25 Search Results for "Carmosino, Marco"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.7
Computing L_∞ Hausdorff Distances Under Translations: The Interplay of Dimensionality, Symmetry and Discreteness

Authors: Sebastian Angrick, Kevin Buchin, Geri Gokaj, and Marvin Künnemann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)

Abstract
To measure the similarity of the shape of point sets, rather than their mere closeness in space, various notions of a Hausdorff distance under translation have been investigated. Specifically, let P and Q denote point sets of n and m points, respectively, in ℝ^d. We consider the task of computing the minimum distance d(P,Q+τ) over an admissible set of translations τ ∈ T, where d(⋅, ⋅) denotes the Hausdorff distance under the L_∞-norm. As variants, we distinguish between continuous (T = ℝ^d) or discrete (T is a given finite set of t translations) as well as directed or undirected (choosing the directed or undirected Hausdorff distance for d(⋅, ⋅)). We seek to apply the paradigm of fine-grained complexity to understand the complexity of these variants, and in particular: How is the running time influenced by the dimension d, the relationship between n and m, and the specific choice of variant? As our main results, we obtain: - The asymmetric definition of the most studied variant, the continuous directed Hausdorff distance, results in an intrinsically asymmetric time complexity: While (Chan, SoCG'23) established a symmetric Õ((nm)^{d/2}) upper bound for all d ≥ 3 and proved it to be conditionally optimal for combinatorial algorithms whenever m ≤ n, we show that this lower bound does not hold for the case n ≪ m, by providing a combinatorial, almost-linear-time algorithm for d = 3 and n = m^{o(1)}. We further prove general, i.e., non-combinatorial, conditional lower bounds for d ≥ 3, in particular: (1) m^{⌊d/2⌋ - o(1)} for small n and (2) n^{d/2 - o(1)} for d = 3 and small m. - We observe that the directed and undirected case is closely related, in particular, all our lower bounds for d ≥ 3 hold for both the directed and undirected variant. A remarkable exception is the case of d = 1 for which we provide a conditional separation. Specifically, in contrast to the undirected variants being solvable in near-linear time (Rote, IPL'91), we show that the directed variants are at least as hard as the additive problem MaxConv LowerBound introduced in (Cygan, Mucha, Wegrzycki and Wlodarczyk, TALG'19). - We show that the discrete variants reduce to a variant of 3SUM for d ≤ 3. This gives a barrier in proving a tight lower bound of these variants under the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis (OVH); in contrast, the continuous variants admit a tight conditional lower bound under OVH in d = 2 (Bringmann, Nusser, JoCG'21). These results reveal an intricate interplay of dimensionality, symmetry and discreteness in determining the fine-grained complexity of computing Hausdorff distances under translation.
Cite as

Sebastian Angrick, Kevin Buchin, Geri Gokaj, and Marvin Künnemann. Computing L_∞ Hausdorff Distances Under Translations: The Interplay of Dimensionality, Symmetry and Discreteness. In 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 367, pp. 7:1-7:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{angrick_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.7,
  author =	{Angrick, Sebastian and Buchin, Kevin and Gokaj, Geri and K\"{u}nnemann, Marvin},
  title =	{{Computing L\underline∞ Hausdorff Distances Under Translations: The Interplay of Dimensionality, Symmetry and Discreteness}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-418-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{367},
  editor =	{Ahn, Hee-Kap and Hoffmann, Michael and Nayyeri, Amir},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258131},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hausdorff Distance, Fine-Grained Complexity, Computational Geometry, Translation-Invariant Similarity Measures}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.23
Simple Circuit Extensions for XOR in PTIME

Authors: Marco Carmosino, Ngu Dang, and Tim Jackman

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
The Minimum Circuit Size Problem for Partial Functions (MCSP^*) is hard assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) (Ilango, 2020). This breakthrough result leveraged a characterization of the optimal {∧, ∨, ¬} circuits for n-bit OR (OR_n) and a reduction from the partial f-Simple Extension Problem where f = OR_n. It remains open to extend that reduction to show ETH-hardness of total MCSP. However, Ilango observed that the total f-Simple Extension Problem is easy whenever f is computed by read-once formulas (like OR_n). Therefore, extending Ilango’s proof to total MCSP would require replacing OR_n with a more complex but similarly well-understood Boolean function. This work shows that the f-Simple Extension problem remains easy when f is the next natural candidate: XOR_n. We first develop a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for the f-Simple Extension Problem that is efficient whenever the optimal circuits for f are (1) linear in size, (2) polynomially "few" and efficiently enumerable in the truth-table size (up to isomorphism and permutation of inputs), and (3) all have constant bounded fan-out. XOR_n satisfies all three of these conditions. When ¬ gates count towards circuit size, optimal XOR_n circuits are binary trees of n-1 subcircuits computing (¬)XOR₂ (Kombarov, 2011). We extend this characterization when ¬ gates do not contribute the circuit size. Thus, the XOR-Simple Extension Problem is in polynomial time under both measures of circuit complexity. We conclude by discussing conjectures about the complexity of the f-Simple Extension problem for each explicit function f with known and unrestricted circuit lower bounds over the DeMorgan basis. Examining the conditions under which our Simple Extension Solver is efficient, we argue that multiplexer functions (MUX) are the most promising candidate for ETH-hardness of a Simple Extension Problem, towards proving ETH-hardness of total MCSP.
Cite as

Marco Carmosino, Ngu Dang, and Tim Jackman. Simple Circuit Extensions for XOR in PTIME. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 23:1-23:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{carmosino_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.23,
  author =	{Carmosino, Marco and Dang, Ngu and Jackman, Tim},
  title =	{{Simple Circuit Extensions for XOR in PTIME}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255127},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Minimum Circuit Size Problem, Circuit Lower Bounds, Exponential Time Hypothesis}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.28
Conditional Complexity Hardness: Monotone Circuit Size, Matrix Rigidity, and Tensor Rank

Authors: Nikolai Chukhin, Alexander S. Kulikov, Ivan Mihajlin, and Arina Smirnova

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)

Abstract
Proving complexity lower bounds remains a challenging task: currently, we only know how to prove conditional uniform (algorithm) lower bounds and nonuniform (circuit) lower bounds in restricted circuit models. About a decade ago, Williams (STOC 2010) showed how to derive nonuniform lower bounds from uniform upper bounds: roughly, by designing a fast algorithm for checking satisfiability of circuits, one gets a lower bound for this circuit class. Since then, a number of results of this kind have been proved. For example, Jahanjou et al. (ICALP 2015) and Carmosino et al. (ITCS 2016) proved that if NSETH fails, then E^{NP} has series-parallel circuit size ω(n). One can also derive nonuniform lower bounds from nondeterministic uniform lower bounds. Perhaps the most well-known example is the Karp-Lipton theorem (STOC 1980): if Σ₂ ≠ Π₂, then NP ⊄ P/poly. Some recent examples include the following. Nederlof (STOC 2020) proved a lower bound on the matrix multiplication tensor rank under an assumption that TSP cannot be solved faster than in 2ⁿ time. Belova et al. (SODA 2024) proved that there exists an explicit polynomial family of arithmetic circuit size Ω(n^{δ}), for any δ > 0, assuming that MAX-3-SAT cannot be solved faster than in 2ⁿ nondeterministic time. Williams (FOCS 2024) proved an exponential lower bound for ETHR ∘ ETHR circuits under the Orthogonal Vectors conjecture. Whereas all the lower bounds above are proved under strong assumptions that might eventually be refuted, the revealed connections are of great interest and may still give further insights: one may be able to weaken the used assumptions or to construct generators from other fine-grained reductions. In this paper, we continue developing this line of research and show how uniform nondeterministic lower bounds can be used to construct generators of various types of combinatorial objects that are notoriously hard to analyze: Boolean functions of high circuit size, matrices of high rigidity, and tensors of high rank. Specifically, we prove the following. - If, for some ε and k, k-SAT cannot be solved in input-oblivious co-nondeterministic time O(2^{(1/2+ε)n}), then there exists a monotone Boolean function family in coNP of monotone circuit size 2^{Ω(n / log n)}. Combining this with the result above, we get win-win circuit lower bounds: either E^{NP{}} requires series-parallel circuits of size ω(n) or coNP requires monotone circuits of size 2^{Ω(n / log n)}. - If, for all ε > 0, MAX-3-SAT cannot be solved in co-nondeterministic time O(2^{(1 - ε)n}), then there exist small families of matrices with rigidity exceeding the best known constructions as well as small families of three-dimensional tensors of rank n^{1+Δ}, for some Δ > 0.
Cite as

Nikolai Chukhin, Alexander S. Kulikov, Ivan Mihajlin, and Arina Smirnova. Conditional Complexity Hardness: Monotone Circuit Size, Matrix Rigidity, and Tensor Rank. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 28:1-28:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chukhin_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.28,
  author =	{Chukhin, Nikolai and Kulikov, Alexander S. and Mihajlin, Ivan and Smirnova, Arina},
  title =	{{Conditional Complexity Hardness: Monotone Circuit Size, Matrix Rigidity, and Tensor Rank}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255177},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: computational complexity, circuit complexity, lower bounds, conditional lower bounds, monotone circuits, matrix rigidity, tensor rank, arithmetic circuits, fine-grained complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.35
Boolean Basis and Succinctness of Modal Logic via Hella-Vilander Games

Authors: Sebastian Pfau

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
The Hella-Vilander game for modal logic is a model comparison game that captures the formula size necessary to separate sets of pointed Kripke structures. We introduce the ℳ-ON game as a modification of this game. Our game captures the necessary number of modal operators, i.e., ◇ and □ instead of formula size. We use our game to show that the bi-implication ↔, sometimes also called equivalence, enables us to write modal logic formula with significantly fewer modal operators. With this we show, that with bi-implications we can also write significantly shorter modal logic formulas. This result holds even if only special classes of Kripke structures are considered. To be more precise we show that there is an exponential succinctness gap between modal logic and its extension with bi-implication on the class of structures with a transitive and reflexive accessibility relation, as well as on the class of structures with a symmetrical and reflexive accessibility relation. Lastly we show that for the class of structures with a transitive and symmetrical accessibility relation this succinctness gap disappears.
Cite as

Sebastian Pfau. Boolean Basis and Succinctness of Modal Logic via Hella-Vilander Games. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 35:1-35:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pfau:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.35,
  author =	{Pfau, Sebastian},
  title =	{{Boolean Basis and Succinctness of Modal Logic via Hella-Vilander Games}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{35:1--35:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.35},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254600},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.35},
  annote =	{Keywords: succinctness, modal logic, model comparison games}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.36
A Game for Counting Logic Formula Size and an Application to Linear Orders

Authors: Grégoire Fournier and György Turán

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 363, 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)

Abstract
Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé (EF) games are a basic tool in finite model theory for proving definability lower bounds, with many applications in complexity theory and related areas. They have been applied to study various logics, giving insights on quantifier rank and other logical complexity measures. In this paper, we present an EF game to capture formula size in counting logic with a bounded number of variables. The game combines games introduced previously for counting logic quantifier rank due to Immerman and Lander, and for first-order formula size due to Adler and Immerman, and Hella and Väänänen. The game is used to prove an extension of a formula size lower bound of Grohe and Schweikardt for distinguishing linear orders, from 3-variable first-order logic to 3-variable counting logic.
Cite as

Grégoire Fournier and György Turán. A Game for Counting Logic Formula Size and an Application to Linear Orders. In 34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 363, pp. 36:1-36:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fournier_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2026.36,
  author =	{Fournier, Gr\'{e}goire and Tur\'{a}n, Gy\"{o}rgy},
  title =	{{A Game for Counting Logic Formula Size and an Application to Linear Orders}},
  booktitle =	{34th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2026)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-411-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{363},
  editor =	{Guerrini, Stefano and K\"{o}nig, Barbara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254612},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2026.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: Finite Model Theory, Logical Aspects of Computational Complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.56
The Hardness of Learning Quantum Circuits and Its Cryptographic Applications

Authors: Bill Fefferman, Soumik Ghosh, Makrand Sinha, and Henry Yuen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
We show that concrete hardness assumptions about learning or cloning the output state of a random quantum circuit can be used as the foundation for secure quantum cryptography. In particular, under these assumptions we construct secure one-way state generators (OWSGs), digital signature schemes, quantum bit commitments, and private key encryption schemes. We also discuss evidence for these hardness assumptions by analyzing the best-known quantum learning algorithms, as well as proving black-box lower bounds for cloning and learning given state preparation oracles. Our random circuit-based constructions provide concrete instantiations of quantum cryptographic primitives whose security do not depend on the existence of one-way functions. The use of random circuits in our constructions also opens the door to {NISQ-friendly quantum cryptography}. We discuss noise tolerant versions of our OWSG and digital signature constructions which can potentially be implementable on noisy quantum computers connected by a quantum network. On the other hand, they are still secure against {noiseless} quantum adversaries, raising the intriguing possibility of a useful implementation of an end-to-end cryptographic protocol on near-term quantum computers. Finally, our explorations suggest that the rich interconnections between learning theory and cryptography in classical theoretical computer science also extend to the quantum setting.
Cite as

Bill Fefferman, Soumik Ghosh, Makrand Sinha, and Henry Yuen. The Hardness of Learning Quantum Circuits and Its Cryptographic Applications. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 56:1-56:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fefferman_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.56,
  author =	{Fefferman, Bill and Ghosh, Soumik and Sinha, Makrand and Yuen, Henry},
  title =	{{The Hardness of Learning Quantum Circuits and Its Cryptographic Applications}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{56:1--56:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.56},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253431},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.56},
  annote =	{Keywords: quantum learning, quantum circuits, cryptographic hardness, one-way state generators}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.20
Samplability Makes Learning Easier

Authors: Guy Blanc, Caleb Koch, Jane Lange, Carmen Strassle, and Li-Yang Tan

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
The standard definition of PAC learning (Valiant 1984) requires learners to succeed under all distributions - even ones that are intractable to sample from. This stands in contrast to samplable PAC learning (Blum, Furst, Kearns, and Lipton 1993), where learners only have to succeed under samplable distributions. We study this distinction and show that samplable PAC substantially expands the power of efficient learners. We first construct a concept class that requires exponential sample complexity in standard PAC but is learnable with polynomial sample complexity in samplable PAC. We then lift this statistical separation to the computational setting and obtain a separation relative to a random oracle. Our proofs center around a new complexity primitive, explicit evasive sets, that we introduce and study. These are sets for which membership is easy to determine but are extremely hard to sample from. Our results extend to the online setting to similarly show that its landscape changes when the adversary is assumed to be efficient instead of computationally unbounded.
Cite as

Guy Blanc, Caleb Koch, Jane Lange, Carmen Strassle, and Li-Yang Tan. Samplability Makes Learning Easier. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 20:1-20:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{blanc_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.20,
  author =	{Blanc, Guy and Koch, Caleb and Lange, Jane and Strassle, Carmen and Tan, Li-Yang},
  title =	{{Samplability Makes Learning Easier}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-253071},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: PAC learning, Samplable distributions}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.113
Multi-Quadratic Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bounds Imply VNC ¹ ≠ VNP

Authors: Benjamin Rossman and Davidson Zhu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
The sum-of-squares (SoS) complexity of a d-multiquadratic polynomial f (quadratic in each of d blocks of n variables) is the minimum s such that f = ∑_{i = 1}^s g_i² with each g_i d-multilinear. In the case d = 2, Hrubeš, Wigderson and Yehudayoff [Hrubeš et al., 2011] showed that an n^{1+Ω(1)} lower bound on the SoS complexity of explicit biquadratic polynomials implies an exponential lower bound for non-commutative arithmetic circuits. In this paper, we establish an analogous connection between general multiquadratic sum-of-squares and commutative arithmetic formulas. Specifically, we show that an n^{d-o(log d)} lower bound on the SoS complexity of explicit d-multiquadratic polynomials, for any d = d(n) with ω(1) ≤ d(n) ≤ O((log n)/(log log n)), would separate the algebraic complexity classes VNC¹ and VNP.
Cite as

Benjamin Rossman and Davidson Zhu. Multi-Quadratic Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bounds Imply VNC ¹ ≠ VNP. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 113:1-113:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{rossman_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.113,
  author =	{Rossman, Benjamin and Zhu, Davidson},
  title =	{{Multi-Quadratic Sum-Of-Squares Lower Bounds Imply VNC ¹ ≠ VNP}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{113:1--113:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.113},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254006},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.113},
  annote =	{Keywords: sum-of-squares, arithmetic formulas}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.115
Lower Bounds for Noncommutative Circuits with Low Syntactic Degree

Authors: Pratik Shastri

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 362, 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)

Abstract
Proving lower bounds on the size of noncommutative arithmetic circuits is an important problem in arithmetic circuit complexity. For explicit n variate polynomials of degree Θ(n), the best known general bound is Ω(n log n) [Strassen, 1973; Walter Baur and Volker Strassen, 1983]. Recent work of Chatterjee and Hrubeš [Chatterjee and Hrubeš, 2023] has provided stronger (Ω(n²)) bounds for the restricted class of homogeneous circuits. The present paper extends these results to a broader class of circuits by using syntactic degree as a complexity measure. The syntactic degree of a circuit is a well known parameter which measures the extent to which high degree computation is used in the circuit. A homogeneous circuit computing a degree d polynomial can be assumed, without loss of generality, to have syntactic degree exactly equal to d [Fournier et al., 2024]. We generalize this by considering circuits that are not necessarily homogeneous but have low syntactic degree. Specifically, for an explicit n variate, degree n polynomial f we show that any circuit with syntactic degree O(n) computing f must have size Ω(n^{1+c}) for some constant c > 0. We also show that any circuit with syntactic degree o(nlog n) computing the same f must have size ω(nlog n). We further analyze the circuit size required to compute f based on the number of distinct syntactic degrees appearing in the circuit. Our analysis yields an ω(nlog n) size lower bound for all but a narrow parameter regime where an improved bound is not obtained. Finally, we observe that low syntactic degree circuits are more powerful than homogeneous circuits in a fine grained sense: there exists an n variate, degree Θ(n) polynomial that has a circuit of size O(nlog ²n) and syntactic degree O(n) but any homogeneous circuit computing it requires size Ω(n²).
Cite as

Pratik Shastri. Lower Bounds for Noncommutative Circuits with Low Syntactic Degree. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 362, pp. 115:1-115:9, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{shastri:LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.115,
  author =	{Shastri, Pratik},
  title =	{{Lower Bounds for Noncommutative Circuits with Low Syntactic Degree}},
  booktitle =	{17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026)},
  pages =	{115:1--115:9},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-410-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{362},
  editor =	{Saraf, Shubhangi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.115},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-254028},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.115},
  annote =	{Keywords: Noncommutative Circuits, Lower Bounds, Circuit Complexity, Algebraic Complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.111
Hardness of Median and Center in the Ulam Metric

Authors: Nick Fischer, Elazar Goldenberg, Mursalin Habib, and Karthik C. S.

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
The classical rank aggregation problem seeks to combine a set X of n permutations into a single representative "consensus" permutation. In this paper, we investigate two fundamental rank aggregation tasks under the well-studied Ulam metric: computing a median permutation (which minimizes the sum of Ulam distances to X) and computing a center permutation (which minimizes the maximum Ulam distance to X) in two settings. - Continuous Setting: In the continuous setting, the median/center is allowed to be any permutation. It is known that computing a center in the Ulam metric is NP-hard and we add to this by showing that computing a median is NP-hard as well via a simple reduction from the Max-Cut problem. While this result may not be unexpected, it had remained elusive until now and confirms a speculation by Chakraborty, Das, and Krauthgamer [SODA '21]. - Discrete Setting: In the discrete setting, the median/center must be a permutation from the input set. We fully resolve the fine-grained complexity of the discrete median and discrete center problems under the Ulam metric, proving that the naive Õ(n² L)-time algorithm (where L is the length of the permutation) is conditionally optimal. This resolves an open problem raised by Abboud, Bateni, Cohen-Addad, Karthik C. S., and Seddighin [APPROX '23]. Our reductions are inspired by the known fine-grained lower bounds for similarity measures, but we face and overcome several new highly technical challenges.
Cite as

Nick Fischer, Elazar Goldenberg, Mursalin Habib, and Karthik C. S.. Hardness of Median and Center in the Ulam Metric. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 111:1-111:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fischer_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.111,
  author =	{Fischer, Nick and Goldenberg, Elazar and Habib, Mursalin and Karthik C. S.},
  title =	{{Hardness of Median and Center in the Ulam Metric}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{111:1--111:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.111},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-245809},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.111},
  annote =	{Keywords: Ulam distance, median, center, rank aggregation, fine-grained complexity}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.31
Towards Free Lunch Derandomization from Necessary Assumptions (And OWFs)

Authors: Marshall Ball, Lijie Chen, and Roei Tell

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
The question of optimal derandomization, introduced by Doron et. al (JACM 2022), garnered significant recent attention. Works in recent years showed conditional superfast derandomization algorithms, as well as conditional impossibility results, and barriers for obtaining superfast derandomization using certain black-box techniques. Of particular interest is the extreme high-end, which focuses on "free lunch" derandomization, as suggested by Chen and Tell (FOCS 2021). This is derandomization that incurs essentially no time overhead, and errs only on inputs that are infeasible to find. Constructing such algorithms is challenging, and so far there have not been any results following the one in their initial work. In their result, their algorithm is essentially the classical Nisan-Wigderson generator, and they relied on an ad-hoc assumption asserting the existence of a function that is non-batch-computable over all polynomial-time samplable distributions. In this work we deduce free lunch derandomization from a variety of natural hardness assumptions. In particular, we do not resort to non-batch-computability, and the common denominator for all of our assumptions is hardness over all polynomial-time samplable distributions, which is necessary for the conclusion. The main technical components in our proofs are constructions of new and superfast targeted generators, which completely eliminate the time overheads that are inherent to all previously known constructions. In particular, we present an alternative construction for the targeted generator by Chen and Tell (FOCS 2021), which is faster than the original construction, and also more natural and technically intuitive. These contributions significantly strengthen the evidence for the possibility of free lunch derandomization, distill the required assumptions for such a result, and provide the first set of dedicated technical tools that are useful for studying the question.
Cite as

Marshall Ball, Lijie Chen, and Roei Tell. Towards Free Lunch Derandomization from Necessary Assumptions (And OWFs). In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 31:1-31:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ball_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.31,
  author =	{Ball, Marshall and Chen, Lijie and Tell, Roei},
  title =	{{Towards Free Lunch Derandomization from Necessary Assumptions (And OWFs)}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237259},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Pseudorandomness, Derandomization}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.34
Witness Encryption and NP-Hardness of Learning

Authors: Halley Goldberg and Valentine Kabanets

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 339, 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)

Abstract
We study connections between two fundamental questions from computer science theory. (1) Is witness encryption possible for NP [Sanjam Garg et al., 2013]? That is, given an instance x of an NP-complete language L, can one encrypt a secret message with security contingent on the ability to provide a witness for x ∈ L? (2) Is computational learning (in the sense of [Leslie G. Valiant, 1984; Michael J. Kearns et al., 1994]) hard for NP? That is, is there a polynomial-time reduction from instances of L to instances of learning? Our main contribution is that certain formulations of NP-hardness of learning characterize the existence of witness encryption for NP. More specifically, we show: - witness encryption for a language L ∈ NP is equivalent to a half-Levin reduction from L to the Computational Gap Learning problem (denoted CGL [Benny Applebaum et al., 2008]), where a half-Levin reduction is the same as a Levin reduction but only required to preserve witnesses in one direction, and CGL formalizes agnostic learning as a decision problem. We show versions of the statement above for witness encryption secure against non-uniform and uniform adversaries. We also show that witness encryption for NP with ciphertexts of logarithmic length, along with a circuit lower bound for E, are together equivalent to NP-hardness of a generalized promise version of MCSP. We complement the above with a number of unconditional NP-hardness results for agnostic PAC learning. Extending a result of [Shuichi Hirahara, 2022] to the standard setting of boolean circuits, we show NP-hardness of "semi-proper" learning. Namely: - for some polynomial s, it is NP-hard to agnostically learn circuits of size s(n) by circuits of size s(n)⋅ n^{1/(log log n)^O(1)}. Looking beyond the computational model of standard boolean circuits enables us to prove NP-hardness of improper learning (ie. without a restriction on the size of hypothesis returned by the learner). We obtain such results for: - learning circuits with oracle access to a given randomly sampled string, and - learning RAM programs. In particular, we show that a variant of MINLT [Ker-I Ko, 1991] for RAM programs is NP-hard with parameters corresponding to the setting of improper learning. We view these results as partial progress toward the ultimate goal of showing NP-hardness of learning boolean circuits in an improper setting. Lastly, we give some consequences of NP-hardness of learning for private- and public-key cryptography. Improving a main result of [Benny Applebaum et al., 2008], we show that if improper agnostic PAC learning is NP-hard under a randomized non-adaptive reduction (with some restrictions), then NP ⊈ BPP implies the existence of i.o. one-way functions. In contrast, if CGL is NP-hard under a half-Levin reduction, then NP ⊈ BPP implies the existence of i.o. public-key encryption.
Cite as

Halley Goldberg and Valentine Kabanets. Witness Encryption and NP-Hardness of Learning. In 40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 339, pp. 34:1-34:43, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{goldberg_et_al:LIPIcs.CCC.2025.34,
  author =	{Goldberg, Halley and Kabanets, Valentine},
  title =	{{Witness Encryption and NP-Hardness of Learning}},
  booktitle =	{40th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2025)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:43},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-379-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{339},
  editor =	{Srinivasan, Srikanth},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-237281},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2025.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: agnostic PAC learning, witness encryption, NP-hardness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.30
Provability of the Circuit Size Hierarchy and Its Consequences

Authors: Marco Carmosino, Valentine Kabanets, Antonina Kolokolova, Igor C. Oliveira, and Dimitrios Tsintsilidas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 325, 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)

Abstract
The Circuit Size Hierarchy (CSH^a_b) states that if a > b ≥ 1 then the set of functions on n variables computed by Boolean circuits of size n^a is strictly larger than the set of functions computed by circuits of size n^b. This result, which is a cornerstone of circuit complexity theory, follows from the non-constructive proof of the existence of functions of large circuit complexity obtained by Shannon in 1949. Are there more "constructive" proofs of the Circuit Size Hierarchy? Can we quantify this? Motivated by these questions, we investigate the provability of CSH^a_b in theories of bounded arithmetic. Among other contributions, we establish the following results: i) Given any a > b > 1, CSH^a_b is provable in Buss’s theory 𝖳²₂. ii) In contrast, if there are constants a > b > 1 such that CSH^a_b is provable in the theory 𝖳¹₂, then there is a constant ε > 0 such that 𝖯^NP requires non-uniform circuits of size at least n^{1 + ε}. In other words, an improved upper bound on the proof complexity of CSH^a_b would lead to new lower bounds in complexity theory. We complement these results with a proof of the Formula Size Hierarchy (FSH^a_b) in PV₁ with parameters a > 2 and b = 3/2. This is in contrast with typical formalizations of complexity lower bounds in bounded arithmetic, which require APC₁ or stronger theories and are not known to hold even in 𝖳¹₂.
Cite as

Marco Carmosino, Valentine Kabanets, Antonina Kolokolova, Igor C. Oliveira, and Dimitrios Tsintsilidas. Provability of the Circuit Size Hierarchy and Its Consequences. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 325, pp. 30:1-30:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{carmosino_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.30,
  author =	{Carmosino, Marco and Kabanets, Valentine and Kolokolova, Antonina and C. Oliveira, Igor and Tsintsilidas, Dimitrios},
  title =	{{Provability of the Circuit Size Hierarchy and Its Consequences}},
  booktitle =	{16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2025)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-361-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{325},
  editor =	{Meka, Raghu},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-226586},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: Bounded Arithmetic, Circuit Complexity, Hierarchy Theorems}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.17
Description Complexity of Unary Structures in First-Order Logic with Links to Entropy

Authors: Reijo Jaakkola, Antti Kuusisto, and Miikka Vilander

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 326, 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)

Abstract
The description complexity of a model is the length of the shortest formula that defines the model. We study the description complexity of unary structures in first-order logic FO, also drawing links to semantic complexity in the form of entropy. The class of unary structures provides, e.g., a simple way to represent tabular Boolean data sets as relational structures. We define structures with FO-formulas that are strictly linear in the size of the model as opposed to using the naive quadratic ones, and we use arguments based on formula size games to obtain related lower bounds for description complexity. For a typical structure the upper and lower bounds in fact match up to a sublinear term, leading to a precise asymptotic result on the expected description complexity of a randomly selected structure. We then give bounds on the relationship between Shannon entropy and description complexity. We extend this relationship also to Boltzmann entropy by establishing an asymptotic match between the two entropies. Despite the simplicity of unary structures, our arguments require the use of formula size games, Stirling’s approximation and Chernoff bounds.
Cite as

Reijo Jaakkola, Antti Kuusisto, and Miikka Vilander. Description Complexity of Unary Structures in First-Order Logic with Links to Entropy. In 33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 326, pp. 17:1-17:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jaakkola_et_al:LIPIcs.CSL.2025.17,
  author =	{Jaakkola, Reijo and Kuusisto, Antti and Vilander, Miikka},
  title =	{{Description Complexity of Unary Structures in First-Order Logic with Links to Entropy}},
  booktitle =	{33rd EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-362-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{326},
  editor =	{Endrullis, J\"{o}rg and Schmitz, Sylvain},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-227749},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: formula size, finite model theory, formula size games, entropy, randomness}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.34
On the Number of Quantifiers Needed to Define Boolean Functions

Authors: Marco Carmosino, Ronald Fagin, Neil Immerman, Phokion G. Kolaitis, Jonathan Lenchner, and Rik Sengupta

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 306, 49th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2024)

Abstract
The number of quantifiers needed to express first-order (FO) properties is captured by two-player combinatorial games called multi-structural games. We analyze these games on binary strings with an ordering relation, using a technique we call parallel play, which significantly reduces the number of quantifiers needed in many cases. Ordered structures such as strings have historically been notoriously difficult to analyze in the context of these and similar games. Nevertheless, in this paper, we provide essentially tight bounds on the number of quantifiers needed to characterize different-sized subsets of strings. The results immediately give bounds on the number of quantifiers necessary to define several different classes of Boolean functions. One of our results is analogous to Lupanov’s upper bounds on circuit size and formula size in propositional logic: we show that every Boolean function on n-bit inputs can be defined by a FO sentence having (1+ε)n/log(n) + O(1) quantifiers, and that this is essentially tight. We reduce this number to (1 + ε)log(n) + O(1) when the Boolean function in question is sparse.
Cite as

Marco Carmosino, Ronald Fagin, Neil Immerman, Phokion G. Kolaitis, Jonathan Lenchner, and Rik Sengupta. On the Number of Quantifiers Needed to Define Boolean Functions. In 49th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 306, pp. 34:1-34:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{carmosino_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.34,
  author =	{Carmosino, Marco and Fagin, Ronald and Immerman, Neil and Kolaitis, Phokion G. and Lenchner, Jonathan and Sengupta, Rik},
  title =	{{On the Number of Quantifiers Needed to Define Boolean Functions}},
  booktitle =	{49th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2024)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-335-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{306},
  editor =	{Kr\'{a}lovi\v{c}, Rastislav and Ku\v{c}era, Anton{\'\i}n},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-205907},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: logic, combinatorial games, Boolean functions, quantifier number}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 25 Document/PDF
  • 14 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 9 2026
  • 5 2025
  • 2 2024
  • 1 2021
  • 2 2020
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 6 Impagliazzo, Russell
  • 6 Kabanets, Valentine
  • 5 Carmosino, Marco L.
  • 5 Kolokolova, Antonina
  • 4 Carmosino, Marco
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 25 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Computational complexity and cryptography
  • 5 Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness
  • 3 Theory of computation → Algebraic complexity theory
  • 3 Theory of computation → Circuit complexity
  • 3 Theory of computation → Complexity theory and logic
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 3 Minimum Circuit Size Problem
  • 3 circuit complexity
  • 3 circuit lower bounds
  • 3 fine-grained complexity
  • 3 natural proofs
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact