17 Search Results for "Hadzilacos, Vassos"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4
A Hierarchy of Unrestricted Deterministic Objects with Consensus Number 1

Authors: Warren Zhu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
The consensus number of a shared object is the maximum number of processes that can solve consensus in a wait-free manner using copies of the object and registers. In 2016, to prove that an object is not fully characterized by its consensus number, Afek, Ellen and Gafni showed that for all integers n ≥ 2, there exists an infinite sequence of deterministic objects of consensus number n with strictly increasing computational power. In 2018, Daian, Losa, Afek, and Gafni constructed an infinite sequence of deterministic objects of consensus number 1 with strictly decreasing computational power, but the single operation that each of these objects supports is restricted in how it can be used during an execution. As restrictions can have an effect on an object’s consensus number, it was left as an open question whether the same result holds without this restriction. In this paper, we construct an infinite sequence of unrestricted deterministic objects with strictly decreasing computational power. All objects in this sequence have consensus number 1.
Cite as

Warren Zhu. A Hierarchy of Unrestricted Deterministic Objects with Consensus Number 1. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 4:1-4:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zhu:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4,
  author =	{Zhu, Warren},
  title =	{{A Hierarchy of Unrestricted Deterministic Objects with Consensus Number 1}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251778},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Shared Memory, Wait-free, Set Agreement, Consensus Hierarchy}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5
Tight Conditions for Binary-Output Tasks Under Crashes

Authors: Timothé Albouy, Antonio Fernández Anta, Chryssis Georgiou, Nicolas Nicolaou, and Junlang Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
This paper explores necessary and sufficient system conditions to solve distributed tasks with binary outputs (i.e., tasks with output values in {0,1}). We focus on the distinct output sets of values a task can produce (intentionally disregarding validity and value multiplicity), considering that some processes may output no value. In a distributed system with n processes, of which up to t ≤ n can crash, we provide a complete characterization of the tight conditions on n and t under which every class of tasks with binary outputs is solvable, for both synchronous and asynchronous systems. This output-set approach yields highly general results: it unifies multiple distributed computing problems, such as binary consensus and symmetry breaking, and it produces impossibility proofs that hold for stronger task formulations, including those that consider validity, account for value multiplicity, or move beyond binary outputs.
Cite as

Timothé Albouy, Antonio Fernández Anta, Chryssis Georgiou, Nicolas Nicolaou, and Junlang Wang. Tight Conditions for Binary-Output Tasks Under Crashes. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 5:1-5:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{albouy_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5,
  author =	{Albouy, Timoth\'{e} and Fern\'{a}ndez Anta, Antonio and Georgiou, Chryssis and Nicolaou, Nicolas and Wang, Junlang},
  title =	{{Tight Conditions for Binary-Output Tasks Under Crashes}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251786},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed solvability, Asynchrony, Synchrony, Impossibility proofs, Binary-output tasks, Crash tolerance, Disagreement}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.9
Contention-Aware Cooperation

Authors: Timothé Albouy, Davide Frey, Mathieu Gestin, Michel Raynal, and François Taïani

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
As shown by Reliable Broadcast and Consensus, cooperation among a set of independent computing entities (sequential processes) is crucial in fault-tolerant distributed computing. Considering n-process asynchronous message-passing systems where some processes may be Byzantine, this paper introduces a novel cooperation abstraction, Contention-Aware Cooperation (CAC). While Reliable Broadcast is a one-to-n cooperation abstraction and Consensus is an n-to-n cooperation abstraction, CAC is a d-to-n cooperation abstraction where d (1 ≤ d ≤ n) varies with each run and remains unknown to the processes. Correct processes accept the same set of 𝓁 pairs ⟨ v,i ⟩ (v is the value proposed by p_i) from the d proposer processes, where 1 ≤ 𝓁 ≤ d and (as d) 𝓁 remains unknown to the processes (except in specific cases). Those 𝓁 values are accepted one at a time, potentially in different orders at each process. In addition, CAC provides each process with an imperfect oracle that provides insights into the values that they may accept in the future. Interestingly, the CAC abstraction is particularly efficient in favorable circumstances, when the oracle becomes accurate, which processes can detect. To illustrate its practical utility, the paper details two applications leveraging CAC: a fast consensus implementation optimized for low contention (named Cascading Consensus), and a novel naming problem that can be solved under full asynchrony. All algorithms presented require signatures.
Cite as

Timothé Albouy, Davide Frey, Mathieu Gestin, Michel Raynal, and François Taïani. Contention-Aware Cooperation. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 9:1-9:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{albouy_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.9,
  author =	{Albouy, Timoth\'{e} and Frey, Davide and Gestin, Mathieu and Raynal, Michel and Ta\"{i}ani, Fran\c{c}ois},
  title =	{{Contention-Aware Cooperation}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251823},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Agreement, Asynchronous message-passing system, Byzantine processes, Conflict detection, Consensus, Cooperation abstraction, Distributed computing, Fault tolerance, Optimistically terminating consensus, Short-naming}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.6
Hierarchical Consensus: Scalability Through Optimism and Weak Liveness

Authors: Pedro Antonino, Antoine Durand, and A. W. Roscoe

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
Scalability is a central concern of Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) distributed protocols. The ubiquitous approach to work around the well-known Dolev-Reischuk Ω(n²) communication complexity lower bound is to use a random selection process to draw a hopefully small committee from a population of agents to run the communication-heavy protocol. We propose a notion of hierarchical consensus that combines two sub-protocols: an optimistic primary sub-protocol that can tolerate less than 1/2 failures and a fallback secondary protocol that can tolerate less than 1/3 failures; we achieve the higher failure threshold by requiring a weaker notion of liveness for the primary. This distinction between the level of fault tolerance between primary and secondary is reflected in the size of committees implementing these protocols. For a population of agents with close to 2/3 of honest agents, we need to select a committee with hundreds of agents to reach the level of tolerance expected for the primary, whereas we need thousands to reach the level expected for the secondary with a very small probability of error ε. Our hierarchical construct is such that if the primary comes to a decision, it can simply propagate it to the secondary protocol, so it does not need to properly engage in an agreement protocol independently. Our architecture is flexible and allows us to use our technique for most protocols that are based on random sampling. By studying hierarchical protocols, we discovered new theoretical results of independent interest. Specifically, the ability to handover from a primary protocol requires a new Justifiability property that allows agents to pre-decide on a value, such that if the protocol decides, it must be on that pre-decided value.
Cite as

Pedro Antonino, Antoine Durand, and A. W. Roscoe. Hierarchical Consensus: Scalability Through Optimism and Weak Liveness. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 6:1-6:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{antonino_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.6,
  author =	{Antonino, Pedro and Durand, Antoine and Roscoe, A. W.},
  title =	{{Hierarchical Consensus: Scalability Through Optimism and Weak Liveness}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248232},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hierarchical, Handover, Justifiability, Consensus, Distributed Systems, Blockchain}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.3
Fast, Private and Regulated Payments in Asynchronous Networks

Authors: Maxence Brugeres, Victor Languille, Petr Kuznetsov, and Hamza Zarfaoui

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)

Abstract
We propose a decentralized asset-transfer system that enjoys full privacy: no party can learn the details of a transaction, except for its issuer and its recipient. Furthermore, the recipient is not aware of the sender’s identity. Our system does not rely on consensus or synchrony assumptions, and therefore, it is responsive, since it runs at the actual network speed. Under the hood, every transaction creates a consumable coin equipped with a non-interactive zero-knowledge proof (NIZK) that confirms that the issuer has sufficient funds without revealing any information about her identity, the recipient’s identity, or the payment amount. Moreover, we equip our system with a regulatory enforcement mechanism that can be used to regulate transfer limits or restrict specific addresses from sending or receiving funds, while preserving the system’s privacy guarantees. Finally, we report on PaxPay, our implementation of Fully Private Asset Transfer (FPAT) that uses the Gnark library for the NIZKs. In our benchmark, PaxPay exhibits better performance than earlier proposals that either ensure only partial privacy, require some kind of network synchrony or do not implement regulation features. Our system thus reconciles privacy, responsiveness, regulation enforcement and performance.
Cite as

Maxence Brugeres, Victor Languille, Petr Kuznetsov, and Hamza Zarfaoui. Fast, Private and Regulated Payments in Asynchronous Networks. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 3:1-3:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brugeres_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.3,
  author =	{Brugeres, Maxence and Languille, Victor and Kuznetsov, Petr and Zarfaoui, Hamza},
  title =	{{Fast, Private and Regulated Payments in Asynchronous Networks}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247227},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Anonymous, Asset Transfer, Asynchronous System, BFT, CBDC, NIZK, Payment System, Privacy, Regulation, Scalability, zk-SNARK}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.4
Ensuring Convergence and Invariants Without Coordination

Authors: Dina Borrego, Nuno Preguiça, Elisa Gonzalez Boix, and Carla Ferreira

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 333, 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)

Abstract
The CAP theorem demonstrates a trade-off between consistency and availability (and, by extension, latency) in systems where network partitions are unavoidable, such as in cloud computing and local-first software. While adopting weak consistency can preserve availability, it may result in inconsistencies that compromise application correctness. Replicated data types provide a principled, coordination-free approach to guarantee convergence but do not consider application invariants. Existing methods for maintaining invariants in replicated systems either rely on coordination - undermining the benefits of weak consistency - or suffer from limited applicability. This paper introduces the No-Op framework, a generic approach for enforcing consistency without coordination while guaranteeing both convergence and invariant preservation. The core idea of the No-Op approach is to resolve conflicts among concurrent operations by prioritising one operation over the other according to programmer-defined conflict resolution policies. This prioritisation transforms the less-preferred operation into a no-side-effect operation, ensuring conflict-free execution. We formalise the model underlying the No-Op framework and introduce a replication protocol built upon it, accompanied by a formal proof of correctness for both the framework and the protocol. Furthermore, we demonstrate the framework’s applicability by showcasing the design of widely used replicated data types and the preservation of a wide range of application invariants.
Cite as

Dina Borrego, Nuno Preguiça, Elisa Gonzalez Boix, and Carla Ferreira. Ensuring Convergence and Invariants Without Coordination. In 39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 333, pp. 4:1-4:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{borrego_et_al:LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.4,
  author =	{Borrego, Dina and Pregui\c{c}a, Nuno and Gonzalez Boix, Elisa and Ferreira, Carla},
  title =	{{Ensuring Convergence and Invariants Without Coordination}},
  booktitle =	{39th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-373-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{333},
  editor =	{Aldrich, Jonathan and Silva, Alexandra},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-232978},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: distributed systems, conflict resolution, RDTs, invariant preservation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.5
RMR-Efficient Detectable Objects for Persistent Memory and Their Applications

Authors: Sahil Dhoked, Ahmed Fahmy, Wojciech Golab, and Neeraj Mittal

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
We describe a novel construction of arbitrary read-modify-write (RMW) primitives in a persistent shared memory model with process failures. Our construction uses blocking synchronization, in the form of recoverable mutual exclusion (RME), and is optimal in terms of the widely studied remote memory reference (RMR) complexity measure. The implemented objects tolerate either system-wide or independent process crashes, depending on the RME lock used, and also provide detectability for resolving the outcome of operations interrupted by failures. We prove that our construction is RMR-optimal using a reduction back to the RME problem. Our proof technique introduces a novel algorithmic style that enables solving challenging synchronization problems using a common execution path for both the system-wide and independent failure models, which previously required separate analyses, and relies only on a suitable implementation of the detectable base objects in each model to achieve RMR efficiency. Experiments demonstrate that our construction outperforms prior wait-free and lock-free algorithms on a multiprocessor with Intel Optane persistent memory.
Cite as

Sahil Dhoked, Ahmed Fahmy, Wojciech Golab, and Neeraj Mittal. RMR-Efficient Detectable Objects for Persistent Memory and Their Applications. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 5:1-5:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dhoked_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.5,
  author =	{Dhoked, Sahil and Fahmy, Ahmed and Golab, Wojciech and Mittal, Neeraj},
  title =	{{RMR-Efficient Detectable Objects for Persistent Memory and Their Applications}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225417},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: persistent memory, synchronization, recoverability, fault tolerance, detectability, scalability, RMR complexity, theory, mutual exclusion}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.4
AMECOS: A Modular Event-Based Framework for Concurrent Object Specification

Authors: Timothé Albouy, Antonio Fernández Anta, Chryssis Georgiou, Mathieu Gestin, Nicolas Nicolaou, and Junlang Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
In this work, we introduce a modular framework for specifying distributed systems that we call AMECOS. Specifically, our framework departs from the traditional use of sequential specification, which presents limitations both on the specification expressiveness and implementation efficiency of inherently concurrent objects, as documented by Castañeda, Rajsbaum and Raynal in CACM 2023. Our framework focuses on the interactions between the various system components, specified as concurrent objects. Interactions are described with sequences of object events. This provides a modular way of specifying distributed systems and separates legality (object semantics) from other issues, such as consistency. We demonstrate the usability of our framework by (i) specifying various well-known concurrent objects, such as registers, shared memory, message-passing, reliable broadcast, and consensus, (ii) providing hierarchies of ordering semantics (namely, consistency hierarchy, memory hierarchy, and reliable broadcast hierarchy), and (iii) presenting a novel axiomatic proof of the impossibility of the well-known Consensus problem.
Cite as

Timothé Albouy, Antonio Fernández Anta, Chryssis Georgiou, Mathieu Gestin, Nicolas Nicolaou, and Junlang Wang. AMECOS: A Modular Event-Based Framework for Concurrent Object Specification. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 4:1-4:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{albouy_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.4,
  author =	{Albouy, Timoth\'{e} and Fern\'{a}ndez Anta, Antonio and Georgiou, Chryssis and Gestin, Mathieu and Nicolaou, Nicolas and Wang, Junlang},
  title =	{{AMECOS: A Modular Event-Based Framework for Concurrent Object Specification}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225409},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Concurrency, Object specification, Consistency conditions, Consensus impossibility}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25
Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models

Authors: Rowdy Chotkan, Bart Cox, Vincent Rahli, and Jérémie Decouchant

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
Reliable communication is a fundamental distributed communication abstraction that allows any two nodes within a network to communicate with each other. It is necessary for more powerful communication primitives, such as broadcast and consensus. Using different authentication models, two classical protocols implement reliable communication in unknown and sufficiently connected networks. In the former, network links are authenticated, and processes rely on dissemination paths to authenticate messages. In the latter, processes generate digital signatures that are flooded throughout the network. This work considers the hybrid system model that combines authenticated links and authenticated processes. Additionally, we aim to leverage the possible presence of trusted nodes (e.g., network gateways) and trusted components (e.g., Intel SGX enclaves). We first extend the two classical reliable communication protocols to leverage trusted nodes. Then we propose DualRC, our most generic algorithm that considers the hybrid authentication model by manipulating dissemination paths and digital signatures, and leverages the possible presence of trusted nodes and trusted components. We describe and prove methods that establish whether our algorithms implement reliable communication on a given network.
Cite as

Rowdy Chotkan, Bart Cox, Vincent Rahli, and Jérémie Decouchant. Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 25:1-25:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chotkan_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25,
  author =	{Chotkan, Rowdy and Cox, Bart and Rahli, Vincent and Decouchant, J\'{e}r\'{e}mie},
  title =	{{Reliable Communication in Hybrid Authentication and Trust Models}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225611},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: Reliable communication, Byzantine, Authentication models, Trust}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.21
No Symmetric Broadcast Abstraction Characterizes k-Set-Agreement in Message-Passing Systems

Authors: Sylvain Gay, Achour Mostéfaoui, and Matthieu Perrin

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
This paper explores the relationship between broadcast abstractions and the k-set agreement (k-SA) problem in crash-prone asynchronous distributed systems. It specifically investigates whether any broadcast abstraction is computationally equivalent to k-SA in message-passing systems. A key contribution of the paper is the delineation of the realm of "meaningful" broadcast abstractions, through the introduction of two new symmetry properties: compositionality and content-neutrality, inspired by the principle of network neutrality. Such preciseness in definition is essential for this paper’s scope, as our aim is not to characterize the computing power of a specific broadcast abstraction, but rather to explore the domain of broadcast abstractions as a whole, in search of a broadcast abstraction with certain characteristics. The paper’s main contribution is the proof that no broadcast abstraction, which is both content-neutral and compositional, is computationally equivalent to k-set agreement when 1 < k < n, in the crash-prone asynchronous message-passing model. To the best of our knowledge, this result represents the first instance of showing that a coordination problem cannot be expressed by an equivalent broadcast abstraction. It does not establish the absence of an implementation, but rather the absence of a specification that possesses certain properties.
Cite as

Sylvain Gay, Achour Mostéfaoui, and Matthieu Perrin. No Symmetric Broadcast Abstraction Characterizes k-Set-Agreement in Message-Passing Systems. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 21:1-21:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gay_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.21,
  author =	{Gay, Sylvain and Most\'{e}faoui, Achour and Perrin, Matthieu},
  title =	{{No Symmetric Broadcast Abstraction Characterizes k-Set-Agreement in Message-Passing Systems}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225573},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Agreement problem, Asynchronous system, Broadcast abstraction, Communication abstraction, Compositionality, Message-passing system, Network neutrality, Process crash, k-Set agreement, Wait-free model, Total order broadcast}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.31
Dynamic Probabilistic Reliable Broadcast

Authors: João Paulo Bezerra, Veronika Anikina, Petr Kuznetsov, Liron Schiff, and Stefan Schmid

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
Byzantine reliable broadcast is a fundamental primitive in distributed systems that allows a set of processes to agree on a message broadcast by a dedicated process, even when some of them are malicious (Byzantine). It guarantees that no two correct processes deliver different messages, and if a message is delivered by a correct process, every correct process eventually delivers one. Byzantine reliable broadcast protocols are known to scale poorly, as they require Ω(n²) message exchanges, where n is the number of system members. The quadratic cost can be explained by the inherent need for every process to relay a message to every other process. In this paper, we explore ways to overcome this limitation by casting the problem to the probabilistic setting. We propose a solution in which every broadcast message is validated by a small set of witnesses, which allows us to maintain low latency and small communication complexity. In order to tolerate the slow adaptive adversary, we dynamically select the witnesses through a novel stream-local hash function: given a stream of inputs, it generates a stream of output hashed values that adapts to small deviations of the inputs. Our performance analysis shows that the proposed solution exhibits significant scalability gains over state-of-the-art protocols.
Cite as

João Paulo Bezerra, Veronika Anikina, Petr Kuznetsov, Liron Schiff, and Stefan Schmid. Dynamic Probabilistic Reliable Broadcast. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 31:1-31:30, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bezerra_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.31,
  author =	{Bezerra, Jo\~{a}o Paulo and Anikina, Veronika and Kuznetsov, Petr and Schiff, Liron and Schmid, Stefan},
  title =	{{Dynamic Probabilistic Reliable Broadcast}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:30},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225679},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Reliable broadcast, probabilistic algorithms, witness sets, stream-local hashing, cryptocurrencies, accountability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2022.36
On Implementing SWMR Registers from SWSR Registers in Systems with Byzantine Failures

Authors: Xing Hu and Sam Toueg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 246, 36th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2022)

Abstract
The implementation of registers from (potentially) weaker registers is a classical problem in the theory of distributed computing. Since Lamport’s pioneering work [Leslie Lamport, 1986], this problem has been extensively studied in the context of asynchronous processes with crash failures. In this paper, we investigate this problem in the context of Byzantine process failures, with and without process signatures. In particular, we first show a strong impossibility result, namely, that there is no wait-free linearizable implementation of a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer (n-1)-reader registers. In fact, this impossibility result holds even if all the processes except the writer are given atomic 1-writer n-reader registers, and even if we assume that the writer can only crash and at most one reader is subject to Byzantine failures. In light of this impossibility result, we give two register implementations. The first one implements a 1-writer n-reader register from atomic 1-writer 1-reader registers. This implementation is linearizable (under any combination of Byzantine process failures), but it is wait-free only under the assumption that the writer is correct or no reader is Byzantine - thus matching the impossibility result. The second implementation assumes process signatures; it is wait-free and linearizable under any number and combination of Byzantine process failures.
Cite as

Xing Hu and Sam Toueg. On Implementing SWMR Registers from SWSR Registers in Systems with Byzantine Failures. In 36th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 246, pp. 36:1-36:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hu_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2022.36,
  author =	{Hu, Xing and Toueg, Sam},
  title =	{{On Implementing SWMR Registers from SWSR Registers in Systems with Byzantine Failures}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2022)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-255-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{246},
  editor =	{Scheideler, Christian},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2022.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-172272},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2022.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: distributed computing, concurrency, linearizability, shared registers}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2020.16
Optimal Resilience in Systems That Mix Shared Memory and Message Passing

Authors: Hagit Attiya, Sweta Kumari, and Noa Schiller

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 184, 24th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2020)

Abstract
We investigate the minimal number of failures that can partition a system where processes communicate both through shared memory and by message passing. We prove that this number precisely captures the resilience that can be achieved by algorithms that implement a variety of shared objects, like registers and atomic snapshots, and solve common tasks, like randomized consensus, approximate agreement and renaming. This has implications for the m&m-model of [Aguilera et al., 2018] and for the hybrid, cluster-based model of [Damien Imbs and Michel Raynal, 2013; Michel Raynal and Jiannong Cao, 2019].
Cite as

Hagit Attiya, Sweta Kumari, and Noa Schiller. Optimal Resilience in Systems That Mix Shared Memory and Message Passing. In 24th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 184, pp. 16:1-16:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{attiya_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2020.16,
  author =	{Attiya, Hagit and Kumari, Sweta and Schiller, Noa},
  title =	{{Optimal Resilience in Systems That Mix Shared Memory and Message Passing}},
  booktitle =	{24th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2020)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-176-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{184},
  editor =	{Bramas, Quentin and Oshman, Rotem and Romano, Paolo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2020.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-135019},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2020.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: fault resilience, m\&m model, cluster-based model, randomized consensus, approximate agreement, renaming, register implementations, atomic snapshots}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.16
On Deterministic Linearizable Set Agreement Objects

Authors: Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan, Vassos Hadzilacos, and Sam Toueg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 153, 23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019)

Abstract
A recent work showed that, for all n and k, there is a linearizable (n,k)-set agreement object O_L that is equivalent to the (n,k)-set agreement task [David Yu Cheng Chan et al., 2017]: given O_L, it is possible to solve the (n,k)-set agreement task, and given any algorithm that solves the (n,k)-set agreement task (and registers), it is possible to implement O_L. This linearizable object O_L, however, is not deterministic. It turns out that there is also a deterministic (n,k)-set agreement object O_D that is equivalent to the (n,k)-set agreement task, but this deterministic object O_D is not linearizable. This raises the question whether there exists a deterministic and linearizable (n,k)-set agreement object that is equivalent to the (n,k)-set agreement task. Here we show that in general the answer is no: specifically, we prove that for all n ≥ 4, every deterministic linearizable (n,2)-set agreement object is strictly stronger than the (n,2)-set agreement task. We prove this by showing that, for all n ≥ 4, every deterministic and linearizable (n,2)-set agreement object (together with registers) can be used to solve 2-consensus, whereas it is known that the (n,2)-set agreement task cannot do so. For a natural subset of (n,2)-set agreement objects, we prove that this result holds even for n = 3.
Cite as

Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan, Vassos Hadzilacos, and Sam Toueg. On Deterministic Linearizable Set Agreement Objects. In 23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 153, pp. 16:1-16:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deazevedopiovezan_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.16,
  author =	{de Azevedo Piovezan, Felipe and Hadzilacos, Vassos and Toueg, Sam},
  title =	{{On Deterministic Linearizable Set Agreement Objects}},
  booktitle =	{23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-133-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{153},
  editor =	{Felber, Pascal and Friedman, Roy and Gilbert, Seth and Miller, Avery},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-118026},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Asynchronous shared-memory systems, consensus, set agreement, deterministic objects}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.28
Optimal Register Construction in M&M Systems

Authors: Vassos Hadzilacos, Xing Hu, and Sam Toueg

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 153, 23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019)

Abstract
Motivated by recent distributed systems technology, Aguilera et al. introduced a hybrid model of distributed computing, called message-and-memory model or m&m model for short [Marcos K. Aguilera et al., 2018]. In this model, processes can communicate by message passing and also by accessing some shared memory. We consider the basic problem of implementing an atomic single-writer multi-reader (SWMR) register shared by all the processes in m&m systems. Specifically, we give an algorithm that implements such a register in m&m systems and show that it is optimal in the number of process crashes that it can tolerate. This generalizes the well-known implementation of an atomic SWMR register in a pure message-passing system [Attiya et al., 1995].
Cite as

Vassos Hadzilacos, Xing Hu, and Sam Toueg. Optimal Register Construction in M&M Systems. In 23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 153, pp. 28:1-28:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hadzilacos_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.28,
  author =	{Hadzilacos, Vassos and Hu, Xing and Toueg, Sam},
  title =	{{Optimal Register Construction in M\&M Systems}},
  booktitle =	{23rd International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2019)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-133-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{153},
  editor =	{Felber, Pascal and Friedman, Roy and Gilbert, Seth and Miller, Avery},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-118148},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2019.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: asynchronous distributed system, shared memory, message passing}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 17 Document/PDF
  • 11 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2026
  • 8 2025
  • 1 2022
  • 1 2021
  • 2 2020
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 5 Toueg, Sam
  • 4 Hadzilacos, Vassos
  • 3 Albouy, Timothé
  • 2 Fernández Anta, Antonio
  • 2 Georgiou, Chryssis
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 17 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 8 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
  • 6 Theory of computation → Distributed computing models
  • 2 Computer systems organization → Dependable and fault-tolerant systems and networks
  • 2 Computing methodologies → Distributed computing methodologies
  • 2 Theory of computation → Concurrency
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Asynchronous System
  • 3 Consensus
  • 3 Set Agreement
  • 3 Shared Memory
  • 1 Agreement
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact