical clock synchronization problem in distributed computing, and especially in self-stabilization. This paper explores the self-stabilization of a synchronous unison algorithm proposed by Arora et al. using a propositional satisfiability-based approach. We give a logical formulation of the algorithm. This formulation includes the uniqueness of clock values at each node, the updates of clocks based on the minimum clock value in the neighborhood, and the detection of convergence or divergence. To optimize the models, additional constraints are introduced to reduce redundant cases of initial configurations to be analyzed. Our approach not only verifies the algorithm’s behaviour but also offers insights into enhancing its robustness and applicability to broader distributed systems.
Cite as

Asma Khoualdia, Sami Cherif, Stéphane Devismes, and Léo Robert. Analyzing Self-Stabilization of Synchronous Unison via Propositional Satisfiability. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 19:1-19:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{khoualdia_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.19,
  author =	{Khoualdia, Asma and Cherif, Sami and Devismes, St\'{e}phane and Robert, L\'{e}o},
  title =	{{Analyzing Self-Stabilization of Synchronous Unison via Propositional Satisfiability}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238806},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Self-stabilization, Synchronous Unison, Satisfiability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.21
Practically Feasible Proof Logging for Pseudo-Boolean Optimization

Authors: Wietze Koops, Daniel Le Berre, Magnus O. Myreen, Jakob Nordström, Andy Oertel, Yong Kiam Tan, and Marc Vinyals

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Certifying solvers have long been standard for decision problems in Boolean satisfiability (SAT), allowing for proof logging and checking with very limited overhead, but developing similar tools for combinatorial optimization has remained a challenge. A recent promising approach covering a wide range of solving paradigms is pseudo-Boolean proof logging, but this has mostly consisted of proof-of-concept works far from delivering the performance required for real-world deployment. In this work, we present an efficient toolchain based on VeriPB and CakePB for formally verified pseudo-Boolean optimization. We implement proof logging for the full range of techniques in the state-of-the-art solvers RoundingSat and Sat4j, including core-guided search and linear programming integration with Farkas certificates and cut generation. Our experimental evaluation shows that proof logging and checking performance in this much more expressive paradigm is now quite close to the level of SAT solving, and hence is clearly practically feasible.
Cite as

Wietze Koops, Daniel Le Berre, Magnus O. Myreen, Jakob Nordström, Andy Oertel, Yong Kiam Tan, and Marc Vinyals. Practically Feasible Proof Logging for Pseudo-Boolean Optimization. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 21:1-21:27, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{koops_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.21,
  author =	{Koops, Wietze and Le Berre, Daniel and Myreen, Magnus O. and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob and Oertel, Andy and Tan, Yong Kiam and Vinyals, Marc},
  title =	{{Practically Feasible Proof Logging for Pseudo-Boolean Optimization}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:27},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238825},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: proof logging, certifying algorithms, combinatorial optimization, certification, pseudo-Boolean solving, 0-1 integer linear programming}
}
Document
Short Paper
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.42
Towards Modern and Modular SAT for LCG (Short Paper)

Authors: Jip J. Dekker, Alexey Ignatiev, Peter J. Stuckey, and Allen Z. Zhong

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Lazy Clause Generation (LCG) is an architecture for building Constraint Programming (CP) solvers using an underlying Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) engine. The CP propagation engine lazily creates clauses that define the integer variables and impose problem restrictions. The SAT engine uses the clausal model to reason and search, including, crucially, the generation of nogoods. However, while SAT solving has made significant advances recently, the underlying SAT technology in most LCG solvers has largely remained the same. Using a new interface to SAT engines, IPASIR-UP, we can construct an LCG solver which can swap out the underlying SAT engine with any that supports the interface. This new approach means we need to revisit many of the design and engineering decisions for LCG solvers, to take maximum advantage of a better underlying SAT engine while adhering to the restrictions of the interface. In this paper, we explore the possibilities and challenges of using IPASIR-UP for LCG, showing that it can be used to create a highly competitive solver.
Cite as

Jip J. Dekker, Alexey Ignatiev, Peter J. Stuckey, and Allen Z. Zhong. Towards Modern and Modular SAT for LCG (Short Paper). In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 42:1-42:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dekker_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.42,
  author =	{Dekker, Jip J. and Ignatiev, Alexey and Stuckey, Peter J. and Zhong, Allen Z.},
  title =	{{Towards Modern and Modular SAT for LCG}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{42:1--42:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.42},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239038},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.42},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lazy Clause Generation, Boolean Satisfiability, IPASIR-UP}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.39
The 3-Decomposition Conjecture: A SAT-Based Approach with Specialized Propagators

Authors: Tianwei Zhang and Stefan Szeider

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
We investigate the 3-decomposition conjecture, which states that every connected cubic graph can be decomposed into a spanning tree, a collection of cycles, and a matching. Using a SAT-based approach enhanced with specialized propagators, we verify the conjecture for all relevant graphs up to 28 vertices. Our method extends the Satisfiability Modulo Symmetries (SMS) framework with specialized propagators that exploit theoretical properties of minimal counterexamples (counterexamples with the minimal number of vertices), enabling efficient pruning. We demonstrate that graphs containing certain substructures cannot be minimal counterexamples to the conjecture, allowing us to exclude these patterns during the search dynamically. Our experimental results quantify the impact of different propagator configurations and forbidden subgraph constraints on solving efficiency, showing significant performance improvements when leveraging these techniques. The approach scales effectively to graphs of 28 vertices. Our work illustrates how combining SAT solving with specialized constraint propagation techniques can successfully address challenging combinatorial problems in contemporary graph theory.
Cite as

Tianwei Zhang and Stefan Szeider. The 3-Decomposition Conjecture: A SAT-Based Approach with Specialized Propagators. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 39:1-39:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zhang_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.39,
  author =	{Zhang, Tianwei and Szeider, Stefan},
  title =	{{The 3-Decomposition Conjecture: A SAT-Based Approach with Specialized Propagators}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-239005},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: SAT, Symmetry Breaking, Subgraphs, Propagators, Combinatorics}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3
Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes

Authors: Zachary Battleman, Joseph E. Reeves, and Marijn J. H. Heule

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Satisfiability solvers have been instrumental in tackling hard problems, including mathematical challenges that require years of computation. A key obstacle in efficiently solving such problems lies in effectively partitioning them into many, frequently millions of subproblems. Existing automated partitioning techniques, primarily based on lookahead methods, perform well on some instances but fail to generate effective partitions for many others. This paper introduces a powerful partitioning approach that leverages prefixes of proofs derived from conflict-driven clause-learning solvers. This method enables non-experts to harness the power of massively parallel SAT solving for their problems. We also propose a semantically-driven partitioning technique tailored for problems with large cardinality constraints, which frequently arise in optimization tasks. We evaluate our methods on diverse benchmarks, including combinatorial problems and formulas from SAT and MaxSAT competitions. Our results demonstrate that these techniques outperform existing partitioning strategies in many cases, offering improved scalability and efficiency.
Cite as

Zachary Battleman, Joseph E. Reeves, and Marijn J. H. Heule. Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 3:1-3:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{battleman_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3,
  author =	{Battleman, Zachary and Reeves, Joseph E. and Heule, Marijn J. H.},
  title =	{{Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237378},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Satisfiability solving, parallel computing, problem partitioning}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23
Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization

Authors: Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell, and Rui Zhao

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
In the the last two decades, a lot of effort has been devoted to the development of satisfiability-checking tools for a variety of SAT-related problems. However, most of these tools lack optimization capabilities. That is, instead of finding any solution, one is sometimes interested in a solution that is best according to some criterion. Pseudo-Boolean solvers can be used to deal with optimization by successively solving a series of problems that contain an additional pseudo-Boolean constraint expressing that a better solution is required. A key point for the success of this simple approach is that lemmas that are learned for one problem can be reused for subsequent ones. In this paper we go one step further and show how, by using a simple symbolic conflict analysis procedure, not only can lemmas be reused between problems but also strengthened, thus further pruning the search space traversal. In addition, we show how this technique automatically allows one to infer upper bounds in maximization problems, thus giving an estimation of how far the solver is from finding an optimal solution. Experimental results with our PB solver reveal that (i) this technique is indeed effective in practice, providing important speedups in problems where several solutions are found and (ii) on problems with very few solutions, where the impact of our technique is limited, its overhead is negligible.
Cite as

Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell, and Rui Zhao. Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 23:1-23:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nieuwenhuis_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23,
  author =	{Nieuwenhuis, Robert and Oliveras, Albert and Rodr{\'\i}guez-Carbonell, Enric and Zhao, Rui},
  title =	{{Symbolic Conflict Analysis in Pseudo-Boolean Optimization}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237579},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: SAT, Pseudo-Boolean Optimization, Conflict Analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18
Knowledge Problems vs Unification and Matching: Dichotomy Results

Authors: Serdar Erbatur, Andrew M. Marshall, Paliath Narendran, and Christophe Ringeissen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
The research area of cryptographic protocol analysis contains a number of innovative algorithms and procedures for checking various security properties of protocols. Most of these procedures focus on solving one of several "knowledge problems" that model intruder knowledge. Solving these problems can demonstrate the ability of the intruder to obtain some forbidden information of the protocol, such as secret keys. Two important examples of these problems are the deduction problem and the static equivalence problem. Deduction is concerned with the ability to derive a term from a set of terms (or knowledge) obtained from the observation of a protocol instance. Static equivalence, on the other hand, is concerned with distinguishing between two runs of a protocol based on two sets of knowledge. These two knowledge problems at first inspection appear to be very close to the older automated reasoning problems of matching and unification. However, this first impression is wrong, and there have been a few results that have shown theories where one problem, such as unification, is undecidable but another problem, such as deduction, is decidable. These existing dichotomy results were, however, incomplete, and not all cases had been examined, thus leaving the possibility of some connection between the problems for those unexamined cases. In this paper, we consider the missing dichotomy cases. For each of the remaining cases, we demonstrate a theory that separates the two problems. In addition, once the dichotomy results are completed, it leaves open the question of the existence of non-trivial classes of theories for which all four of the problems are decidable. One example for which this is true is the well-known class of subterm convergent term rewrite systems. In this paper, we develop another example, a class of restrictive permutative theories for which all problems are likewise decidable.
Cite as

Serdar Erbatur, Andrew M. Marshall, Paliath Narendran, and Christophe Ringeissen. Knowledge Problems vs Unification and Matching: Dichotomy Results. In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 18:1-18:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{erbatur_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18,
  author =	{Erbatur, Serdar and Marshall, Andrew M. and Narendran, Paliath and Ringeissen, Christophe},
  title =	{{Knowledge Problems vs Unification and Matching: Dichotomy Results}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236331},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge Problems, Unification, Matching, Decidability}
}
Document
Track B: Automata, Logic, Semantics, and Theory of Programming
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.145
Reducing Stochastic Games to Semidefinite Programming

Authors: Manuel Bodirsky, Georg Loho, and Mateusz Skomra

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
We present a polynomial-time reduction from max-average constraints to the feasibility problem for semidefinite programs. This shows that Condon’s simple stochastic games, stochastic mean payoff games, and in particular mean payoff games and parity games can all be reduced to semidefinite programming.
Cite as

Manuel Bodirsky, Georg Loho, and Mateusz Skomra. Reducing Stochastic Games to Semidefinite Programming. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 145:1-145:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bodirsky_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.145,
  author =	{Bodirsky, Manuel and Loho, Georg and Skomra, Mateusz},
  title =	{{Reducing Stochastic Games to Semidefinite Programming}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{145:1--145:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.145},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-235224},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.145},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mean-payoff games, stochastic games, semidefinite programming, max-average constraints, max-atom problem}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.22
Speeding up Pseudo-Boolean Propagation

Authors: Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell, and Rui Zhao

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 305, 27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024)

Abstract
Unit propagation is known to be one of the most time-consuming procedures inside CDCL-based SAT solvers. Not surprisingly, it has been studied in depth and the two-watched-literal scheme, enhanced with implementation details boosting its performance, has emerged as the dominant method. In pseudo-Boolean solvers, the importance of unit propagation is similar, but no dominant method exists: counter propagation and watched-based extensions are efficient for different types of constraints, which has opened the door to hybrid methods. However, probably due to the higher complexity of implementing pseudo-Boolean solvers, research efforts have not focused much on concrete implementation details for unit propagation but rather on higher-level aspects of other procedures, such as conflict analysis. In this paper, we present (i) a novel methodology to precisely assess the performance of propagation mechanisms, (ii) an evaluation of implementation variants of the propagation methods present in {RoundingSat} and (iii) a detailed analysis showing that hybrid methods outperform the ones based on a single technique. Our final contribution is to show that a carefully implemented hybrid propagation method is considerably faster than the preferred propagation mechanism in {RoundingSat}, and that this improvement leads to a better overall performance of the solver.
Cite as

Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras, Enric Rodríguez-Carbonell, and Rui Zhao. Speeding up Pseudo-Boolean Propagation. In 27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 305, pp. 22:1-22:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nieuwenhuis_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2024.22,
  author =	{Nieuwenhuis, Robert and Oliveras, Albert and Rodr{\'\i}guez-Carbonell, Enric and Zhao, Rui},
  title =	{{Speeding up Pseudo-Boolean Propagation}},
  booktitle =	{27th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2024)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-334-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{305},
  editor =	{Chakraborty, Supratik and Jiang, Jie-Hong Roland},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-205449},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2024.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: SAT, Pseudo-Boolean Solving, Implementation-level Details}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.11
Derivation of Constraints from Machine Learning Models and Applications to Security and Privacy

Authors: Moreno Falaschi, Catuscia Palamidessi, and Marco Romanelli

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 86, Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages (2020)

Abstract
This paper shows how we can combine the power of machine learning with the flexibility of constraints. More specifically, we show how machine learning models can be represented by first-order logic theories, and how to derive these theories. The advantage of this representation is that it can be augmented with additional formulae, representing constraints of some kind on the data domain. For instance, new knowledge, or potential attackers, or fairness desiderata. We consider various kinds of learning algorithms (neural networks, k-nearest-neighbours, decision trees, support vector machines) and for each of them we show how to infer the FOL formulae. Then we focus on one particular application domain, namely the field of security and privacy. The idea is to represent the potentialities and goals of the attacker as a set of constraints, then use a constraint solver (more precisely, a solver modulo theories) to verify the satisfiability. If a solution exists, then it means that an attack is possible, otherwise, the system is safe. We show various examples from different areas of security and privacy; specifically, we consider a side-channel attack on a password checker, a malware attack on smart health systems, and a model-inversion attack on a neural network.
Cite as

Moreno Falaschi, Catuscia Palamidessi, and Marco Romanelli. Derivation of Constraints from Machine Learning Models and Applications to Security and Privacy. In Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages. Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 86, pp. 11:1-11:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{falaschi_et_al:OASIcs.Gabbrielli.11,
  author =	{Falaschi, Moreno and Palamidessi, Catuscia and Romanelli, Marco},
  title =	{{Derivation of Constraints from Machine Learning Models and Applications to Security and Privacy}},
  booktitle =	{Recent Developments in the Design and Implementation of Programming Languages},
  pages =	{11:1--11:20},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-171-9},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{86},
  editor =	{de Boer, Frank S. and Mauro, Jacopo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-132338},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.Gabbrielli.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Constraints, machine learning, privacy, security}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagRep.1.7.23
Decision Procedures in Soft, Hard and Bio-ware - Follow Up (Dagstuhl Seminar 11272)

Authors: Nikolaj Bjorner, Robert Nieuwenhuis, Helmut Veith, and Andrei Voronkov

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 1, Issue 7 (2011)

Abstract
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 11272 "Decision Procedures in Soft, Hard and Bio-ware (Follow Up)". It was held as a follow-on for a seminar 10161, of the same title, that took place in late April 2010 during the initial eruption of Eyjafjallajökull. In spite of the travel disruptions caused by the eruption of the volcano, the original seminar received a respectable turnout by European, mainly German and Italian participants. Unfortunately, the eruption hindered participation from overseas or even more distant parts of Europe. This caused the seminar to cover only part of the original objective. The follow-on seminar focused on the remaining objectives, in particular to bio-ware and constraint solving methods.
Cite as

Nikolaj Bjorner, Robert Nieuwenhuis, Helmut Veith, and Andrei Voronkov. Decision Procedures in Soft, Hard and Bio-ware - Follow Up (Dagstuhl Seminar 11272). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 1, Issue 7, pp. 23-35, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2011)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{bjorner_et_al:DagRep.1.7.23,
  author =	{Bjorner, Nikolaj and Nieuwenhuis, Robert and Veith, Helmut and Voronkov, Andrei},
  title =	{{Decision Procedures in Soft, Hard and Bio-ware - Follow Up (Dagstuhl Seminar 11272)}},
  pages =	{23--35},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2011},
  volume =	{1},
  number =	{7},
  editor =	{Bjorner, Nikolaj and Nieuwenhuis, Robert and Veith, Helmut and Voronkov, Andrei},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.1.7.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-32775},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.1.7.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hardware and Software Verification, Bio-analysis, Satisfiability Modulo Theories, Dynamic Symbolic Execution, Interpolants}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.10161.1
10161 Abstracts Collection – Decision Procedures in Software, Hardware and Bioware

Authors: Nikolaj Bjorner, Robert Nieuwenhuis, Helmut Veith, and Andrei Voronkov

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10161, Decision Procedures in Software, Hardware and Bioware (2010)

Abstract
From April 19th, 2010 to April 23rd, 2010, the Dagstuhl Seminar 10161 "Decision Procedures in Soft, Hard and Bio-ware" was held in Schloss Dagstuhl Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as links to slides and links to papers behind the presentations and papers produced as a result of the seminar are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available.
Cite as

Nikolaj Bjorner, Robert Nieuwenhuis, Helmut Veith, and Andrei Voronkov. 10161 Abstracts Collection – Decision Procedures in Software, Hardware and Bioware. In Decision Procedures in Software, Hardware and Bioware. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 10161, pp. 1-15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2010)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bjorner_et_al:DagSemProc.10161.1,
  author =	{Bjorner, Nikolaj and Nieuwenhuis, Robert and Veith, Helmut and Voronkov, Andrei},
  title =	{{10161 Abstracts Collection – Decision Procedures in Software, Hardware and Bioware}},
  booktitle =	{Decision Procedures in Software, Hardware and Bioware},
  pages =	{1--15},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2010},
  volume =	{10161},
  editor =	{Nikolaj Bjorner and Robert Nieuwenhuis and Helmut Veith and Andrei Voronkov},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.10161.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-27421},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.10161.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Decision Procedures, Satisfiability Modulo Theories, Software Verification, Dynamic Symbolic Execution, Interpolants, Hardware Verification, Bio-analysis}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 31 Document/PDF
  • 11 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 11 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2020
  • 1 2011
  • 4 2010
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 9 Nieuwenhuis, Robert
  • 6 Giesl, Jürgen
  • 5 Voronkov, Andrei
  • 4 Baader, Franz
  • 4 Schneider-Kamp, Peter
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 12 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs
  • 1 DagRep
  • 17 DagSemProc

  • Refine by Classification
  • 3 Theory of computation → Automated reasoning
  • 3 Theory of computation → Constraint and logic programming
  • 3 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Combinatorial optimization
  • 2 Theory of computation
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 4 SAT
  • 3 Decision Procedures
  • 3 Termination
  • 2 Bio-analysis
  • 2 Boolean Satisfiability
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact