49 Search Results for "Nöllenburg, Martin"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.42
Computing Twin-Width via Treedepth and Vertex Integrity

Authors: Robert Ganian and Mathis Rocton

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
Twin-width is a graph parameter that has become central to explaining the fixed-parameter tractability of first-order model checking across many graph classes. Despite its algorithmic importance, computing twin-width remains poorly understood: even recognizing graphs of twin-width at most four is NP-hard, and no fixed-parameter approximations parameterized by twin-width itself are known. A recent approach towards breaking this barrier focuses on first developing fixed-parameter algorithms for computing or approximating twin-width under parameterizations distinct from twin-width. Our first result establishes that approximating twin-width is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by treedepth, thereby breaking the long-standing barrier that all previous tractable parameterizations were based on deletion distance. The proof proceeds via oriented twin-width, yielding the first constructive evidence that this variant may be easier to handle algorithmically. As our second main result, we show that computing twin-width exactly is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to vertex integrity. This constitutes the first non-trivial parameterized algorithm for computing optimal contraction sequences.
Cite as

Robert Ganian and Mathis Rocton. Computing Twin-Width via Treedepth and Vertex Integrity. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 42:1-42:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ganian_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.42,
  author =	{Ganian, Robert and Rocton, Mathis},
  title =	{{Computing Twin-Width via Treedepth and Vertex Integrity}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{42:1--42:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.42},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255318},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.42},
  annote =	{Keywords: twin-width, fixed-parameter algorithms, treedepth, vertex integrity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.25
Structural Parameterizations of Simultaneous Planarity

Authors: Thomas Depian, Simon D. Fink, Alexander Firbas, Robert Ganian, Matthias Pfretzschner, and Ignaz Rutter

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 359, 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)

Abstract
Given a set of graphs on the same vertex set, the problem Simultaneous Embedding With Fixed Edges (SEFE) asks, whether there exist planar drawings of all input graphs, such that every pair of drawings coincides on their shared subgraph. It is known that SEFE is NP-complete [Elisabeth Gassner et al., 2006], even in the so-called sunflower case, where all pairs of input graphs have the same shared graph G_∩ [Marcus Schaefer, 2012]. Fink, Pfretzschner, and Rutter [Simon D. Fink et al., 2023] recently initiated the study of the parameterized complexity of SEFE in the sunflower case, mainly focusing on structural parameters of G_∩. In this work, we shift the focus towards parameters of the union graph G_∪ that contains the edges of all input graphs. On the positive side, we establish fixed-parameter tractability for the problem with respect to the feedback edge set number of G_∪. We complement this result by showing that it, surprisingly, remains NP-complete even if G_∪ has constant vertex cover number. These results settle two open questions posed by Fink et al. [Simon D. Fink et al., 2023].
Cite as

Thomas Depian, Simon D. Fink, Alexander Firbas, Robert Ganian, Matthias Pfretzschner, and Ignaz Rutter. Structural Parameterizations of Simultaneous Planarity. In 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 359, pp. 25:1-25:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{depian_et_al:LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.25,
  author =	{Depian, Thomas and Fink, Simon D. and Firbas, Alexander and Ganian, Robert and Pfretzschner, Matthias and Rutter, Ignaz},
  title =	{{Structural Parameterizations of Simultaneous Planarity}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-408-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{359},
  editor =	{Chen, Ho-Lin and Hon, Wing-Kai and Tsai, Meng-Tsung},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249332},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: SEFE, Simultaneous Planarity, Fixed-Parameter Tractability, NP-hardness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.27
Geometry Matters in Planar Storyplans

Authors: Alexander Dobler, Maximilian Holzmüller, and Martin Nöllenburg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
A storyplan visualizes a graph G = (V,E) as a sequence of 𝓁 frames Γ₁, … , Γ_𝓁, each of which is a drawing of the induced subgraph G[V_i] of a vertex subset V_i ⊆ V. Moreover, each vertex v ∈ V is contained in a single consecutive sequence of frames Γ_i, … , Γ_j, all vertices and edges contained in consecutive frames are drawn identically, and the union of all frames is a drawing of G. In GD 2022, the concept of planar storyplans was introduced, in which each frame must be a planar (topological) drawing. Several (parameterized) complexity results for recognizing graphs that admit a planar storyplan were provided, including NP-hardness. In this paper, we investigate an open question posed in the GD paper and show that the geometric and topological settings of the planar storyplan problem differ: We provide an instance of a graph that admits a planar storyplan, but no planar geometric storyplan, in which each frame is a planar straight-line drawing. Still, by adapting the reduction proof from the topological to the geometric setting, we show that recognizing the graphs that admit planar geometric storyplans remains NP-hard.
Cite as

Alexander Dobler, Maximilian Holzmüller, and Martin Nöllenburg. Geometry Matters in Planar Storyplans. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 27:1-27:9, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dobler_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.27,
  author =	{Dobler, Alexander and Holzm\"{u}ller, Maximilian and N\"{o}llenburg, Martin},
  title =	{{Geometry Matters in Planar Storyplans}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:9},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250135},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: geometric storyplan, planarity, straight-line drawing, dynamic graph drawing}
}
Document
Poster Abstract
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.53
Edge Bundling as a Multi-Objective Optimization Problem (Poster Abstract)

Authors: Raissa dos Santos Vieira, Hugo A. D. do Nascimento, Joelma de Moura Ferreira, Les Foulds, Karsten Klein, and Falk Schreiber

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
Edge bundling is a technique commonly used to reduce visual clutter and improve the comprehension of the drawings of large graphs. Here, we model edge bundling as a multi-objective optimization problem and employ clustering strategies, metaheuristic and Pareto analysis to identify non-dominated solutions for some classical graphs from the literature.
Cite as

Raissa dos Santos Vieira, Hugo A. D. do Nascimento, Joelma de Moura Ferreira, Les Foulds, Karsten Klein, and Falk Schreiber. Edge Bundling as a Multi-Objective Optimization Problem (Poster Abstract). In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 53:1-53:5, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vieira_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.53,
  author =	{Vieira, Raissa dos Santos and Nascimento, Hugo A. D. do and Ferreira, Joelma de Moura and Foulds, Les and Klein, Karsten and Schreiber, Falk},
  title =	{{Edge Bundling as a Multi-Objective Optimization Problem}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{53:1--53:5},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.53},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250397},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.53},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph Drawing, Edge Bundling, Visual Clutter, Multi-objective Optimization}
}
Artifact
Software
DOI: 10.4230/artifacts.25067
NarratiViz

Authors: Tim Hegemann

Abstract
Cite as

Tim Hegemann. NarratiViz (Software, Source Code). Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@misc{dagstuhl-artifact-25067,
   title = {{NarratiViz}}, 
   author = {Hegemann, Tim},
   note = {Software, BMFTR grant 01IS22012C, swhId: \href{https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:dir:a7efa9c0ca674b6cf25b1c4b2c1f4793cc814723;origin=https://github.com/hegetim/narrativiz;visit=swh:1:snp:b18239e66463dee63bc79cf243cc2afca36ef668;anchor=swh:1:rev:24dd910cfb575574c90d7aa0650ab69cfcd11b07}{\texttt{swh:1:dir:a7efa9c0ca674b6cf25b1c4b2c1f4793cc814723}} (visited on 2025-11-26)},
   url = {https://github.com/hegetim/narrativiz},
   doi = {10.4230/artifacts.25067},
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.17
Visualizing Treewidth

Authors: Alvin Chiu, Thomas Depian, David Eppstein, Michael T. Goodrich, and Martin Nöllenburg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
A witness drawing of a graph is a visualization that clearly shows a given property of a graph. We study and implement various drawing paradigms for witness drawings to clearly show that graphs have bounded pathwidth or treewidth. Our approach draws the tree decomposition or path decomposition as a tree of bags, with induced subgraphs shown in each bag, and with "tracks" for each graph vertex connecting its copies in multiple bags. Within bags, we optimize the vertex layout to avoid crossings of edges and tracks. We implement a visualization prototype for crossing minimization using dynamic programming for graphs of small width and heuristic approaches for graphs of larger width. We introduce a taxonomy of drawing styles, which render the subgraph for each bag as an arc diagram with one or two pages or as a circular layout with straight-line edges, and we render tracks either with straight lines or with orbital-radial paths.
Cite as

Alvin Chiu, Thomas Depian, David Eppstein, Michael T. Goodrich, and Martin Nöllenburg. Visualizing Treewidth. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 17:1-17:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chiu_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.17,
  author =	{Chiu, Alvin and Depian, Thomas and Eppstein, David and Goodrich, Michael T. and N\"{o}llenburg, Martin},
  title =	{{Visualizing Treewidth}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250034},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph drawing, witness drawings, pathwidth, treewidth}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.14
OOPS: Optimized One-Planarity Solver via SAT

Authors: Sergey Pupyrev

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
We present OOPS (Optimized One-Planarity Solver), a practical heuristic for recognizing 1-planar graphs and several important subclasses. A graph is 1-planar if it can be drawn in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once - a natural generalization of planar graphs that has received increasing attention in graph drawing and beyond-planar graph theory. Although testing planarity can be done in linear time, recognizing 1-planar graphs is NP-complete, making effective practical algorithms especially valuable. The core idea of our approach is to reduce the recognition of 1-planarity to a propositional satisfiability (SAT) instance, enabling the use of modern SAT solvers to efficiently explore the search space. Despite the inherent complexity of the problem, our method is substantially faster in practice than naïve or brute-force algorithms. In addition to demonstrating the empirical performance of our solver on synthetic and real-world instances, we show how OOPS can be used as a discovery tool in theoretical graph theory. Specifically, we employ OOPS to investigate two research problems concerning 1-planarity of specific graph families. Our implementation of the algorithm is publicly available to support further exploration in the field.
Cite as

Sergey Pupyrev. OOPS: Optimized One-Planarity Solver via SAT. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 14:1-14:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pupyrev:LIPIcs.GD.2025.14,
  author =	{Pupyrev, Sergey},
  title =	{{OOPS: Optimized One-Planarity Solver via SAT}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250004},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: beyond planarity, 1-planar graph, SAT, book embeddings, upward 1-planarity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.9
The Page Number of Monotone Directed Acyclic Outerplanar Graphs Is Four or Five

Authors: Jawaherul Md. Alam, Michael A. Bekos, Martin Gronemann, and Michael Kaufmann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
A k-page book embedding of a directed acyclic graph consists of a topological order of its vertices and a k-coloring of its edges, such that no two edges of the same color cross, that is, their endpoints do not alternate in the order. The minimum value of k for which such an embedding exists is referred to as the page number of the graph. In contrast to general directed acyclic planar graphs, which may have unbounded page number [SIAM J. Comput. 28(5), 1999], it was recently shown that directed acyclic outerplanar graphs have bounded page number. In particular, Jungeblut, Merker and Ueckerdt provided an upper bound of 24,776 on their page number [FOCS 2023: 1937-1952]. In this work, we focus on so-called monotone directed acyclic outerplanar graphs. Starting from a single edge, these graphs are constructed by iteratively connecting a new vertex to the endpoints of an existing edge on the outer face using either two incoming or two outgoing edges incident to it. These graphs have twist-number 4 [GD 2023: 135-151] (i.e., they admit a topological order in which no more than four edges pairwise cross), a property, which was leveraged by Jungeblut, Merker and Ueckerdt to show that their page number is at most 128. We lower this upper bound to 5 and we also provide a lower bound of 4. A notable consequence of our result is a significant improvement of the upper bound on the page number of general directed outerplanar graphs from 24,776 to 1,160.
Cite as

Jawaherul Md. Alam, Michael A. Bekos, Martin Gronemann, and Michael Kaufmann. The Page Number of Monotone Directed Acyclic Outerplanar Graphs Is Four or Five. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 9:1-9:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alam_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.9,
  author =	{Alam, Jawaherul Md. and Bekos, Michael A. and Gronemann, Martin and Kaufmann, Michael},
  title =	{{The Page Number of Monotone Directed Acyclic Outerplanar Graphs Is Four or Five}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249952},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Book embeddings, page number, directed outerplanar graphs}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.39
Optimizing Wiggle in Storylines

Authors: Alexander Dobler, Tim Hegemann, Martin Nöllenburg, and Alexander Wolff

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
A storyline visualization shows interactions between characters over time. Each character is represented by an x-monotone curve. Time is mapped to the x-axis, and groups of characters that interact at a particular point t in time must be ordered consecutively in the y-dimension at x = t. The predominant objective in storyline optimization so far has been the minimization of crossings between (blocks of) characters. Building on this work, we investigate another important, but less studied quality criterion, namely the minimization of wiggle, i.e., the amount of vertical movement of the characters over time. Given a storyline instance together with an ordering of the characters at any point in time, we show that wiggle count minimization is NP-complete. In contrast, we provide algorithms based on mathematical programming to solve linear wiggle height minimization and quadratic wiggle height minimization efficiently. Finally, we introduce a new method for routing character curves that focuses on keeping distances between neighboring curves constant as long as they run in parallel. We have implemented our algorithms, and we conduct a case study that explores the differences between the three optimization objectives. We use existing benchmark data, but we also present a new use case for storylines, namely the visualization of rolling stock schedules in railway operation.
Cite as

Alexander Dobler, Tim Hegemann, Martin Nöllenburg, and Alexander Wolff. Optimizing Wiggle in Storylines. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 39:1-39:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dobler_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.39,
  author =	{Dobler, Alexander and Hegemann, Tim and N\"{o}llenburg, Martin and Wolff, Alexander},
  title =	{{Optimizing Wiggle in Storylines}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{39:1--39:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.39},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250252},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.39},
  annote =	{Keywords: Storyline visualization, wiggle minimization, NP-complete, linear programming, quadratic programming, experimental analysis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.37
Show Me Your Best Side: Characteristics of User-Preferred Perspectives for 3D Graph Drawings

Authors: Lucas Joos, Gavin J. Mooney, Maximilian T. Fischer, Daniel A. Keim, Falk Schreiber, Helen C. Purchase, and Karsten Klein

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
The visual analysis of graphs in 3D has become increasingly popular, accelerated by the rise of immersive technology, such as augmented and virtual reality. Unlike 2D drawings, 3D graph layouts are highly viewpoint-dependent, making perspective selection critical for revealing structural and relational patterns. Despite its importance, there is limited empirical evidence guiding what constitutes an effective or preferred viewpoint from the user’s perspective. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation into user-preferred viewpoints in 3D graph visualisations. We conducted a controlled study with 23 participants in a virtual reality environment, where users selected their most and least preferred viewpoints for 36 different graphs varying in size and layout. From this data, enriched by qualitative feedback, we distil common strategies underlying viewpoint choice. We further analyse the alignment of user preferences with classical 2D aesthetic criteria (e.g., Crossings), 3D-specific measures (e.g., Node-Node Occlusion), and introduce a novel measure capturing the perceivability of a graph’s principal axes (Isometric Viewpoint Deviation). Our data-driven analysis indicates that Stress, Crossings, Gabriel Ratio, Edge-Node Overlap, and Isometric Viewpoint Deviation are key indicators of viewpoint preference. Beyond our findings, we contribute a publicly available dataset consisting of the graphs and computed aesthetic measures, supporting further research and the development of viewpoint evaluation measures for 3D graph drawing.
Cite as

Lucas Joos, Gavin J. Mooney, Maximilian T. Fischer, Daniel A. Keim, Falk Schreiber, Helen C. Purchase, and Karsten Klein. Show Me Your Best Side: Characteristics of User-Preferred Perspectives for 3D Graph Drawings. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 37:1-37:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{joos_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.37,
  author =	{Joos, Lucas and Mooney, Gavin J. and Fischer, Maximilian T. and Keim, Daniel A. and Schreiber, Falk and Purchase, Helen C. and Klein, Karsten},
  title =	{{Show Me Your Best Side: Characteristics of User-Preferred Perspectives for 3D Graph Drawings}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250236},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph Aesthetics, Immersive 3D, Node-Link Diagrams, Empirical Evaluation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.32
Planar Stories of Graph Drawings: Algorithms and Experiments

Authors: Carla Binucci, Sabine Cornelsen, Walter Didimo, Seok-Hee Hong, Eleni Katsanou, Maurizio Patrignani, Antonios Symvonis, and Samuel Wolf

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
We address the problem of computing a dynamic visualization of a geometric graph G as a sequence of frames. Each frame shows only a portion of the graph but their union covers G entirely. The two main requirements of our dynamic visualization are: (i) guaranteeing drawing stability, so to preserve the user’s mental map; (ii) keeping the visual complexity of each frame low. To satisfy the first requirement, we never change the position of the vertices. Regarding the second requirement, we avoid edge crossings in each frame. More precisely, in the first frame we visualize a suitable subset of non-crossing edges; in each subsequent frame, exactly one new edge enters the visualization and all the edges that cross with it are deleted. We call such a sequence of frames a planar story of G. Our goal is to find a planar story whose minimum number of edges contemporarily displayed is maximized (i.e., a planar story that maximizes the minimum frame size). Besides studying our model from a theoretical point of view, we also design and experimentally compare different algorithms, both exact techniques and heuristics. These algorithms provide an array of alternative trade-offs between efficiency and effectiveness, also depending on the structure of the input graph.
Cite as

Carla Binucci, Sabine Cornelsen, Walter Didimo, Seok-Hee Hong, Eleni Katsanou, Maurizio Patrignani, Antonios Symvonis, and Samuel Wolf. Planar Stories of Graph Drawings: Algorithms and Experiments. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 32:1-32:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{binucci_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.32,
  author =	{Binucci, Carla and Cornelsen, Sabine and Didimo, Walter and Hong, Seok-Hee and Katsanou, Eleni and Patrignani, Maurizio and Symvonis, Antonios and Wolf, Samuel},
  title =	{{Planar Stories of Graph Drawings: Algorithms and Experiments}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250182},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph Drawing, Dynamic Graphs, Graph Stories, Heuristics, ILP}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.35
A Walk on the Wild Side: A Shape-First Methodology for Orthogonal Drawings

Authors: Giordano Andreola, Susanna Caroppo, Giuseppe Di Battista, Fabrizio Grosso, Maurizio Patrignani, and Allegra Strippoli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
Several algorithms for the construction of orthogonal drawings of graphs, including those based on the Topology-Shape-Metrics (TSM) paradigm, tend to prioritize the minimization of crossings. This emphasis has two notable side effects: some edges are drawn with unnecessarily long sequences of segments and bends, and the overall drawing area may become excessively large. As a result, the produced drawings often lack geometric uniformity. Moreover, orthogonal crossings are known to have a limited impact on readability, suggesting that crossing minimization may not always be the optimal goal. In this paper, we introduce a methodology that "subverts" the traditional TSM pipeline by focusing on minimizing bends. Given a graph G, we ideally seek to construct a rectilinear drawing of G, that is, an orthogonal drawing with no bends. When not possible, we incrementally subdivide the edges of G by introducing dummy vertices that will (possibly) correspond to bends in the final drawing. This process continues until a rectilinear drawing of a subdivision of the graph is found, after which the final coordinates are computed. We tackle the (NP-complete) rectilinear drawability problem by encoding it as a SAT formula and solving it with state-of-the-art SAT solvers. If the SAT formula is unsatisfiable, we use the solver’s proof to determine which edge to subdivide. Our implementation, domus, which is fairly simple, is evaluated through extensive experiments on small- to medium-sized graphs. The results show that it consistently outperforms ogdf’s TSM-based approach across most standard graph drawing metrics.
Cite as

Giordano Andreola, Susanna Caroppo, Giuseppe Di Battista, Fabrizio Grosso, Maurizio Patrignani, and Allegra Strippoli. A Walk on the Wild Side: A Shape-First Methodology for Orthogonal Drawings. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 35:1-35:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{andreola_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.35,
  author =	{Andreola, Giordano and Caroppo, Susanna and Di Battista, Giuseppe and Grosso, Fabrizio and Patrignani, Maurizio and Strippoli, Allegra},
  title =	{{A Walk on the Wild Side: A Shape-First Methodology for Orthogonal Drawings}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{35:1--35:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.35},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250218},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.35},
  annote =	{Keywords: Non-planar Orthogonal Drawings, SAT Solver, Experimental Comparison}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.30
Universal Quality Metrics for Graph Drawings: Which Graphs Excite Us Most?

Authors: Gavin J. Mooney, Tim Hegemann, Alexander Wolff, Michael Wybrow, and Helen C. Purchase

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)

Abstract
Graphs are drawn for various purposes, and drawings are meant to display various features of a graph (such as planarity, Hamiltonicity). Still, there is a long history in measuring the quality of a graph drawing. Most of the metrics that have been implemented and used in large studies assume that graphs are drawn straight-line. Most of the studies use randomly generated graphs or one of very few existing benchmark sets that consist of graphs with a specific technical background (e.g., telecommunication networks). In this paper, we extend ten commonly used metrics to node-link diagrams where edges can be curves or polygonal chains. We implement these measures and use them to evaluate a new collection of graph drawings that we have extracted from 27 proceedings of the Graph Drawing conference using an automated pipeline. We compare the "metrics landscape" of our new benchmark set, the GD-collection-v1, which seems to mostly contain manually drawn graphs, to the metric landscape of a benchmark set with randomly generated graphs and computer-generated straight-line drawings that has been used in a recent study [Mooney et al.; PacificVis 2024]. Comparing the GD-collection-v1 with the Mooney at al. dataset reveals a distinct metrics landscape: GD drawings come from much smaller graphs (median vertex number 11 vs. 48) and therefore attain higher medians on most readability metrics. For example, Neighbourhood Preservation (0.5 vs. 0.239) is markedly higher in the GD-collection-v1. We also find that a large proportion of extracted drawings contain curved and/or polygonal edges (57%), motivating the extended metric definitions.
Cite as

Gavin J. Mooney, Tim Hegemann, Alexander Wolff, Michael Wybrow, and Helen C. Purchase. Universal Quality Metrics for Graph Drawings: Which Graphs Excite Us Most?. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 30:1-30:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mooney_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.30,
  author =	{Mooney, Gavin J. and Hegemann, Tim and Wolff, Alexander and Wybrow, Michael and Purchase, Helen C.},
  title =	{{Universal Quality Metrics for Graph Drawings: Which Graphs Excite Us Most?}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250162},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph drawing metrics, metric landscape, straight-line drawings, polyline drawings, curved drawings, automated extraction of graph drawings}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.21
A Unified FPT Framework for Crossing Number Problems

Authors: Éric Colin de Verdière and Petr Hliněný

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
The basic (and traditional) crossing number problem is to determine the minimum number of crossings in a topological drawing of an input graph in the plane. We develop a unified framework that smoothly captures many generalized crossing number problems, and that yields fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms for them not only in the plane but also on surfaces. Our framework takes the following form. We fix a surface S, an integer r, and a map κ from the set of topological drawings of graphs in S to ℤ_+ ∪ {∞}, satisfying some natural monotonicity conditions, but essentially describing the allowed drawings and how we want to count the crossings in them. Then deciding whether an input graph G has an allowed drawing D on S with κ(D) ≤ r can be done in time quadratic in the size of G (and exponential in other parameters). More generally, we may take as input an edge-colored graph, and distinguish crossings by the colors of the involved edges; and we may allow to perform a bounded number of edge removals and vertex splits to G before drawing it. The proof is a reduction to the embeddability of a graph on a two-dimensional simplicial complex. This framework implies, in a unified way, quadratic FPT algorithms for many topological crossing number variants established in the graph drawing community. Some of these variants already had previously published FPT algorithms, mostly relying on Courcelle’s metatheorem, but for many of those, we obtain an algorithm with a better runtime. Moreover, our framework extends, at no cost, to these crossing number variants in any fixed surface.
Cite as

Éric Colin de Verdière and Petr Hliněný. A Unified FPT Framework for Crossing Number Problems. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 21:1-21:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{colindeverdiere_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.21,
  author =	{Colin de Verdi\`{e}re, \'{E}ric and Hlin\v{e}n\'{y}, Petr},
  title =	{{A Unified FPT Framework for Crossing Number Problems}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244897},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: computational geometry, fixed-parameter tractability, graph drawing, graph embedding, crossing number, two-dimensional simplicial complex, surface}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.15
Linear Layouts Revisited: Stacks, Queues, and Exact Algorithms

Authors: Thomas Depian, Simon D. Fink, Robert Ganian, and Vaishali Surianarayanan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
In spite of the extensive study of stack and queue layouts, many fundamental questions remain open concerning the complexity-theoretic frontiers for computing stack and queue layouts. A stack (resp. queue) layout places vertices along a line and assigns edges to pages so that no two edges on the same page are crossing (resp. nested). We provide three new algorithms which together substantially expand our understanding of these problems: 1) A fixed-parameter algorithm for computing minimum-page stack and queue layouts w.r.t. the vertex integrity of an n-vertex graph G. This result is motivated by an open question in the literature and generalizes the previous algorithms parameterizing by the vertex cover number of G. The proof relies on a newly developed Ramsey pruning technique. Vertex integrity intuitively measures the vertex deletion distance to a subgraph with only small connected components. 2) An n^𝒪(q 𝓁) algorithm for computing 𝓁-page stack and queue layouts of page width at most q. This is the first algorithm avoiding a double-exponential dependency on the parameters. The page width of a layout measures the maximum number of edges one needs to cross on any page to reach the outer face. 3) A 2^𝒪(n) algorithm for computing 1-page queue layouts. This improves upon the previously fastest n^𝒪(n) algorithm and can be seen as a counterpart to the recent subexponential algorithm for computing 2-page stack layouts [ICALP'24], but relies on an entirely different technique.
Cite as

Thomas Depian, Simon D. Fink, Robert Ganian, and Vaishali Surianarayanan. Linear Layouts Revisited: Stacks, Queues, and Exact Algorithms. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 15:1-15:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{depian_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.15,
  author =	{Depian, Thomas and Fink, Simon D. and Ganian, Robert and Surianarayanan, Vaishali},
  title =	{{Linear Layouts Revisited: Stacks, Queues, and Exact Algorithms}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244835},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: stack layouts, queue layouts, parameterized algorithms, vertex integrity, Ramsey theory}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 48 Document/PDF
  • 25 Document/HTML
  • 1 Artifact

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 24 2025
  • 9 2024
  • 3 2023
  • 1 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 29 Nöllenburg, Martin
  • 11 Ganian, Robert
  • 6 Depian, Thomas
  • 5 Bhore, Sujoy
  • 5 Montecchiani, Fabrizio
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 42 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs
  • 5 DagRep

  • Refine by Classification
  • 18 Theory of computation → Computational geometry
  • 11 Human-centered computing → Graph drawings
  • 9 Mathematics of computing → Graph algorithms
  • 9 Mathematics of computing → Graph theory
  • 7 Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 6 graph drawing
  • 4 Graph Drawing
  • 4 NP-hardness
  • 4 computational geometry
  • 4 parameterized complexity
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact