54 Search Results for "Slivovsky, Friedrich"

Volume

LIPIcs, Volume 271

26th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2023)

SAT 2023, July 4-8, 2023, Alghero, Italy

Editors: Meena Mahajan and Friedrich Slivovsky

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2026.12
Long-Distance Q(D^std)-Consensus Is Sound

Authors: Abhimanyu Choudhury, Meena Mahajan, and Friedrich Slivovsky

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 377, 29th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2026)

Abstract
We describe a procedure that extracts existential strategies from verification proofs in the Long-Distance Consensus (i.e., Term Resolution) proof system when augmented with dependency schemes. We prove that when the standard dependency scheme 𝙳^std is used, the extracted strategies are winning strategies, thus establishing soundness of the proof system LDQ(D^std)-Consensus. We show through a counterexample that this approach fails to show soundness for LDQ(D^rrs)-Consensus.
Cite as

Abhimanyu Choudhury, Meena Mahajan, and Friedrich Slivovsky. Long-Distance Q(D^std)-Consensus Is Sound. In 29th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 377, pp. 12:1-12:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{choudhury_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2026.12,
  author =	{Choudhury, Abhimanyu and Mahajan, Meena and Slivovsky, Friedrich},
  title =	{{Long-Distance Q(D^std)-Consensus Is Sound}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2026)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-431-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{377},
  editor =	{Ignatiev, Alexey and Szeider, Stefan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2026.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-263181},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2026.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantified Boolean Formulas, Proof systems, Long-Distance Term Resolution / Consensus, Dependency Schemes}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.11
Factorised Representations of Join Queries: Tight Bounds and a New Dichotomy

Authors: Christoph Berkholz and Harry Vinall-Smeeth

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 365, 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)

Abstract
A common theme in factorised databases and knowledge compilation is the representation of solution sets in a useful yet succinct data structure. In this paper, we study the representation of the result of join queries (or, equivalently, the set of homomorphisms between two relational structures). We focus on the very general format of {∪,×}-circuits - also known as d-representations or DNNF circuits - and aim to find the limits of this approach. In prior work, it has been shown that there always exists a {∪,×}-circuit of size N^O(subw) representing the query result, where N is the size of the database and subw the submodular width of the query. If the arity of all relations is bounded by a constant, then subw is linear in the treewidth tw of the query. In this setting, the authors of this paper proved a lower bound of N^Ω(tw^ε) on the circuit size (ICALP 2023), where ε > 0 depends on the excluded grid theorem. Our first main contribution is to improve this lower bound to N^Ω(tw), which is tight up to a constant factor in the exponent. Our second contribution is a N^Ω(subw^{1/4}) lower bound on the circuit size for join queries over relations of unbounded arity. Both lower bounds are unconditional lower bounds on the circuit size for well-chosen database instances. Their proofs use a combination of structural (hyper)graph theory with communication complexity in a simple yet novel way. While the second lower bound is asymptotically equivalent to Marx’s conditional bound on the decision complexity (JACM 2013), our N^Θ(tw) bound in the bounded arity setting is tight, while the best conditional bound on the decision complexity is N^Ω(tw/log tw). Note that removing this logarithmic factor in the decision setting is a major open problem.
Cite as

Christoph Berkholz and Harry Vinall-Smeeth. Factorised Representations of Join Queries: Tight Bounds and a New Dichotomy. In 29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 365, pp. 11:1-11:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{berkholz_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.11,
  author =	{Berkholz, Christoph and Vinall-Smeeth, Harry},
  title =	{{Factorised Representations of Join Queries: Tight Bounds and a New Dichotomy}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2026)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-413-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{365},
  editor =	{ten Cate, Balder and Funk, Maurice},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-256255},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2026.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: join queries, homomorphisms, factorised databases, succinct representation, knowledge compilation, lower bounds}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.42
Computing Twin-Width via Treedepth and Vertex Integrity

Authors: Robert Ganian and Mathis Rocton

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
Twin-width is a graph parameter that has become central to explaining the fixed-parameter tractability of first-order model checking across many graph classes. Despite its algorithmic importance, computing twin-width remains poorly understood: even recognizing graphs of twin-width at most four is NP-hard, and no fixed-parameter approximations parameterized by twin-width itself are known. A recent approach towards breaking this barrier focuses on first developing fixed-parameter algorithms for computing or approximating twin-width under parameterizations distinct from twin-width. Our first result establishes that approximating twin-width is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by treedepth, thereby breaking the long-standing barrier that all previous tractable parameterizations were based on deletion distance. The proof proceeds via oriented twin-width, yielding the first constructive evidence that this variant may be easier to handle algorithmically. As our second main result, we show that computing twin-width exactly is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to vertex integrity. This constitutes the first non-trivial parameterized algorithm for computing optimal contraction sequences.
Cite as

Robert Ganian and Mathis Rocton. Computing Twin-Width via Treedepth and Vertex Integrity. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 42:1-42:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ganian_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.42,
  author =	{Ganian, Robert and Rocton, Mathis},
  title =	{{Computing Twin-Width via Treedepth and Vertex Integrity}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{42:1--42:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.42},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255318},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.42},
  annote =	{Keywords: twin-width, fixed-parameter algorithms, treedepth, vertex integrity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.18
Bridging Treewidth and Clique-Width via Cograph-Modular-Treewidth

Authors: Václav Blažej, Satyabrata Jana, M. S. Ramanujan, and Peter Strulo

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
Many classical graph problems - such as Max Cut, Chromatic Number, Edge Dominating Set, and Hamiltonian Cycle - are polynomial-time solvable on cographs, fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) when parameterized by treewidth, but W[1]-hard when parameterized by clique-width. In contrast, Graph Isomorphism is FPT parameterized by treewidth, but for clique-width it is known to be in XP; whether it is FPT or W[1]-hard is open. This reveals a sharp tractability gap between treewidth and clique-width. In this work, we propose a new structural graph parameter, 𝒞-modular-treewidth, which lies between treewidth and clique-width. The parameter leverages modular decomposition and restricts modules to induce graphs from a fixed class 𝒞 (e.g., cographs or edgeless graphs). By exploiting true and false twins - a hallmark of cograph-like structure - our parameter allows the design of efficient algorithms for several hard problems beyond the reach of treewidth-based methods. In this work, we show that 𝒞-modular-treewidth enables efficient solutions under suitable choices of 𝒞, opening a new pathway in the parameterized complexity landscape between treewidth and clique-width. In particular we show that - When parameterized by cograph-modular-treewidth, Isomorphism admits an FPT algorithm, whereas Chromatic Number remains W[1]-hard. - When parameterized by independent-modular-treewidth, Hamiltonian Cycle and Edge Dominating Set remain W[1]-hard.
Cite as

Václav Blažej, Satyabrata Jana, M. S. Ramanujan, and Peter Strulo. Bridging Treewidth and Clique-Width via Cograph-Modular-Treewidth. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 18:1-18:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{blazej_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.18,
  author =	{Bla\v{z}ej, V\'{a}clav and Jana, Satyabrata and Ramanujan, M. S. and Strulo, Peter},
  title =	{{Bridging Treewidth and Clique-Width via Cograph-Modular-Treewidth}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251507},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Treewidth, Clique-width, Cograph, FPT, W\lbrack1\rbrack-hard}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.25
On the Interplay of Cube Learning and Dependency Schemes in {QCDCL} Proof Systems

Authors: Abhimanyu Choudhury and Meena Mahajan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 360, 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)

Abstract
Quantified Conflict Driven Clause Leaning (QCDCL) is one of the main approaches to solving Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF). Cube-learning is employed in this approach to ensure that true formulas can be verified. Dependency Schemes help to detect spurious dependencies that are implied by the variable ordering in the quantifier prefix of QBFs but are not essential for constructing (counter)models. This detection can provably shorten refutations in specific proof systems, and is expected to speed up runs of QBF solvers. The simplest underlying proof system [BeyersdorffBöhm-LMCS2023], formalises the reasoning in the QCDCL approach on false formulas, when neither cube-learning nor dependency schemes is used. The work of [BöhmPeitlBeyersdorff-AI2024] further incorporates cube-learning. The work of [ChoudhuryMahajan-JAR2024] incorporates a limited use of dependency schemes, but without cube-learning. In this work, proof systems underlying the reasoning of QCDCL solvers which use cube learning, and which use dependency schemes at all stages, are formalised. Sufficient conditions for soundness and completeness are presented, and it is shown that using the standard and reflexive resolution path dependency schemes (𝙳^{std} and 𝙳^{rrs}) to relax the decision order provably shortens refutations. When the decisions are restricted to follow quantification order, but dependency schemes are used in propagation and learning, in conjunction with cube-learning, the resulting proof systems using the dependency schemes 𝙳^{std} and 𝙳^{rrs} are investigated in detail and their relative strengths are analysed.
Cite as

Abhimanyu Choudhury and Meena Mahajan. On the Interplay of Cube Learning and Dependency Schemes in {QCDCL} Proof Systems. In 45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 360, pp. 25:1-25:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{choudhury_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.25,
  author =	{Choudhury, Abhimanyu and Mahajan, Meena},
  title =	{{On the Interplay of Cube Learning and Dependency Schemes in \{QCDCL\} Proof Systems}},
  booktitle =	{45th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2025)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-406-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{360},
  editor =	{Aiswarya, C. and Mehta, Ruta and Roy, Subhajit},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251062},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2025.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: QBF, CDCL, Resolution, Dependency schemes}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.26
Improving the SMT Proof Reconstruction Pipeline in Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Hanna Lachnitt, Mathias Fleury, Haniel Barbosa, Jibiana Jakpor, Bruno Andreotti, Andrew Reynolds, Hans-Jörg Schurr, Clark Barrett, and Cesare Tinelli

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Sledgehammer is a tool that increases the level of automation in the Isabelle/HOL proof assistant by asking external automatic theorem provers (ATPs), including SMT solvers, to prove the current goal. When the external ATP succeeds it must provide enough evidence that the goal holds for Isabelle to be able to reprove it internally based on that evidence. In particular, Isabelle can do this by replaying fine-grained proof certificates from proof-producing SMT solvers as long as they are expressed in the Alethe format, which until now was supported only by the veriT SMT solver. We report on our experience adding proof reconstruction support for the cvc5 SMT solver in Isabelle by extending cvc5 to produce proofs in the Alethe format and then adapting Isabelle to reconstruct those proofs. We discuss several difficulties and pitfalls we encountered and describe a set of tools and techniques we developed to improve the process. A notable outcome of this effort is that Isabelle can now be used as an independent proof checker for SMT problems written in the SMT-LIB standard. We evaluate cvc5’s integration on a set of SMT-LIB benchmarks originating from Isabelle as well as on a set of Isabelle proofs. Our results confirm that this integration complements and improves Sledgehammer’s capabilities.
Cite as

Hanna Lachnitt, Mathias Fleury, Haniel Barbosa, Jibiana Jakpor, Bruno Andreotti, Andrew Reynolds, Hans-Jörg Schurr, Clark Barrett, and Cesare Tinelli. Improving the SMT Proof Reconstruction Pipeline in Isabelle/HOL. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 26:1-26:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lachnitt_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.26,
  author =	{Lachnitt, Hanna and Fleury, Mathias and Barbosa, Haniel and Jakpor, Jibiana and Andreotti, Bruno and Reynolds, Andrew and Schurr, Hans-J\"{o}rg and Barrett, Clark and Tinelli, Cesare},
  title =	{{Improving the SMT Proof Reconstruction Pipeline in Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246243},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: interactive theorem proving, proof assistants, Isabelle/HOL, SMT, certification, proof certificates, proof reconstruction, proof automation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.12
An Expansion-Based Approach for Quantified Integer Programming

Authors: Michael Hartisch and Leroy Chew

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
Quantified Integer Programming (QIP) bridges multiple domains by extending Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF) to incorporate general integer variables and linear constraints while also generalizing Integer Programming through variable quantification. As a special case of Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problems (QCSP), QIP provides a versatile framework for addressing complex decision-making scenarios. Additionally, the inclusion of a linear objective function enables QIP to effectively model multistage robust discrete linear optimization problems, making it a powerful tool for tackling uncertainty in optimization. While two primary solution paradigms exist for QBF - search-based and expansion-based approaches - only search-based methods have been explored for QIP and QCSP. We introduce an expansion-based approach for QIP using Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement (CEGAR), adapting techniques from QBF. We extend this methodology to tackle multistage robust discrete optimization problems with linear constraints and further embed it in an optimization framework, enhancing its applicability. Our experimental results highlight the advantages of this approach, demonstrating superior performance over existing search-based solvers for QIP in specific instances. Furthermore, the ability to model problems using linear constraints enables notable performance gains over state-of-the-art expansion-based solvers for QBF.
Cite as

Michael Hartisch and Leroy Chew. An Expansion-Based Approach for Quantified Integer Programming. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 12:1-12:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hartisch_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.12,
  author =	{Hartisch, Michael and Chew, Leroy},
  title =	{{An Expansion-Based Approach for Quantified Integer Programming}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238736},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Quantified Integer Programming, Quantified Constraint Satisfaction, Robust Discrete Optimization, Expansion, CEGAR}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.15
Symmetric Core Learning for Pseudo-Boolean Optimization by Implicit Hitting Sets

Authors: Hannes Ihalainen, Jeremias Berg, Matti Järvisalo, and Bart Bogaerts

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 340, 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)

Abstract
We propose symmetric core learning (SCL) as a novel approach to making the implicit hitting set approach (IHS) to constraint optimization more symmetry-aware. SCL has the potential of significantly reducing the number of iterations and, in particular, the number of calls to an NP decision solver for extracting individual unsatisfiable cores. As the technique is focused on generating symmetric cores to the hitting set component of IHS, SCL is generally applicable in IHS-style search for essentially any constraint optimization paradigm. In this work, we focus in particular on integrating SCL to IHS for pseudo-Boolean optimization (PBO), as earlier proposed static symmetry breaking through lex-leader constraints generated before search turns out to often degrade the performance of the IHS approach to PBO. In contrast, we show that SCL can improve the runtime performance of a state-of-the-art IHS approach to PBO and generally does not impose significant overhead in terms of runtime performance.
Cite as

Hannes Ihalainen, Jeremias Berg, Matti Järvisalo, and Bart Bogaerts. Symmetric Core Learning for Pseudo-Boolean Optimization by Implicit Hitting Sets. In 31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 340, pp. 15:1-15:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ihalainen_et_al:LIPIcs.CP.2025.15,
  author =	{Ihalainen, Hannes and Berg, Jeremias and J\"{a}rvisalo, Matti and Bogaerts, Bart},
  title =	{{Symmetric Core Learning for Pseudo-Boolean Optimization by Implicit Hitting Sets}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2025)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-380-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{340},
  editor =	{de la Banda, Maria Garcia},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-238767},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2025.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: Implicit hitting sets, symmetries, unsatisfiable cores, pseudo-Boolean optimization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3
Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes

Authors: Zachary Battleman, Joseph E. Reeves, and Marijn J. H. Heule

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Satisfiability solvers have been instrumental in tackling hard problems, including mathematical challenges that require years of computation. A key obstacle in efficiently solving such problems lies in effectively partitioning them into many, frequently millions of subproblems. Existing automated partitioning techniques, primarily based on lookahead methods, perform well on some instances but fail to generate effective partitions for many others. This paper introduces a powerful partitioning approach that leverages prefixes of proofs derived from conflict-driven clause-learning solvers. This method enables non-experts to harness the power of massively parallel SAT solving for their problems. We also propose a semantically-driven partitioning technique tailored for problems with large cardinality constraints, which frequently arise in optimization tasks. We evaluate our methods on diverse benchmarks, including combinatorial problems and formulas from SAT and MaxSAT competitions. Our results demonstrate that these techniques outperform existing partitioning strategies in many cases, offering improved scalability and efficiency.
Cite as

Zachary Battleman, Joseph E. Reeves, and Marijn J. H. Heule. Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 3:1-3:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{battleman_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3,
  author =	{Battleman, Zachary and Reeves, Joseph E. and Heule, Marijn J. H.},
  title =	{{Problem Partitioning via Proof Prefixes}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237378},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Satisfiability solving, parallel computing, problem partitioning}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.11
Better Extension Variables in DQBF via Independence

Authors: Leroy Chew and Tomáš Peitl

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
We show that extension variables in (D)QBF can be generalised by conditioning on universal assignments. The benefit of this is that the dependency sets of such conditioned extension variables can be made smaller to allow easier refutations. This simple modification instantly solves many challenges in p-simulating the QBF expansion rule, which cannot be p-simulated in proof systems that have strategy extraction [Leroy Chew and Judith Clymo, 2020]. Simulating expansion is even more crucial in DQBF, where other methods are incomplete. In this paper we provide an overview of the strength of this new independent extension rule. We find that a new version of Extended Frege called IndExtFrege + ∀red can p-simulate a multitude of difficult QBF and DQBF techniques, even techniques that are difficult to approach with eFrege + ∀red. We show five p-simulations, that IndExtFrege + ∀red p-simulates QRAT, DQBF-IR-calc, IR(𝒟^rrs)-calc, Fork-Resolution and DQRAT which together underpin most DQBF solving and preprocessing techniques. The p-simulations work despite these systems using complicated rules and our new extension rule being relatively simple. Moreover, unlike recent p-simulations by eFrege + ∀red we can simulate the proof rules line by line, which allows us to mix QBF rules more easily with other inference steps.
Cite as

Leroy Chew and Tomáš Peitl. Better Extension Variables in DQBF via Independence. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 11:1-11:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chew_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.11,
  author =	{Chew, Leroy and Peitl, Tom\'{a}\v{s}},
  title =	{{Better Extension Variables in DQBF via Independence}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237453},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: DQBF, QBF, Proof Systems, Dependency Schemes, RAT, Extended Frege, Skolem functions}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.10
Fine-Grained Complexity Analysis of Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas

Authors: Che Cheng, Long-Hin Fung, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang, Friedrich Slivovsky, and Tony Tan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas (DQBF) extend Quantified Boolean Formulas by allowing each existential variable to depend on an explicitly specified subset of the universal variables. The satisfiability problem for DQBF is NEXP-complete in general, with only a few tractable fragments known to date. We investigate the complexity of DQBF with k existential variables (k-DQBF) under structural restrictions on the matrix - specifically, when it is in Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) or Disjunctive Normal Form (DNF) - as well as under constraints on the dependency sets. For DNF matrices, we obtain a clear classification: 2-DQBF is PSPACE-complete, while 3-DQBF is NEXP-hard, even with disjoint dependencies. For CNF matrices, the picture is more nuanced: we show that the complexity of k-DQBF ranges from NL-complete for 2-DQBF with disjoint dependencies to NEXP-complete for 6-DQBF with arbitrary dependencies.
Cite as

Che Cheng, Long-Hin Fung, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang, Friedrich Slivovsky, and Tony Tan. Fine-Grained Complexity Analysis of Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 10:1-10:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cheng_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.10,
  author =	{Cheng, Che and Fung, Long-Hin and Jiang, Jie-Hong Roland and Slivovsky, Friedrich and Tan, Tony},
  title =	{{Fine-Grained Complexity Analysis of Dependency Quantified Boolean Formulas}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237441},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dependency quantified Boolean formulas, complexity, completeness, conjunctive normal form, disjunctive normal form}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.25
QRP+Gen: A Framework for Checking Q-Resolution Proofs with Generalized Axioms

Authors: Mark Peyrer and Martina Seidl

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Q-resolution is a proof system for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) that forms the foundation for search-based QBF solvers with clause and cube learning. To derive stronger clauses and cubes, Q-resolution was extended with so-called generalized axioms. The derivation of such generalized axioms relies on solving oracles that could be, for example, SAT solvers or even QBF solvers. While the correctness of results obtained with classical QCDCL-based solving can be efficiently certified by an independent checker, until now, proof generation had to be turned off to benefit from generalized axioms. Consequently, the results obtained with reasoning under generalized axioms could not be certified independently. To overcome this restriction, we present QRP+Gen, a novel framework to automatically generate and check Q-resolution proofs that contain generalized axioms. To this end, we extended the Q-resolution format QRP such that all necessary information is included to verify the correctness of generalized axioms. Our extension allows to integrate certificates produced by any oracle which can produce automatically checkable proofs. Furthermore, we developed a proof checker that orchestrates the proof checking of the core Q-resolution proof and the proofs produced by the oracles. As a case study, we equipped the search-based QBF solver DepQBF with proof-producing oracles for the SAT-based techniques trivial truth and trivial falsity.
Cite as

Mark Peyrer and Martina Seidl. QRP+Gen: A Framework for Checking Q-Resolution Proofs with Generalized Axioms. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 25:1-25:10, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{peyrer_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.25,
  author =	{Peyrer, Mark and Seidl, Martina},
  title =	{{QRP+Gen: A Framework for Checking Q-Resolution Proofs with Generalized Axioms}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:10},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237592},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: Automated Reasoning, Quantified Resolution Proof, Generalized Axioms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.22
Enumerating All Boolean Matches

Authors: Alexander Nadel and Yogev Shalmon

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
Boolean matching, a fundamental problem in circuit design, determines whether two Boolean circuits are equivalent under input/output permutations and negations. While most works focus on finding a single match or proving its absence, the problem of enumerating all matches remains largely unexplored, with BooM being a notable exception. Motivated by timing challenges in Intel’s library mapping flow, we introduce EBat - an open-source tool for enumerating all matches between single-output circuits. Built from scratch, EBat reuses BooM’s SAT encoding and introduces novel high-level algorithms and performance-critical subroutines to efficiently identify and block multiple mismatches and matches simultaneously. Experiments demonstrate that EBat substantially outperforms BooM’s baseline algorithm, solving 3 to 4 times more benchmarks within a given time limit. EBat has been productized as part of Intel’s library mapping flow, effectively addressing the timing challenges.
Cite as

Alexander Nadel and Yogev Shalmon. Enumerating All Boolean Matches. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 22:1-22:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nadel_et_al:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.22,
  author =	{Nadel, Alexander and Shalmon, Yogev},
  title =	{{Enumerating All Boolean Matches}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237568},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Boolean Matching, All-Boolean-Matching, Enumeration, SAT, Generalization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17
Core-Guided Linear Programming-Based Maximum Satisfiability

Authors: George Katsirelos

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 341, 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)

Abstract
The core-guided algorithm OLL is the basis of some of the most successful algorithms for MaxSAT in recent evaluations. It works by iteratively finding cores of the formula and transforming it so that it exhibits a higher lower bound. It has recently been shown to implicitly discover cores of the original formula, as well as a compact representation of its reasoning within a linear program. In this paper, we use and extend these results to design a practical MaxSAT solver. We show an explicit linear program which matches and usually exceeds the bound computed by OLL. We show that OLL can be restated as an algorithm that explicitly computes a feasible dual solution of this linear program. This restated algorithm naturally works with an arbitrary dual solution. It can in fact be used to improve any LP representation of the MaxSAT instance. This presents a large increase of the potential design space for such algorithms. We describe some potential improvements from this insight and show that an implementation outperforms the state of the art algorithms on the set of instances from the latest MaxSAT evaluation.
Cite as

George Katsirelos. Core-Guided Linear Programming-Based Maximum Satisfiability. In 28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 341, pp. 17:1-17:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{katsirelos:LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17,
  author =	{Katsirelos, George},
  title =	{{Core-Guided Linear Programming-Based Maximum Satisfiability}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-381-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{341},
  editor =	{Berg, Jeremias and Nordstr\"{o}m, Jakob},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237513},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAT.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: maximum satisfiability, core-guided solvers, linear programming}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 52 Document/PDF
  • 13 Document/HTML
  • 1 Artifact
  • 1 Volume

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2026
  • 11 2025
  • 3 2024
  • 33 2023
  • 3 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 11 Slivovsky, Friedrich
  • 6 Szeider, Stefan
  • 4 Mahajan, Meena
  • 3 Biere, Armin
  • 3 Chew, Leroy
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 52 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 17 Theory of computation → Automated reasoning
  • 10 Theory of computation → Proof complexity
  • 7 Mathematics of computing → Solvers
  • 5 Theory of computation → Constraint and logic programming
  • 5 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 9 QBF
  • 6 CDCL
  • 5 SAT
  • 5 Satisfiability
  • 3 MaxSAT
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact