14 Search Results for "Rivera, Nicolás"


Document
Flip Distance of Non-Crossing Spanning Trees: NP-Hardness and Improved Bounds

Authors: Håvard Bakke Bjerkevik, Joseph Dorfer, Linda Kleist, Torsten Ueckerdt, and Birgit Vogtenhuber

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)


Abstract
We consider the problem of reconfiguring non-crossing spanning trees on point sets. For a set P of n points in general position in the plane, the flip graph ℱ(P) has a vertex for each non-crossing spanning tree on P and an edge between any two spanning trees that can be transformed into each other by the exchange of a single edge (coined a flip). This flip graph has been intensively studied, lately with an emphasis on determining its diameter diam(ℱ(P)) for sets P of n points in convex position. For this case, the current best bounds are 14/9⋅n - O(1) ≤ diam(ℱ(P)) < 15/9⋅n - 3, obtained in a recent breakthrough work [Bjerkevik, Kleist, Ueckerdt, and Vogtenhuber; SODA 2025]. The crucial tool for both the upper and lower bound are so-called conflict graphs, which the authors stated might be the key ingredient for determining the diameter (up to lower-order terms). In this paper, we pick up the concept of conflict graphs from the above-mentioned work and show that this tool is even more versatile than previously hoped. As our first main result, we use conflict graphs to show that computing the flip distance between two non-crossing spanning trees is NP-hard, even for point sets in convex position. Interestingly, the result still holds for more constrained flip operations, concretely, compatible flips (where the removed and the added edge do not cross) and rotations (where the removed and the added edge share an endpoint). Additionally, we present new insights on the diameter of the flip graph, by this directly extending the line of research from [BKUV SODA25]. Their lower bound is based on a constant-size pair of trees, one of which is of a type we refer to as stacked. We show that if one of the trees is stacked, then the lower bound is indeed optimal up to a constant term, that is, there exists a flip sequence of length at most 14/9⋅(n-1) to any other tree. Lastly, we improve the lower bound on the diameter of the flip graph ℱ(P) for n points in convex position to 11/7⋅n-o(n).

Cite as

Håvard Bakke Bjerkevik, Joseph Dorfer, Linda Kleist, Torsten Ueckerdt, and Birgit Vogtenhuber. Flip Distance of Non-Crossing Spanning Trees: NP-Hardness and Improved Bounds. In 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 367, pp. 16:1-16:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bjerkevik_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.16,
  author =	{Bjerkevik, H\r{a}vard Bakke and Dorfer, Joseph and Kleist, Linda and Ueckerdt, Torsten and Vogtenhuber, Birgit},
  title =	{{Flip Distance of Non-Crossing Spanning Trees: NP-Hardness and Improved Bounds}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-418-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{367},
  editor =	{Ahn, Hee-Kap and Hoffmann, Michael and Nayyeri, Amir},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258225},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Non-crossing, spanning tree, plane graph, flip graph, reconfiguration, diameter, complexity, NP-hard, edge exchange, compatible flip, rotation, happy edge property}
}
Document
Higher Hardness Results for the Reconfiguration of Odd Matchings

Authors: Joseph Dorfer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)


Abstract
We study the reconfiguration of odd matchings of combinatorial graphs. Odd matchings are matchings that cover all but one vertex of a graph. A reconfiguration step, or flip, is an operation that matches the isolated vertex and, consequently, isolates another vertex. The flip graph of odd matchings is a graph that has all odd matchings of a graph as vertices and an edge between two vertices if their corresponding matchings can be transformed into one another via a single flip. We show that computing the diameter of the flip graph of odd matchings is Π₂^p-hard. This complements a recent result by Wulf [FOCS25] that it is Π₂^p-hard to compute the diameter of the flip graph of perfect matchings where a flip swaps matching edges along a single cycle of unbounded size. Further, we show that computing the radius of the flip graph of odd matchings is Σ₃^p-hard. The respective decision problems for the diameter and the radius are also complete in the respective level of the polynomial hierarchy. This shows that computing the radius of the flip graph of odd matchings is provably harder than computing its diameter, unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses. Finally, we reduce set cover to the problem of finding shortest flip sequences. As a consequence, we show APX-hardness and that the problem cannot be approximated by a sublogarithmic factor. By doing so, we answer a question asked by Aichholzer, Brenner, Dorfer, Hoang, Perz, Rieck, and Verciani [GD25].

Cite as

Joseph Dorfer. Higher Hardness Results for the Reconfiguration of Odd Matchings. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 33:1-33:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dorfer:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.33,
  author =	{Dorfer, Joseph},
  title =	{{Higher Hardness Results for the Reconfiguration of Odd Matchings}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255222},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph Reconfiguration Problems, Flip Graphs, Polynomial Hierarchy, APX-hardness}
}
Document
Broadcast in Almost Mixing Time

Authors: Anton Paramonov and Roger Wattenhofer

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 364, 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)


Abstract
We study the problem of broadcasting multiple messages in the CONGEST model. In this problem, a dedicated source node s possesses a set M of messages with every message of size O(log n) where n is the total number of nodes. The objective is to ensure that every node in the network learns all messages in M. The execution of an algorithm progresses in rounds, and we focus on optimizing the round complexity of broadcasting multiple messages. Our primary contribution is a randomized algorithm for networks with expander topology. The algorithm succeeds with high probability and achieves a round complexity that is optimal up to a factor of the network’s mixing time and polylogarithmic terms. It leverages a multi-COBRA primitive, which uses multiple branching random walks running in parallel. A crucial aspect of our method is the use of these branching random walks to construct an optimal (up to a polylogarithmic factor) tree packing of a random graph, which is then used for efficient broadcasting. We also prove the problem to be NP-hard in a centralized setting and provide insights into why lower bounds that can be matched in expanders, namely graph diameter and |M|/minCut, cannot be tight in general graphs.

Cite as

Anton Paramonov and Roger Wattenhofer. Broadcast in Almost Mixing Time. In 43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 364, pp. 71:1-71:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{paramonov_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2026.71,
  author =	{Paramonov, Anton and Wattenhofer, Roger},
  title =	{{Broadcast in Almost Mixing Time}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2026)},
  pages =	{71:1--71:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-412-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{364},
  editor =	{Mahajan, Meena and Manea, Florin and McIver, Annabelle and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.71},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-255603},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2026.71},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed algorithms, Expander Graphs, Random graphs, Broadcast, Branching random walks, Tree packing, CONGEST model}
}
Document
Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility? (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 25122)

Authors: Bran Knowles, Vicki L. Hanson, Christoph Becker, Mike Berners-Lee, Andrew A. Chien, Benoit Combemale, Vlad Coroamă, Koen De Bosschere, Yi Ding, Adrian Friday, Boris Gamazaychikov, Lynda Hardman, Simon Hinterholzer, Mattias Höjer, Lynn Kaack, Lenneke Kuijer, Anne-Laure Ligozat, Jan Tobias Muehlberg, Yunmook Nah, Thomas Olsson, Anne-Cécile Orgerie, Daniel Pargman, Birgit Penzenstadler, Tom Romanoff, Emma Strubell, Colin Venters, and Junhua Zhao

Published in: Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 11, Issue 1 (2025)


Abstract
This Manifesto was produced from the Perspectives Workshop 25122 entitled "Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility?" held March 16-19, 2025 at Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany. The Workshop provided a forum for world-leading computer scientists and expert consultants on environmental policy and sustainable transition to engage in a critical and urgent conversation about computing’s responsibilities in addressing climate change - or more aptly, climate crisis. The resulting Manifesto outlines commitments and directions for future action which, if adopted as a basis for more responsible computing practices, will help ensure that these technologies do not threaten the long-term habitability of the planet. We preface our Manifesto with a recognition that humanity is on a path that is not in agreement with international global warming targets and explore how computing technologies are currently hastening the overshoot of these boundaries. We critically assess the vaunted potential for harnessing computing technologies for the mitigation of global warming, agreeing that, under current circumstances, computing is contributing to negative environmental impacts in other sectors. Computing primarily improves efficiency and reduces costs which leads to more consumption and more negative environmental impact. Relying solely on efficiency gains in computing has thus far proven to be insufficient to curb global greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, computing’s purpose within a strategy for tackling climate change must be reimagined. Our recommendations cover changes that need to be urgently made to the design priorities of computing technologies, but also speak to the more systemic shift in mindset, with sustainability and human rights providing a necessary moral foundation for developing the kinds of computing technologies most needed by society. We also stress the importance of digital policy that accounts for both the direct material impacts of computing and the detrimental indirect impacts arising from computing-enabled efficiencies, and the role of computing professionals in informing policy making.

Cite as

Bran Knowles, Vicki L. Hanson, Christoph Becker, Mike Berners-Lee, Andrew A. Chien, Benoit Combemale, Vlad Coroamă, Koen De Bosschere, Yi Ding, Adrian Friday, Boris Gamazaychikov, Lynda Hardman, Simon Hinterholzer, Mattias Höjer, Lynn Kaack, Lenneke Kuijer, Anne-Laure Ligozat, Jan Tobias Muehlberg, Yunmook Nah, Thomas Olsson, Anne-Cécile Orgerie, Daniel Pargman, Birgit Penzenstadler, Tom Romanoff, Emma Strubell, Colin Venters, and Junhua Zhao. Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility? (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 25122). In Dagstuhl Manifestos, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp. 1-18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{knowles_et_al:DagMan.11.1.1,
  author =	{Knowles, Bran and Hanson, Vicki L. and Becker, Christoph and Berners-Lee, Mike and Chien, Andrew A. and Combemale, Benoit and Coroam\u{a}, Vlad and De Bosschere, Koen and Ding, Yi and Friday, Adrian and Gamazaychikov, Boris and Hardman, Lynda and Hinterholzer, Simon and H\"{o}jer, Mattias and Kaack, Lynn and Kuijer, Lenneke and Ligozat, Anne-Laure and Muehlberg, Jan Tobias and Nah, Yunmook and Olsson, Thomas and Orgerie, Anne-C\'{e}cile and Pargman, Daniel and Penzenstadler, Birgit and Romanoff, Tom and Strubell, Emma and Venters, Colin and Zhao, Junhua},
  title =	{{Climate Change: What is Computing’s Responsibility? (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 25122)}},
  pages =	{1--18},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Manifestos},
  ISSN =	{2193-2433},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{11},
  number =	{1},
  editor =	{Knowles, Bran and Hanson, Vicki L. and Becker, Christoph and Berners-Lee, Mike and Chien, Andrew A. and Combemale, Benoit and Coroam\u{a}, Vlad and De Bosschere, Koen and Ding, Yi and Friday, Adrian and Gamazaychikov, Boris and Hardman, Lynda and Hinterholzer, Simon and H\"{o}jer, Mattias and Kaack, Lynn and Kuijer, Lenneke and Ligozat, Anne-Laure and Muehlberg, Jan Tobias and Nah, Yunmook and Olsson, Thomas and Orgerie, Anne-C\'{e}cile and Pargman, Daniel and Penzenstadler, Birgit and Romanoff, Tom and Strubell, Emma and Venters, Colin and Zhao, Junhua},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagMan.11.1.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250724},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagMan.11.1.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: sustainability, climate change, efficiency, supply chain management, climate modelling}
}
Document
Towards Constant Time Multi-Call Rumor Spreading on Small-Set Expanders

Authors: Emilio Cruciani, Sebastian Forster, and Tijn de Vos

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 356, 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)


Abstract
We study a multi-call variant of the classic PUSH&PULL rumor spreading process where nodes can contact k of their neighbors instead of a single one during both PUSH and PULL operations. We show that rumor spreading can be made faster at the cost of an increased amount of communication between the nodes. As a motivating example, consider the process on a complete graph of n nodes: while the standard PUSH&PULL protocol takes Θ(log n) rounds, we prove that our k-PUSH&PULL variant completes in Θ(log_{k} n) rounds, with high probability. We generalize this result in an expansion-sensitive way, as has been done for the classic PUSH&PULL protocol for different notions of expansion, e.g., conductance and vertex expansion. We consider small-set vertex expanders, graphs in which every sufficiently small subset of nodes has a large neighborhood, ensuring strong local connectivity. In particular, when the expansion parameter satisfies ϕ > 1, these graphs have a diameter of o(log n), as opposed to other standard notions of expansion. Since the graph’s diameter is a lower bound on the number of rounds required for rumor spreading, this makes small-set expanders particularly well-suited for fast information dissemination. We prove that k-PUSH&PULL takes O(log_{ϕ} n ⋅ log_{k} n) rounds in these expanders, with high probability. We complement this with a simple lower bound of Ω(log_{ϕ} n+ log_{k} n) rounds.

Cite as

Emilio Cruciani, Sebastian Forster, and Tijn de Vos. Towards Constant Time Multi-Call Rumor Spreading on Small-Set Expanders. In 39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 356, pp. 26:1-26:25, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cruciani_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2025.26,
  author =	{Cruciani, Emilio and Forster, Sebastian and de Vos, Tijn},
  title =	{{Towards Constant Time Multi-Call Rumor Spreading on Small-Set Expanders}},
  booktitle =	{39th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2025)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:25},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-402-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{356},
  editor =	{Kowalski, Dariusz R.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-248434},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2025.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: small set expansion, vertex expansion, rumor spreading, multi-call rumor spreading, push\&pull protocol}
}
Document
Multi-Criteria Route Planning with Little Regret

Authors: Carina Truschel and Sabine Storandt

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 137, 25th Symposium on Algorithmic Approaches for Transportation Modelling, Optimization, and Systems (ATMOS 2025)


Abstract
Multi-criteria route planning arises naturally in real-world navigation scenarios where users care about more than just one objective - such as minimizing travel time while also avoiding steep inclines or unpaved surfaces or toll routes. To capture the possible trade-offs between competing criteria, many algorithms compute the set of Pareto-optimal paths, which are paths that are not dominated by others with respect to the considered cost vectors. However, the number of Pareto-optimal paths can grow exponentially with the size of the input graph. This leads to significant computational overhead and results in large output sets that overwhelm users with too many alternatives. In this work, we present a technique based on the notion of regret minimization that efficiently filters the Pareto set during or after the search to a subset of specified size. Regret minimizing algorithms identify such a representative solution subset by considering how any possible user values any subset with respect to the objectives. We prove that regret-based filtering provides us with quality guarantees for the two main query types that are considered in the context of multi-criteria route planning, namely constrained shortest path queries and personalized path queries. Furthermore, we design a novel regret minimization algorithm that works for any number of criteria, is easy to implement and produces solutions with much smaller regret value than the most commonly used baseline algorithm. We carefully describe how to incorporate our regret minimization algorithm into existing route planning techniques to drastically reduce their running times and space consumption, while still returning paths that are close-to-optimal.

Cite as

Carina Truschel and Sabine Storandt. Multi-Criteria Route Planning with Little Regret. In 25th Symposium on Algorithmic Approaches for Transportation Modelling, Optimization, and Systems (ATMOS 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 137, pp. 13:1-13:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{truschel_et_al:OASIcs.ATMOS.2025.13,
  author =	{Truschel, Carina and Storandt, Sabine},
  title =	{{Multi-Criteria Route Planning with Little Regret}},
  booktitle =	{25th Symposium on Algorithmic Approaches for Transportation Modelling, Optimization, and Systems (ATMOS 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:20},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-404-8},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{137},
  editor =	{Sauer, Jonas and Schmidt, Marie},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.ATMOS.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247698},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.ATMOS.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Pareto-optimality, Regret minimization, Contraction Hierarchies}
}
Document
PvpAMM: A Perpetual Market for Unbalanced Long-Short Positions

Authors: Zhenhang Shang, Zhenyu Zhao, and Kani Chen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)


Abstract
Perpetual futures - swap contracts without expiration dates - are the most widely traded derivatives in cryptocurrency markets. Traditional perpetual trading relies on order books, which require substantial bilateral liquidity and face challenges in high-volatility environments. In this paper, we introduce pvpAMM, a peer-to-peer perpetual trading protocol based on automated market maker (AMM) principles. The protocol enables efficient settlement of long-short mismatched markets and drives positions toward equilibrium: when the minority leveraged side wins, their returns are amplified compared to conventional perpetual contracts, while the opposite occurs when the majority side prevails. We also propose arbitrage mechanisms to maintain economic equilibrium within the pvpAMM system. By incorporating liquidity providers (LPs), the protocol aligns more closely with traditional order book trading. Numerical experiments validate our theoretical findings.

Cite as

Zhenhang Shang, Zhenyu Zhao, and Kani Chen. PvpAMM: A Perpetual Market for Unbalanced Long-Short Positions. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 34:1-34:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{shang_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.34,
  author =	{Shang, Zhenhang and Zhao, Zhenyu and Chen, Kani},
  title =	{{PvpAMM: A Perpetual Market for Unbalanced Long-Short Positions}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247534},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Perpetuals, Decentralized Finance, Auto Market Making, Blockchain}
}
Document
Single-Token vs Two-Token Blockchain Tokenomics

Authors: Aggelos Kiayias, Philip Lazos, and Paolo Penna

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)


Abstract
We study long-term equilibria that arise in the token monetary policy, or tokenomics, design of proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain systems that engage utility maximizing users and validators. Validators are system maintainers who get rewarded with tokens for performing the work necessary for the system to function properly, while users compete and pay with such tokens for getting a desired portion of the system service. We study how the system service provision and suitable rewards schemes together can lead to equilibria with the following desirable characteristics (1) viability: the system keeps parties engaged, (2) decentralization and skin-in-the-game: multiple sufficiently invested validators are participating, (3) stability: the price path of the underlying token used to transact with the system does not change widely over time, and (4) feasibility: the mechanism is easy to implement as a smart contract, e.g., it does not require a fiat reserve on-chain to perform token buybacks or to perform bookkeeping of exponentially growing token holdings. Our analysis enables us to put forward a novel generic mechanism for blockchain monetary policy that we call quantitative rewarding (QR). We investigate how to implement QR in single-token and two-token proof of stake (PoS) blockchain systems. The latter are systems that utilize one token for the users to pay the transaction fees and a different token for the validators to participate in the PoS protocol and get rewarded. Our approach demonstrates a concrete advantage of the two-token setting in terms of the ability of the QR mechanism to be realized effectively and provide good equilibria. Our analysis also reveals an inherent limitation of the single token setting in terms of implementing an effective blockchain monetary policy - a distinction that is, to the best of our knowledge, highlighted for the first time.

Cite as

Aggelos Kiayias, Philip Lazos, and Paolo Penna. Single-Token vs Two-Token Blockchain Tokenomics. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 22:1-22:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kiayias_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.22,
  author =	{Kiayias, Aggelos and Lazos, Philip and Penna, Paolo},
  title =	{{Single-Token vs Two-Token Blockchain Tokenomics}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247412},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Blockchain, tokenomics, buyback, equilibria, price path, stable price, discounted game, dual-token, proof-of-stake, validator}
}
Document
Distributed Branching Random Walks and Their Applications

Authors: Vijeth Aradhya, Seth Gilbert, and Thorsten Götte

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 324, 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)


Abstract
In recent years, the explosion of big data and analytics has necessitated distributed storage and processing with several compute nodes (e.g., multiple datacenters). These nodes collaboratively perform parallel computation, where the data is typically partitioned across these nodes to ensure scalability, redundancy and load-balancing. But the nodes may not always be co-located; in many cases, they are part of a larger communication network. Since those nodes only need to communicate among themselves, a key challenge is to design efficient routes catered to that subnetwork. In this work, we initiate the study of distributed sampling and routing problems for subnetworks in any well-connected network. Given any network G = (V, E) with mixing time τ_mix, consider the canonical problem of permutation routing [Ghaffari, Kuhn and Su, PODC 2017] that aims to minimize both congestion and dilation of the routes, where the demands (i.e., set of source-terminal pairs) are such that each node sends or receives number of messages proportional to its degree. We show that the permutation routing problem, when demands are restricted to any subset S ⊆ V (i.e., subnetwork), can be solved in exp(O(√(log|S|))) ⋅ Õ(τ_mix) rounds (where Õ(⋅) hides polylogarithmic factors of |V|). This means that the running time depends subpolynomially on the subnetwork size (i.e., not on the entire network size). The ability to solve permutation routing efficiently immediately implies that a large class of parallel algorithms can be simulated efficiently on the subnetwork. As a prerequisite to constructing efficient routes, we design and analyze distributed branching random walks that distribute tokens started by the nodes in the subnetwork. At a high-level, these algorithms operate by always moving each token according to a (lazy) simple random walk, but also branching a token into multiple tokens at some specified intervals; ultimately, if a node starts a branching walk, with its id in a token, then by the end of execution, several tokens with its id would be randomly distributed among the nodes. As these random walks can be started by many nodes, a crucial challenge is to ensure low-congestion, which is a primary focus of this paper.

Cite as

Vijeth Aradhya, Seth Gilbert, and Thorsten Götte. Distributed Branching Random Walks and Their Applications. In 28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 324, pp. 36:1-36:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{aradhya_et_al:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.36,
  author =	{Aradhya, Vijeth and Gilbert, Seth and G\"{o}tte, Thorsten},
  title =	{{Distributed Branching Random Walks and Their Applications}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2024)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-360-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{324},
  editor =	{Bonomi, Silvia and Galletta, Letterio and Rivi\`{e}re, Etienne and Schiavoni, Valerio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-225723},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2024.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed Graph Algorithms, Random Walks, Permutation Routing}
}
Document
Rumors with Changing Credibility

Authors: Charlotte Out, Nicolás Rivera, Thomas Sauerwald, and John Sylvester

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 287, 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024)


Abstract
Randomized rumor spreading processes diffuse information on an undirected graph and have been widely studied. In this work, we present a generic framework for analyzing a broad class of such processes on regular graphs. Our analysis is protocol-agnostic, as it only requires the expected proportion of newly informed vertices in each round to be bounded, and a natural negative correlation property. This framework allows us to analyze various protocols, including PUSH, PULL, and PUSH-PULL, thereby extending prior research. Unlike previous work, our framework accommodates message failures at any time t ≥ 0 with a probability of 1-q(t), where the credibility q(t) is any function of time. This enables us to model real-world scenarios in which the transmissibility of rumors may fluctuate, as seen in the spread of "fake news" and viruses. Additionally, our framework is sufficiently broad to cover dynamic graphs.

Cite as

Charlotte Out, Nicolás Rivera, Thomas Sauerwald, and John Sylvester. Rumors with Changing Credibility. In 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 287, pp. 86:1-86:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{out_et_al:LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.86,
  author =	{Out, Charlotte and Rivera, Nicol\'{a}s and Sauerwald, Thomas and Sylvester, John},
  title =	{{Rumors with Changing Credibility}},
  booktitle =	{15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2024)},
  pages =	{86:1--86:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-309-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2024},
  volume =	{287},
  editor =	{Guruswami, Venkatesan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.86},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-196149},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2024.86},
  annote =	{Keywords: Rumor spreading, epidemic algorithms, "fake news"}
}
Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
Multiple Random Walks on Graphs: Mixing Few to Cover Many

Authors: Nicolás Rivera, Thomas Sauerwald, and John Sylvester

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 198, 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021)


Abstract
Random walks on graphs are an essential primitive for many randomised algorithms and stochastic processes. It is natural to ask how much can be gained by running k multiple random walks independently and in parallel. Although the cover time of multiple walks has been investigated for many natural networks, the problem of finding a general characterisation of multiple cover times for worst-case start vertices (posed by Alon, Avin, Koucký, Kozma, Lotker, and Tuttle in 2008) remains an open problem. First, we improve and tighten various bounds on the stationary cover time when k random walks start from vertices sampled from the stationary distribution. For example, we prove an unconditional lower bound of Ω((n/k) log n) on the stationary cover time, holding for any n-vertex graph G and any 1 ≤ k = o(nlog n). Secondly, we establish the stationary cover times of multiple walks on several fundamental networks up to constant factors. Thirdly, we present a framework characterising worst-case cover times in terms of stationary cover times and a novel, relaxed notion of mixing time for multiple walks called the partial mixing time. Roughly speaking, the partial mixing time only requires a specific portion of all random walks to be mixed. Using these new concepts, we can establish (or recover) the worst-case cover times for many networks including expanders, preferential attachment graphs, grids, binary trees and hypercubes.

Cite as

Nicolás Rivera, Thomas Sauerwald, and John Sylvester. Multiple Random Walks on Graphs: Mixing Few to Cover Many. In 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 198, pp. 107:1-107:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{rivera_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.107,
  author =	{Rivera, Nicol\'{a}s and Sauerwald, Thomas and Sylvester, John},
  title =	{{Multiple Random Walks on Graphs: Mixing Few to Cover Many}},
  booktitle =	{48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021)},
  pages =	{107:1--107:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-195-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{198},
  editor =	{Bansal, Nikhil and Merelli, Emanuela and Worrell, James},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.107},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-141764},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.107},
  annote =	{Keywords: Multiple Random walks, Markov Chains, Random Walks, Cover Time}
}
Document
Fast Plurality Consensus in Regular Expanders

Authors: Colin Cooper, Tomasz Radzik, Nicolás Rivera, and Takeharu Shiraga

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 91, 31st International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2017)


Abstract
In a voting process on a graph vertices revise their opinions in a distributed way based on the opinions of nearby vertices. The voting completes when the vertices reach consensus, that is, they all have the same opinion. The classic example is synchronous pull voting where at each step, each vertex adopts the opinion of a random neighbour. This very simple process, however, can be slow and the final opinion is not necessarily the one with the initial largest support. It was shown earlier that if there are initially only two opposing opinions, then both these drawbacks can be overcome by a synchronous two-sample voting, in which at each step each vertex considers its own opinion and the opinions of two random neighbours. If there are initially three or more opinions, a problem arises when there is no clear majority. One class of opinions may be largest (the plurality opinion), although its total size is less than that of two other opinions put together. We analyse the performance of the two-sample voting on d-regular graphs for this case. We show that, if the difference between the initial sizes A_1 and A_2 of the largest and second largest opinions is at least C n max{sqrt((log n)/A_1), lambda}, then the largest opinion wins in O((n log n)/A_1) steps with high probability. Here C is a suitable constant and lambda is the absolute second eigenvalue of transition matrix P=Adj(G)/d of a simple random walk on the graph G. Our bound generalizes the results of Becchetti et al. [SPAA 2014] for the related three-sample voting process on complete graphs. Our bound implies that if lambda = o(1), then the two-sample voting can consistently converge to the largest opinion, even if A_1 - A_2 = o(n). If lambda is constant, we show that the case A_1 - A_2 = o(n) can be dealt with by sampling using short random walks. Finally, we give a simple and efficient push voting algorithm for the case when there are a number of large opinions and any of them is acceptable as the final winning opinion.

Cite as

Colin Cooper, Tomasz Radzik, Nicolás Rivera, and Takeharu Shiraga. Fast Plurality Consensus in Regular Expanders. In 31st International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 91, pp. 13:1-13:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cooper_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2017.13,
  author =	{Cooper, Colin and Radzik, Tomasz and Rivera, Nicol\'{a}s and Shiraga, Takeharu},
  title =	{{Fast Plurality Consensus in Regular Expanders}},
  booktitle =	{31st International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2017)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-053-8},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{91},
  editor =	{Richa, Andr\'{e}a},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2017.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-79778},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2017.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Plurality consensus, Regular expanders}
}
Document
The Linear Voting Model

Authors: Colin Cooper and Nicolás Rivera

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 55, 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)


Abstract
We study voting models on graphs. In the beginning, the vertices of a given graph have some initial opinion. Over time, the opinions on the vertices change by interactions between graph neighbours. Under suitable conditions the system evolves to a state in which all vertices have the same opinion. In this work, we consider a new model of voting, called the Linear Voting Model. This model can be seen as a generalization of several models of voting, including among others, pull voting and push voting. One advantage of our model is that, even though it is very general, it has a rich structure making the analysis tractable. In particular we are able to solve the basic question about voting, the probability that certain opinion wins the poll, and furthermore, given appropriate conditions, we are able to bound the expected time until some opinion wins.

Cite as

Colin Cooper and Nicolás Rivera. The Linear Voting Model. In 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 55, pp. 144:1-144:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cooper_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.144,
  author =	{Cooper, Colin and Rivera, Nicol\'{a}s},
  title =	{{The Linear Voting Model}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)},
  pages =	{144:1--144:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-013-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{55},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Mitzenmacher, Michael and Rabani, Yuval and Sangiorgi, Davide},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.144},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-62883},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.144},
  annote =	{Keywords: Voter model, Interacting particles, Randomized algorithm, Probabilistic voting}
}
Document
Discordant Voting Processes on Finite Graphs

Authors: Colin Cooper, Martin Dyer, Alan Frieze, and Nicolás Rivera

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 55, 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)


Abstract
We consider an asynchronous voting process on graphs which we call discordant voting, and which can be described as follows. Initially each vertex holds one of two opinions, red or blue say. Neighbouring vertices with different opinions interact pairwise. After an interaction both vertices have the same colour. The quantity of interest is T, the time to reach consensus, i.e. the number of interactions needed for all vertices have the same colour. An edge whose endpoint colours differ (i.e. one vertex is coloured red and the other one blue) is said to be discordant. A vertex is discordant if its is incident with a discordant edge. In discordant voting, all interactions are based on discordant edges. Because the voting process is asynchronous there are several ways to update the colours of the interacting vertices. - Push: Pick a random discordant vertex and push its colour to a random discordant neighbour. - Pull: Pick a random discordant vertex and pull the colour of a random discordant neighbour. - Oblivious: Pick a random endpoint of a random discordant edge and push the colour to the other end point. We show that ET, the expected time to reach consensus, depends strongly on the underlying graph and the update rule. For connected graphs on n vertices, and an initial half red, half blue colouring the following hold. For oblivious voting, ET = (n^2)/4 independent of the underlying graph. For the complete graph Kn, the push protocol has ET = Theta(n*log(n)), whereas the pull protocol has ET = Theta(2^n). For the cycle C_n all three protocols have ET = Theta(n^2). For the star graph however, the pull protocol has ET = O(n^2), whereas the push protocol is slower with ET = Theta(n^2*log(n)). The wide variation in ET for the pull protocol is to be contrasted with the well known model of synchronous pull voting, for which ET = O(n) on many classes of expanders.

Cite as

Colin Cooper, Martin Dyer, Alan Frieze, and Nicolás Rivera. Discordant Voting Processes on Finite Graphs. In 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 55, pp. 145:1-145:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cooper_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.145,
  author =	{Cooper, Colin and Dyer, Martin and Frieze, Alan and Rivera, Nicol\'{a}s},
  title =	{{Discordant Voting Processes on Finite Graphs}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2016)},
  pages =	{145:1--145:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-013-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{55},
  editor =	{Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis and Mitzenmacher, Michael and Rabani, Yuval and Sangiorgi, Davide},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.145},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-62898},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.145},
  annote =	{Keywords: Distributed consensus, Voter model, Interacting particles, Randomized algorithm}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 14 Document/PDF
  • 8 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 3 2026
  • 6 2025
  • 1 2024
  • 1 2021
  • 1 2017
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 5 Rivera, Nicolás
  • 3 Cooper, Colin
  • 2 Dorfer, Joseph
  • 2 Sauerwald, Thomas
  • 2 Sylvester, John
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 12 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs
  • 1 DagMan

  • Refine by Classification
  • 4 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
  • 3 Mathematics of computing → Stochastic processes
  • 3 Theory of computation → Random walks and Markov chains
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Combinatoric problems
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Combinatorics
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Blockchain
  • 2 Interacting particles
  • 2 Random Walks
  • 2 Randomized algorithm
  • 2 Voter model
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail