36 Search Results for "Chimani, Markus"


Document
General Multiplicative Spanners in Practice

Authors: Fritz Bökler, Markus Chimani, and Henning Jasper

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 371, 24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026)


Abstract
Given an undirected graph G with edge weights and lengths, a minimum α-spanner is a least-weight subgraph H ⊆ G that preserves distances w.r.t. the lengths between all node pairs up to a factor of α. Literature often takes the simplifying assumption of a single (coupled) edge function for weights and lengths. For such instances, several exact and non-exact algorithms are known and have been thoroughly evaluated in practice. However, many practical instances have decoupled form, as their weights and lengths are generally independent. Due to the increased complexity, only few (and even fewer practical) algorithms are able to guarantee low-weight solutions. This prompts practitioners to force their naturally decoupled instances into a coupled format, forsaking any quality guarantee. We implement several exact, approximative and heuristic algorithms for decoupled α-spanners, and use algorithm engineering to speed them up in practice. Our hypothesis-driven experiments evaluate their performance w.r.t. solution quality and speed. Generally, many practical instances can indeed be solved exactly within reasonable time, while LP-based approximation algorithms are not worthwhile. We find that standard greedy algorithms often yield acceptable results, but there are also practical instances for which they yield arbitrarily poor solutions. Here, augmented greedy variations offer a good compromise between solution quality and speed.

Cite as

Fritz Bökler, Markus Chimani, and Henning Jasper. General Multiplicative Spanners in Practice. In 24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 371, pp. 8:1-8:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bokler_et_al:LIPIcs.SEA.2026.8,
  author =	{B\"{o}kler, Fritz and Chimani, Markus and Jasper, Henning},
  title =	{{General Multiplicative Spanners in Practice}},
  booktitle =	{24th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2026)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-422-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{371},
  editor =	{Aum\"{u}ller, Martin and Finocchi, Irene},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-260120},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2026.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph spanners, ILP, experimental study, algorithm engineering}
}
Document
Upward Book Embeddings of Partitioned Digraphs

Authors: Giordano Da Lozzo, Fabrizio Frati, and Ignaz Rutter

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 367, 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)


Abstract
In 1999, Heath, Pemmaraju, and Trenk [SIAM J. Comput. 28(4), 1999] extended the classic notion of book embeddings to digraphs, introducing the concept of upward book embeddings, in which the vertices must appear along the spine in a topological order and the edges are partitioned into pages, so that no two edges in the same page cross. For a partitioned digraph G = (V, ⋃^k_{i=1} E_i), that is, a digraph whose edge set is partitioned into k subsets, an upward book embedding is required to assign edges to pages as prescribed by the given partition. In a companion paper, Heath and Pemmaraju [SIAM J. Comput. 28(5), 1999] proved that the problem of testing the existence of an upward book embedding of a partitioned digraph is linear-time solvable for k = 1 and recently Akitaya, Demaine, Hesterberg, and Liu [GD, 2017] have shown the problem NP-complete for k ≥ 3. In this paper, we study upward book embeddings of partitioned digraphs and focus on the unsolved case k = 2. Our first main result is a novel characterization of the upward embeddings that support an upward book embedding in two pages. We exploit this characterization in several ways, and obtain a rich picture of the complexity landscape of the problem. First, we show that the problem remains NP-complete when k = 2, thus closing the complexity gap for the problem. Second, we show that, for an n-vertex partitioned digraph with a prescribed planar embedding, the existence of an upward book embedding that respects the given planar embedding can be tested in O(n log³ n) time. Finally, leveraging the SPQ(R)-tree decomposition of biconnected graphs into triconnected components, we present a cubic-time testing algorithm for biconnected directed partial 2-trees.

Cite as

Giordano Da Lozzo, Fabrizio Frati, and Ignaz Rutter. Upward Book Embeddings of Partitioned Digraphs. In 42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 367, pp. 36:1-36:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2026)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{dalozzo_et_al:LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.36,
  author =	{Da Lozzo, Giordano and Frati, Fabrizio and Rutter, Ignaz},
  title =	{{Upward Book Embeddings of Partitioned Digraphs}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2026)},
  pages =	{36:1--36:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-418-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{367},
  editor =	{Ahn, Hee-Kap and Hoffmann, Michael and Nayyeri, Amir},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-258424},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2026.36},
  annote =	{Keywords: upward book embeddings, partitioned digraphs, SPQ-trees, 2-trees}
}
Document
Traffic-Oblivious Multi-Commodity Flow Network Design

Authors: Markus Chimani and Max Ilsen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 359, 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)


Abstract
We consider the Minimum Multi-Commodity Flow Subgraph (MMCFS) problem: given a directed graph G with edge capacities cap and a retention ratio α ∈ (0,1), find an edge-wise minimum subgraph G' ⊆ G such that for all traffic matrices T routable in G using a multi-commodity flow, α⋅ T is routable in G'. This natural yet novel problem is motivated by recent research that investigates how the power consumption in backbone computer networks can be reduced by turning off connections during times of low demand without compromising the quality of service. Since the actual traffic demands are generally not known beforehand, our approach must be traffic-oblivious, i.e., work for all possible sets of simultaneously routable traffic demands in the original network. In this paper we present the problem, relate it to other known problems in literature, and show several structural results, including a reformulation, maximum possible deviations from the optimum, and NP-hardness (as well as a certain inapproximability) already on very restricted instances. The most significant contribution is a max(1/α, 2)-approximation based on a surprisingly simple LP-rounding scheme. We also give instances where this worst-case approximation ratio is met and thus prove that our analysis is tight.

Cite as

Markus Chimani and Max Ilsen. Traffic-Oblivious Multi-Commodity Flow Network Design. In 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 359, pp. 19:1-19:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chimani_et_al:LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.19,
  author =	{Chimani, Markus and Ilsen, Max},
  title =	{{Traffic-Oblivious Multi-Commodity Flow Network Design}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-408-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{359},
  editor =	{Chen, Ho-Lin and Hon, Wing-Kai and Tsai, Meng-Tsung},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249273},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Multi-commodity flow, Digraphs, LP-rounding, Approximation algorithm}
}
Document
Structural Parameterizations of Simultaneous Planarity

Authors: Thomas Depian, Simon D. Fink, Alexander Firbas, Robert Ganian, Matthias Pfretzschner, and Ignaz Rutter

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 359, 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)


Abstract
Given a set of graphs on the same vertex set, the problem Simultaneous Embedding With Fixed Edges (SEFE) asks, whether there exist planar drawings of all input graphs, such that every pair of drawings coincides on their shared subgraph. It is known that SEFE is NP-complete [Elisabeth Gassner et al., 2006], even in the so-called sunflower case, where all pairs of input graphs have the same shared graph G_∩ [Marcus Schaefer, 2012]. Fink, Pfretzschner, and Rutter [Simon D. Fink et al., 2023] recently initiated the study of the parameterized complexity of SEFE in the sunflower case, mainly focusing on structural parameters of G_∩. In this work, we shift the focus towards parameters of the union graph G_∪ that contains the edges of all input graphs. On the positive side, we establish fixed-parameter tractability for the problem with respect to the feedback edge set number of G_∪. We complement this result by showing that it, surprisingly, remains NP-complete even if G_∪ has constant vertex cover number. These results settle two open questions posed by Fink et al. [Simon D. Fink et al., 2023].

Cite as

Thomas Depian, Simon D. Fink, Alexander Firbas, Robert Ganian, Matthias Pfretzschner, and Ignaz Rutter. Structural Parameterizations of Simultaneous Planarity. In 36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 359, pp. 25:1-25:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{depian_et_al:LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.25,
  author =	{Depian, Thomas and Fink, Simon D. and Firbas, Alexander and Ganian, Robert and Pfretzschner, Matthias and Rutter, Ignaz},
  title =	{{Structural Parameterizations of Simultaneous Planarity}},
  booktitle =	{36th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2025)},
  pages =	{25:1--25:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-408-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{359},
  editor =	{Chen, Ho-Lin and Hon, Wing-Kai and Tsai, Meng-Tsung},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.25},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249332},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2025.25},
  annote =	{Keywords: SEFE, Simultaneous Planarity, Fixed-Parameter Tractability, NP-hardness}
}
Document
NNP-NET: Accelerating t-SNE Graph Drawing for Very Large Graphs by Neural Networks

Authors: Ilan Hartskeerl, Tamara Mchedlidze, Simon van Wageningen, Peter Vangorp, and Alexandru Telea

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
tsNET is a recent graph drawing (GD) method that creates high quality layouts but suffers from a very high runtime. We present a new GD method, NNP-NET, which reduces tsNET’s time complexity to generate layouts for very large graphs in seconds. Additionally, we extend tsNET to support drawing graphs with edge weights. We accomplish this by replacing tsNET’s t-SNE projection with Neural Network Projection (NNP), a fast dimensionality reduction (DR) method that can imitate any given DR method. Our experiments show that NNP-NET gets good quality results when compared to other state-of-the art GD methods while yielding a better computational scalability.

Cite as

Ilan Hartskeerl, Tamara Mchedlidze, Simon van Wageningen, Peter Vangorp, and Alexandru Telea. NNP-NET: Accelerating t-SNE Graph Drawing for Very Large Graphs by Neural Networks. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 22:1-22:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hartskeerl_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.22,
  author =	{Hartskeerl, Ilan and Mchedlidze, Tamara and van Wageningen, Simon and Vangorp, Peter and Telea, Alexandru},
  title =	{{NNP-NET: Accelerating t-SNE Graph Drawing for Very Large Graphs by Neural Networks}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{22:1--22:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.22},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250087},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.22},
  annote =	{Keywords: supervised graph drawing, dimensionality reduction, t-SNE}
}
Document
Towards a Better Understanding of Graph Perception in Immersive Environments

Authors: Lin Zhang, Yao Wang, Ying Zhang, Wilhelm Kerle-Malcharek, Karsten Klein, Falk Schreiber, and Andreas Bulling

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
As Immersive Analytics (IA) increasingly uses Virtual Reality (VR) for stereoscopic 3D (S3D) graph visualisation, it is crucial to understand how users perceive network structures in these immersive environments. However, little is known about how humans read S3D graphs during task solving, and how gaze behaviour indicates task performance. To address this gap, we report a user study with 18 participants asked to perform three analytical tasks on S3D graph visualisations in a VR environment. Our findings reveal systematic relationships between network structural properties and gaze behaviour. Based on these insights, we contribute a comprehensive eye tracking methodology for analysing human perception in immersive environments and establish eye tracking as a valuable tool for objectively evaluating cognitive load in S3D graph visualisation.

Cite as

Lin Zhang, Yao Wang, Ying Zhang, Wilhelm Kerle-Malcharek, Karsten Klein, Falk Schreiber, and Andreas Bulling. Towards a Better Understanding of Graph Perception in Immersive Environments. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 11:1-11:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zhang_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.11,
  author =	{Zhang, Lin and Wang, Yao and Zhang, Ying and Kerle-Malcharek, Wilhelm and Klein, Karsten and Schreiber, Falk and Bulling, Andreas},
  title =	{{Towards a Better Understanding of Graph Perception in Immersive Environments}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249976},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Stereoscopic 3D, Graph Visualisation, Eye Tracking, Graph Perception}
}
Document
OOPS: Optimized One-Planarity Solver via SAT

Authors: Sergey Pupyrev

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
We present OOPS (Optimized One-Planarity Solver), a practical heuristic for recognizing 1-planar graphs and several important subclasses. A graph is 1-planar if it can be drawn in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once - a natural generalization of planar graphs that has received increasing attention in graph drawing and beyond-planar graph theory. Although testing planarity can be done in linear time, recognizing 1-planar graphs is NP-complete, making effective practical algorithms especially valuable. The core idea of our approach is to reduce the recognition of 1-planarity to a propositional satisfiability (SAT) instance, enabling the use of modern SAT solvers to efficiently explore the search space. Despite the inherent complexity of the problem, our method is substantially faster in practice than naïve or brute-force algorithms. In addition to demonstrating the empirical performance of our solver on synthetic and real-world instances, we show how OOPS can be used as a discovery tool in theoretical graph theory. Specifically, we employ OOPS to investigate two research problems concerning 1-planarity of specific graph families. Our implementation of the algorithm is publicly available to support further exploration in the field.

Cite as

Sergey Pupyrev. OOPS: Optimized One-Planarity Solver via SAT. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 14:1-14:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{pupyrev:LIPIcs.GD.2025.14,
  author =	{Pupyrev, Sergey},
  title =	{{OOPS: Optimized One-Planarity Solver via SAT}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{14:1--14:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.14},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250004},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.14},
  annote =	{Keywords: beyond planarity, 1-planar graph, SAT, book embeddings, upward 1-planarity}
}
Document
Same Quality Metrics, Different Graph Drawings

Authors: Simon van Wageningen, Tamara Mchedlidze, and Alexandru C. Telea

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
Graph drawings are commonly used to visualize relational data. User understanding and performance are linked to the quality of such drawings, which is measured by quality metrics. The tacit knowledge in the graph drawing community about these quality metrics is that they are not always able to accurately capture the quality of graph drawings. In particular, such metrics may rate drawings with very poor quality as very good. In this work we make this tacit knowledge explicit by showing that we can modify existing graph drawings into arbitrary target shapes while keeping one or more quality metrics almost identical. This supports the claim that more advanced quality metrics are needed to capture the "goodness" of a graph drawing and that we cannot confidently rely on the value of a single (or several) certain quality metrics.

Cite as

Simon van Wageningen, Tamara Mchedlidze, and Alexandru C. Telea. Same Quality Metrics, Different Graph Drawings. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 7:1-7:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{vanwageningen_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.7,
  author =	{van Wageningen, Simon and Mchedlidze, Tamara and Telea, Alexandru C.},
  title =	{{Same Quality Metrics, Different Graph Drawings}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{7:1--7:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.7},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249935},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.7},
  annote =	{Keywords: graph drawing, quality metrics, assumptions, fooling}
}
Document
The Page Number of Monotone Directed Acyclic Outerplanar Graphs Is Four or Five

Authors: Jawaherul Md. Alam, Michael A. Bekos, Martin Gronemann, and Michael Kaufmann

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
A k-page book embedding of a directed acyclic graph consists of a topological order of its vertices and a k-coloring of its edges, such that no two edges of the same color cross, that is, their endpoints do not alternate in the order. The minimum value of k for which such an embedding exists is referred to as the page number of the graph. In contrast to general directed acyclic planar graphs, which may have unbounded page number [SIAM J. Comput. 28(5), 1999], it was recently shown that directed acyclic outerplanar graphs have bounded page number. In particular, Jungeblut, Merker and Ueckerdt provided an upper bound of 24,776 on their page number [FOCS 2023: 1937-1952]. In this work, we focus on so-called monotone directed acyclic outerplanar graphs. Starting from a single edge, these graphs are constructed by iteratively connecting a new vertex to the endpoints of an existing edge on the outer face using either two incoming or two outgoing edges incident to it. These graphs have twist-number 4 [GD 2023: 135-151] (i.e., they admit a topological order in which no more than four edges pairwise cross), a property, which was leveraged by Jungeblut, Merker and Ueckerdt to show that their page number is at most 128. We lower this upper bound to 5 and we also provide a lower bound of 4. A notable consequence of our result is a significant improvement of the upper bound on the page number of general directed outerplanar graphs from 24,776 to 1,160.

Cite as

Jawaherul Md. Alam, Michael A. Bekos, Martin Gronemann, and Michael Kaufmann. The Page Number of Monotone Directed Acyclic Outerplanar Graphs Is Four or Five. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 9:1-9:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{alam_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.9,
  author =	{Alam, Jawaherul Md. and Bekos, Michael A. and Gronemann, Martin and Kaufmann, Michael},
  title =	{{The Page Number of Monotone Directed Acyclic Outerplanar Graphs Is Four or Five}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{9:1--9:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249952},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Book embeddings, page number, directed outerplanar graphs}
}
Document
Separability of Witness Gabriel Drawings

Authors: Carolina Haase, Philipp Kindermann, William Lenhart, and Giuseppe Liotta

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
A witness Gabriel drawing Γ is a straight-line drawing of a graph in which any two vertices of Γ are adjacent if and only if the disk having these vertices as antipodal points contains no element of a special set of points called witnesses. A witness Gabriel drawing is linearly separable if the vertices and the witnesses lie in opposite half-planes. We prove that every outerplanar graph has a linearly separable witness Gabriel drawing by introducing and studying a new type of drawing that we call a border parabola drawing. We then use border parabola drawings to characterize those triangle-free graphs that admit a linearly separable witness Gabriel drawing. We also consider witness Gabriel drawings where no witness lies in the interior of the convex hull of the vertex set, which we call convexly separable drawings. We construct witness Gabriel drawable graphs for which any witness Gabriel drawing must be convexly separable and that do not admit any linearly separable witness Gabriel drawing.

Cite as

Carolina Haase, Philipp Kindermann, William Lenhart, and Giuseppe Liotta. Separability of Witness Gabriel Drawings. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 13:1-13:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{haase_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.13,
  author =	{Haase, Carolina and Kindermann, Philipp and Lenhart, William and Liotta, Giuseppe},
  title =	{{Separability of Witness Gabriel Drawings}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249998},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Proximity Drawings, Witness Gabriel Graphs, Geometric Graph Theory}
}
Document
Stress in Graph Drawings: Perception, Preference, and Performance

Authors: Gavin J. Mooney, Jacob Miller, Michael Wybrow, Stephen Kobourov, and Helen C. Purchase

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
Stress in a graph drawing has been a popular layout principle for more than two decades. Low stress drawings exhibit the property that the geometric distances between all pairs of nodes correlate with the shortest paths between them. The assumption has always been that low stress drawings are "nicer" and better support human perception and comprehension than high stress drawings. In this paper, we put these assumptions to the test. We use a normalised scale-independent and rotation-independent metric for stress; this is necessary to ensure strict controls on our experimental stimuli. We report on three experiments, exploring human perception of stress, preference for stress, and the effect of stress on a graph performance task. We conclude that people can see stress in a graph drawing, that they prefer low stress drawings, and that their performance in a shortest path task improves as stress decreases - thus empirically confirming long-standing assumptions.

Cite as

Gavin J. Mooney, Jacob Miller, Michael Wybrow, Stephen Kobourov, and Helen C. Purchase. Stress in Graph Drawings: Perception, Preference, and Performance. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 38:1-38:23, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{mooney_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.38,
  author =	{Mooney, Gavin J. and Miller, Jacob and Wybrow, Michael and Kobourov, Stephen and Purchase, Helen C.},
  title =	{{Stress in Graph Drawings: Perception, Preference, and Performance}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{38:1--38:23},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.38},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250240},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.38},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph Drawing, Graph Drawing Metrics, Stress, Visual Perception, User Study}
}
Document
Graph Drawing Contest Abstract
Winning the GD Challenge for the 4th Time: Our Approach (Graph Drawing Contest Abstract)

Authors: Julien Bianchetti and Laurent Moalic

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
We present the approach we designed to tackle and win the 2025 Graph Drawing Challenge on minimizing the k-planarity of graphs. Our method employs a multi-stage heuristic centered around two Simulated Annealing (SA) algorithms: the first aims to reduce the total number of crossings, while the second improves the k-value. To obtain a good initial solution, we first applied tools from the OGDF library, which helped reduce crossings. The challenge consisted of nine instances to optimize. Our approach achieved the best results on eight out of nine instances - sharing the top score twice with other teams and ranking first alone in six cases.

Cite as

Julien Bianchetti and Laurent Moalic. Winning the GD Challenge for the 4th Time: Our Approach (Graph Drawing Contest Abstract). In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 43:1-43:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bianchetti_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.43,
  author =	{Bianchetti, Julien and Moalic, Laurent},
  title =	{{Winning the GD Challenge for the 4th Time: Our Approach}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{43:1--43:4},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.43},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250293},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.43},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph Drawing Contest, simulated annealing, k-planarity}
}
Document
Heuristics for Exact 1-Planarity Testing

Authors: Simon D. Fink, Miriam Münch, Matthias Pfretzschner, and Ignaz Rutter

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
Since many real-world graphs are nonplanar, the study of graphs that allow few crossings per edge has been an active subfield of graph theory in recent years. One of the most natural generalizations of planar graphs are the so-called 1-planar graphs that admit a drawing with at most one crossing per edge. Unfortunately, testing whether a graph is 1-planar is known to be NP-complete even for very restricted graph classes. On the positive side, Binucci, Didimo and Montecchiani [Binucci et al., 2023] presented the first practical algorithm for testing 1-planarity based on an easy-to-implement backtracking strategy. We build on this idea and systematically explore the design choices of such algorithms and propose several new ingredients, such as different branching strategies and multiple filter criteria that allow us to reject certain branches in the search tree early on. We conduct an extensive experimental evaluation that evaluates the efficiency and effectiveness of these ingredients. Given a time limit of three hours per instance, our best configuration is able to solve more than 95% of the non-planar instances from the well-known North and Rome graphs with up to 50 vertices. Notably, the median running time for solved instances is well below 4 seconds.

Cite as

Simon D. Fink, Miriam Münch, Matthias Pfretzschner, and Ignaz Rutter. Heuristics for Exact 1-Planarity Testing. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 4:1-4:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{fink_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.4,
  author =	{Fink, Simon D. and M\"{u}nch, Miriam and Pfretzschner, Matthias and Rutter, Ignaz},
  title =	{{Heuristics for Exact 1-Planarity Testing}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-249909},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: 1-Planarity, Experiments, Backtracking}
}
Document
Show Me Your Best Side: Characteristics of User-Preferred Perspectives for 3D Graph Drawings

Authors: Lucas Joos, Gavin J. Mooney, Maximilian T. Fischer, Daniel A. Keim, Falk Schreiber, Helen C. Purchase, and Karsten Klein

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
The visual analysis of graphs in 3D has become increasingly popular, accelerated by the rise of immersive technology, such as augmented and virtual reality. Unlike 2D drawings, 3D graph layouts are highly viewpoint-dependent, making perspective selection critical for revealing structural and relational patterns. Despite its importance, there is limited empirical evidence guiding what constitutes an effective or preferred viewpoint from the user’s perspective. In this paper, we present a systematic investigation into user-preferred viewpoints in 3D graph visualisations. We conducted a controlled study with 23 participants in a virtual reality environment, where users selected their most and least preferred viewpoints for 36 different graphs varying in size and layout. From this data, enriched by qualitative feedback, we distil common strategies underlying viewpoint choice. We further analyse the alignment of user preferences with classical 2D aesthetic criteria (e.g., Crossings), 3D-specific measures (e.g., Node-Node Occlusion), and introduce a novel measure capturing the perceivability of a graph’s principal axes (Isometric Viewpoint Deviation). Our data-driven analysis indicates that Stress, Crossings, Gabriel Ratio, Edge-Node Overlap, and Isometric Viewpoint Deviation are key indicators of viewpoint preference. Beyond our findings, we contribute a publicly available dataset consisting of the graphs and computed aesthetic measures, supporting further research and the development of viewpoint evaluation measures for 3D graph drawing.

Cite as

Lucas Joos, Gavin J. Mooney, Maximilian T. Fischer, Daniel A. Keim, Falk Schreiber, Helen C. Purchase, and Karsten Klein. Show Me Your Best Side: Characteristics of User-Preferred Perspectives for 3D Graph Drawings. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 37:1-37:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{joos_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.37,
  author =	{Joos, Lucas and Mooney, Gavin J. and Fischer, Maximilian T. and Keim, Daniel A. and Schreiber, Falk and Purchase, Helen C. and Klein, Karsten},
  title =	{{Show Me Your Best Side: Characteristics of User-Preferred Perspectives for 3D Graph Drawings}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{37:1--37:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.37},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250236},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.37},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph Aesthetics, Immersive 3D, Node-Link Diagrams, Empirical Evaluation}
}
Document
Planar Stories of Graph Drawings: Algorithms and Experiments

Authors: Carla Binucci, Sabine Cornelsen, Walter Didimo, Seok-Hee Hong, Eleni Katsanou, Maurizio Patrignani, Antonios Symvonis, and Samuel Wolf

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 357, 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)


Abstract
We address the problem of computing a dynamic visualization of a geometric graph G as a sequence of frames. Each frame shows only a portion of the graph but their union covers G entirely. The two main requirements of our dynamic visualization are: (i) guaranteeing drawing stability, so to preserve the user’s mental map; (ii) keeping the visual complexity of each frame low. To satisfy the first requirement, we never change the position of the vertices. Regarding the second requirement, we avoid edge crossings in each frame. More precisely, in the first frame we visualize a suitable subset of non-crossing edges; in each subsequent frame, exactly one new edge enters the visualization and all the edges that cross with it are deleted. We call such a sequence of frames a planar story of G. Our goal is to find a planar story whose minimum number of edges contemporarily displayed is maximized (i.e., a planar story that maximizes the minimum frame size). Besides studying our model from a theoretical point of view, we also design and experimentally compare different algorithms, both exact techniques and heuristics. These algorithms provide an array of alternative trade-offs between efficiency and effectiveness, also depending on the structure of the input graph.

Cite as

Carla Binucci, Sabine Cornelsen, Walter Didimo, Seok-Hee Hong, Eleni Katsanou, Maurizio Patrignani, Antonios Symvonis, and Samuel Wolf. Planar Stories of Graph Drawings: Algorithms and Experiments. In 33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 357, pp. 32:1-32:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{binucci_et_al:LIPIcs.GD.2025.32,
  author =	{Binucci, Carla and Cornelsen, Sabine and Didimo, Walter and Hong, Seok-Hee and Katsanou, Eleni and Patrignani, Maurizio and Symvonis, Antonios and Wolf, Samuel},
  title =	{{Planar Stories of Graph Drawings: Algorithms and Experiments}},
  booktitle =	{33rd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2025)},
  pages =	{32:1--32:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-403-1},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{357},
  editor =	{Dujmovi\'{c}, Vida and Montecchiani, Fabrizio},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.32},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250182},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.GD.2025.32},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph Drawing, Dynamic Graphs, Graph Stories, Heuristics, ILP}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 36 Document/PDF
  • 20 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2026
  • 19 2025
  • 4 2024
  • 1 2023
  • 1 2022
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Author
  • 16 Chimani, Markus
  • 5 Rutter, Ignaz
  • 4 Fink, Simon D.
  • 4 Wiedera, Tilo
  • 3 Da Lozzo, Giordano
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 36 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 10 Mathematics of computing → Graph algorithms
  • 9 Mathematics of computing → Graph theory
  • 7 Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms
  • 5 Human-centered computing → Graph drawings
  • 5 Theory of computation → Computational geometry
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 6 algorithm engineering
  • 4 crossing number
  • 4 integer linear programming
  • 3 Graph spanners
  • 3 ILP
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail