23 Search Results for "Castañeda, Armando"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.23
Simple Circuit Extensions for XOR in PTIME

Authors: Marco Carmosino, Ngu Dang, and Tim Jackman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
The Minimum Circuit Size Problem for Partial Functions (MCSP^*) is hard assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) (Ilango, 2020). This breakthrough result leveraged a characterization of the optimal {∧, ∨, ¬} circuits for n-bit OR (OR_n) and a reduction from the partial f-Simple Extension Problem where f = OR_n. It remains open to extend that reduction to show ETH-hardness of total MCSP. However, Ilango observed that the total f-Simple Extension Problem is easy whenever f is computed by read-once formulas (like OR_n). Therefore, extending Ilango’s proof to total MCSP would require replacing OR_n with a more complex but similarly well-understood Boolean function. This work shows that the f-Simple Extension problem remains easy when f is the next natural candidate: XOR_n. We first develop a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for the f-Simple Extension Problem that is efficient whenever the optimal circuits for f are (1) linear in size, (2) polynomially "few" and efficiently enumerable in the truth-table size (up to isomorphism and permutation of inputs), and (3) all have constant bounded fan-out. XOR_n satisfies all three of these conditions. When ¬ gates count towards circuit size, optimal XOR_n circuits are binary trees of n-1 subcircuits computing (¬)XOR₂ (Kombarov, 2011). We extend this characterization when ¬ gates do not contribute the circuit size. Thus, the XOR-Simple Extension Problem is in polynomial time under both measures of circuit complexity. We conclude by discussing conjectures about the complexity of the f-Simple Extension problem for each explicit function f with known and unrestricted circuit lower bounds over the DeMorgan basis. Examining the conditions under which our Simple Extension Solver is efficient, we argue that multiplexer functions (MUX) are the most promising candidate for ETH-hardness of a Simple Extension Problem, towards proving ETH-hardness of total MCSP.
Cite as

Marco Carmosino, Ngu Dang, and Tim Jackman. Simple Circuit Extensions for XOR in PTIME. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 23:1-23:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{carmosino_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.23,
  author =	{Carmosino, Marco and Dang, Ngu and Jackman, Tim},
  title =	{{Simple Circuit Extensions for XOR in PTIME}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255127},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Minimum Circuit Size Problem, Circuit Lower Bounds, Exponential Time Hypothesis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5
Tight Conditions for Binary-Output Tasks Under Crashes

Authors: Timothé Albouy, Antonio Fernández Anta, Chryssis Georgiou, Nicolas Nicolaou, and Junlang Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
This paper explores necessary and sufficient system conditions to solve distributed tasks with binary outputs (i.e., tasks with output values in {0,1}). We focus on the distinct output sets of values a task can produce (intentionally disregarding validity and value multiplicity), considering that some processes may output no value. In a distributed system with n processes, of which up to t ≤ n can crash, we provide a complete characterization of the tight conditions on n and t under which every class of tasks with binary outputs is solvable, for both synchronous and asynchronous systems. This output-set approach yields highly general results: it unifies multiple distributed computing problems, such as binary consensus and symmetry breaking, and it produces impossibility proofs that hold for stronger task formulations, including those that consider validity, account for value multiplicity, or move beyond binary outputs.
Cite as

Timothé Albouy, Antonio Fernández Anta, Chryssis Georgiou, Nicolas Nicolaou, and Junlang Wang. Tight Conditions for Binary-Output Tasks Under Crashes. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 5:1-5:24, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{albouy_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5,
  author =	{Albouy, Timoth\'{e} and Fern\'{a}ndez Anta, Antonio and Georgiou, Chryssis and Nicolaou, Nicolas and Wang, Junlang},
  title =	{{Tight Conditions for Binary-Output Tasks Under Crashes}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:24},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251786},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed solvability, Asynchrony, Synchrony, Impossibility proofs, Binary-output tasks, Crash tolerance, Disagreement}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.13
A General Input-Dependent Colorless Computability Theorem and Applications to Core-Dependent Adversaries

Authors: Yannis Coutouly and Emmanuel Godard

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
Distributed computing tasks can be presented with a triple (ℐ,𝒪,Δ). The solvability of a colorless task on the Iterated Immediate Snapshot model (IIS) has been characterized by the Colorless Computability Theorem [Maurice Herlihy et al., 2013]. A recent paper [Yannis Coutouly and Emmanuel Godard, 2024] generalizes this theorem for any message adversaries ℳ ⊆ IIS by geometric methods. In 2001, Mostéfaoui, Rajsbaum, Raynal, and Roy [Achour Mostéfaoui et al., 2002] introduced condition-based adversaries. This setting considers a particular adversary that will be applied only to a subset of input configurations. In this setting, they studied the k-set agreement task with condition-based t-resilient adversaries and obtained a sufficient condition on the conditions that make k-Set Agreement solvable. In this paper we have three contributions: 1) We generalize the characterization of [Yannis Coutouly and Emmanuel Godard, 2024] to input-dependent adversaries, which means that the adversaries can change depending on the input configuration. 2) We show that core-resilient adversaries of IIS_n have the same computability power as the core-resilient adversaries of IIS_n where crashes only happen at the start. 3) Using the two previous contributions, we provide a necessary and sufficient characterization of the condition-based, core-dependent adversaries that can solve k-Set Agreement. We also distinguish four settings that may appear when presenting a distributed task as (ℐ,𝒪,Δ). Finally, in a later section, we present structural properties on the carrier map Δ. Such properties allow simpler proof, without changing the computability power of the task. Most of the proofs in this article leverage the topological framework used in distributed computing by using simple geometric constructions.
Cite as

Yannis Coutouly and Emmanuel Godard. A General Input-Dependent Colorless Computability Theorem and Applications to Core-Dependent Adversaries. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 13:1-13:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{coutouly_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.13,
  author =	{Coutouly, Yannis and Godard, Emmanuel},
  title =	{{A General Input-Dependent Colorless Computability Theorem and Applications to Core-Dependent Adversaries}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251862},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: colorless task, topological methods, geometric simplicial complex, k-set-agreement, t-resilient model, condition-based computability}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29
How Exhaustive Does an Extension-Based Proof Need to Be?

Authors: Faith Ellen, Shihao Liu, Leqi Zhu, Eli Gafni, and Rati Gelashvili

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
The class of extension-based proofs encompasses traditional valency arguments. It has been shown that they are insufficient to establish the impossibility of (n-1)-set agreement among n ≥ 3 processes in an asynchronous system with crash failures. We generalize this definition to k-exhaustive extension-based proofs, in which a prover can learn the maximum length of all executions involving a set of at most k processes from a specified configuration (which may be infinite). An upper bound on the length of these executions enables the prover to determine the outputs of all these executions. When k = n, this enables the prover to perform an exhaustive search of all reachable configurations, so it knows everything about the protocol. On the other hand, extension based proofs are as powerful as 1-exhaustive extension-based proofs. For any task with no deterministic, wait-free solution among n ≥ 2 processes, we show that there is an (n-1)-exhaustive extension-based proof of its impossibility. This is done using a new characterization of such tasks. In contrast, we prove that for 1 ≤ k ≤ n-2, there is no k-exhaustive extension-based proof of the impossibility of (n-1)-set agreement.
Cite as

Faith Ellen, Shihao Liu, Leqi Zhu, Eli Gafni, and Rati Gelashvili. How Exhaustive Does an Extension-Based Proof Need to Be?. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 29:1-29:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ellen_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29,
  author =	{Ellen, Faith and Liu, Shihao and Zhu, Leqi and Gafni, Eli and Gelashvili, Rati},
  title =	{{How Exhaustive Does an Extension-Based Proof Need to Be?}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-252020},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Extension-based proof, set agreement, valency argument, zero-one exclusion}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.29
Strong Linearizability Without Compare&Swap: The Case of Bags

Authors: Faith Ellen and Gal Sela

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
Because strongly-linearizable objects provide stronger guarantees than linearizability, they serve as valuable building blocks for the design of concurrent data structures. Yet, many objects that have linearizable implementations from base objects weaker than compare&swap objects do not have strongly-linearizable implementations from the same base objects. We focus on one such object: the bag, a multiset from which processes can take unspecified elements. We present the first lock-free, strongly-linearizable implementation of a bag from interfering objects (specifically, registers and test&set objects). This may be surprising, since there are provably no such implementations of stacks or queues. Since a bag can contain arbitrarily many elements, an unbounded amount of space must be used to implement it. Hence, it makes sense to also consider a bag with a bound on its capacity. However, like stacks and queues, a bag with capacity b shared by more than 2b processes has no lock-free, strongly-linearizable implementation from interfering objects. If we further restrict a bounded bag so that only one process can insert into it, we are able to obtain a lock-free, strongly-linearizable implementation from O(b+n) interfering objects, where n is the number of processes. Our goal is to understand the circumstances under which strongly-linearizable implementations of bags exist and, more generally, to understand the power of interfering objects.
Cite as

Faith Ellen and Gal Sela. Strong Linearizability Without Compare&Swap: The Case of Bags. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 29:1-29:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ellen_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.29,
  author =	{Ellen, Faith and Sela, Gal},
  title =	{{Strong Linearizability Without Compare\&Swap: The Case of Bags}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248464},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Strong-Linearizability, Bag, Concurrent Data Structures, Wait-Freedom, Lock-Freedom}
}
Document
Brief Announcement
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.62
Brief Announcement: Time, Fences and the Ordering of Events in TSO

Authors: Raïssa Nataf and Yoram Moses

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
Total Store Order (TSO) is one of the most popular relaxed memory model in multiprocessor architectures, widely implemented, for example, in Intel’s x86 and x64 platforms. It delays write visibility via store buffers, thereby allowing a significant improvement in efficiency. This, however, complicates reasoning about correctness, as executions may violate sequential consistency. We present a semantic framework that provides effective tools that can pinpoint when such synchronization is necessary under TSO. We define a TSO-specific occurs-before relation, adapting Lamport’s happens-before to TSO, and prove that events at different sites can be temporally ordered only via an occurs-before chain. Analyzing how fences and RMWs create these chains lets us identify when they are unavoidable. We present in this BA how these results impact linearizable implementations of registers, capturing information flow and causality in TSO. The full version of this work provides details as well as results regarding the need for synchronization in linearizable implementations of additional objects.
Cite as

Raïssa Nataf and Yoram Moses. Brief Announcement: Time, Fences and the Ordering of Events in TSO. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 62:1-62:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{nataf_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.62,
  author =	{Nataf, Ra\"{i}ssa and Moses, Yoram},
  title =	{{Brief Announcement: Time, Fences and the Ordering of Events in TSO}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{62:1--62:7},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.62},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248784},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.62},
  annote =	{Keywords: TSO, linearizability, happens before, fences, synchronization actions}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.10
Amnesiac Flooding: Easy to Break, Hard to Escape

Authors: Henry Austin, Maximilien Gadouleau, George B. Mertzios, and Amitabh Trehan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
Broadcast is a central problem in distributed computing. Recently, Hussak and Trehan [PODC'19/ STACS'20/DC'23] proposed a stateless broadcasting protocol (Amnesiac Flooding), which was surprisingly proven to terminate in asymptotically optimal time (linear in the diameter of the network). However, it remains unclear: (i) Are there other stateless terminating broadcast algorithms with the desirable properties of Amnesiac Flooding, (ii) How robust is Amnesiac Flooding with respect to faults? In this paper we make progress on both of these fronts. Under a reasonable restriction (obliviousness to message content) additional to the fault-free synchronous model, we prove that Amnesiac Flooding is the only strictly stateless deterministic protocol that can achieve terminating broadcast. We achieve this by identifying four natural properties of a terminating broadcast protocol that Amnesiac Flooding uniquely satisfies. In contrast, we prove that even minor relaxations of any of these four criteria allow the construction of other terminating broadcast protocols. On the other hand, we prove that Amnesiac Flooding can become non-terminating or non-broadcasting, even if we allow just one node to drop a single message on a single edge in a single round. As a tool for proving this, we focus on the set of all configurations of transmissions between nodes in the network, and obtain a dichotomy characterizing the configurations, starting from which, Amnesiac Flooding terminates. Additionally, we characterise the structure of sets of Byzantine agents capable of forcing non-termination or non-broadcast of the protocol on arbitrary networks.
Cite as

Henry Austin, Maximilien Gadouleau, George B. Mertzios, and Amitabh Trehan. Amnesiac Flooding: Easy to Break, Hard to Escape. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 10:1-10:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{austin_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.10,
  author =	{Austin, Henry and Gadouleau, Maximilien and Mertzios, George B. and Trehan, Amitabh},
  title =	{{Amnesiac Flooding: Easy to Break, Hard to Escape}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248273},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Amnesiac flooding, Terminating protocol, Algorithm state, Stateless protocol, Flooding algorithm, Network algorithms, Graph theory, Termination, Communication, Broadcast}
}
Document
Brief Announcement
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.46
Brief Announcement: Communication Patterns for Optimal Resilience

Authors: Hagit Attiya, Itay Flam, and Jennifer L. Welch

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)

Abstract
In response to the impossibility of solving the consensus problem in asynchronous systems subject to failures, various relaxations of the consensus problem have been proposed, including approximate agreement, crusader agreement, gather, and reliable broadcast. Some are interesting in their own right while others are useful building blocks for solving other problems. We focus on message-passing systems of n processes, up to f of which can experience malicious (Byzantine) failures. These problems all require that n > 3f and they frequently have fairly simple and efficient algorithms when n > 5f. Challenges arise when considering resilience between 3f+1 and 5f. For instance, nearly twenty years elapsed between the discovery of an approximate agreement algorithm for n > 5f [Danny Dolev et al., 1986] and one for n > 3f [Abraham et al., 2004]. A stumbling block could be too much focus on looking for algorithms in a certain natural and intuitive form, which we call canonical (asynchronous) rounds. In such an algorithm, each process repeatedly sends a message containing its entire state tagged with a round number, then waits to receive n-f messages with that same round number, does some local computation and proceeds to the next round number. The n > 5f approximate agreement algorithm is in canonical round form but the n > 3f one is not. For algorithms in canonical round form, an obvious way of measuring time is the number of canonical rounds until the algorithm completes. However, this approach does not apply to other algorithms, such as those in which processes wait to receive a certain number of messages that have other properties besides simply having a certain round number. Attempts to rewrite these latter algorithms in canonical round form can result in drastically increased round complexity. This blow-up in the round complexity is inherent, as we show in this paper that for a wide set of problems, there is no algorithm in canonical round form that has a finite upper bound on the number of rounds if n ≤ 5f. In contrast, the standard way of measuring time results in constant time complexity. We first show the impossibility of a bounded number of canonical rounds for a generic problem that captures the key properties needed in the proof. The result then follows immediately for, most notably, crusader agreement and flavors of approximate agreement. We then show via reductions that the same result holds for reliable broadcast and gather, since there are crusader agreement algorithms that use reliable broadcast and gather with no round overhead.
Cite as

Hagit Attiya, Itay Flam, and Jennifer L. Welch. Brief Announcement: Communication Patterns for Optimal Resilience. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 46:1-46:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{attiya_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.46,
  author =	{Attiya, Hagit and Flam, Itay and Welch, Jennifer L.},
  title =	{{Brief Announcement: Communication Patterns for Optimal Resilience}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{46:1--46:7},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.46},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248620},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.46},
  annote =	{Keywords: canonical rounds, reliable broadcast, gather, crusader agreement, approximate agreement, time complexity}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.14
Algorithms for the Diverse-k-SAT Problem: The Geometry of Satisfying Assignments

Authors: Per Austrin, Ioana O. Bercea, Mayank Goswami, Nutan Limaye, and Adarsh Srinivasan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 334, 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)

Abstract
Given a k-CNF formula and an integer s ≥ 2, we study algorithms that obtain s solutions to the formula that are as dispersed as possible. For s = 2, this problem of computing the diameter of a k-CNF formula was initiated by Creszenzi and Rossi, who showed strong hardness results even for k = 2. The current best upper bound [Angelsmark and Thapper '04] goes to 4ⁿ as k → ∞. As our first result, we show that this quadratic blow up is not necessary by utilizing the Fast-Fourier transform (FFT) to give a O^*(2ⁿ) time exact algorithm for computing the diameter of any k-CNF formula. For s > 2, the problem was raised in the SAT community (Nadel '11) and several heuristics have been proposed for it, but no algorithms with theoretical guarantees are known. We give exact algorithms using FFT and clique-finding that run in O^*(2^{(s-1)n}) and O^*(s² |Ω_{𝐅}|^{ω ⌈ s/3 ⌉}) respectively, where |Ω_{𝐅}| is the size of the solutions space of the formula 𝐅 and ω is the matrix multiplication exponent. However, current SAT algorithms for finding one solution run in time O^*(2^{ε_{k}n}) for ε_{k} ≈ 1-Θ(1/k), which is much faster than all above run times. As our main result, we analyze two popular SAT algorithms - PPZ (Paturi, Pudlák, Zane '97) and Schöning’s ('02) algorithms, and show that in time poly(s)O^*(2^{ε_{k}n}), they can be used to approximate diameter as well as the dispersion (s > 2) problem. While we need to modify Schöning’s original algorithm for technical reasons, we show that the PPZ algorithm, without any modification, samples solutions in a geometric sense. We believe this geometric sampling property of PPZ may be of independent interest. Finally, we focus on diverse solutions to NP-complete optimization problems, and give bi-approximations running in time poly(s)O^*(2^{ε n}) with ε < 1 for several problems such as Maximum Independent Set, Minimum Vertex Cover, Minimum Hitting Set, Feedback Vertex Set, Multicut on Trees and Interval Vertex Deletion. For all of these problems, all existing exact methods for finding optimal diverse solutions have a runtime with at least an exponential dependence on the number of solutions s. Our methods show that by relaxing to bi-approximations, this dependence on s can be made polynomial.
Cite as

Per Austrin, Ioana O. Bercea, Mayank Goswami, Nutan Limaye, and Adarsh Srinivasan. Algorithms for the Diverse-k-SAT Problem: The Geometry of Satisfying Assignments. In 52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 334, pp. 14:1-14:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{austrin_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.14,
  author =	{Austrin, Per and Bercea, Ioana O. and Goswami, Mayank and Limaye, Nutan and Srinivasan, Adarsh},
  title =	{{Algorithms for the Diverse-k-SAT Problem: The Geometry of Satisfying Assignments}},
  booktitle =	{52nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2025)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-372-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{334},
  editor =	{Censor-Hillel, Keren and Grandoni, Fabrizio and Ouaknine, Jo\"{e}l and Puppis, Gabriele},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-233916},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2025.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: Exponential time algorithms, Satisfiability, k-SAT, PPZ, Sch\"{o}ning, Dispersion, Diversity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2025.28
Faster Approximate Elastic-Degenerate String Matching - Part A

Authors: Solon P. Pissis, Jakub Radoszewski, and Wiktor Zuba

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 331, 36th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2025)

Abstract
An elastic-degenerate (ED) string 𝐓 is a sequence 𝐓 = 𝐓[1] ⋯ 𝐓[n] of n finite sets of strings. The cardinality m of 𝐓 is the total number of strings in 𝐓[i], for all i ∈ [1..n]. The size N of 𝐓 is the total length of all m strings of 𝐓. ED strings have been introduced to represent a set of closely-related DNA sequences. Let P = P[1..p] be a pattern of length p and k > 0 be an integer. We consider the problem of k-Approximate ED String Matching (EDSM): searching k-approximate occurrences of P in the language of 𝐓. We call k-Approximate EDSM under the Hamming distance, k-Mismatch EDSM; and we call k-Approximate EDSM under edit distance, k-Edit EDSM. Bernardini et al. (Theoretical Computer Science, 2020) showed a simple 𝒪(k m p + kN)-time algorithm for k-Mismatch EDSM and an 𝒪(k² m p + kN)-time algorithm for k-Edit EDSM. We improve the dependency on k in both results, obtaining an Õ(k^{2/3}mp+√kN)-time algorithm for k-Mismatch EDSM and an Õ(kmp+ kN)-time algorithm for k-Edit EDSM. Bernardini et al. (Theory of Computing Systems, 2024) presented several algorithms for 1-Approximate EDSM working in Õ(np²+N) time. They have also left the possibility to generalize these solutions for k > 1 as an open problem. We improve the runtime of their solution for 1-Mismatch and 1-Edit EDSM from Õ(np²+N) to 𝒪(np²+N). We further show algorithms for k-Approximate EDSM for the Hamming and edit distances working in Õ(np² + N) time, for any constant k > 0. Finally, we show how our techniques can be applied to improve upon the complexity of the k-Approximate ED String Intersection and k-Approximate Doubly EDSM problems that were introduced very recently by Gabory et al. (Information and Computation, 2025).
Cite as

Solon P. Pissis, Jakub Radoszewski, and Wiktor Zuba. Faster Approximate Elastic-Degenerate String Matching - Part A. In 36th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 331, pp. 28:1-28:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pissis_et_al:LIPIcs.CPM.2025.28,
  author =	{Pissis, Solon P. and Radoszewski, Jakub and Zuba, Wiktor},
  title =	{{Faster Approximate Elastic-Degenerate String Matching - Part A}},
  booktitle =	{36th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2025)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-369-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{331},
  editor =	{Bonizzoni, Paola and M\"{a}kinen, Veli},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2025.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-231227},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2025.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: ED string, approximate string matching, Hamming distance, edit distance}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.34
Agreement Tasks in Fault-Prone Synchronous Networks of Arbitrary Structure

Authors: Pierre Fraigniaud, Minh Hang Nguyen, and Ami Paz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
Consensus is arguably the most studied problem in distributed computing as a whole, and particularly in the distributed message-passing setting. In this latter framework, research on consensus has considered various hypotheses regarding the failure types, the memory constraints, the algorithmic performances (e.g., early stopping and obliviousness), etc. Surprisingly, almost all of this work assumes that messages are passed in a complete network, i.e., each process has a direct link to every other process. A noticeable exception is the recent work of Castañeda et al. (Inf. Comput. 2023) who designed a generic oblivious algorithm for consensus running in radius(G,t) rounds in every graph G, when up to t nodes can crash by irrevocably stopping, where t is smaller than the node-connectivity κ of G. Here, radius(G,t) denotes a graph parameter called the radius of G whenever up to t nodes can crash. For t = 0, this parameter coincides with radius(G), the standard radius of a graph, and, for G = K_n, the running time radius(K_n,t) = t+1 of the algorithm exactly matches the known round-complexity of consensus in the clique K_n. Our main result is a proof that radius(G,t) rounds are necessary for oblivious algorithms solving consensus in G when up to t nodes can crash, thus validating a conjecture of Castañeda et al., and demonstrating that their consensus algorithm is optimal for any graph G. We also extend the result of Castañeda et al. to two different settings: First, to the case where the number t of failures is not necessarily smaller than the connectivity κ of the considered graph; Second, to the k-set agreement problem for which agreement is not restricted to be on a single value as in consensus, but on up to k different values.
Cite as

Pierre Fraigniaud, Minh Hang Nguyen, and Ami Paz. Agreement Tasks in Fault-Prone Synchronous Networks of Arbitrary Structure. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 34:1-34:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fraigniaud_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.34,
  author =	{Fraigniaud, Pierre and Nguyen, Minh Hang and Paz, Ami},
  title =	{{Agreement Tasks in Fault-Prone Synchronous Networks of Arbitrary Structure}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228606},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Consensus, set-agreement, fault tolerance, crash failures}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.54
Partial Minimum Branching Program Size Problem Is ETH-Hard

Authors: Ludmila Glinskih and Artur Riazanov

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
We show that assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, the Partial Minimum Branching Program Size Problem ({MBPSP}^{*}) requires superpolynomial time. This result also applies to the partial minimization problems for many interesting subclasses of branching programs, such as read-k branching programs and OBDDs. Combining these results with the recent unconditional lower bounds for {MCSP} [Ludmila Glinskih and Artur Riazanov, 2022], we obtain an unconditional superpolynomial lower bound on the size of Read-Once Nondeterministic Branching Programs (1- NBP) computing the total versions of the minimum BP, read-k-BP, and OBDD size problems. Additionally we show that it is NP-hard to check whether a given BP computing a partial Boolean function can be compressed to a BP of a given size.
Cite as

Ludmila Glinskih and Artur Riazanov. Partial Minimum Branching Program Size Problem Is ETH-Hard. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 54:1-54:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{glinskih_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.54,
  author =	{Glinskih, Ludmila and Riazanov, Artur},
  title =	{{Partial Minimum Branching Program Size Problem Is ETH-Hard}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{54:1--54:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.54},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226822},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.54},
  annote =	{Keywords: MCSP, branching programs, meta-complexity, lower bounds}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.12
Crash-Tolerant Perpetual Exploration with Myopic Luminous Robots on Rings

Authors: Fukuhito Ooshita, Naoki Kitamura, Ryota Eguchi, Michiko Inoue, Hirotsugu Kakugawa, Sayaka Kamei, Masahiro Shibata, and Yuichi Sudo

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
We investigate crash-tolerant perpetual exploration algorithms by myopic luminous robots on ring networks. Myopic robots mean that they can observe nodes only within a certain fixed distance ϕ, and luminous robots mean that they have light devices that can emit a color from a set of colors. The goal of perpetual exploration is to ensure that robots, starting from specific initial positions and colors, move in such a way that every node is visited by at least one robot infinitely often. As a main contribution, we clarify the tight necessary and sufficient number of robots to realize perpetual exploration when at most f robots crash. In the fully synchronous model, we prove that f+2 robots are necessary and sufficient for any ϕ ≥ 1. In the semi-synchronous and asynchronous models, we prove that 3f+3 (resp., 2f+2) robots are necessary and sufficient if ϕ = 1 (resp., ϕ ≥ 2).
Cite as

Fukuhito Ooshita, Naoki Kitamura, Ryota Eguchi, Michiko Inoue, Hirotsugu Kakugawa, Sayaka Kamei, Masahiro Shibata, and Yuichi Sudo. Crash-Tolerant Perpetual Exploration with Myopic Luminous Robots on Rings. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 12:1-12:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ooshita_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.12,
  author =	{Ooshita, Fukuhito and Kitamura, Naoki and Eguchi, Ryota and Inoue, Michiko and Kakugawa, Hirotsugu and Kamei, Sayaka and Shibata, Masahiro and Sudo, Yuichi},
  title =	{{Crash-Tolerant Perpetual Exploration with Myopic Luminous Robots on Rings}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225486},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: mobile robots, crash faults, LCM model, exploration}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.19
A General Class of Reductions and Extension-Based Proofs

Authors: Yusong Shi and Weidong Liu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
The concept of extension-based proofs models the idea of a valency argument which is widely used in distributed computing. Extension-based proofs have been shown to be limited in power: there is no extension-based proof of the impossibility of a wait-free protocol for (n,k)-set agreement among n > k ≥ 2 processes. Previous work used a restricted class of reductions to show that there are no extension-based proofs of the impossibility of wait-free protocols for some other distributed computing problems. It is known that for a restricted class of reductions, if a task 𝒯 reduces to 𝒮 and 𝒯 has an augmented extension-based proof that it is impossible to solve in the NIS model, then so does 𝒮. We introduce multiple-instance extension-based proofs and show that, if 𝒯 reduces to multiple instances of 𝒮, instead of just one instance and 𝒯 has an augmented extension-based proof, then 𝒮 has a multiple-instance extension-based proof that it is impossible to solve in the NIIS model. We introduce a new version of extension-based proofs that can further our understanding of extension-based proofs and their limitations.
Cite as

Yusong Shi and Weidong Liu. A General Class of Reductions and Extension-Based Proofs. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 19:1-19:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{shi_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.19,
  author =	{Shi, Yusong and Liu, Weidong},
  title =	{{A General Class of Reductions and Extension-Based Proofs}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225559},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Reductions, Impossibility proofs, Extension-based proof}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.4
AMECOS: A Modular Event-Based Framework for Concurrent Object Specification

Authors: Timothé Albouy, Antonio Fernández Anta, Chryssis Georgiou, Mathieu Gestin, Nicolas Nicolaou, and Junlang Wang

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)

Abstract
In this work, we introduce a modular framework for specifying distributed systems that we call AMECOS. Specifically, our framework departs from the traditional use of sequential specification, which presents limitations both on the specification expressiveness and implementation efficiency of inherently concurrent objects, as documented by Castañeda, Rajsbaum and Raynal in CACM 2023. Our framework focuses on the interactions between the various system components, specified as concurrent objects. Interactions are described with sequences of object events. This provides a modular way of specifying distributed systems and separates legality (object semantics) from other issues, such as consistency. We demonstrate the usability of our framework by (i) specifying various well-known concurrent objects, such as registers, shared memory, message-passing, reliable broadcast, and consensus, (ii) providing hierarchies of ordering semantics (namely, consistency hierarchy, memory hierarchy, and reliable broadcast hierarchy), and (iii) presenting a novel axiomatic proof of the impossibility of the well-known Consensus problem.
Cite as

Timothé Albouy, Antonio Fernández Anta, Chryssis Georgiou, Mathieu Gestin, Nicolas Nicolaou, and Junlang Wang. AMECOS: A Modular Event-Based Framework for Concurrent Object Specification. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 4:1-4:29, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{albouy_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.4,
  author =	{Albouy, Timoth\'{e} and Fern\'{a}ndez Anta, Antonio and Georgiou, Chryssis and Gestin, Mathieu and Nicolaou, Nicolas and Wang, Junlang},
  title =	{{AMECOS: A Modular Event-Based Framework for Concurrent Object Specification}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:29},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225409},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Concurrency, Object specification, Consistency conditions, Consensus impossibility}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 23 Document/PDF
  • 16 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2026
  • 11 2025
  • 2 2024
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 6 Castañeda, Armando
  • 4 Attiya, Hagit
  • 2 Albouy, Timothé
  • 2 Chockler, Gregory
  • 2 Ellen, Faith
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 22 LIPIcs
  • 1 DagRep

  • Refine by Classification
  • 12 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
  • 10 Theory of computation → Distributed computing models
  • 6 Theory of computation → Concurrent algorithms
  • 4 Computing methodologies → Distributed algorithms
  • 3 Computing methodologies → Concurrent algorithms
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Impossibility proofs
  • 3 Wait-freedom
  • 2 Asynchrony
  • 2 Correctness condition
  • 2 Extension-based proof
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact