LIPIcs, Volume 141

10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)



Thumbnail PDF

Event

ITP 2019, September 9-12, 2019, Portland, OR, USA

Editors

John Harrison
  • Amazon AWS, Portland, OR, USA
John O'Leary
  • Intel Corporation
Andrew Tolmach
  • Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA

Publication Details

  • published at: 2019-09-05
  • Publisher: Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik
  • ISBN: 978-3-95977-122-1
  • DBLP: db/conf/itp/itp2019

Access Numbers

Documents

No documents found matching your filter selection.
Document
Complete Volume
LIPIcs, Volume 141, ITP'19, Complete Volume

Authors: John Harrison, John O'Leary, and Andrew Tolmach


Abstract
LIPIcs, Volume 141, ITP'19, Complete Volume

Cite as

10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Proceedings{harrison_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019,
  title =	{{LIPIcs, Volume 141, ITP'19, Complete Volume}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-112972},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019},
  annote =	{Keywords: Theory of computation, Logic}
}
Document
Front Matter
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Authors: John Harrison, John O'Leary, and Andrew Tolmach


Abstract
Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization

Cite as

10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 0:i-0:xiv, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{harrison_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.0,
  author =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  title =	{{Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{0:i--0:xiv},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.0},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110550},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.0},
  annote =	{Keywords: Front Matter, Table of Contents, Preface, Conference Organization}
}
Document
Invited Talk
A Million Lines of Proof About a Moving Target (Invited Talk)

Authors: June Andronick


Abstract
In the last ten years, we have been porting, maintaining, and evolving the world’s largest proof base, the formal proof in Isabelle/HOL of the seL4 microkernel. But actually, there is no such thing as "the seL4 proof"; there are a number of proofs (functional correctness, binary translation validation, integrity and confidentiality proofs, etc) about a number of instances of seL4 (depending on the hardware platform it runs on, the features it includes, the extensions it supports). We will give an overview of the current state of these proofs, and, importantly, the challenges we face in keeping to maintain, evolve and extend them, and the processes we have put in place to manage their dependence on the evolving implementation.

Cite as

June Andronick. A Million Lines of Proof About a Moving Target (Invited Talk). In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, p. 1:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{andronick:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.1,
  author =	{Andronick, June},
  title =	{{A Million Lines of Proof About a Moving Target}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110567},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof maintentance, proof evolution, seL4, Isabelle/HOL}
}
Document
Invited Talk
What Makes a Mathematician Tick? (Invited Talk)

Authors: Kevin Buzzard


Abstract
Formalised mathematics has a serious image problem in mathematics departments. Mathematicians working in "mainstream" areas such as modern algebra, analysis, geometry etc have absolutely no desire to work formally, it slows them down and they cannot see the point. The mathematical community has its own methods for deciding whether a proof (in pdf format) is correct or not; these methods rely on the views of a cabal of experts - our high priests. Our proof of the odd order theorem is "John Thompson got a Fields Medal for the work". This proof is of a rather different nature to the formalised proof of Gonthier et al. Our methods are arcane and mysterious; there is also ample evidence that they are, in general, extremely accurate when it comes to the important stuff. I will talk about my attempts, as a "mainstream mathematician", to introduce formalised mathematics to my community.

Cite as

Kevin Buzzard. What Makes a Mathematician Tick? (Invited Talk). In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, p. 2:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{buzzard:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.2,
  author =	{Buzzard, Kevin},
  title =	{{What Makes a Mathematician Tick?}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110576},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formalization of mathematics}
}
Document
Invited Talk
An Increasing Need for Formality (Invited Talk)

Authors: Martin Dixon


Abstract
The talk will touch on a number of practical opportunities for formal modeling and methods that Intel sees in HW security research including: instruction sets; the proliferation of programmable agents within SoC’s; and negative space testing.

Cite as

Martin Dixon. An Increasing Need for Formality (Invited Talk). In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, p. 3:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dixon:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.3,
  author =	{Dixon, Martin},
  title =	{{An Increasing Need for Formality}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{3:1--3:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.3},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110588},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.3},
  annote =	{Keywords: Hardware security, formal modeling, instruction sets, SoC’s, negative space testing}
}
Document
A Verified Compositional Algorithm for AI Planning

Authors: Mohammad Abdulaziz, Charles Gretton, and Michael Norrish


Abstract
We report on our HOL4 verification of an AI planning algorithm. The algorithm is compositional in the following sense: a planning problem is divided into multiple smaller abstractions, then each of the abstractions is solved, and finally the abstractions' solutions are composed into a solution for the given problem. Formalising the algorithm, which was already quite well understood, revealed nuances in its operation which could lead to computing buggy plans. The formalisation also revealed that the algorithm can be presented more generally, and can be applied to systems with infinite states and actions, instead of only finite ones. Our formalisation extends an earlier model for slightly simpler transition systems, and demonstrates another step towards formal treatments of more and more of the algorithms and reasoning used in AI planning, as well as model checking.

Cite as

Mohammad Abdulaziz, Charles Gretton, and Michael Norrish. A Verified Compositional Algorithm for AI Planning. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 4:1-4:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{abdulaziz_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.4,
  author =	{Abdulaziz, Mohammad and Gretton, Charles and Norrish, Michael},
  title =	{{A Verified Compositional Algorithm for AI Planning}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110596},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: AI Planning, Compositional Algorithms, Algorithm Verification, Transition Systems}
}
Document
Proving Tree Algorithms for Succinct Data Structures

Authors: Reynald Affeldt, Jacques Garrigue, Xuanrui Qi, and Kazunari Tanaka


Abstract
Succinct data structures give space-efficient representations of large amounts of data without sacrificing performance. They rely on cleverly designed data representations and algorithms. We present here the formalization in Coq/SSReflect of two different tree-based succinct representations and their accompanying algorithms. One is the Level-Order Unary Degree Sequence, which encodes the structure of a tree in breadth-first order as a sequence of bits, where access operations can be defined in terms of Rank and Select, which work in constant time for static bit sequences. The other represents dynamic bit sequences as binary balanced trees, where Rank and Select present a low logarithmic overhead compared to their static versions, and with efficient insertion and deletion. The two can be stacked to provide a dynamic representation of dictionaries for instance. While both representations are well-known, we believe this to be their first formalization and a needed step towards provably-safe implementations of big data.

Cite as

Reynald Affeldt, Jacques Garrigue, Xuanrui Qi, and Kazunari Tanaka. Proving Tree Algorithms for Succinct Data Structures. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 5:1-5:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{affeldt_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.5,
  author =	{Affeldt, Reynald and Garrigue, Jacques and Qi, Xuanrui and Tanaka, Kazunari},
  title =	{{Proving Tree Algorithms for Succinct Data Structures}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110609},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Coq, small-scale reflection, succinct data structures, LOUDS, bit vectors, self balancing trees}
}
Document
Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors

Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, and Simon Hudon


Abstract
A broad class of data types, including arbitrary nestings of inductive types, coinductive types, and quotients, can be represented as quotients of polynomial functors. This provides perspicuous ways of constructing them and reasoning about them in an interactive theorem prover.

Cite as

Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro, and Simon Hudon. Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 6:1-6:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{avigad_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.6,
  author =	{Avigad, Jeremy and Carneiro, Mario and Hudon, Simon},
  title =	{{Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{6:1--6:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.6},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110612},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.6},
  annote =	{Keywords: data types, polynomial functors, inductive types, coinductive types}
}
Document
Primitive Floats in Coq

Authors: Guillaume Bertholon, Érik Martin-Dorel, and Pierre Roux


Abstract
Some mathematical proofs involve intensive computations, for instance: the four-color theorem, Hales' theorem on sphere packing (formerly known as the Kepler conjecture) or interval arithmetic. For numerical computations, floating-point arithmetic enjoys widespread usage thanks to its efficiency, despite the introduction of rounding errors. Formal guarantees can be obtained on floating-point algorithms based on the IEEE 754 standard, which precisely specifies floating-point arithmetic and its rounding modes, and a proof assistant such as Coq, that enjoys efficient computation capabilities. Coq offers machine integers, however floating-point arithmetic still needed to be emulated using these integers. A modified version of Coq is presented that enables using the machine floating-point operators. The main obstacles to such an implementation and its soundness are discussed. Benchmarks show potential performance gains of two orders of magnitude.

Cite as

Guillaume Bertholon, Érik Martin-Dorel, and Pierre Roux. Primitive Floats in Coq. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 7:1-7:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bertholon_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.7,
  author =	{Bertholon, Guillaume and Martin-Dorel, \'{E}rik and Roux, Pierre},
  title =	{{Primitive Floats in Coq}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110629},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: Coq formal proofs, floating-point arithmetic, reflexive tactics, Cholesky decomposition}
}
Document
A Certificate-Based Approach to Formally Verified Approximations

Authors: Florent Bréhard, Assia Mahboubi, and Damien Pous


Abstract
We present a library to verify rigorous approximations of univariate functions on real numbers, with the Coq proof assistant. Based on interval arithmetic, this library also implements a technique of validation a posteriori based on the Banach fixed-point theorem. We illustrate this technique on the case of operations of division and square root. This library features a collection of abstract structures that organise the specfication of rigorous approximations, and modularise the related proofs. Finally, we provide an implementation of verified Chebyshev approximations, and we discuss a few examples of computations.

Cite as

Florent Bréhard, Assia Mahboubi, and Damien Pous. A Certificate-Based Approach to Formally Verified Approximations. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 8:1-8:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brehard_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.8,
  author =	{Br\'{e}hard, Florent and Mahboubi, Assia and Pous, Damien},
  title =	{{A Certificate-Based Approach to Formally Verified Approximations}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110638},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: approximation theory, Chebyshev polynomials, Banach fixed-point theorem, interval arithmetic, Coq}
}
Document
Higher-Order Tarski Grothendieck as a Foundation for Formal Proof

Authors: Chad E. Brown, Cezary Kaliszyk, and Karol Pąk


Abstract
We formally introduce a foundation for computer verified proofs based on higher-order Tarski-Grothendieck set theory. We show that this theory has a model if a 2-inaccessible cardinal exists. This assumption is the same as the one needed for a model of plain Tarski-Grothendieck set theory. The foundation allows the co-existence of proofs based on two major competing foundations for formal proofs: higher-order logic and TG set theory. We align two co-existing Isabelle libraries, Isabelle/HOL and Isabelle/Mizar, in a single foundation in the Isabelle logical framework. We do this by defining isomorphisms between the basic concepts, including integers, functions, lists, and algebraic structures that preserve the important operations. With this we can transfer theorems proved in higher-order logic to TG set theory and vice versa. We practically show this by formally transferring Lagrange’s four-square theorem, Fermat 3-4, and other theorems between the foundations in the Isabelle framework.

Cite as

Chad E. Brown, Cezary Kaliszyk, and Karol Pąk. Higher-Order Tarski Grothendieck as a Foundation for Formal Proof. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 9:1-9:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brown_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.9,
  author =	{Brown, Chad E. and Kaliszyk, Cezary and P\k{a}k, Karol},
  title =	{{Higher-Order Tarski Grothendieck as a Foundation for Formal Proof}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110643},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: model, higher-order, Tarski Grothendieck, proof foundation}
}
Document
Generic Authenticated Data Structures, Formally

Authors: Matthias Brun and Dmitriy Traytel


Abstract
Authenticated data structures are a technique for outsourcing data storage and maintenance to an untrusted server. The server is required to produce an efficiently checkable and cryptographically secure proof that it carried out precisely the requested computation. Recently, Miller et al. [https://doi.org/10.1145/2535838.2535851] demonstrated how to support a wide range of such data structures by integrating an authentication construct as a first class citizen in a functional programming language. In this paper, we put this work to the test of formalization in the Isabelle proof assistant. With Isabelle’s help, we uncover and repair several mistakes and modify the small-step semantics to perform call-by-value evaluation rather than requiring terms to be in administrative normal form.

Cite as

Matthias Brun and Dmitriy Traytel. Generic Authenticated Data Structures, Formally. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 10:1-10:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brun_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.10,
  author =	{Brun, Matthias and Traytel, Dmitriy},
  title =	{{Generic Authenticated Data Structures, Formally}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{10:1--10:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.10},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110657},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.10},
  annote =	{Keywords: Authenticated Data Structures, Verifiable Computation, Isabelle/HOL, Nominal Isabelle}
}
Document
A Verified and Compositional Translation of LTL to Deterministic Rabin Automata

Authors: Julian Brunner, Benedikt Seidl, and Salomon Sickert


Abstract
We present a formalisation of the unified translation approach from linear temporal logic (LTL) to omega-automata from [Javier Esparza et al., 2018]. This approach decomposes LTL formulas into "simple" languages and allows a clear separation of concerns: first, we formalise the purely logical result yielding this decomposition; second, we develop a generic, executable, and expressive automata library providing necessary operations on automata to re-combine the "simple" languages; third, we instantiate this generic theory to obtain a construction for deterministic Rabin automata (DRA). We extract from this particular instantiation an executable tool translating LTL to DRAs. To the best of our knowledge this is the first verified translation of LTL to DRAs that is proven to be double-exponential in the worst case which asymptotically matches the known lower bound.

Cite as

Julian Brunner, Benedikt Seidl, and Salomon Sickert. A Verified and Compositional Translation of LTL to Deterministic Rabin Automata. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 11:1-11:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{brunner_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.11,
  author =	{Brunner, Julian and Seidl, Benedikt and Sickert, Salomon},
  title =	{{A Verified and Compositional Translation of LTL to Deterministic Rabin Automata}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110664},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Automata Theory, Automata over Infinite Words, Deterministic Automata, Linear Temporal Logic, Model Checking, Verified Algorithms}
}
Document
Formalizing Computability Theory via Partial Recursive Functions

Authors: Mario Carneiro


Abstract
We present an extension to the mathlib library of the Lean theorem prover formalizing the foundations of computability theory. We use primitive recursive functions and partial recursive functions as the main objects of study, and we use a constructive encoding of partial functions such that they are executable when the programs in question provably halt. Main theorems include the construction of a universal partial recursive function and a proof of the undecidability of the halting problem. Type class inference provides a transparent way to supply Gödel numberings where needed and encapsulate the encoding details.

Cite as

Mario Carneiro. Formalizing Computability Theory via Partial Recursive Functions. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 12:1-12:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{carneiro:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.12,
  author =	{Carneiro, Mario},
  title =	{{Formalizing Computability Theory via Partial Recursive Functions}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{12:1--12:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.12},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110671},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.12},
  annote =	{Keywords: Lean, computability, halting problem, primitive recursion}
}
Document
Formal Proofs of Tarjan’s Strongly Connected Components Algorithm in Why3, Coq and Isabelle

Authors: Ran Chen, Cyril Cohen, Jean-Jacques Lévy, Stephan Merz, and Laurent Théry


Abstract
Comparing provers on a formalization of the same problem is always a valuable exercise. In this paper, we present the formal proof of correctness of a non-trivial algorithm from graph theory that was carried out in three proof assistants: Why3, Coq, and Isabelle.

Cite as

Ran Chen, Cyril Cohen, Jean-Jacques Lévy, Stephan Merz, and Laurent Théry. Formal Proofs of Tarjan’s Strongly Connected Components Algorithm in Why3, Coq and Isabelle. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 13:1-13:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chen_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.13,
  author =	{Chen, Ran and Cohen, Cyril and L\'{e}vy, Jean-Jacques and Merz, Stephan and Th\'{e}ry, Laurent},
  title =	{{Formal Proofs of Tarjan’s Strongly Connected Components Algorithm in Why3, Coq and Isabelle}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110683},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Mathematical logic, Formal proof, Graph algorithm, Program verification}
}
Document
First-Order Guarded Coinduction in Coq

Authors: Łukasz Czajka


Abstract
We introduce two coinduction principles and two proof translations which, under certain conditions, map coinductive proofs that use our principles to guarded Coq proofs. The first principle provides an "operational" description of a proof by coinduction, which is easy to reason with informally. The second principle extends the first one to allow for direct proofs by coinduction of statements with existential quantifiers and multiple coinductive predicates in the conclusion. The principles automatically enforce the correct use of the coinductive hypothesis. We implemented the principles and the proof translations in a Coq plugin.

Cite as

Łukasz Czajka. First-Order Guarded Coinduction in Coq. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 14:1-14:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{czajka:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.14,
  author =	{Czajka, {\L}ukasz},
  title =	{{First-Order Guarded Coinduction in Coq}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110690},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: coinduction, Coq, guardedness, corecursion}
}
Document
Formalizing the Solution to the Cap Set Problem

Authors: Sander R. Dahmen, Johannes Hölzl, and Robert Y. Lewis


Abstract
In 2016, Ellenberg and Gijswijt established a new upper bound on the size of subsets of F^n_q with no three-term arithmetic progression. This problem has received much mathematical attention, particularly in the case q = 3, where it is commonly known as the cap set problem. Ellenberg and Gijswijt’s proof was published in the Annals of Mathematics and is noteworthy for its clever use of elementary methods. This paper describes a formalization of this proof in the Lean proof assistant, including both the general result in F^n_q and concrete values for the case q = 3. We faithfully follow the pen and paper argument to construct the bound. Our work shows that (some) modern mathematics is within the range of proof assistants.

Cite as

Sander R. Dahmen, Johannes Hölzl, and Robert Y. Lewis. Formalizing the Solution to the Cap Set Problem. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 15:1-15:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dahmen_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.15,
  author =	{Dahmen, Sander R. and H\"{o}lzl, Johannes and Lewis, Robert Y.},
  title =	{{Formalizing the Solution to the Cap Set Problem}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{15:1--15:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.15},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110703},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.15},
  annote =	{Keywords: formal proof, combinatorics, cap set problem, Lean}
}
Document
Nine Chapters of Analytic Number Theory in Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Manuel Eberl


Abstract
In this paper, I present a formalisation of a large portion of Apostol’s Introduction to Analytic Number Theory in Isabelle/HOL. Of the 14 chapters in the book, the content of 9 has been mostly formalised, while the content of 3 others was already mostly available in Isabelle before. The most interesting results that were formalised are: - The Riemann and Hurwitz zeta functions and the Dirichlet L functions - Dirichlet’s theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions - An analytic proof of the Prime Number Theorem - The asymptotics of arithmetical functions such as the prime omega function, the divisor count sigma_0(n), and Euler’s totient function phi(n)

Cite as

Manuel Eberl. Nine Chapters of Analytic Number Theory in Isabelle/HOL. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 16:1-16:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{eberl:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.16,
  author =	{Eberl, Manuel},
  title =	{{Nine Chapters of Analytic Number Theory in Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{16:1--16:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.16},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110714},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.16},
  annote =	{Keywords: Isabelle, theorem proving, analytic number theory, number theory, arithmetical function, Dirichlet series, prime number theorem, Dirichlet’s theorem, zeta function, L functions}
}
Document
A Certifying Extraction with Time Bounds from Coq to Call-By-Value Lambda Calculus

Authors: Yannick Forster and Fabian Kunze


Abstract
We provide a plugin extracting Coq functions of simple polymorphic types to the (untyped) call-by-value lambda calculus L. The plugin is implemented in the MetaCoq framework and entirely written in Coq. We provide Ltac tactics to automatically verify the extracted terms w.r.t a logical relation connecting Coq functions with correct extractions and time bounds, essentially performing a certifying translation and running time validation. We provide three case studies: A universal L-term obtained as extraction from the Coq definition of a step-indexed self-interpreter for L, a many-reduction from solvability of Diophantine equations to the halting problem of L, and a polynomial-time simulation of Turing machines in L.

Cite as

Yannick Forster and Fabian Kunze. A Certifying Extraction with Time Bounds from Coq to Call-By-Value Lambda Calculus. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 17:1-17:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{forster_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.17,
  author =	{Forster, Yannick and Kunze, Fabian},
  title =	{{A Certifying Extraction with Time Bounds from Coq to Call-By-Value Lambda Calculus}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110724},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: call-by-value, lambda calculus, Coq, constructive type theory, extraction, computability}
}
Document
Formal Proof and Analysis of an Incremental Cycle Detection Algorithm

Authors: Armaël Guéneau, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, Arthur Charguéraud, and François Pottier


Abstract
We study a state-of-the-art incremental cycle detection algorithm due to Bender, Fineman, Gilbert, and Tarjan. We propose a simple change that allows the algorithm to be regarded as genuinely online. Then, we exploit Separation Logic with Time Credits to simultaneously verify the correctness and the worst-case amortized asymptotic complexity of the modified algorithm.

Cite as

Armaël Guéneau, Jacques-Henri Jourdan, Arthur Charguéraud, and François Pottier. Formal Proof and Analysis of an Incremental Cycle Detection Algorithm. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 18:1-18:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gueneau_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.18,
  author =	{Gu\'{e}neau, Arma\"{e}l and Jourdan, Jacques-Henri and Chargu\'{e}raud, Arthur and Pottier, Fran\c{c}ois},
  title =	{{Formal Proof and Analysis of an Incremental Cycle Detection Algorithm}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110739},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: interactive deductive program verification, complexity analysis}
}
Document
A Formalization of Forcing and the Unprovability of the Continuum Hypothesis

Authors: Jesse Michael Han and Floris van Doorn


Abstract
We describe a formalization of forcing using Boolean-valued models in the Lean 3 theorem prover, including the fundamental theorem of forcing and a deep embedding of first-order logic with a Boolean-valued soundness theorem. As an application of our framework, we specialize our construction to the Boolean algebra of regular opens of the Cantor space 2^{omega_2 x omega} and formally verify the failure of the continuum hypothesis in the resulting model.

Cite as

Jesse Michael Han and Floris van Doorn. A Formalization of Forcing and the Unprovability of the Continuum Hypothesis. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 19:1-19:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{han_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.19,
  author =	{Han, Jesse Michael and van Doorn, Floris},
  title =	{{A Formalization of Forcing and the Unprovability of the Continuum Hypothesis}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110742},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Interactive theorem proving, formal verification, set theory, forcing, independence proofs, continuum hypothesis, Boolean-valued models, Lean}
}
Document
Refinement with Time - Refining the Run-Time of Algorithms in Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Maximilian P. L. Haslbeck and Peter Lammich


Abstract
Separation Logic with Time Credits is a well established method to formally verify the correctness and run-time of algorithms, which has been applied to various medium-sized use-cases. Refinement is a technique in program verification that makes software projects of larger scale manageable. Combining these two techniques for the first time, we present a methodology for verifying the functional correctness and the run-time analysis of algorithms in a modular way. We use it to verify Kruskal’s minimum spanning tree algorithm and the Edmonds - Karp algorithm for network flow. An adaptation of the Isabelle Refinement Framework [Lammich and Tuerk, 2012] enables us to specify the functional result and the run-time behaviour of abstract algorithms which can be refined to more concrete algorithms. From these, executable imperative code can be synthesized by an extension of the Sepref tool [Lammich, 2015], preserving correctness and the run-time bounds of the abstract algorithm.

Cite as

Maximilian P. L. Haslbeck and Peter Lammich. Refinement with Time - Refining the Run-Time of Algorithms in Isabelle/HOL. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 20:1-20:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{haslbeck_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.20,
  author =	{Haslbeck, Maximilian P. L. and Lammich, Peter},
  title =	{{Refinement with Time - Refining the Run-Time of Algorithms in Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{20:1--20:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110754},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Isabelle, Time Complexity Analysis, Separation Logic, Program Verification, Refinement, Run Time, Algorithms}
}
Document
Virtualization of HOL4 in Isabelle

Authors: Fabian Immler, Jonas Rädle, and Makarius Wenzel


Abstract
We present a novel approach to combine the HOL4 and Isabelle theorem provers: both are implemented in SML and based on distinctive variants of HOL. The design of HOL4 allows to replace its inference kernel modules, and the system infrastructure of Isabelle allows to embed other applications of SML. That is the starting point to provide a virtual instance of HOL4 in the same run-time environment as Isabelle. Moreover, with an implementation of a virtual HOL4 kernel that operates on Isabelle/HOL terms and theorems, we can load substantial HOL4 libraries to make them Isabelle theories, but still disconnected from existing Isabelle content. Finally, we introduce a methodology based on the transfer package of Isabelle to connect the imported HOL4 material to that of Isabelle/HOL.

Cite as

Fabian Immler, Jonas Rädle, and Makarius Wenzel. Virtualization of HOL4 in Isabelle. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 21:1-21:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{immler_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.21,
  author =	{Immler, Fabian and R\"{a}dle, Jonas and Wenzel, Makarius},
  title =	{{Virtualization of HOL4 in Isabelle}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110760},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: Virtualization, HOL4, Isabelle, Isabelle/HOL, Isabelle/ML}
}
Document
Generating Verified LLVM from Isabelle/HOL

Authors: Peter Lammich


Abstract
We present a framework to generate verified LLVM programs from Isabelle/HOL. It is based on a code generator that generates LLVM text from a simplified fragment of LLVM, shallowly embedded into Isabelle/HOL. On top, we have developed a separation logic, a verification condition generator, and an LLVM backend to the Isabelle Refinement Framework. As case studies, we have produced verified LLVM implementations of binary search and the Knuth-Morris-Pratt string search algorithm. These are one order of magnitude faster than the Standard-ML implementations produced with the original Refinement Framework, and on par with unverified C implementations. Adoption of the original correctness proofs to the new LLVM backend was straightforward. The trusted code base of our approach is the shallow embedding of the LLVM fragment and the code generator, which is a pretty printer combined with some straightforward compilation steps.

Cite as

Peter Lammich. Generating Verified LLVM from Isabelle/HOL. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 22:1-22:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lammich:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.22,
  author =	{Lammich, Peter},
  title =	{{Generating Verified LLVM from Isabelle/HOL}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110777},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: Isabelle/HOL, LLVM, Separation Logic, Verification Condition Generator, Code Generation}
}
Document
Proof Pearl: Purely Functional, Simple and Efficient Priority Search Trees and Applications to Prim and Dijkstra

Authors: Peter Lammich and Tobias Nipkow


Abstract
The starting point of this paper is a new, purely functional, simple and efficient data structure combining a search tree and a priority queue, which we call a priority search tree. The salient feature of priority search trees is that they offer a decrease-key operation, something that is missing from other simple, purely functional priority queue implementations. As two applications of this data structure we verify purely functional, simple and efficient implementations of Prim’s and Dijkstra’s algorithms. This constitutes the first verification of an executable and even efficient version of Prim’s algorithm.

Cite as

Peter Lammich and Tobias Nipkow. Proof Pearl: Purely Functional, Simple and Efficient Priority Search Trees and Applications to Prim and Dijkstra. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 23:1-23:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lammich_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.23,
  author =	{Lammich, Peter and Nipkow, Tobias},
  title =	{{Proof Pearl: Purely Functional, Simple and Efficient Priority Search Trees and Applications to Prim and Dijkstra}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{23:1--23:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.23},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110788},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.23},
  annote =	{Keywords: Priority queue, Dijkstra’s algorithm, Prim’s algorithm, verification, Isabelle}
}
Document
A Verified LL(1) Parser Generator

Authors: Sam Lasser, Chris Casinghino, Kathleen Fisher, and Cody Roux


Abstract
An LL(1) parser is a recursive descent algorithm that uses a single token of lookahead to build a grammatical derivation for an input sequence. We present an LL(1) parser generator that, when applied to grammar G, produces an LL(1) parser for G if such a parser exists. We use the Coq Proof Assistant to verify that the generator and the parsers that it produces are sound and complete, and that they terminate on all inputs without using fuel parameters. As a case study, we extract the tool’s source code and use it to generate a JSON parser. The generated parser runs in linear time; it is two to four times slower than an unverified parser for the same grammar.

Cite as

Sam Lasser, Chris Casinghino, Kathleen Fisher, and Cody Roux. A Verified LL(1) Parser Generator. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 24:1-24:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lasser_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.24,
  author =	{Lasser, Sam and Casinghino, Chris and Fisher, Kathleen and Roux, Cody},
  title =	{{A Verified LL(1) Parser Generator}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110794},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: interactive theorem proving, top-down parsing}
}
Document
Binary-Compatible Verification of Filesystems with ACL2

Authors: Mihir Parang Mehta and William R. Cook


Abstract
Filesystems are an essential component of most computer systems. Work on the verification of filesystem functionality has been focused on constructing new filesystems in a manner which simplifies the process of verifying them against specifications. This leaves open the question of whether filesystems already in use are correct at the binary level. This paper introduces LoFAT, a model of the FAT32 filesystem which efficiently implements a subset of the POSIX filesystem operations, and HiFAT, a more abstract model of FAT32 which is simpler to reason about. LoFAT is proved to be correct in terms of refinement of HiFAT, and made executable by enabling the state of the model to be written to and read from FAT32 disk images. EqFAT, an equivalence relation for disk images, considers whether two disk images contain the same directory tree modulo reordering of files and implementation-level details regarding cluster allocation. A suite of co-simulation tests uses EqFAT to compare the operation of existing FAT32 implementations to LoFAT and check the correctness of existing implementations of FAT32 such as the mtools suite of programs and the Linux FAT32 implementation. All models and proofs are formalized and mechanically verified in ACL2.

Cite as

Mihir Parang Mehta and William R. Cook. Binary-Compatible Verification of Filesystems with ACL2. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 25:1-25:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mehta_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.25,
  author =	{Mehta, Mihir Parang and Cook, William R.},
  title =	{{Binary-Compatible Verification of Filesystems with ACL2}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110807},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: interactive theorem proving, filesystems}
}
Document
Ornaments for Proof Reuse in Coq

Authors: Talia Ringer, Nathaniel Yazdani, John Leo, and Dan Grossman


Abstract
Ornaments express relations between inductive types with the same inductive structure. We implement fully automatic proof reuse for a particular class of ornaments in a Coq plugin, and show how such a tool can give programmers the rewards of using indexed inductive types while automating away many of the costs. The plugin works directly on Coq code; it is the first ornamentation tool for a non-embedded dependently typed language. It is also the first tool to automatically identify ornaments: To lift a function or proof, the user must provide only the source type, the destination type, and the source function or proof. In taking advantage of the mathematical properties of ornaments, our approach produces faster functions and smaller terms than a more general approach to proof reuse in Coq.

Cite as

Talia Ringer, Nathaniel Yazdani, John Leo, and Dan Grossman. Ornaments for Proof Reuse in Coq. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 26:1-26:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{ringer_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.26,
  author =	{Ringer, Talia and Yazdani, Nathaniel and Leo, John and Grossman, Dan},
  title =	{{Ornaments for Proof Reuse in Coq}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{26:1--26:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.26},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110816},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.26},
  annote =	{Keywords: ornaments, proof reuse, proof automation}
}
Document
Verifying That a Compiler Preserves Concurrent Value-Dependent Information-Flow Security

Authors: Robert Sison and Toby Murray


Abstract
It is common to prove by reasoning over source code that programs do not leak sensitive data. But doing so leaves a gap between reasoning and reality that can only be filled by accounting for the behaviour of the compiler. This task is complicated when programs enforce value-dependent information-flow security properties (in which classification of locations can vary depending on values in other locations) and complicated further when programs exploit shared-variable concurrency. Prior work has formally defined a notion of concurrency-aware refinement for preserving value-dependent security properties. However, that notion is considerably more complex than standard refinement definitions typically applied in the verification of semantics preservation by compilers. To date it remains unclear whether it can be applied to a realistic compiler, because there exist no general decomposition principles for separating it into smaller, more familiar, proof obligations. In this work, we provide such a decomposition principle, which we show can almost halve the complexity of proving secure refinement. Further, we demonstrate its applicability to secure compilation, by proving in Isabelle/HOL the preservation of value-dependent security by a proof-of-concept compiler from an imperative While language to a generic RISC-style assembly language, for programs with shared-memory concurrency mediated by locking primitives. Finally, we execute our compiler in Isabelle on a While language model of the Cross Domain Desktop Compositor, demonstrating to our knowledge the first use of a compiler verification result to carry an information-flow security property down to the assembly-level model of a non-trivial concurrent program.

Cite as

Robert Sison and Toby Murray. Verifying That a Compiler Preserves Concurrent Value-Dependent Information-Flow Security. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 27:1-27:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sison_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.27,
  author =	{Sison, Robert and Murray, Toby},
  title =	{{Verifying That a Compiler Preserves Concurrent Value-Dependent Information-Flow Security}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{27:1--27:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.27},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110829},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.27},
  annote =	{Keywords: Secure compilation, Information flow security, Concurrency, Verification}
}
Document
Quantitative Continuity and Computable Analysis in Coq

Authors: Florian Steinberg, Laurent Théry, and Holger Thies


Abstract
We give a number of formal proofs of theorems from the field of computable analysis. Many of our results specify executable algorithms that work on infinite inputs by means of operating on finite approximations and are proven correct in the sense of computable analysis. The development is done in the proof assistant Coq and heavily relies on the Incone library for information theoretic continuity. This library is developed by one of the authors and the results of this paper extend the library. While full executability in a formal development of mathematical statements about real numbers and the like is not a feature that is unique to the Incone library, its original contribution is to adhere to the conventions of computable analysis to provide a general purpose interface for algorithmic reasoning on continuous structures. The paper includes a brief description of the most important concepts of Incone and its sub libraries mf and Metric. The results that provide complete computational content include that the algebraic operations and the efficient limit operator on the reals are computable, that the countably infinite product of a space with itself is isomorphic to a space of functions, compatibility of the enumeration representation of subsets of natural numbers with the abstract definition of the space of open subsets of the natural numbers, and that continuous realizability implies sequential continuity. We also describe many non-computational results that support the correctness of definitions from the library. These include that the information theoretic notion of continuity used in the library is equivalent to the metric notion of continuity on Baire space, a complete comparison of the different concepts of continuity that arise from metric and represented space structures and the discontinuity of the unrestricted limit operator on the real numbers and the task of selecting an element of a closed subset of the natural numbers.

Cite as

Florian Steinberg, Laurent Théry, and Holger Thies. Quantitative Continuity and Computable Analysis in Coq. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 28:1-28:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{steinberg_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.28,
  author =	{Steinberg, Florian and Th\'{e}ry, Laurent and Thies, Holger},
  title =	{{Quantitative Continuity and Computable Analysis in Coq}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{28:1--28:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.28},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110830},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.28},
  annote =	{Keywords: computable analysis, Coq, contionuous functionals, discontinuity, closed choice on the naturals}
}
Document
Deriving Proved Equality Tests in Coq-Elpi: Stronger Induction Principles for Containers in Coq

Authors: Enrico Tassi


Abstract
We describe a procedure to derive equality tests and their correctness proofs from inductive type declarations in Coq. Programs and proofs are derived compositionally, reusing code and proofs derived previously. The key steps are two. First, we design appropriate induction principles for data types defined using parametric containers. Second, we develop a technique to work around the modularity limitations imposed by the purely syntactic termination check Coq performs on recursive proofs. The unary parametricity translation of inductive data types turns out to be the key to both steps. Last but not least, we provide an implementation of the procedure for the Coq proof assistant based on the Elpi [Dunchev et al., 2015] extension language.

Cite as

Enrico Tassi. Deriving Proved Equality Tests in Coq-Elpi: Stronger Induction Principles for Containers in Coq. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 29:1-29:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{tassi:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.29,
  author =	{Tassi, Enrico},
  title =	{{Deriving Proved Equality Tests in Coq-Elpi: Stronger Induction Principles for Containers in Coq}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110841},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Coq, Containers, Induction, Equality test, Parametricity translation}
}
Document
Complete Non-Orders and Fixed Points

Authors: Akihisa Yamada and Jérémy Dubut


Abstract
In this paper, we develop an Isabelle/HOL library of order-theoretic concepts, such as various completeness conditions and fixed-point theorems. We keep our formalization as general as possible: we reprove several well-known results about complete orders, often without any property of ordering, thus complete non-orders. In particular, we generalize the Knaster - Tarski theorem so that we ensure the existence of a quasi-fixed point of monotone maps over complete non-orders, and show that the set of quasi-fixed points is complete under a mild condition - attractivity - which is implied by either antisymmetry or transitivity. This result generalizes and strengthens a result by Stauti and Maaden. Finally, we recover Kleene’s fixed-point theorem for omega-complete non-orders, again using attractivity to prove that Kleene’s fixed points are least quasi-fixed points.

Cite as

Akihisa Yamada and Jérémy Dubut. Complete Non-Orders and Fixed Points. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 30:1-30:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{yamada_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.30,
  author =	{Yamada, Akihisa and Dubut, J\'{e}r\'{e}my},
  title =	{{Complete Non-Orders and Fixed Points}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{30:1--30:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.30},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110852},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.30},
  annote =	{Keywords: Order Theory, Lattice Theory, Fixed-Points, Isabelle/HOL}
}
Document
Verified Decision Procedures for Modal Logics

Authors: Minchao Wu and Rajeev Goré


Abstract
We describe a formalization of modal tableaux with histories for the modal logics K, KT and S4 in Lean. We describe how we formalized the static and transitional rules, the non-trivial termination and the correctness of loop-checks. The formalized tableaux are essentially executable decision procedures with soundness and completeness proved. Termination is also proved in order to define them as functions in Lean. All of these decision procedures return a concrete Kripke model in cases where the input set of formulas is satisfiable, and a proof constructed via the tableau rules witnessing unsatisfiability otherwise. We also describe an extensible formalization of backjumping and its verified implementation for the modal logic K. As far as we know, these are the first verified decision procedures for these modal logics.

Cite as

Minchao Wu and Rajeev Goré. Verified Decision Procedures for Modal Logics. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 31:1-31:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{wu_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.31,
  author =	{Wu, Minchao and Gor\'{e}, Rajeev},
  title =	{{Verified Decision Procedures for Modal Logics}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{31:1--31:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.31},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110866},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.31},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formal Methods, Interactive Theorem Proving, Modal Logic, Lean}
}
Document
Characteristic Formulae for Liveness Properties of Non-Terminating CakeML Programs

Authors: Johannes Åman Pohjola, Henrik Rostedt, and Magnus O. Myreen


Abstract
There are useful programs that do not terminate, and yet standard Hoare logics are not able to prove liveness properties about non-terminating programs. This paper shows how a Hoare-like programming logic framework (characteristic formulae) can be extended to enable reasoning about the I/O behaviour of programs that do not terminate. The approach is inspired by transfinite induction rather than coinduction, and does not require non-terminating loops to be productive. This work has been developed in the HOL4 theorem prover and has been integrated into the ecosystem of proof tools surrounding the CakeML programming language.

Cite as

Johannes Åman Pohjola, Henrik Rostedt, and Magnus O. Myreen. Characteristic Formulae for Liveness Properties of Non-Terminating CakeML Programs. In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 32:1-32:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{amanpohjola_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.32,
  author =	{\r{A}man Pohjola, Johannes and Rostedt, Henrik and Myreen, Magnus O.},
  title =	{{Characteristic Formulae for Liveness Properties of Non-Terminating CakeML Programs}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110872},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Program verification, non-termination, liveness, Hoare logic}
}
Document
Short Paper
The DPRM Theorem in Isabelle (Short Paper)

Authors: Jonas Bayer, Marco David, Abhik Pal, Benedikt Stock, and Dierk Schleicher


Abstract
Hilbert’s 10th problem asks for an algorithm to tell whether or not a given diophantine equation has a solution over the integers. The non-existence of such an algorithm was shown in 1970 by Yuri Matiyasevich. The key step is known as the DPRM theorem: every recursively enumerable set of natural numbers is Diophantine. We present the formalization of Matiyasevich’s proof of the DPRM theorem in Isabelle. To represent recursively enumerable sets in equations, we implement and arithmetize register machines. Using several number-theoretic lemmas, we prove that exponentiation has a diophantine representation. Further, we contribute a small library of number-theoretic implementations of binary digit-wise relations. Finally, we discuss and contribute an is_diophantine predicate. We expect the complete formalization of the DPRM theorem in the near future; at present it is complete except for a minor gap in the arithmetization proofs of register machines and extending the is_diophantine predicate by two binary digit-wise relations.

Cite as

Jonas Bayer, Marco David, Abhik Pal, Benedikt Stock, and Dierk Schleicher. The DPRM Theorem in Isabelle (Short Paper). In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 33:1-33:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bayer_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.33,
  author =	{Bayer, Jonas and David, Marco and Pal, Abhik and Stock, Benedikt and Schleicher, Dierk},
  title =	{{The DPRM Theorem in Isabelle}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{33:1--33:7},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.33},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110883},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.33},
  annote =	{Keywords: DPRM theorem, Hilbert’s tenth problem, Diophantine predicates, Register machines, Recursively enumerable sets, Isabelle, Formal verification}
}
Document
Short Paper
Hammering Mizar by Learning Clause Guidance (Short Paper)

Authors: Jan Jakubův and Josef Urban


Abstract
We describe a very large improvement of existing hammer-style proof automation over large ITP libraries by combining learning and theorem proving. In particular, we have integrated state-of-the-art machine learners into the E automated theorem prover, and developed methods that allow learning and efficient internal guidance of E over the whole Mizar library. The resulting trained system improves the real-time performance of E on the Mizar library by 70% in a single-strategy setting.

Cite as

Jan Jakubův and Josef Urban. Hammering Mizar by Learning Clause Guidance (Short Paper). In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 34:1-34:8, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{jakubuv_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.34,
  author =	{Jakub\r{u}v, Jan and Urban, Josef},
  title =	{{Hammering Mizar by Learning Clause Guidance}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:8},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110898},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proof automation, ITP hammers, Automated theorem proving, Machine learning}
}
Document
Short Paper
Declarative Proof Translation (Short Paper)

Authors: Cezary Kaliszyk and Karol Pąk


Abstract
Declarative proof styles of different proof assistants include a number of incompatible features. In this paper we discuss and classify the differences between them and propose efficient algorithms for declarative proof outline translation. We demonstrate the practicality of our algorithms by automatically translating the proof outlines in 200 articles from the Mizar Mathematical Library to the Isabelle/Isar proof style. This generates the corresponding theories with 15301 proof outlines accepted by the Isabelle proof checker. The goal of our translation is to produce a declarative proof in the target system that is both accepted and short and therefore readable. For this three kinds of adaptations are required. First, the proof structure often needs to be rebuilt to capture the extensions of the natural deduction rules supported by the systems. Second, the references to previous items and their labels need to be matched and aligned. Finally, adaptations in the annotations of individual proof step may be necessary.

Cite as

Cezary Kaliszyk and Karol Pąk. Declarative Proof Translation (Short Paper). In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 35:1-35:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{kaliszyk_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.35,
  author =	{Kaliszyk, Cezary and P\k{a}k, Karol},
  title =	{{Declarative Proof Translation}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{35:1--35:7},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.35},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110903},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.35},
  annote =	{Keywords: Declarative Proof, Translation, Isabelle/Isar, Mizar}
}
Document
Short Paper
Formalization of the Domination Chain with Weighted Parameters (Short Paper)

Authors: Daniel E. Severín


Abstract
The Cockayne-Hedetniemi Domination Chain is a chain of inequalities between classic parameters of graph theory: for a given graph G, ir(G) <= gamma(G) <= iota(G) <= alpha(G) <= Gamma(G) <= IR(G). These parameters return the maximum/minimum cardinality of a set satisfying some property. However, they can be generalized for graphs with weighted vertices where the objective is to maximize/minimize the sum of weights of a set satisfying the same property, and the domination chain still holds for them. In this work, the definition of these parameters as well as the chain is formalized in Coq/Ssreflect.

Cite as

Daniel E. Severín. Formalization of the Domination Chain with Weighted Parameters (Short Paper). In 10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 141, pp. 36:1-36:7, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{severin:LIPIcs.ITP.2019.36,
  author =	{Sever{\'\i}n, Daniel E.},
  title =	{{Formalization of the Domination Chain with Weighted Parameters}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2019)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:7},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-122-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2019},
  volume =	{141},
  editor =	{Harrison, John and O'Leary, John and Tolmach, Andrew},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-110919},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: Domination Chain, Coq, Formalization of Mathematics}
}

Filters


Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail